Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton.
Decided December, 1879.
A writ of entry on a mortgage can be maintained before there has been any breach of the condition.
WRIT OF ENTRY, on a mortgage. Plea, the general issue, with a brief statement that the condition of the mortgage has not been broken. Motion to reject the brief statement.
Burrows Jewell, for the plaintiff.
Burleigh Adams, for the defendant.
In an action counting upon a seizin in fee and in mortgage, the judgment must be conditional. G. L., c. 232, s. 12; Aiken v. Gale, 37 N.H. 501; McDaniel v. Cater, 21 N.H. 229; Briggs v. Sholes, 14 N.H. 266.
BINGHAM, J.
It is provided by Gen. Laws, c. 232, s. 12, that in actions on mortgages the judgment shall be conditional, that if the mortgagor pays to the mortgagee the sum the court shall adjudge due, within two months after judgment rendered, with interest, the judgment shall be void. The defendant claims that this provision applies to all actions upon mortgages, and that, if nothing is due on the mortgage debt, no action can be maintained because no judgment can be rendered. This statute, almost in its present
Page 470
form, has existed in this state for a longer period than is covered by our reported cases. We are unable to find an instance in which the court has intimated such a construction as the defendant claims. A mortgage vests the seizin of the estate in the mortgagee, and he may at any time enter upon the mortgagor, and take and retain possession of the premises for the purpose of receiving the rents and profits until the condition is performed. Brown v. Cram, 1 N.H. 169; Hartshorn v. Hubbard, 2 N.H. 453; Hunt v. Stiles, 10 N.H. 466; Dearborn v. Dearborn, 9 N.H. 117; Ellison v. Daniels, 11 N.H. 274; Smith v. Moore, 11 N.H. 55, 61; Chellis v. Stearns, 22 N.H. 312. In an action brought to foreclose a mortgage, the judgment must be conditional. But in this case, the mortgagee, being entitled to the possession of the premises in order that he may take the rents and profits, can maintain his action. Hobart v. Sanborn, 13 N.H. 226.
Case discharged.
ALLEN, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
53 N.H. 442 Superior Court of Judicature of New Hampshire. BROWN v. COLLINS. June, 1873.…
131 A. 353 FLORENCE E. WOLCOTT, by her next friend, v. WILLIAM E. FELLOWS a.…
29 A. 846 DOW v. HARKIN.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1892. If…
433 A.2d 1266 BARRINGTON EAST CLUSTER I UNIT OWNERS' ASSOCIATION a. v. TOWN OF BARRINGTON…
312 A.2d 698 KATHERINE PIPER v. ROBERT FICKETT, d.b.a. FICKETT'S JEWELERS No. 6599Supreme Court of…
358 A.2d 412 DOROTHY C. RUANE INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN…