Articles Tagged: 62 A. 380

62 A. 380 HALLWOOD CASH REGISTER CO. v. ROLLINS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided November 7, 1905. If evidence in rebuttal contradicts the defendant’s claim without alleging new substantive facts, testimony in mere denial thereof is not admissible in surrebuttal as a matter of legal right. Where a machine has been operated by […]

62 A. 380 LAMPREY v. H. P. HOOD SONS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided November 7, 1905. An entry of nolle prosequi which was not procured by the respondent in a criminal proceeding, nor made in consequence of a compromise to which he was a party, is a sufficient termination of the case […]