SEAVEY v. DRAKE a., Ex’rs. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1883. IN EQUITY. Reported 62 N.H. 393. Facts found by the court. C. P. Sanborn and J. Y. Mugridge, for the plaintiff. W. L. Foster and S. Dana, for the defendants. STANLEY, J. The facts found at the trial are such as […]
Articles Tagged: 62 N.H. 699
SMART v. GALE, 62 N.H. 699 (1883)
SMART v. GALE. SAME v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1883. DOE, C. J. Since the decision (62 N.H. 62) that the plaintiff could not recover on the count for money had and received, he has been allowed to amend the declaration by adding a count in case for deceit, and […]