Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford.
Decided December, 1882.
In a notice given by a traveller to a town of an injury caused by a defective highway, the day of the injury is a sufficient description of the time, in the absence of evidence that a specification of the hour was necessary.
CASE, for injuries received by a traveller on a highway. Verdict for the plaintiff. In the notice given to the town (G. L., c. 75, s. 7), the plaintiff stated that the injuries were received February 20, 1881. The defendants excepted to the ruling that the time was sufficiently stated.
Worcester Gafney, for the defendants.
Copeland Edgerly, for the plaintiff.
DOE, C. J.
It is not found as a fact that a more specific statement of the time was necessary, and no error of law appears. Donnelly v. Fall River, 132 Mass. 299.
Judgment on the verdict.
BLODGETT J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Page 347
53 N.H. 442 Superior Court of Judicature of New Hampshire. BROWN v. COLLINS. June, 1873.…
131 A. 353 FLORENCE E. WOLCOTT, by her next friend, v. WILLIAM E. FELLOWS a.…
29 A. 846 DOW v. HARKIN.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1892. If…
433 A.2d 1266 BARRINGTON EAST CLUSTER I UNIT OWNERS' ASSOCIATION a. v. TOWN OF BARRINGTON…
312 A.2d 698 KATHERINE PIPER v. ROBERT FICKETT, d.b.a. FICKETT'S JEWELERS No. 6599Supreme Court of…
358 A.2d 412 DOROTHY C. RUANE INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN…