CONNOLLY v. WAYCOTT. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided December, 1884. ASSUMPSIT for labor. D. H. Woodward, for the plaintiff. Lane Dole and E. R. Champlin, for the defendant. CARPENTER, J. No question of law is presented. Whether the labor was performed upon the credit of the defendant, or upon that of Knapp, was […]
Articles Tagged: 63 N.H. 618
BATES v. HAZEN, 63 N.H. 618 (1885)
BATES v. HAZEN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1885. ASSUMPSIT on an account annexed. Trial by the court. The dispute was, whether the plaintiff agreed to take the note of one Nichols in payment, provided Nichols said he would pay the note to him, or whether he took it as collateral security […]