Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.
Decided June, 1883.
DOE, C. J.
Since the decision (62 N.H. 62) that the plaintiff could not recover on the count for money had and received, he has been allowed to amend the declaration by adding a count in case for deceit, and a referee has found for the plaintiff; and in an action of debt, the referee has found a breach of the bond declared on.
Judgment for the plaintiff in both suits.
ALLEN, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
J. Y. Mugridge and Gould Martin, for the plaintiff.
Leach Stevens and Barnard Barnard, for the defendant.
53 N.H. 442 Superior Court of Judicature of New Hampshire. BROWN v. COLLINS. June, 1873.…
131 A. 353 FLORENCE E. WOLCOTT, by her next friend, v. WILLIAM E. FELLOWS a.…
29 A. 846 DOW v. HARKIN.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1892. If…
433 A.2d 1266 BARRINGTON EAST CLUSTER I UNIT OWNERS' ASSOCIATION a. v. TOWN OF BARRINGTON…
312 A.2d 698 KATHERINE PIPER v. ROBERT FICKETT, d.b.a. FICKETT'S JEWELERS No. 6599Supreme Court of…
358 A.2d 412 DOROTHY C. RUANE INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN…