WILKINSON v. COMPANY, 79 N.H. 335 (1920)

109 A. 45 ROBERT H. WILKINSON by his next friend MABEL F. WILKINSON v. MOORE PRESTON COAL CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided January 6, 1920. A master is not liable for the acts of his servant while acting outside the scope of his employment. The owner of a coal wagon, whose driver […]

Read More

SOLOMONS v. CHESLEY, 58 N.H. 238 (1878)

SOLOMONS a. v. CHESLEY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided March, 1878. In a trial upon the general issue, a brief statement, filed in the same cause, is not evidence for the plaintiff. The validity of a bill of sale given as security for the price of spirituous liquors illegally sold, may be denied […]

Read More

GARDNER v. AHERN, 117 N.H. 529 (1977)

375 A.2d 258 LAURENCE F. GARDNER v. PATRICIA M. AHERN No. 7665Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hanover District Court Decided June 20, 1977 Laurence F. Gardner, pro se, filed no brief. Martha M. Davis, of Windsor, Vt., for the defendant, filed no brief. MEMORANDUM OPINION Action in assumpsit to recover the balance due on a […]

Read More

ELLINWOOD v. HOLT, 60 N.H. 57 (1880)

ELLINWOOD v. HOLT. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1880. An attachment of mortgaged personal property by the holder of the mortgage, in an action founded in part upon a note for which the mortgage is held as collateral security, which is defeated by forcible seizure of the property by an officer claiming […]

Read More

KNOX v. REYNOLDS, 112 N.H. 469 (1972)

298 A.2d 738 MARY LOUISE (REYNOLDS) KNOX v. JOHN H. REYNOLDS. No. 6341.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided December 29, 1972. 1. The record of prior proceedings in divorce action warranted denial of plaintiff’s motion to reinstitute support payments that had been suspended because of nonresident plaintiff’s disregard of orders granting visitation rights to […]

Read More

HILLIARD v. BEATTIE, 67 N.H. 571 (1893)

39 A. 897 HILLIARD v. BEATTIE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December, 1893. An assignment of a pending suit as security for a debt, with authority to settle the suit and apply the proceeds on the debt, is irrevocable by the assignor, and survives to the administrators of the assignee. A plaintiff in […]

Read More

WEHRINGER v. BULLEN, 120 N.H. 446 (1980)

417 A.2d 1 CAMERON K. WEHRINGER v. MARY S. BULLEN No. 79-418Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided June 18, 1980 Specific Performance — Review — Discretion of Lower Court Trial court’s discretionary denial of specific performance to enforce contract to purchase defendant’s land was proper where contract price of $30 an acre for land […]

Read More

MORGAN v. MORGAN, 94 N.H. 116 (1946)

47 A.2d 569 MILFORD S. MORGAN v. SIDNEY J. MORGAN. No. 3588.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June 4, 1946. A decree incompatible with the facts found by the Trial Court will be set aside. The statute of frauds cannot be invoked for the purpose of avoiding liability for a fraudulent misrepresentation of intention […]

Read More

JACKSON v. SMART, 89 N.H. 457 (1938)

200 A. 789 JOHN W. JACKSON v. ALBERT SMART. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided June 21, 1938. The questions of fact involved in a motion for a new trial are entirely within the jurisdiction of the Superior Court. New evidence which is not cumulative but presents an entirely different situation from that disclosed […]

Read More

CARIGNAN v. COMPANY, 95 N.H. 262 (1948)

61 A.2d 799 WALTER CARIGNAN v. AMOSKEAG HAMPER COMPANY. No. 3763.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided November 3, 1948. An employer was held not to have misled an injured workman into thinking he had but one remedy by mailing a “draft for compensation due” him, since the statute (R. L., c. 216, s. 22) […]

Read More

COMEAU v. VERGATO, 149 N.H. 508 (2003)

823 A.2d 764 RACHEL COMEAU v. JERRY VERGATO No. 2002-413Supreme Court of New Hampshire Milford District CourtArgued April 10, 2003 Opinion Issued May 16, 2003 1. Landlord and Tenant — Nature of Relationship — ParticularMatters In defining “landlord” the legislature intended the inclusion of “manufactured housing” within the definition of “residential premises” to be exclusive […]

Read More

STATE v. ARSENAULT, 115 N.H. 109 (1975)

336 A.2d 244 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. LEONARD G. ARSENAULT SAME v. JOHN F. FARRELL SAME v. SAMUEL S. SNOW SAME v. ERIC D. LAHAR No. 6630 No. 6802 No. 6803 No. 6866Supreme Court of New Hampshire Salem District Court Carroll Carroll Grafton Decided March 31, 1975 1. Intoxication is a fact open to […]

Read More

BRENNAN v. WINNIPESAUKEE FLAGSHIP CORP., 122 N.H. 524 (1982)

446 A.2d 1175 MARY E. BRENNAN a. v. WINNIPESAUKEE FLAGSHIP CORPORATION a. No. 81-081Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided June 11, 1982 1. Zoning — Construction of Ordinances — Administrative Constructions Construction of the terms of a zoning ordinance is a question of law upon which the supreme court is not bound by the […]

Read More

IN THE MATTER OF HAMPERS, 154 N.H. 275 (2006)

IN THE MATTER OF MARCUS J. HAMPERS AND KRISTIN C. HAMPERS. No. 2005-128.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan.Argued: June 7, 2006. Opinion Issued: November 1, 2006. 1. Divorce — Grounds — Particular Cases Where there was evidence that respondent desired to continue the marriage and that, therefore, there was a reasonable possibility of reconciliation, it […]

Read More

FOSS v. RAILWAY, 73 N.H. 246 (1905)

60 A. 747 FOSS v. PORTSMOUTH, DOVER YORK RAILWAY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided April 4, 1905. An interjected remark by the court as to the value of conflicting medical theories, conditional in form and harmless in substance, does not furnish cause for setting aside a verdict. No exception lies to the exclusion […]

Read More

MILNE v. BURLINGTON HOMES, INC., 117 N.H. 813 (1977)

379 A.2d 198 MICHAEL G. MILNE v. BURLINGTON HOMES, INC. No. 7709Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided October 24, 1977 1. Pleading — Form and Requisites Allegations of pleadings are sufficiently clear if they are understandable by the court and counsel. 2. Pleading — Form and Requisites Even though an action may be one […]

Read More

STATE v. SUNAPEE DAM CO., 72 N.H. 114 (1903)

55 A. 899 STATE a. v. SUNAPEE DAM CO. a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided April 11, 1903. Costs cannot be imposed, except as terms, until the action is finally disposed of. Whether persons injured by an unreasonable exercise of the right of flowage may by amendment and against the objection of the […]

Read More

M. MOONEY CORP. v. U.S. FIDELITY GUARANTY CO., 136 N.H. 463 (1992)

618 A.2d 793 M. MOONEY CORP. v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY GUARANTY COMPANY No. 91-425Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided December 3, 1992 1. Insurance — Coverage — Burden of Proof When insurer and insured dispute whether insurance policy covers incident at issue, insurer bears burden of establishing no insurance coverage and ambiguities are resolved […]

Read More

SAVINGS BANK v. BLISS, 80 N.H. 108 (1921)

114 A. 742 NEWPORT SAVINGS BANK v. JOHN BLISS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided April 5, 1921. The affidavit of posting notice of a tax sale, required by P. S., c. 61, s. 7, need not be signed by the collector; and his account of the sale need not state the dates of […]

Read More

IN THE MATTER OF SUTTON AND SUTTON, 148 N.H. 676 (2002)

813 A.2d 1193 In the Matter of Anne C. Sutton and John E. Sutton, Jr. No. 2001-531Supreme Court of New Hampshire Lebanon Family DivisionArgued October 9, 2002 Opinion Issued December 17, 2002 1. Divorce—Division of Property—Factors Considered Compensation for services to be rendered after the marriage is dissolved is future income, which cannot be considered […]

Read More

ADAMS v. BUSHEY, 60 N.H. 290 (1880)

ADAMS v. BUSHEY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided December, 1880. Where a view has been had during a trial before a referee, it is no cause for setting aside the report that a second view way taken by the referee alone after the hearing, the court at the trial term having found, as […]

Read More

STATE v. WHITING, 117 N.H. 701 (1977)

378 A.2d 736 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. TEX WHITING No. 7632Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided September 30, 1977 1. Witnesses — Self-Incrimination In light of witnesses’ right against self-incrimination, it was perfectly proper for court to excuse jury and to advise prospective defense witnesses of that right and to give them opportunity […]

Read More

CILLEY v. N.H. BALL BEARINGS, INC., 128 N.H. 401 (1986)

514 A.2d 818 RICHARD C. CILLEY v. NEW HAMPSHIRE BALL BEARINGS, INC. No. 85-263Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided August 7, 1986 1. Judgments — Summary Judgment — Generally Trial judge has the power to reverse, sua sponte, an earlier denial of a motion for summary judgment. 2. Judgments — Summary Judgment — Purpose […]

Read More

HOBBS v. COMPANY, 74 N.H. 116 (1906)

65 A. 382 HOBBS, Adm’r, v. GEORGE W. BLANCHARD SONS CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided December 4, 1906. It is the duty of the owner of premises to so conduct his business as not to actively render unreasonably dangerous the situation of trespassers or bare licensees whose presence is known to him. […]

Read More

CLOUGH v. RUSSELL, 55 N.H. 279 (1875)

CLOUGH v. RUSSELL AND TRUSTEE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided March 13, 1875. Trustee process — Husband and wife. The transfer by husband to wife of a note payable to him or order, in payment of a loan previously made to him by the wife from funds which she held as her own […]

Read More

ERIN FOOD SERVS., INC. v. 688 PROPS., 119 N.H. 232 (1979)

401 A.2d 201 ERIN FOOD SERVICES, INC. v. 688 PROPERTIES No. 78-166Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided April 13, 1979 1. Contracts — Construction — Generally Interpretation of contracts is the process of determining from the language and conduct of the parties what they are required to do to conform to the terms of […]

Read More

BOYCE v. CONCORD GEN. MUT. INS. CO., 121 N.H. 774 (1981)

435 A.2d 510 ARLINE R. BOYCE, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ROBIN L. BOYCE v. CONCORD GENERAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY a. No. 80-303Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided September 16, 1981 1. Motor Vehicles — Financial Responsibility Laws Use of disjunctive “or” in language of statute dealing with motor vehicle liability policies providing indemnity […]

Read More

STATE v. GREY, 148 N.H. 666 (2002)

813 A.2d 465 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. Jeffery A. Grey No. 2001-379Supreme Court of New Hampshire MerrimackArgued October 2, 2002 Opinion Issued December 17, 2002 1. Search and Seizure—Warrant Requirement; Exceptions—Consent The State constitution particularly protects people from unreasonable police entries into their private homes because of the heightened expectation of privacy given […]

Read More

WHEELER v. WHITNEY, 59 N.H. 197 (1879)

WHEELER v. WHITNEY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June, 1879. In trespass for an assault, a justification of the assault in self-defence is not available under the general issue. TRESPASS, for an assault and battery. Plea, the general issue. The court gave the jury certain instructions on the subject of self-defence, to which […]

Read More

CHURCHILL v. DOVER, 156 N.H. 667 (2008)

CHURCHILL REALTY TRUST v. CITY OF DOVER ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. No. 2007-043.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Strafford.Argued: September 19, 2007. Opinion Issued: January 15, 2008. 1. Zoning and Planning — Statutes — Construction Provision of statute pertaining to land affected by municipal boundaries precludes an owner of contiguous land in adjoining municipalities from treating […]

Read More

STATE v. WOODMAN, 114 N.H. 497 (1974)

323 A.2d 921 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. LEONARD WOODMAN No. 6575Supreme Court of New Hampshire Epping Municipal Court Decided July 30, 1974 1. A New Hampshire resident driving a Massachusetts-registered commercial vehicle in New Hampshire trader a commercial license issued to him in Massachusetts is in violation of RSA 262:27-a (Supp. 1973) if he […]

Read More

AMERICAN POLICYHOLDER’S INS. CO. v. BAKER, 119 N.H. 958 (1979)

409 A.2d 1346 AMERICAN POLICYHOLDER’S INSURANCE CO. v. LOUIS BAKER, ADMINISTRATOR, ESTATE OF CRAIG BAKER, AND HELEN KIRATSOS, ADMINISTRATRIX, ESTATE OF JOHN BECK LOUIS BAKER, ADMINISTRATOR, ESTATE OF CRAIG BAKER v. HELEN KIRATSOS, ADMINISTRATRIX, ESTATE OF JOHN BECK No. 79-175Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided December 28, 1979 1. Executors and Administrators — Litigation […]

Read More

BECKMAN v. SOUTHER, 68 N.H. 381 (1895)

36 A. 14 BECKMAN v. SOUTHER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided December, 1895. Upon the question whether unnecessary force was used in arresting the plaintiff, evidence that the defendant knew him to be a violent and dangerous person is competent. Whether evidence of the defendant’s violence in making a previous arrest is admissible, […]

Read More

THOMSON v. COMPANY, 86 N.H. 436 (1934)

170 A. 769 PHYLLIS THOMSON, Adm’x v. THE AMOSKEAG MANUFACTURING COMPANY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided January 2, 1934. The workmen’s compensation act applies only when there has been an accidental injury, definite as to time and place and occurring in the course of the employment. The act does not give compensation for […]

Read More

GULF INS. CO. v. AMSCO, 153 N.H. 28 (2005)

889 A.2d 1040 GULF INSURANCE COMPANY v. AMSCO, INC. a. No. 2004-354.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued: September 15, 2005. Opinion Issued: December 28, 2005. 1. Discovery — Disclosure of Witnesses — Generally In superior court, a party is entitled to disclosure of the opposing party’s experts, the substance of the facts and opinions about […]

Read More

TOWERS v. DEP’T OF EMPL. SEC., 117 N.H. 612 (1977)

376 A.2d 136 ALICE M. TOWERS v. DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY CONTINENTAL SHOE COMPANY AND SOUTH BERWICK SHOE COMPANY No. 7628Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided July 25, 1977 1. Unemployment Compensation — Judicial Review — Parameters of Review Where unemployment compensation claimant, aggrieved by decision of appeal tribunal, failed within fifteen days after […]

Read More

STATE v. MARTIN, 118 N.H. 102 (1978)

382 A.2d 1107 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. WILLIAM E. MARTIN No. 7813Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided February 17, 1978 Criminal Law — Post-Conviction Relief — Right to Counsel of Choice Where defendant, who was indicted for aggravated assault, stated at trial that he had no money and could not afford lawyer, […]

Read More

AMICA MUT. INS. CO. v. MORRISON, 130 N.H. 250 (1987)

536 A.2d 199 AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. MICHAEL MORRISON a. No. 87-021Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided December 31, 1987 1. Insurance — Construction of Contracts — Generally General rule in construction of insurance contracts is that the court will honor the reasonable expectations of the policyholder. 2. Insurance — Construction of Contracts […]

Read More

STATE v. GUERTIN, 89 N.H. 126 (1937)

193 A. 237 STATE v. EUGENE GUERTIN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Municipal Court of Manchester. Decided June 24, 1937. The rates of fare which may be charged by a common carrier are subject to state control. By P.L., c. 54, s. 12, PAR. VI the legislature has constitutionally authorized cities to regulate the rates […]

Read More

DUSSEAULT v. ASSOCIATION, 74 N.H. 407 (1907)

68 A. 461 DUSSEAULT a. v. ASSOCIATION CANADO-AMERICAINE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December 3, 1907. Evidence that the members of a society were admitted to a fraternal order, upon the express agreement that those above a certain age should be insured for a less sum than the death benefit provided by the […]

Read More

DOUGLAS’ CASE, 147 N.H. 538 (2002)

809 A.2d 755 DOUGLAS’ CASE No. LD-98-013Supreme Court of New HampshireArgued: January 23, 2002 Opinion Issued: April 12, 2002 1. Attorneys — Reprimand, Suspension and Disbarment — Procedure In a proceeding before a judicial referee on a petition for suspension of respondent attorney, although the referee refused to allow respondent to testify for the purpose […]

Read More

CLARK v. RAILROAD, 64 N.H. 323 (1887)

10 A. 676 CLARK v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June, 1887. The plaintiff’s horse escaped into the highway and was killed upon a crossing by the defendants’ train run in a careless and negligent manner. The plaintiff was in no fault for the escape of his horse, and used […]

Read More

IN RE NASHUA ASS’N OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS, 119 N.H. 90 (1979)

398 A.2d 832 In re NASHUA ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS No. 78-132Supreme Court of New Hampshire PELRB Decided February 28, 1979 1. Public Employees — Public Employee Labor Relations Boards — Abuse of Discretion Determination of the public employee labor relations board will be upheld unless it constitutes a clear abuse of discretion. 2. Administrative […]

Read More

EMERY v. RAILROAD, 67 N.H. 434 (1893)

36 A. 367 EMERY, Adm’r, v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June, 1893. A violent, unusual, and unexpected movement of a railroad car, after the train has stopped at a station and while passengers are getting ready to leave the car, tends to show negligence on the part of the […]

Read More

McINNES v. GOLDTHWAITE, 96 N.H. 413 (1951)

77 A.2d 849 WILLIAM M. MCINNES, Ex’r., Ap’t v. JOEL E. GOLDTHWAITE a., Tr’s Ap’es. No. 3990Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided January 2, 1951 Where an executor takes possession and control of the testator’s real estate and seeks to have his expenditures of estate funds thereon allowed in his account he may not […]

Read More

SMITH v. SAVINGS BANK, 64 N.H. 228 (1886)

9 A. 792 SMITH, Adm’x, v. OSSIPEE VALLEY TEN CENTS SAVINGS BANK. OSSIPEE VALLEY TEN CENTS SAVINGS BANK v. SMITH, Adm’x, a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided December, 1886. S. deposited money in a savings-bank in the name of his daughter, intending it as a present gift to her, subject to the right […]

Read More

HIGGINS v. CUSHMAN S. COLBY, C.P.A., P.A., 140 N.H. 765 (1996)

674 A.2d 971 MARIE T. HIGGINS v. CUSHMAN S. COLBY C.P.A., P.A., a. No. 94-831Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided April 9, 1996 1. Labor — Compensation — Benefits; Generally While the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) preempts State common law tort and contract claims that relate to a benefit plan, […]

Read More

STATE v. WARGO, 83 N.H. 532 (1929)

145 A. 456 STATE v. STEVE J. WARGO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided March 5, 1929. On the trial of an indictment for rape, conduct of the respondent towards the prosecutrix tending to show his purpose was to have sexual relations and consisting of improper advances or relations or punishment to subjugate her […]

Read More

McALPINE v. GILPATRICK, 90 N.H. 57 (1939)

4 A.2d 352 ELLEN McALPINE v. FRED R. GILPATRICK a. No. 3048.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided February 7, 1939. If the mother of a minor is not an unfit custodian she is entitled to custody by force of P. L., c. 290, s. 4, notwithstanding the child’s welfare would be better subserved if […]

Read More

STATE v. DUPONT, 155 N.H. 644 (2007)

931 A.2d 583 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. TIMOTHY DUPONT. No. 2006-504.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-northern judicial district.Submitted: March 22, 2007. Opinion Issued: July 13, 2007. 1. Appeal and Error — Record or Transcript — Indigents Post-conviction and post-appeal, an indigent defendant is not automatically entitled to transcripts at State expense. Defendant first […]

Read More

HACKETT v. GALE, 104 N.H. 90 (1962)

179 A.2d 451 LAWRENCE C. HACKETT a. v. FLOYD I. GALE. No. 5013.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hampton Municipal Court.Argued February 6, 1962. Decided March 22, 1962. 1. Where a municipal zoning ordinance authorized accessory use of residences in a certain zoned district “as offices for doctors, engineers, architects, lawyers or others” the words “or […]

Read More

LEMAY v. LEMAY, 109 N.H. 217 (1968)

247 A.2d 189 RITA G. LEMAY v. LIONEL A. LEMAY. No. 5831.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued October 1, 1968. Decided October 31, 1968. 1. The Trial Court has authority to make an order of custody of children of parents who are living apart notwithstanding the fact that a divorce or separation is denied. 2. […]

Read More

CHAGNON LUMBER CO. v. STONE MILL CONST. CORP., 124 N.H. 820 (1984)

474 A.2d 588 CHAGNON LUMBER CO., INC. v. STONE MILL CONSTRUCTION CORP. AND JOHN W. AND ANN M. BREITEN No. 82-527Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided April 19, 1984 1. Appeal and Error — Preservation of Questions — Generally While issues on appeal are limited to issues raised in the trial court, the supreme […]

Read More

INSURANCE CO. v. CLARK, 58 N.H. 164 (1877)

THE PHENIX MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. CLARK. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided August, 1877. When the intention with which an act is done is a relevant fact, a witness may testify, directly, with what intention and under what controlling influence he acted, as well as he may testify to doing the act. […]

Read More

MARSTON v. MARSTON, 64 N.H. 146 (1886)

5 A. 713 MARSTON, Adm’r, Ap’t, v. MARSTON a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June, 1886. The gift of a promissory note by the payee to the maker, perfected by delivery, is not rendered invalid by a subsequent arrangement whereby the note is restored to the custody of the donor with a right […]

Read More

HILL v. CARR, 78 N.H. 458 (1917)

101 A. 525 AMELIA H. HILL v. BURT W. CARR, Ex’r. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June 30, 1917. Where there is doubt as to the understanding of the parties to a verbal contract, the court may allow the jury to determine how the language used was understood, subject to instructions as to […]

Read More

SHALLOW BROOK ASSOC’S v. DUBE, 135 N.H. 40 (1991)

599 A.2d 132 SHALLOW BROOK ASSOCIATES v. RONALD DUBE AND PAULINE DUBE No. 90-503Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided November 8, 1991 1. Contracts — Specific Performance — Time Where the court’s decree is that the purchaser shall receive a deed when he makes a tender of the price, but no time is fixed […]

Read More

KIMBALL v. BADGER, 93 N.H. 345 (1945)

42 A.2d 1 F. GORDON KIMBALL, State Treas. v. DANIEL W. BADGER a., Ex’rs u/w HORACE W. PEARSON. No. 3520.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided April 3, 1945. The distinction drawn by R. L., c. 87, s. 38, between legatees under a will or persons who would be heirs-at-law of the decedent in the […]

Read More

SCULLY’S AUTO-MARINE UPHOLSTERY v. PEERLESS INS. CO., 136 N.H. 65 (1992)

611 A.2d 635 SCULLY’S AUTO-MARINE UPHOLSTERY, INC. v. PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. a. No. 91-198Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided July 30, 1992 1. Declaratory Judgments — Statutes — Applicability Declaratory judgment statute allowing petition to determine coverage of an insurance policy if filed within six months of the underlying suit giving rise to […]

Read More

FISKE v. WARNER, 99 N.H. 236 (1954)

109 A.2d 37 GEORGE F. FISKE v. SAM BASS WARNER a., Tr’ees. No. 4335.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued October 6, 1954. Decided October 29, 1954. A bequest of the net income of a trust estate with a general power to appoint the trust property to such persons as the donee should direct and appoint […]

Read More

GOUDIE v. FISHER, 79 N.H. 424 (1920)

111 A. 282 LAWRENCE W. GOUDIE v. ELIZABETH FISHER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided May 4, 1920. An easement cannot pass by implication merely upon the ground of convenience. A landowner cannot have an easement in his own land. Only existing easements pass as appurtenant to the land conveyed. TRESPASS, quare clausum. Plea, […]

Read More

STATE v. STERRIN, 78 N.H. 220 (1916)

98 A. 482 STATE v. NICHOLAS STERRIN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June 24, 1916. The operator of a motor vehicle knowing that injury has been caused to another person is required by Laws 1911, c. 133, s. 20 to return to the place of the accident and there remain for a sufficient […]

Read More

CONCORD ORTHOPAEDICS PROF. ASSOC. v. FORBES, 142 N.H. 440 (1997)

702 A.2d 1273 CONCORD ORTHOPAEDICS PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION v. H. JAMES FORBES, M.D. No. 95-865Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided December 4, 1997 1. Contracts — Legality — Agreements Not To Compete Although the matter involving a two-year covenant not to compete between a physician and a professional association was technically moot due to its […]

Read More

FERNALD v. CHURCH, 77 N.H. 108 (1913)

88 A. 705 JOSIAH E. FERNALD, Adm’r, v. FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST, SCIENTIST, IN BOSTON, a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided October 7, 1913. It is the duty of the court to effectuate the intention of the creator of a trust, in so far as it is ascertainable and legal. Questions of law […]

Read More

COX v. PINKHAM, 80 N.H. 134 (1921)

114 A. 18 JOHN COX (ROCKINGHAM COUNTY plaintiff in interest) v. LEWIS PINKHAM. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided May 3, 1921. Evidence of a promise to “clothe, educate and care for” a minor will warrant the finding of a promise to support and care for him; but such promise does not include funeral […]

Read More

RANGER v. N.H. YOUTH DEV. CENTER, 118 N.H. 163 (1978)

384 A.2d 493 ALFRED H. RANGER v. NEW HAMPSHIRE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER ROBERT M. DUVALL, LABOR COMMISSIONER No. 7948Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided March 24, 1978 1. Workmen’s Compensation — Attorneys’ Fees Where plaintiff while working at his job received an injury to his eye on December 1, 1966, and suffered complete loss […]

Read More

PETITION OF GRAHAM, 106 N.H. 545 (1965)

215 A.2d 697 PETITION OF DANA L. GRAHAM. No. 5363.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton.Argued October 5, 1965. Decided December 30, 1965. 1. The right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution in a prosecution for a felony is the right to the effective aid of counsel in the preparation […]

Read More

STATE v. MEEKINS, 127 N.H. 777 (1986)

508 A.2d 1048 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JAMES MEEKINS No. 84-580Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided April 9, 1986 1. Indictment and Information — Specificity — Dates If the date an offense is committed is not an essential element of the crime, the State is not necessarily bound to the date specified […]

Read More

McDONOUGH v. HASKELL, 84 N.H. 229 (1930)

149 A. 72 JOSEPH McDONOUGH, Ex’r, v. KATHRYN P. HASKELL, Ex’x. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided February 4, 1930. Under P. L., c. 306, s. 11 requiring a widow to release the provisions of her husband’s will in her favor in order to entitle her to her statutory distributory share, there is no […]

Read More

CHICKERING c. CO. v. JACKSON, 81 N.H. 60 (1923)

121 A. 344 CHICKERING SONS DIVISION AMERICAN PIANO CO., INC., v. HARRY B. JACKSON. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided May 1, 1923. A foreign corporation which after soliciting business in this state sells and delivers goods in a foreign state to a citizen of this state is not “doing business in this state” […]

Read More

STATE v. GORHAM, 55 N.H. 152 (1875)

STATE v. GORHAM. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided March 11, 1875. An indictment (founded upon Gen. Stats., ch. 264, sec. 15), charging that the respondents, with force and arms in and upon one Stephen Lohiel, of said Hart’s Location, feloniously did make an assault, and him the said Stephen Lohiel in bodily fear […]

Read More

MURPHY v. BATEMAN, 121 N.H. 748 (1981)

433 A.2d 1330 MAURICE M. MURPHY v. DAVID H. BATEMAN a. No. 80-353Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided August 10, 1981 1. Appeal and Error — Findings — Master’s Findings Master’s findings will not be disturbed unless they are unsupported by evidence or erroneous as a matter of law. 2. Appeal and Error — […]

Read More

FOWLER v. HANCOCK, 89 N.H. 301 (1938)

197 A. 715 FREDERICK W. FOWLER, Trustee v. FREDERICK L. HANCOCK a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided March 1, 1938. When there is a vacancy in a trusteeship, the trust is to be maintained and enforced by a substituted trustee with such powers as the due execution of the trust requires. Devise to […]

Read More

HUTCHINS v. BERRY, 73 N.H. 603 (1905)

61 A. 554 HUTCHINS v. BERRY a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided June 6, 1905. BILL IN EQUITY, to determine the gristmill right, so called, water for power at the Pickering dam on Smith’s river in Wolfeborough. Transferred from the June term, 1904, of the superior court by Wallace, C.J. May 2, 1855, […]

Read More

STATE v. FOGG, 92 N.H. 308 (1943)

30 A.2d 491 STATE v. CARL FOGG. No. 3361.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided February 2, 1943. An indictment for breaking, entering and larceny, enumerating certain goods of the value of one hundred dollars as the subject of the larceny, but without stating the value of each article, is valid. Indictment against three jointly […]

Read More

STATE v. GRAND TRUNK RAILWAY, 58 N.H. 198 (1877)

STATE v. GRAND TRUNK RAILWAY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided August, 1877. The cost of obtaining and prosecuting an indictment, upon Gen. St., c. 264, s. 14, against a railroad for causing the death of a person, is to be borne by the complainant, and is not a charge upon the county. INDICTMENT, […]

Read More

STATE v. MORRILL, 154 N.H. 547 (2006)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. DONALD W. MORRILL a/k/a “SAM” W. MORRILL. No. 2005-694.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford.Argued: October 3, 2006. Opinion Issued: December 19, 2006. 1. Evidence — Particular Matters — Opening the Door Doctrine At one time the phrase “opening the door” referred to the doctrine of “curative admissibility.” Under that […]

Read More

NASHUA v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, 101 N.H. 503 (1959)

148 A.2d 277 NASHUA v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE No. 4693Supreme Court of New Hampshire OriginalArgued December 2, 1958 Decided January 30, 1959 1. The Supreme Court will not exercise its discretionary power to issue writs of certiorari (RSA 490:4) where there has been provided by statute an available and adequate remedy by […]

Read More

STATE v. BRIAND, 130 N.H. 650 (1988)

547 A.2d 235 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JUNE BRIAND No. 88-016Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided July 11, 1988 1. Mental Health — Criminal Offenses — Pre-Trial Psychiatric Examinations Absent constitutional or other overriding concerns, New Hampshire courts have the power to order a criminal defendant to submit to psychological or psychiatric […]

Read More

NEW IPSWICH ELECTRIC DEPT. v. GREENVILLE ELECTRIC, 108 N.H. 338 (1967)

235 A.2d 833 NEW IPSWICH ELECTRIC LIGHTING DEPARTMENT v. GREENVILLE ELECTRIC LIGHTING CO. a. No. 5663.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission.Argued September 8, 1967. Decided November 30, 1967. 1. An order of the Public Utilities Commission dismissing a complaint by a municipal electric lighting department against a public utility and its customer alleging […]

Read More

BERGERON v. DUPONT, 116 N.H. 373 (1976)

359 A.2d 627 LOUIS A. BERGERON v. LAWRENCE J. DUPONT, JR., a. No. 7180Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided June 30, 1976 1. A representation that was true when made could be fraudulent if the maker failed to disclose subsequent information that made the original representation false. 2. If a seller makes material statements […]

Read More

STATE v. REENSTIERNA, 101 N.H. 286 (1958)

140 A.2d 572 STATE v. JON G. REENSTIERNA. No. 4634.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Keene Municipal Court.Submitted April 1, 1958. Decided April 24, 1958. 1. Where the State in a complaint for operating a motor vehicle on a public way while under the influence of intoxicating liquor seeks to establish intoxication by means of a […]

Read More

McDONNELL v. TOWN OF DERRY, 116 N.H. 3 (1976)

350 A.2d 620 THOMAS E. McDONNELL a. v. TOWN OF DERRY a. No. 7301Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided January 21, 1976 1. All votes taken by official ballot at first session of town meeting on subject matter not required by statute (RSA 39:2-a (Supp. 1975)) to be included on ballot should be final […]

Read More

HALE v. BROWN, 59 N.H. 551 (1880)

HALE v. BROWN a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided June, 1880. A lumberman’s lien, under Gen. St., c. 125, s. 14, attaches to the whole of the lumber cut and hauled by him, although he has performed only a part of the contract within sixty days prior to the bringing of his suit […]

Read More

HOPKINS v. HACKER, 105 N.H. 150 (1963)

195 A.2d 587 CHARLES HOPKINS v. WILLIAM HACKER. WILLIAM HACKER v. CHARLES HOPKINS. No. 5148.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued November 5, 1963. Decided December 3, 1963. 1. In an action against an owner of real estate by his agent in charge of rentals for injuries sustained at the hands of the tenant, the owner […]

Read More

IN RE ADOPTION OF BABY C., 125 N.H. 216 (1984)

480 A.2d 101 In re ADOPTION OF BABY C. No. 83-404Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough County Probate Court Decided July 23, 1984 1. Parent and Child — Parental Rights — Fundamental Human Rights The supreme court recently reaffirmed its position that parental rights are fundamental rights under the New Hampshire Constitution, recognizing that there […]

Read More

TIRRELL v. JOHNSTON, 86 N.H. 530 (1934)

171 A. 641 NATHAN A. TIRRELL v. FRANCIS W. JOHNSTON a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided March 6, 1934. Upon all questions touching federal power and federal exemptions from state interference the decisions of the federal supreme court control. Where those decisions do not clearly include the case in hand, the state court […]

Read More

NASSIF REALTY CORP. v. NATIONAL FIRE INS. CO., 107 N.H. 267 (1966)

220 A.2d 748 NASSIF REALTY CORPORATION v. NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 5478.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire.Argued May 4, 1966. Decided June 30, 1966. 1. The rule-making power of the Superior and Supreme Courts, as courts of general jurisdiction, is broad and comprehensive. 2. Every court of record has inherent power to make such […]

Read More

HOLT v. DOWNS, 58 N.H. 170 (1877)

HOLT a. v. DOWNS a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided August, 1877. An unincorporated society, claiming to be a church, and engaged in the lawful promotion or defence of religion, is a church whose deacons may be a corporation, under Gen. St., c. 139, s. 6. An indissoluble union of a church and […]

Read More

ADAMS v. HOSPITAL, 82 N.H. 260 (1926)

132 A. 525 NINA B. ADAMS a. v. CARRIE F. WRIGHT HOSPITAL. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan. Decided March 2, 1926. A bequest of property to an unmarried woman to be used for the support of herself and her family, if she have any, is intended to be used for her own support and […]

Read More

ANDREWS v. NATIONWIDE MUT. INS. CO., 124 N.H. 148 (1983)

467 A.2d 254 KENNETH W. ANDREWS a. v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY No. 82-255Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided October 28, 1983 1. Declaratory Judgments — Statutes — Construction Merely because the legislature deemed a six-month filing limitation desirable in cases involving third-party insurance claims under the declaratory judgment statute does not mean it […]

Read More

NARAMORE v. PUTNAM, 99 N.H. 175 (1954)

106 A.2d 568 LESLIE NARAMORE v. GLADYS DERBY PUTNAM. No. 4330.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire.Argued June 2, 1954. Decided July 1, 1954. A stop sign regulation upon a public highway at an intersecting way which provides that vehicles entering the through route shall “yield the right of way to vehicles travelling on” such route […]

Read More

IN RE J.B. J.G., 157 N.H. 577 (2008)

IN THE MATTER OF J.B. AND J.G. No. 2008-023.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Portsmouth Family Division.Argued: May 21, 2008. Opinion Issued: August 6, 2008. 1. Parent and Child — Custody — ParentalRights and Duties Petitioner’s lack of a biological connection to a child was not fatal to his request for parental rights and responsibilities so […]

Read More

FOURNIER v. COMPANY, 70 N.H. 629 (1900)

47 A. 255 FOURNIER v. COLUMBIAN MANUFACTURING CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1900. CASE, by the plaintiff, whose right hand was injured by the gears of a spinning-frame in the defendants’ cotton mill. The plaintiff was a doffer in the defendants’ employ. It was her duty to clean or wipe the […]

Read More

STATE v. DYSART, 118 N.H. 743 (1978)

393 A.2d 569 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. VICTOR W. DYSART No. 78-191Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided October 30, 1978 Motor Vehicles — Habitual Offender Proceedings — Restoration of Privilege To Operate Where statute provides that following a finding that a person is a habitual offender the court shall direct the person […]

Read More

GRIFFIN v. AUBURN, 58 N.H. 121 (1877)

GRIFFIN v. THE TOWN OF AUBURN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided August, 1877. The court at a law term will not revise the discretion of a trial judge in a matter relating to costs, unless such discretion is specially reserved. On the question whether a tree was situated so near the travelled path […]

Read More

HAZEN v. CORPORATION, 89 N.H. 522 (1938)

2 A.2d 449 CHARLES HAZEN v. P. H. RICE CORPORATION. SAME v. RICHARD BARRY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided November 1, 1938. A challenge to a juror not for principal cause but only to the favor, presents no question of law but only one of fact for the trial court. Challenges to the […]

Read More

COLBY v. TOWN OF RYE, 122 N.H. 991 (1982)

453 A.2d 1270 JAMES J. COLBY, JR. a. v. TOWN OF RYE No. 82-078Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided December 8, 1982 1. Zoning — Nonconforming Uses — Generally Nonconforming uses are protected by the New Hampshire Constitution, although expansion of such a use into a new area may be prohibited. N.H. CONST. pt. […]

Read More

SANDERS v. SANDERS, 83 N.H. 587 (1929)

146 A. 816 MAY EUNICE SANDERS v. ROBERT CARL SANDERS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided June 27, 1929. PETITION, for contempt for failure to comply with an order for the support of the plaintiff’s child. On hearing, the order was vacated and the petition dismissed. To the denial of a motion for a […]

Read More

DODGE v. HOME, 95 N.H. 472 (1949)

67 A.2d 10 RALPH L. DODGE, Adm’r w. w. a. v. NEW HAMPSHIRE CENTENNIAL HOME FOR THE AGED. No. 3802.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June 7, 1949. It is not inequitable for a charitable home for the aged to retain property of an inmate who dies during a probationary term, when said property […]

Read More