15 A. 128
Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.
Decided June, 1888.
MOTION for rehearing of case reported 64 N.H. 371.
BLODGETT, J.
The motion for a rehearing is denied. If the facts stated in the case reserved at the October trial term, 1887, were properly before us, the decree ordered at the June law term, 1887, would be so modified as not to limit Charles A. Minot to the income of the fund. But as the order granting a further hearing for the finding of additional facts was made without hearing and without notice, the additional facts are not properly before us. The application to reopen the case will be heard on notice at the trial term; and if such accident, mistake, or misfortune is found as would authorize a new trial, the decree will then and there be so modified as not to limit Charles A. Minot to the income.
Case discharged.
SMITH and BINGHAM, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.
W. L. Foster, for the plaintiff.
Bingham Mitchell, for the defendants.
Page 619
53 N.H. 442 Superior Court of Judicature of New Hampshire. BROWN v. COLLINS. June, 1873.…
131 A. 353 FLORENCE E. WOLCOTT, by her next friend, v. WILLIAM E. FELLOWS a.…
29 A. 846 DOW v. HARKIN.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1892. If…
433 A.2d 1266 BARRINGTON EAST CLUSTER I UNIT OWNERS' ASSOCIATION a. v. TOWN OF BARRINGTON…
312 A.2d 698 KATHERINE PIPER v. ROBERT FICKETT, d.b.a. FICKETT'S JEWELERS No. 6599Supreme Court of…
358 A.2d 412 DOROTHY C. RUANE INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN…