CONNOLLY v. WAYCOTT, 63 N.H. 618 (1884)

CONNOLLY v. WAYCOTT.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire.
Decided December, 1884.

ASSUMPSIT for labor.

D. H. Woodward, for the plaintiff.

Lane Dole and E. R. Champlin, for the defendant.

CARPENTER, J.

No question of law is presented. Whether the labor was performed upon the credit of the defendant, or upon that of Knapp, was a question of fact.

Exceptions overruled.

BLODGETT, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 63 N.H. 618

Recent Posts

BROWN v. COLLINS, 53 N.H. 442 (1873)

53 N.H. 442 Superior Court of Judicature of New Hampshire. BROWN v. COLLINS. June, 1873.…

7 years ago

WOLCOTT v. FELLOWS, 82 N.H. 556 (1925)

131 A. 353 FLORENCE E. WOLCOTT, by her next friend, v. WILLIAM E. FELLOWS a.…

9 years ago

DOW v. HARKIN, 67 N.H. 383 (1892)

29 A. 846 DOW v. HARKIN.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1892. If…

9 years ago

BARRINGTON EAST OWNERS’ ASSOC. v. TOWN OF BARRINGTON, 121 N.H. 627 (1981)

433 A.2d 1266 BARRINGTON EAST CLUSTER I UNIT OWNERS' ASSOCIATION a. v. TOWN OF BARRINGTON…

9 years ago

PIPER v. FICKETT, 113 N.H. 631 (1973)

312 A.2d 698 KATHERINE PIPER v. ROBERT FICKETT, d.b.a. FICKETT'S JEWELERS No. 6599Supreme Court of…

9 years ago

RUANE v. CARDINAL REALTY, INC., 116 N.H. 321 (1976)

358 A.2d 412 DOROTHY C. RUANE INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN…

9 years ago