GEORGE v. COMPANY, 75 N.H. 593 (1909)

73 A. 1117 GEORGE, Adm’r, v. NEWMARKET MANUFACTURING CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June 26, 1909. CASE, for negligently causing the death of the plaintiff’s intestate. Trial by jury and verdict for the plaintiff. Transferred from the October term, 1908, of the superior court by Pike, J., on the defendants’ exception to […]

Read More

LANCASTER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. KATTAR, 110 N.H. 163 (1970)

262 A.2d 278 LANCASTER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. GEORGE T. KATTAR a. No. 5991Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos Decided February 27, 1970 1. A deed containing the language, “[P]ursuant to this condition, the parties specifically may not use the land as security for any mortgage, nor cut or remove any growth of any kind therefrom, […]

Read More

BEAUDOIN v. BEAUDOIN, 118 N.H. 325 (1978)

386 A.2d 1261 TERRI BEAUDOIN v. RAYMOND BEAUDOIN PAMELA BEAUDOIN v. RAYMOND BEAUDOIN No. 7904Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided May 9, 1978 1. Parent and Child — Parental Rights — Earnings and Services of Child While it has long been established law in New Hampshire that parents are entitled to earnings and services […]

Read More

LEWIS v. RAILROAD, 60 N.H. 187 (1880)

LEWIS v. EASTERN RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided December, 1880. On the question whether a locomotive engine emitting steam and standing near a highway crossing is an object dangerous to the public travel, as likely to frighten horses of ordinary gentleness, evidence of other horses than the plaintiff’s being frightened by locomotives […]

Read More

BANK v. SINCLAIR, 60 N.H. 100 (1880)

BANK OF NEWBURY v. SINCLAIR a. SAME v. PIERCE. SAME v. QUIMBY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June, 1880. Under a written guaranty, by which the guarantor agrees to be responsible for a certain indebtedness of the principal that may be incurred before a certain day, notice of the acceptance of the guaranty […]

Read More

WHITCHER v. STATE, 87 N.H. 405 (1935)

181 A. 549 HAROLD P. WHITCHER v. STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided November 5, 1935. In a petition by the owner of a dam and mill-privilege at the outlet of a great pond asking for a declaratory judgment defining the right of such owner, against the littoral proprietors […]

Read More

COE v. ERROL, 62 N.H. 303 (1882)

COE v. ERROL. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided June, 1882. It is competent for any state to provide that tangible personal property within it may be taxed there irrespective of the residence of the owner; but if he be a non-resident, such property must have an actual situs within the state where the […]

Read More

STATE v. NASH, 83 N.H. 536 (1929)

145 A. 262 STATE v. FRANCIS NASH. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided March 5, 1929. An indictment charging that the respondent “did forcibly feel the private parts” of a female child is sustained by proof that he indecently placed his hand in their immediate vicinity. To rebut the insinuation that a prosecution was […]

Read More

STATE v. FOURNIER, 118 N.H. 230 (1978)

385 A.2d 223 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. CAROL M. FOURNIER No. 7901Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided April 7, 1978 1. Criminal Law — Plea of Guilty — Consequences A defendant need only be advised of the direct consequences of his guilty plea and not of consequences collateral. RSA 262-B:2 (Supp. 1975). […]

Read More

BUSICK v. CORPORATION, 91 N.H. 257 (1941)

18 A.2d 190 MARY BUSICK v. HOME OWNERS LOAN CORPORATION. No. 3216.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided February 4, 1941. In general a landlord is under no legal duty to repair the leased premises. If obligated to do so by the express terms of the tenancy, he is not liable in an action of […]

Read More

PETTES v. UPHAM, 59 N.H. 149 (1879)

PETTES v. UPHAM. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided June, 1879. Under Gen. Laws, c. 184, s. 6, the revocation of a guardianship, the personal cause of which has ceased, is not prevented by a pending process of settling the ward’s estate in the insolvent course, under Gen. Laws, c. 186, s. 10. PROBATE […]

Read More

BUTTRICK v. ASSOCIATION, 87 N.H. 194 (1935)

177 A. 416 HELEN BUTTRICK v. THE WOMAN’S HOSPITAL AID ASSOCIATION. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided January 1, 1935. Where counsel’s argument is objected to before the completion of a sentence which so far as uttered is not a misstatement of evidence, the possibility that the sentence might have been so completed as […]

Read More

CHICOPEE MFG. CO. v. COMPANY, 97 N.H. 553 (1952)

89 A.2d 751 CHICOPEE MANUFACTURING COMPANY a. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. SAME. No. 4141.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission. Decided June 26, 1952. MOTIONS, in aid of two appeals, under the provisions of Revised Laws, chapter 414, as amended by Laws 1951, chapter 203, […]

Read More

CLOUTIER v. CITY OF BERLIN, 154 N.H. 13 (2006)

DEBRA A. CLOUTIER v. CITY OF BERLIN. No. 2005-342.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos.Argued: May 10, 2006. Opinion Issued: August 2, 2006. 1. Torts — Defenses — Statutory Immunity Statute pertaining to the duty of a municipality upon receiving notice of an insufficiency of a highway or bridge or sidewalk does nothing more than define […]

Read More

BREAGY v. STARK, 138 N.H. 479 (1994)

642 A.2d 329 RICHARD BREAGY v. RONALD STARK a. No. 92-639Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-southern judicial district Decided May 19, 1994 1. Discovery — Generally — Scope and Purpose Discovery is proper as long as information sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence; absent a claim of privilege or irrelevance, […]

Read More

JENNESS v. HAZELTON, 58 N.H. 423 (1878)

JENNESS a., Ap’ts, v. HAZELTON, Ap’ee. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided August, 1878. If a person of sound mind executes a will without undue influence, knowing its contents, it is not invalid because he has not sufficient knowledge of his property; but if he does not know its contents and intend it for […]

Read More

WOODS v. CHARLTON, 62 N.H. 649 (1883)

WOODS a. v. CHARLTON, Adm’r. WOODS a. v. CLARK. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June, 1883. The hirer of a farm, with the stock upon it, for a year, is the owner of the natural increase of the stock raised during that time. The first action is a bill in equity to restrain […]

Read More

DRAKE v. BOWLES, 97 N.H. 471 (1952)

92 A.2d 161 EVA DRAKE v. RETTA M. BOWLES d/b/a MY LADY BEAUTY SHOP. No. 4136.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided November 5, 1952. In an action for personal injuries it was not error to require the plaintiff to submit herself to an ordinary physical examination by a particular licensed physician as requested by […]

Read More

MARDEN v. SUGDEN, 71 N.H. 274 (1902)

52 A. 74 MARDEN, Trustee, v. SUGDEN a. SUGDEN a. v. HALL. SAME v. LANGDON. SAME v. NICKERSON. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided April 1, 1902. An order for the payment of money due an insolvent debtor, given within four months before the filing of a petition in bankruptcy to a creditor who […]

Read More

OSGOOD v. MAXWELL, 78 N.H. 35 (1915)

95 A. 954 ANSON G. OSGOOD, Adm’r, v. WILLIAM H. MAXWELL. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided November 2, 1915. Where an accessible witness of a transaction is not called, either party may properly argue that his opponent did not summon him because his testimony would have been unfavorable. Where it is a reasonable […]

Read More

SALTMARSH v. BOW, 56 N.H. 428 (1876)

SALTMARSH v. BOW. Supreme Court of New Hampshire FROM MERRIMACK CIRCUIT COURT. Decided March 22, 1876. Injuries from defective highways. If a town suffers the travelled part of a highway to become widened, so as to hold out to the traveller that the whole width is equally suitable for the public travel, it is answerable […]

Read More

GEN. ELEC. v. COMM’R, N.H. DEP’T, 154 N.H. 457 (2006)

914 A.2d 246 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER, NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ADMINISTRATION. No. 2005-668.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued: July 21, 2006. Opinion Issued: December 5, 2006. 1. Dismissal — Practice and Procedure — Review In considering a motion to dismiss, the standard of review is whether the allegations in plaintiff’s pleadings […]

Read More

WESTON v. BROWN, 82 N.H. 157 (1925)

131 A. 141 CHRISTIANA E. WESTON v. LESLIE R. BROWN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided November 3, 1925. One who acts in reliance upon a false representation made for the purpose of inducing him to vary his line of conduct may recover any damages which he sustains if the statement was fraudulent or […]

Read More

CHABOT v. CHABOT, 126 N.H. 793 (1985)

497 A.2d 851 PEARL E. CHABOT v. WILFRED E. CHABOT No. 84-506Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided July 24, 1985 1. Pleading — Motion To Amend — Review Defendant’s failure to object within ten days to plaintiff’s motion to amend her libel for divorce is deemed a waiver of defendant’s right to a hearing […]

Read More

AMERICAN ASBESTOS CORP. v. RYDER, 111 N.H. 282 (1971)

281 A.2d 53 AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORP. a. v. LIDIA R. RYDER. No. 6213.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided July 29, 1971. 1. An employee’s continuing total disability was properly found and ruled to be chargeable to the accidental injury she received in the course of her employment and not to her unreasonable conduct, […]

Read More

HUTCHINS v. MACOMBER, 68 N.H. 473 (1896)

44 A. 602 HUTCHINS v. MACOMBER, Receiver. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided June, 1896. When the circumstances under which an accident occurred disclose nothing in the plaintiff’s conduct to which negligence can fairly be imputed, the absence of fault may justify a finding of due care on his part. CASE, for negligence. Trial […]

Read More

QUIMBY v. STRAW, 71 N.H. 160 (1901)

51 A. 656 QUIMBY v. STRAW a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December 3, 1901. Where the upper story of a building erected by adjoining owners in accordance with an oral agreement is dependent upon a stairway located on one of the lots, an owner whose access is cut off by the construction […]

Read More

DRAKE v. McQUADE, 66 N.H. 303 (1890)

20 A. 956 DRAKE a., Ap’ts v. McQUADE a. SHELTERS, Ap’t, v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1890. When an agreement for a compromise has been signed by the requisite number of creditors, as provided in Laws 1885, c. 85, s. 11, a creditor whose debt is provable is entitled to […]

Read More

JEWELL v. SWAIN, 57 N.H. 506 (1876)

JEWELL v. SWAIN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire FROM GRAFTON CIRCUIT COURT. Decided August 11, 1876. Excessive distraint. A collector of taxes, in distraining, must exercise a sound discretion as to the property to be seized. He is bound to select such articles as will best facilitate the satisfaction of the tax, with the least […]

Read More

GHILAIN v. COUTURE, 84 N.H. 48 (1929)

146 A. 395 MARY L. GHILAIN, Adm’x, v. ALPHONSE L. COUTURE a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided May 7, 1929. In actions for causing death the nature of the right of action and the person in whom it is invested are fixed by the lex loci delicti. Under P. S., c. 191, ss. […]

Read More

RUSS v. HOBBS, 61 N.H. 93 (1881)

RUSS v. HOBBS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided June, 1881. Mere payment of the amount of interest due on a note by a second note for that amount, signed by the debtor and another person, is not a good consideration for the holder’s promise to extend the time of the first note: and […]

Read More

APPEAL OF PORTSMOUTH TRUST CO., 120 N.H. 753 (1980)

423 A.2d 603 APPEAL OF THE PORTSMOUTH TRUST COMPANY APPEAL OF THE PISCATAQUA SAVINGS BANK APPEAL OF THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PORTSMOUTH APPEAL OF THE PORTSMOUTH COOPERATIVE BANK APPEAL OF THE PORTSMOUTH SAVINGS BANK (Board of Trust Company Incorporation) Nos. 80-181 80-182 80-183 80-184 80-185Supreme Court of New Hampshire Board of Trust Company Incorporation […]

Read More

PEPPIN v. RAILROAD, 86 N.H. 395 (1933)

169 A. 877 BLANCHE PEPPIN v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. LOUIS PEPPIN v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December 5, 1933. Private crossings over railroads, being constructed solely for the accommodation of individuals (P. L., c. 249, s. 1), there is no statutory obligation imposed upon railroads to protect such crossings for the […]

Read More

HEATH v. HEATH, 58 N.H. 292 (1878)

HEATH v. HEATH. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided March, 1878. Whether or not, in a bastardy proceeding, the mother, in the time of travail, made to the persons attending her the declaration required by Rev. Sts., c. 68, s. 4, is immaterial, since the removal of the disability of parties to testify, and […]

Read More

MURDOCK v. CITY OF KEENE, 137 N.H. 70 (1993)

623 A.2d 755 JOHN R. MURDOCK v. CITY OF KEENE No. 92-262Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire Decided April 13, 1993 1. Negligence — Damages — Suicides As a general rule, negligence actions seeking damages for the suicide of another will not lie because the act of suicide is considered a deliberate, intentional and intervening […]

Read More

CULOTTA v. N.H. DEP’T OF LABOR, 142 N.H. 304 (1997)

700 A.2d 302 GEORGE D. CULOTTA a. v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR a. No. 95-758Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-northern judicial district Decided September 23, 1997 1. Torts — Generally — Sovereign Immunity In order to establish the State’s intentional tort liability, a plaintiff must prove that the offending State employee not only lacked […]

Read More

WINCHESTER v. STOCKWELL, 76 N.H. 193 (1911)

81 A. 526 WINCHESTER v. STOCKWELL. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided October 3, 1911. A town which purchases realty at a tax sale cannot thereafter maintain an action against the owner for the unpaid taxes, either in its own name or that of its collector. Since the enactment of chapter 64, Laws 1895, […]

Read More

LITTKY v. WINCHESTER SCHOOL DIST., 129 N.H. 626 (1987)

529 A.2d 399 DENNIS LITTKY v. WINCHESTER SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 86-408Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire Decided August 6, 1987 1. Statutes — Construction and Application — Administrative Construction The construction of a statute by those charged with its administration is entitled to substantial deference, and may be persuasive. 2. Schools and School Districts — […]

Read More

CATE v. CATE, 80 N.H. 16 (1921)

112 A. 826 SHADRACH M. CATE, a. v. JOSEPH G. CATE, a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided January 4, 1921. The retention of a foreclosing possession is a question of fact; such possession once taken continues until there is an entry in opposition thereto, and the required continued possession may be found solely […]

Read More

LUCC v. PUBLIC SERV. CO. OF N.H., 119 N.H. 332 (1979)

402 A.2d 626 LEGISLATIVE UTILITY CONSUMERS’ COUNCIL v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE a. No. 78-020 No. 78-173Supreme Court of New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Decided May 17, 1979 1. Public Utilities — Regulatory Agencies — Powers Statutory authority to set public utility rates in New Hampshire has long existed exclusively in the public […]

Read More

RODRIGUEZ v. WEBB, 141 N.H. 177 (1996)

680 A.2d 604 JACINTO RODRIGUEZ, JR. v. ROBERT WEBB, SR. d/b/a BOB’S HEAVY EQUIPMENT No. 94-534Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided July 11, 1996 1. Evidence — Relevance — Particular Cases The defendant’s argument that the baler itself was not relevant, and hence its destruction was of no consequence in personal injury case, was […]

Read More

HUGUELET v. ALLSTATE INS. CO., 141 N.H. 777 (1997)

693 A.2d 408 TAMMY HUGUELET v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY No. 95-736Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided April 24, 1997 1. Insurance — Parties; Rights and Duties — Payment and Discharge of Liability In a dispute over whether plaintiff’s acceptance of a settlement check for injuries sustained in an accident with defendant’s insured released defendant […]

Read More

TIBBETTS v. SHAPLEIGH, 60 N.H. 487 (1881)

TIBBETTS a. v. SHAPLEIGH. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided June, 1881. An unsatisfied judgment against one joint promissor is no bar to a subsequent suit against the remaining co-promissors, who at the time of the recovery of the judgment were without the jurisdiction, so that no service could be made upon them. Bringing […]

Read More

DAVIDSON RUBBER CO. v. MATHERSON, 111 N.H. 272 (1971)

281 A.2d 50 DAVIDSON RUBBER COMPANY, INC. v. ANDREA MATHERSON. No. 6153.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided July 29, 1971. 1. When the evidence indicated that simple surgery with a minor risk would have cured the disability, an employee’s continuing disability from an accidental injury arising in the course of her employment was properly […]

Read More

OLESKEY v. STATE, 112 N.H. 131 (1972)

290 A.2d 621 ANTHONY W. OLESKEY v. STATE. No. 6130.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided April 28, 1972. 1. Permanent appointment of a permanent State classified employee to a position of limited duration, subject to the probationary period required by the State Personnel Division’s rules, would entitle him to unemployment compensation benefits under RSA […]

Read More

JOHNSON v. RAILROAD, 83 N.H. 350 (1928)

143 A. 516 FRANK B. JOHNSON v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June 28, 1928. A statute requiring a license for the doing of a certain act makes an unlicensed actor a wrongdoer, and he cannot claim a legal right which is dependent upon such illegal conduct. The causal violation […]

Read More

DONATO v. BOUTIN, 114 N.H. 65 (1974)

314 A.2d 677 NOELLA DONATO AND JOHN DONATO v. ADELARD BOUTIN No. 6711Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos Decided January 31, 1974 1. Whether an instruction on a particular issue is necessary to assist the jury in making its determination is within the sound discretion of the trial court. 2. Record warranted trial court to […]

Read More

ZUKIS v. TOWN OF FITZWILLIAM, 135 N.H. 384 (1992)

604 A.2d 956 MARY W. ZUKIS v. TOWN OF FITZWILLIAM a. No. 90-274Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire Decided March 20, 1992 1. Appeal and Error — Standards of Review — Generally On appeal supreme court will uphold trial court unless its decision is not supported by the evidence or is legally erroneous. 2. Zoning […]

Read More

STEVENS v. ROLFE, 58 N.H. 63 (1876)

STEVENS v. ROLFE a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided December, 1876. The 46th rule, considering the signatures of instruments declared on as admitted if not denied within the first four days of the first term, does not apply to an instrument declared on in an amendment made after the first term. ASSUMPSIT, on […]

Read More

STATE v. MERRICK, 68 N.H. 601 (1894)

35 A. 251 STATE v. MERRICK. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1894. INDICTMENT, for the unlawful sale of liquor. An association called the Law and Order League prosecuted the defendant in the police court and before the grand jury at their own expense for the purpose of obtaining one half the fine. […]

Read More

HODGES v. KENSINGTON, 102 N.H. 399 (1960)

157 A.2d 649 CHARLES E. HODGES v. KENSINGTON. No. 4789.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued December 2, 1959. Decided January 27, 1960. 1. A taxpayer whose real property is assessed at more than its true value is entitled to an abatement if the assessment is disproportionately higher in relation to its true value than that […]

Read More

STATE v. WARD, 118 N.H. 874 (1978)

395 A.2d 511 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. MICHAEL C. WARD No. 78-100Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided December 20, 1978 1. Evidence — Certified Copies of Prior Convictions — Admissibility Certified copies of prior convictions prepared by a clerk of court are admissible into evidence. RSA 516:30. 2. Evidence — Certified Copies […]

Read More

PETITION OF PICCOLI, 106 N.H. 278 (1965)

209 A.2d 736 PETITION OF GENNARO PICCOLI. No. 5337.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original.Filed January 26, 1965. Submitted March 3, 1965. Decided April 30, 1965. 1. A petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed as an original proceeding in the Supreme Court was dismissed for lack of prosecution where neither the petitioner, at liberty […]

Read More

SILVERSTEIN v. TOWN OF ALEXANDRIA, 150 N.H. 679 (2004)

843 A.2d 963 CARY SILVERSTEIN v. TOWN OF ALEXANDRIA. No. 2003-388.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Plymouth District CourtArgued: January 14, 2004. Opinion Issued: March 15, 2004. 1. Weapons — Generally — Licensing In reviewing appeals from denial of a license to carry a loaded pistol or revolver, in the absence of a sufficient record of […]

Read More

SAUCIER CO. v. McVETTY, 107 N.H. 419 (1966)

223 A.2d 520 AL SAUCIER SON, INC. v. RUFUS H. McVETTY a. No. 5507.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos.Argued September 8, 1966. Decided October 31, 1966. 1. In an action to recover for labor and materials furnished, and for extras, in the construction of improvements to a dwelling house, the evidence warranted the finding that […]

Read More

STATE v. TUCKER, 131 N.H. 526 (1989)

557 A.2d 270 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JEFFREY W. TUCKER No. 87-380Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided April 7, 1989 1. Constitutional Law — Miranda Warning — Custodial Interrogation The police must inform an individual of his or her rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), prior to commencing custodial […]

Read More

KING v. NEDOVICH, 118 N.H. 161 (1978)

384 A.2d 134 JOHN KING a. v. PAUL NEDOVICH a. No. 7946Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided March 24, 1978 Parties — Substitution — Allowed Where plaintiffs’ insurer moved to intervene and to substitute itself as party plaintiff in actions brought by plaintiffs, and insurer alleged that it had paid plaintiffs $6,817.99 under homeowner’s […]

Read More

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. LITVIN, 147 N.H. 606 (2002)

794 A.2d 806 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. VALERIE LITVIN No. 2001-045Supreme Court of New Hampshire CoosArgued: February 13, 2002 Opinion Issued: April 17, 2002 1. Criminal Law — Self-Incrimination — Civil Proceedings In prosecution for unauthorized taking, admission of defendant’s statements given by her during city’s investigation of funds missing from her department […]

Read More

LISBON DISTRICT v. LISBON, 85 N.H. 173 (1931)

155 A. 252 LISBON VILLAGE DISTRICT v. LISBON. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June 2, 1931. The declaratory judgment act (Laws 1929, c. 86) was not intended as a substitute for adequate remedies previously existing; nor to confer jurisdiction to give advice as to future cases; but to supply deficiencies in remedial law. […]

Read More

SILVA v. BOTSCH, 120 N.H. 600 (1980)

420 A.2d 301 EDWARD J. SILVA v. DONALD H. BOTSCH a. No. 80-175Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided September 10, 1980 1. Constitutional Law — Mootness Doctrine — Discretion Question of mootness is one of convenience and discretion and is not subject to hard-and-fast rules. 2. Statutes — Construction and Application — Legislative Intent […]

Read More

FOURNIER v. STATE, 121 N.H. 283 (1981)

428 A.2d 1238 APPEAL OF CHERYL FOURNIER a. v. THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE a. JANET GREENWOOD v. COMMISSIONER, NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY a. Nos. 79-306 79-307Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Strafford Decided April 17, 1981 1. Unemployment Compensation — Denial of Benefits — Review If an appeal tribunal of State’s Department […]

Read More

STATE v. SHEA, 117 N.H. 1007 (1977)

380 A.2d 1099 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JOHN A. SHEA No. 7736Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided December 16, 1977 Criminal Law — Plea-Bargaining — Retraction of Plea Prior supreme court decision, which would allow defendant to retract his plea of guilty in case in which plea was entered in accordance with plea […]

Read More

GRIMES v. DURNIN, 80 N.H. 145 (1921)

114 A. 273 DANIEL D. GRIMES a. v. THOMAS J. DURNIN a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June 7, 1921. Unreasonable interference with the plaintiff’s business by his striking employees may be enjoined. Where upon the transfer of an exception to an order granting an injunction, the injunction itself is not transferred, the […]

Read More

SPAULDING v. MAYO, 81 N.H. 85 (1923)

122 A. 899 NELLIE M. SPAULDING v. ARTHUR F. MAYO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan. Decided June 5, 1923. Whether an agreement is void as being in restraint of trade is ascertained by determining whether the limitations on freedom of action are reasonable. A promise to employ the defendant in the plaintiff’s undertaking business […]

Read More

HILLEBRAND v. HILLEBRAND, 130 N.H. 520 (1988)

546 A.2d 1047 ROSEMARIE HILLEBRAND v. THOMAS A. HILLEBRAND No. 87-022Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan Decided June 6, 1988 1. Divorce — Trial Court — Discretion Trial courts have broad discretion in divorce matters, and their decision will be upheld unless an abuse of discretion is shown or the court erred as a matter […]

Read More

TUTTLE v. COMPANY, 75 N.H. 288 (1909)

73 A. 407 TUTTLE v. D. W. PINGREE CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided June 1, 1909. Where a deed of standing timber provides that all “lumber” remaining on the premises at the end of three years shall revert to the grantor, the forfeiture clause cannot be construed to include sawed lumber remaining […]

Read More

MAHAGAN v. MEAD, 63 N.H. 130 (1884)

MAHAGAN v. MEAD a. WILLEY v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1884. A verbal promise by A to pay B one half the proceeds of a piece of land when he should sell it is not within the statute of frauds. Judgments and awards bind only parties and privies. BILLS IN […]

Read More

INGAHARRO v. BLANCHETTE, 122 N.H. 54 (1982)

440 A.2d 445 WALTER J. INGAHARRO v. JACQUES E. BLANCHETTE a. No. 81-054Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided January 20, 1982 1. Contracts — Parol Evidence Rule The parol evidence rule does not preclude the use of evidence tending to prove fraud or misrepresentation. 2. Contracts — Parol Evidence Rule In an action brought […]

Read More

TUCKER v. TILTON, 55 N.H. 223 (1875)

TUCKER v. TILTON. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided March 13, 1875. Under Gen. Stats., ch. 123, sec. 12, notice to a subsequent attaching creditor of a valid mortgage not recorded is equivalent to a record. In such a case, knowledge of the officer employed to make the attachment is knowledge of the plaintiff. […]

Read More

STATE v. PAGE, 122 N.H. 543 (1982)

447 A.2d 128 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. EDWIN W. PAGE, II No. 82-019Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided June 11, 1982 Appeal and Error — Affirmance — Grounds The decision of the supreme court in Novosel v. Helgemoe, 118 N.H. 115 (1978), that sanity should not be treated as an element of […]

Read More

IN RE DAVID B., 127 N.H. 772 (1986)

508 A.2d 1045 In re DAVID B. (New Hampshire Division of Mental Health and Developmental Services) No. 84-528Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original Decided April 9, 1986 1. Administrative Law — Judicial Review — Standards The test to determine whether to grant a writ of certiorari is whether the agency has acted illegally in respect […]

Read More

WILLIAMS v. WILLIAMS, 87 N.H. 430 (1935)

182 A. 172 MARTHA Y. WILLIAMS v. GEORGE F. WILLIAMS. CHARLES L. MITCHELL v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided December 3, 1935. Entries made in the regular course of business are admissible when proof of their correctness has been made to the satisfaction of the trial justice. In an action to recover […]

Read More

MOONEY v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD, 65 N.H. 670 (1889)

23 A. 529 MOONEY, Adm’x, v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided December, 1889. BILL IN EQUITY, alleging that the plaintiff’s intestate was killed by the negligence of the defendants; that she was prevented from giving the notice required by Laws of 1887, c. 71, s. 2, within the time limited, […]

Read More

BELIVEAU v. NORFOLK DEDHAM MUT. FIRE INS. CO., 120 N.H. 73 (1980)

411 A.2d 1101 ROGER BELIVEAU, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF RICHARD BELIVEAU v. NORFOLK DEDHAM MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY AND CONCORD GENERAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY No. 79-016Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided February 14, 1980 1. Insurance — Liability for Damage or Injury — Wording of Policy Absent statutory provisions or public policy to […]

Read More

IN RE GENE B., 128 N.H. 321 (1986)

512 A.2d 432 In re GENE B. No. 85-207Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided July 17, 1986 1. Criminal Law — Sentence — Determination Practical results of sentencing changes are looked to when construing the requirement of State v. Wheeler, 120 N.H. 496 (1980), that any substantial increase in the length or severity of […]

Read More

STATE v. RYAN, 142 N.H. 486 (1997)

703 A.2d 1364 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JAMES E. RYAN No. 96-195Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-northern judicial district Decided December 29, 1997 1. Criminal Law-Judgment and Sentence — Appeal Because a sentence is a decision on the merits that a defendant may appeal to the supreme court, a defendant has, pursuant to […]

Read More

BRADLEY v. LACONIA, 66 N.H. 269 (1890)

20 A. 331 BRADLEY v. LACONIA. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided June, 1890. The remedy against a tax illegally assessed is by appeal from the assessment. ASSUMPSIT, to recover back money paid for taxes which the plaintiff claims were illegally assessed upon the parochial school property of the Catholic church in Laconia, from […]

Read More

MECHANICKS NAT. BANK v. D’AMOURS, 100 N.H. 461 (1957)

129 A.2d 859 THE MECHANICKS NATIONAL BANK OF CONCORD Tr. u/w of Charles Sherman Hall v. ERNEST R. D’AMOURS, Director of Charitable Trusts, The State of New Hampshire. No. 4545.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued January 3, 1957. Decided March 4, 1957. The assets of a trust which does not expressly or impliedly prohibit investment […]

Read More

GUARD RAIL ERECTORS INC. v. COMPANY, 86 N.H. 349 (1933)

168 A. 903 GUARD RAIL ERECTORS, INC. v. STANDARD SURETY CASUALTY CO. OF NEW YORK. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided November 7, 1933. Under Laws 1927, c. 88, ss. 1-3, extending the benefit of the mechanics’ lien law to those supplying labor or materials on any public construction etc., for the state, notice […]

Read More

GALLAGHER v. STREET RAILWAY, 70 N.H. 212 (1899)

47 A. 610 GALLAGHER v. MANCHESTER STREET RAILWAY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1899. A nonsuit will not be ordered in an action for negligence when the evidence warrants a finding that at the time of the accident the plaintiff could not, and the defendant could, have prevented the injury by the […]

Read More

GOULD v. CONCORD HOSPITAL, 126 N.H. 405 (1985)

493 A.2d 1193 NANCY GOULD, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ERWIN F. GOULD v. CONCORD HOSPITAL a. No. 84-319 No. 84-368 No. 84-376Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided April 18, 1985 1. Appeal and Error — Dismissal of Complaint — Standards for Review In considering a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff’s allegations are regarded […]

Read More

SUN VALLEY c. CO. v. WATTS, 98 N.H. 428 (1954)

102 A.2d 504 SUN VALLEY BEACH, INC. v. EDWIN G. WATTS a. No. 4160.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued December 1, 1953. Decided January 29, 1954. Where the original owner of a large tract of land subdivided it into lots under a general plan and imposed upon certain lots sold therefrom restrictions against use for […]

Read More

STEWART v. STEARNS, 63 N.H. 99 (1884)

STEWART v. STEARNS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1884. False and fraudulent representations, calculated and intended to mislead, and prevent examination and inquiry as to the quality and character of a stock of goods, made by a vendor to a purchaser unacquainted with such goods, who, exercising ordinary prudence, is induced to […]

Read More

COLEBROOK WATER COMPANY v. PARSONS, 88 N.H. 217 (1936)

186 A. 14 COLEBROOK WATER COMPANY v. CUSHMAN H. PARSONS a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided June 26, 1936. Where a written instrument contains a clause reciting the object or intention of the parties such clause is obviously designed to prevail over contradictory or ambiguous statements contained elsewhere in the document. By written […]

Read More

STATE v. JENSEN, 158 N.H. 109 (2008)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. GRAHAM JENSEN. No. 2007-667.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Rochester District Court.Argued: October 22, 2008. Opinion Issued: November 21, 2008. 1. Contracts — Legality — Public Policy Where a contract was originally legal, but because of a change in the law, performance of the acts prescribed in the contract by […]

Read More

DOIRON v. DOIRON, 109 N.H. 1 (1968)

241 A.2d 372 ALICE O. DOIRON v. JOSEPH A. DOIRON. No. 5639.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued November 7, 1967. Decided April 30, 1968. 1. In an action brought in this state by a wife against her husband while both parties were domiciled in Massachusetts, for injuries previously sustained in this state as the result […]

Read More

TAYLOR v. BLAKE, 64 N.H. 392 (1887)

10 A. 698 TAYLOR a. v. BLAKE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June, 1887. The following words of description in a deed make the thread of the stream a boundary of the tract conveyed: “thence . . . to a poplar tree on the bank of Newfound river, and hence up said river […]

Read More

CARTER v. THURSTON, 58 N.H. 104 (1877)

CARTER v. THURSTON a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided March, 1877. The navigability of a stream, for the purpose of bringing it within the denomination of a public river or highway, does not depend upon the mode by which commerce is conducted upon it, as whether by steamers, or sailing vessels, or boats, […]

Read More

PERKINS v. COMPANY, 90 N.H. 534 (1940)

13 A.2d 475 EVERETT G. PERKINS v. NEW HAMPSHIRE POWER CO., a. No. 3112.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided March 5, 1940. A finding having been made by the Public Service Commission pursuant to P. L., c. 240, s. 27 that the public good would be served by a transfer and sale of the […]

Read More

STATE v. CORMIER, 127 N.H. 253 (1985)

499 A.2d 986 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. MAUREEN CORMIER No. 84-509Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided August 16, 1985 1. Constitutional Law — New Hampshire Constitution — Self-Incrimination State constitutional privilege against self-incrimination applies only to evidence provided by a defendant that is of testimonial character. N.H. CONST. pt. 1, art. 15. […]

Read More

COOPER v. HOPKINS, 70 N.H. 271 (1900)

48 A. 100 COOPER v. HOPKINS a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June, 1900. If testimony in relation to an immaterial matter is elicited upon cross-examination, it is not open to contradiction for the purpose of disparaging the credibility of the witness. The erroneous admission of prejudicial evidence, in contradiction of testimony as […]

Read More

DODGE v. BRENNAN, 59 N.H. 138 (1879)

DODGE v. BRENNAN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1879. Under an unrestricted common law submission, the parties are presumed to agree that every consideration, both of law and fact, which can affect the decision of the cause, is included in the authority of the arbitrators, and is matter proper for their determination. […]

Read More

STATE v. MARION, 122 N.H. 20 (1982)

440 A.2d 448 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JAY MARION No. 81-092Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided January 15, 1982 1. Arson — Statutes — Purpose The purpose of the paragraph incorporated by reference in the arson statute which provides for the definition of “property of another” is to include within the sweep […]

Read More

BAILEY v. MUSUMECI, 134 N.H. 280 (1991)

591 A.2d 1316 ROBERT E. BAILEY AND JOANN W. BAILEY v. JOSEPH A. MUSUMECI No. 89-298Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided June 5, 1991 1. Contracts — Rescission — Unilateral Mistake Criteria established in Curran Company v. State, 106 N.H. 558 (1905), for rescission of a contract based upon unilateral mistake need not be […]

Read More

MUELLER v. HOPKINTON TOWN CLERK, 113 N.H. 90 (1973)

302 A.2d 115 WILLIAM MUELLER a. v. HOPKINTON TOWN CLERK a. No. 6619Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided March 2, 1973 1. Where mandamus to require inclusion of a proposed zoning amendment in a warrant for a town meeting was denied by the trial court, the supreme court, without reaching the merits and despite […]

Read More

STATE v. CUTTING, 114 N.H. 200 (1974)

317 A.2d 553 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. MABEL G. CUTTING No. 6647Supreme Court of New Hampshire Claremont District Court Decided March 29, 1974 1. Reasonable precision in the definition of the crime proscribed is an essential requirement of a criminal statute. 2. The terms of a criminal statute must be sufficiently explicit to inform […]

Read More

HASHIM v. CHIMIKLIS, 91 N.H. 456 (1941)

21 A.2d 166 JOSEPH HASHIM v. GEORGE A. CHIMIKLIS. No. 3246.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June 25, 1941. The owner or possessor of premises owes to a licensee the duty to give him reasonable information as to dangerous conditions not open to his observation and of which the owner knows or should know. […]

Read More

CANDIA v. CHANDLER, 58 N.H. 127 (1877)

CANDIA and HOOKSETT v. CHANDLER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided August, 1877. In a petition for the discontinuance of a highway that has not been constructed, the fact that a considerable portion of the wood and timber standing near it at the time of the laying out has been cut and carried away, […]

Read More

WISE SHOE CO. v. TOWN OF EXETER, 119 N.H. 700 (1979)

406 A.2d 720 WISE SHOE COMPANY, INC. v. TOWN OF EXETER SPORTS-TEK, INC. v. TOWN OF EXETER No. 79-088Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided August 20, 1979 1. Taxation — Appraisal and Assessment — Abatements To show that an abatement is justified, taxpayer must prove by preponderance of the evidence that the assessment placed […]

Read More