HERSEY v. HUTCHINS, 71 N.H. 458 (1902)

52 A. 862 HERSEY v. HUTCHINS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided June 20, 1902. A plaintiff in a writ of entry, who has recovered judgment for the possession of the locus in quo and taxable costs, is not entitled to recover, in a subsequent action for mesne profits, sums paid to attorneys and […]

Read More

L’HEUREUX v. DESMARAIS, 89 N.H. 237 (1938)

197 A. 327 ANNA L’HEUREUX v. GEORGE DESMARAIS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided January 4, 1938. The conduct of a pedestrian in crossing an intersection of streets while the traffic signals permit cars to turn the corner and cross her path on a cross-walk is not to be tested merely in the light […]

Read More

DIONNE v. CITY OF MANCHESTER, 134 N.H. 225 (1991)

589 A.2d 1016 GERALD C. DIONNE AND GERALDINE T. DIONNE v. CITY OF MANCHESTER No. 90-243Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided May 3, 1991 1. Statutes — Construction and Application — Legislative Intent Supreme court is the final arbiter of the intent of the legislature as expressed in the words of a statute considered […]

Read More

DAVIS v. DYER, 56 N.H. 143 (1875)

DAVIS v. DYER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire FROM GRAFTON CIRCUIT COURT. Decided August 13, 1875. Statute of Limitations — Estoppel in pais. In 1864 the plaintiff and defendants referred all accounts, claims, and demands existing between them to arbitration by a written submission. The time for making an award was enlarged by agreements written […]

Read More

TILTON v. SOCIETY, 60 N.H. 377 (1880)

TILTON, Ex’r, v. THE AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December, 1880. A legacy being given to “the Bible Society,” and there being several Bible societies in existence when the will was made, the society intended by the testator may be identified by extraneous evidence. And evidence that a contribution […]

Read More

SURPRENANT v. LAPORTE, 122 N.H. 347 (1982)

444 A.2d 552 ARTHUR R. SURPRENANT v. SHARON M. (SURPRENANT) LAPORTE No. 81-109Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided April 7, 1982 1. Divorce — Custody and Support of Children — Change in Circumstances The standard to be used in a change of custody proceeding, set forth in Perreault v. Cook, 114 N.H. 440 (1974), […]

Read More

STATE v. LITTLE, 123 N.H. 433 (1983)

462 A.2d 117 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JOHN E. LITTLE No. 82-128Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided June 17, 1983 1. Homicide — Manslaughter — Provocation According to common-law rule which measures provocation under a reasonable-person standard to determine whether it is legally sufficient to reduce murder to manslaughter, provocation is adequate […]

Read More

STATE v. GOODALE, 144 N.H. 224 (1999)

740 A.2d 1026 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. WARREN GOODALE No. 97-589Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided October 20, 1999 1. Appeal and Error — Questions Considered on Appeal — Invited Errors Assault defendant at pretrial hearing did not argue that State’s witnesses were experts he was entitled as a matter of law […]

Read More

OPINION OF THE JUSTICES, 99 N.H. 540 (1955)

114 A.2d 879 OPINION OF THE JUSTICES. No. 4428.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Decided June 22, 1955. Legislation establishing within a particular county three commissioner districts with the provision that one county commissioner shall be chosen from each district by the inhabitants therein does not violate the constitutional provision relating to elections and elective franchise. […]

Read More

STATE v. STETSON, 135 N.H. 267 (1992)

603 A.2d 498 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JAMES T. STETSON No. 90-342Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided February 28, 1992 1. Evidence — Hearsay — Admissibility A decision on the admissibility of evidence under an exception to the hearsay rule is within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not […]

Read More

STATE v. SMITH, 123 N.H. 46 (1983)

455 A.2d 1041 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. CARL H. SMITH, II No. 82-028Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided January 24, 1983 1. Homicide — Manslaughter — Provocation It is generally recognized that provocation is adequate to reduce a homicide from murder to manslaughter only if it would cause a reasonable person to […]

Read More

SNELLING v. CLAREMONT, 155 N.H. 674 (2007)

STEVEN J. SNELLING v. CITY OF CLAREMONT a. No. 2006-315.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan.Argued: May 23, 2007. Opinion Issued: July 18, 2007. 1. Labor — Termination of Employment —Particular Cases In an action by plaintiff claiming violation of his rights under the First Amendment, defendants failed in their contention that the plaintiff spoke pursuant […]

Read More

HOGAN v. LEBEL, 95 N.H. 95 (1948)

58 A.2d 321 STEPHEN T. HOGAN v. FERNANDO G. LEBEL a. No. 3715.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided April 6, 1948. Since the interpretation of a deed presents only a question of law, the construction placed thereon by the Trial Court is reviewable in the Supreme Court. The conveyance of a right of way […]

Read More

CUNNINGHAM v. SPAULDING, 80 N.H. 335 (1922)

116 A. 757 BENJAMIN R. CUNNINGHAM, by his next friend, LILLIAN B. CUNNINGHAM, v. LEON C. SPAULDING a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided March 7, 1922. The failure of a master to inspect an appliance furnished for his servant’s use does not constitute actionable negligence, if the particular defect which caused the servant’s […]

Read More

BURROWS v. CITY OF KEENE, 121 N.H. 590 (1981)

432 A.2d 15 JOHN P. BURROWS a. v. CITY OF KEENE No. 80-419Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire Decided June 26, 1981 1. Pleadings — Amendments — As a Matter of Right Amendment of petition in order to raise constitutional issue of inverse condemnation, although it constitutes a different issue, was properly allowed because issue […]

Read More

COLE v. BANK, 59 N.H. 321 (1879)

COLE a. v. LACONIA SAVINGS-BANK. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided December, 1879. The right of homestead exemption does not exist in land on which no home is established, or which is no part of a homestead and is not connected with one by beneficial use. BILL IN EQUITY, for the assignment of a […]

Read More

STATE v. VILLENEUVE, 160 N.H. 342 (2010)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. WAYNE VILLENEUVE. No. 2009-011.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Lancaster District Court.Argued: February 17, 2010. Opinion Issued: June 3, 2010. 1. Appeal and Error — Preservation of Questions— Particular Cases Defendant expressly waived any objection to the admission of a letter. The trial court marked the letter as an exhibit […]

Read More

McALLISTER v. HAYES, 76 N.H. 108 (1911)

79 A. 726 McALLISTER, Trustee, v. HAYES, Ex’r, a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided April 4, 1911. The language of a will is to be given a literal interpretation, in the absence of evidence that the testator used it in a different sense. When the language of a will is plain and unambiguous, […]

Read More

WATSON v. RAILWAY, 68 N.H. 170 (1894)

36 A. 555 WATSON v. GRAND TRUNK RAILWAY CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided June, 1894. No action lies against a person causing a defect in a highway for an injury resulting therefrom, if the laying out of the highway has been quashed upon certiorari. CASE, for injuries arising from a defect caused […]

Read More

McMURPHY v. ADAMS, 67 N.H. 440 (1893)

39 A. 333 McMURPHY v. ADAMS, Adm’r. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June, 1893. A mortgagee cannot question the validity of a prior mortgage valid between the parties to it, and to which his mortgage is in express terms subject. BILL IN EQUITY, by the holder of a second mortgage to redeem from […]

Read More

SPERL v. SPERL, 119 N.H. 818 (1979)

408 A.2d 422 JEANNETTE SPERL v. CECIL PAUL SPERL No. 79-118Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided November 14, 1979 1. Appeal and Error — Discretion of Lower Court — Abuse Where a party waived his right to trial by jury by his counsel’s inadvertent failure to request a jury trial in accordance with Superior […]

Read More

CAMPBELL v. MANCHESTER, 67 N.H. 148 (1891)

36 A. 877 CAMPBELL a. v. MANCHESTER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1891. When a diseased animal is killed, under Laws of 1889, c. 93, the court has no power to compel the city or town to pay the value of the animal before it became diseased. The appeal provided for in […]

Read More

STATE v. PSEUDAE, 154 N.H. 196 (2006)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JAE PSEUDAE. No. 2005-628.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued: July 21, 2006. Opinion Issued: September 27, 2006. 1. Search and Seizure — Warrant Requirement; Exceptions — Generally Under the State Constitution, warrantless entries are per se unreasonable and illegal unless they fall within one of the exceptions to the […]

Read More

BOEHNER v. STATE, 122 N.H. 79 (1982)

441 A.2d 1146 KENNETH D. BOEHNER a. v. THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE a. No. 81-067Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided February 12, 1982 1. Declaratory Judgments — Nature of Relief A petition for a declaratory judgment is particularly appropriate to determine the constitutionality of a statute when the parties desire and the public […]

Read More

BARKER v. MOSHER, 60 N.H. 73 (1880)

BARKER v. MOSHER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided June, 1880. Pools or bets on a horse trot are void, under Gen. Stats., c[.] 254, s. 12; and an action cannot be maintained to recover either the price of tickets bid off in a pool, or money voluntarily furnished by the pool-seller to make […]

Read More

THOMSON v. CASH, 119 N.H. 371 (1979)

402 A.2d 651 MELDRIM THOMSON, JR. v. KEVIN R. CASH AMOSKEAG PRESS, INC. No. 78-171Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided May 23, 1979 1. Libel and Slander — Defamatory Language — Nature In order to be actionable, language complained of in libel action must be defamatory in that it must tend to lower the […]

Read More

CUTLER v. DUNN, 68 N.H. 394 (1895)

44 A. 536 CUTLER, Assignee, v. DUNN Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided December, 1895. In an action to set aside a sale made within three months of insolvency proceedings, unless the debtor was in fact insolvent it cannot be held that his grantee had reasonable cause to believe him insolvent. Certain evidence considered […]

Read More

BUCKINGHAM v. R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., 142 N.H. 822 (1998)

713 A.2d 381 BRUCE BUCKINGHAM, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF ROXANNE RAMSEY-BUCKINGHAM v. R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO. a. No. 95-350Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided May 29, 1998 1. Pleading — Motion to Dismiss — Review In reviewing a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be […]

Read More

ABBOTT v. POTTER, 125 N.H. 257 (1984)

480 A.2d 118 ARTHUR R. ABBOTT v. WILLIAM POTTER, SUPERINTENDENT, MERRIMACK COUNTY HOUSE OF CORRECTION No. 83-090Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided July 26, 1984 1. Constitutional Law — Right to Effective Counsel — Fundamental Right The supreme court has held that the State Constitution is to be read to guarantee, as a fundamental […]

Read More

COCO v. JASKUNAS, 159 N.H. 515 (2009)

KEVIN COCO a. v. DORIS JASKUNAS. No. 2008-783.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Rockingham.Argued: September 10, 2009. Opinion Issued: December 16, 2009. 1. Covenants — Covenants of Title — Covenants of Warranty and Quiet Enjoyment A reasonable settlement does not foreclose a court’s evaluation of the lawfulness of the underlying claim. Furthermore, a grantee who voluntarily […]

Read More

BATCHELDER v. LIBBEY, 66 N.H. 175 (1889)

19 A. 570 BATCHELDER (Jesseman, Pl. in Int.) v. LIBBEY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December, 1889. The clerk of an auction sale has not authority, without the assent of the owner or auctioneer, to substitute in his record the name of a principal as purchaser in place of the agent who bids […]

Read More

BROWN v. MARDEN, 61 N.H. 15 (1881)

BROWN v. MARDEN a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1881. When selectmen are called upon to determine the amount of assistance furnished to a pauper within ninety days of an election, that he may refund the same in order to have his name inserted in the check-list, and they, acting in good […]

Read More

BAYER v. BAYER, 123 N.H. 780 (1983)

465 A.2d 900 DAVID M. BAYER a., EXECUTORS AND CO-TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES BAYER v. SAM BAYER a. No. 82-523Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan Decided August 31, 1983 1. Limitation of Actions — Statutes — Torts In three equity actions brought in 1980 by the executors and co-trustees of decedent’s estate against […]

Read More

OPINION OF THE JUSTICES, 109 N.H. 191 (1968)

246 A.2d 699 OPINION OF THE JUSTICES. No. 5857.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Request of Governor and Council.Submitted October 2, 1968. Answer returned October 16, 1968. 1. The Industrial Development Authority statute (RSA ch. 162-A) authorizing the Governor and Council to guarantee in the name of the State payment of a portion of first mortgage […]

Read More

LEONARD v. STANTON, 93 N.H. 113 (1944)

36 A.2d 271 THOMAS J. LEONARD, Ex’r v. DELIA STANTON, Ap’t. No. 3459.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided February 1, 1944. A scrivener’s misrepresentations in order to be material must have been such as to induce the testator to make some disposal of his property that he would not otherwise have made. Where a […]

Read More

SHUTE v. SARGENT, 67 N.H. 305 (1892)

36 A. 282 SHUTE, Adm’r, v. SARGENT a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided December, 1892. When a husband has forfeited his marital rights by misbehavior, the wife may acquire a separate domicile for all purposes. BILL OF INTERPLEADER, by the administrator with the will annexed of Sarah A. P. Sargent, against her husband […]

Read More

JONES v. WHITTEMORE, 70 N.H. 284 (1900)

47 A. 259 JONES v. WHITTEMORE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided June, 1900. A petition under the flowage act for the assessment of damages cannot be maintained by a landowner against one who claims no right of flowage under the act. PETITION, by a landowner, under sections 12 to 19, chapter 142, of […]

Read More

BRANDT DEVELOPMENT CO. v. CITY OF SOMERSWORTH, 2010-641 (N.H. 10-12-2011)

BRANDT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, LLC v. CITY OF SOMERSWORTH. No. 2010-641Supreme Court of New Hampshire StraffordArgued: June 9, 2011 Opinion Issued: October 12, 2011 Donahue Tucker Ciandella, PLLC, of Portsmouth (Christopher L. Boldt and Keriann Roman on the brief, and Mr. Boldt orally), for the petitioner. Mitchell Municipal Group, P.A., of Laconia (Walter […]

Read More

STATE v. BRUCE, 147 N.H. 37 (2001)

780 A.2d 1270 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. DAVID BRUCE No. 99-639Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided September 28, 2001 1. Appeal and Error — Preservation of Questions — ParticularCases In prosecution for criminal mischief, defendant preserved issue of due process bases on the loss of evidence by the police because, even though […]

Read More

COULOMBE v. GROSS, 84 N.H. 212 (1930)

148 A. 582 OVIDE J. COULOMBE, Adm’r, v. ANNA M. GROSS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided January 7, 1930. Any act intended in denial of ownership and in full relinquishment of personal property amounts to a loss of the party’s interest in it so as to bar him from further claim to it; […]

Read More

SMITH v. RAILROAD, 63 N.H. 25 (1884)

SMITH v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June, 1884. Railroads engaged in interstate commerce are not exempt by their federal constitutional rights from the operation of s. 8, c. 162, Gen. Laws, which makes the proprietors of every railroad liable as insurers for damage done by fire from a locomotive […]

Read More

IN RE MUCHMORE JAYCOX, 159 N.H. 470 (2009)

IN THE MATTER OF ADAM MUCHMORE AND AMY JAYCOX. No. 2009-312.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Lebanon Family Division.Argued: November 4, 2009. Opinion Issued: December 4, 2009. 1. Parent and Child — Custody — Parental Rights and Duties Pursuant to its plain meaning, the statute governing parenting plans requires parents to submit a parenting plan to […]

Read More

PATTERSON v. HALL, 62 N.H. 696 (1882)

PATTERSON, Guard., v. HALL. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1882. BILL IN EQUITY, to set aside a deed, and for an account of rents and profits of certain real estate, alleging that the deed was obtained by fraud. A referee found that the deed was not obtained by fraud. Judgment for the […]

Read More

STATE v. SHARON, 136 N.H. 764 (1993)

622 A.2d 840 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. LEROY SHARON No. 92-276Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided March 25, 1993 1. Evidence — Circumstantial Evidence — Criminal Cases Where State relies on circumstantial evidence to prove an essential component of its case, such evidence must exclude all rational conclusions except guilt. 2. Offenses […]

Read More

FRANKLIN v. CALLUM, INTERIM PROJECT DIRECTOR, 146 N.H. 779 (2001)

782 A.2d 884 PETER FRANKLIN v. DENISE CALLUM, INTERIM PROJECT DIRECTOR, NH/VT SOLID WASTE PROJECT No. 99-294Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan Decided September 20, 2001 1. Attorneys — Professional Conduct Rules — Generally Although the New Hampshire Rules of Professional Conduct do not create substantive rights in third parties, they may be considered to […]

Read More

WILLSON v. LEGRO, 75 N.H. 314 (1909)

74 A. 181 WILLSON a. v. LEGRO a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided October 5, 1909. Where a grantor of realty conveys all the land he intended to sell and all the grantee understood he purchased, the mere fact that the deed inadvertently describes a part of the land twice does not entitle […]

Read More

DUGAS v. TOWN OF CONWAY, 125 N.H. 175 (1984)

480 A.2d 71 JOSEPH F. DUGAS, TRUSTEE v. TOWN OF CONWAY No. 83-303Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll Decided July 3, 1984 1. Costs — Attorney Fees — Unconstitutional Taking In Burrows v. City of Keene, 121 N.H. 590 (1981), the supreme court held that the city’s zoning amendment amounted to an unconstitutional taking of […]

Read More

PERREAULT v. LYONS, 99 N.H. 169 (1954)

106 A.2d 380 FRED PERREAULT v. MARY LYONS a. No. 4327.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued June 2, 1954. Decided July 1, 1954. In an action for malicious prosecution an order setting aside a verdict for the plaintiff as against the weight of the evidence was not erroneous. However, where conflicting inferences could properly be […]

Read More

STATE v. SAULNIER, 132 N.H. 412 (1989)

566 A.2d 1135 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. PHILIP SAULNIER No. 87-283Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided December 8, 1989 1. Appeal and Error — Evidence — Offer of Proof An evidentiary ruling excluding evidence is not preserved for appeal unless the record discloses a contemporaneous offer of proof indicating what testimony the […]

Read More

VALLEY v. RAILROAD, 68 N.H. 546 (1896)

38 A. 383 VALLEY v. CONCORD MONTREAL RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1896. Evidence that a horse exhibited fear on approaching a pile of lumber by which it was alleged to have been frightened at an earlier hour on the same day, is competent as tending to show the cause of […]

Read More

WESTON v. SOCIETY, 79 N.H. 245 (1919)

110 A. 137 WILLIAM H. WESTON, Adm’r Ex’r, v. SECOND ORTHODOX CONGREGATIONAL SOCIETY, Ap’ee. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June 3, 1919. If a power of disposal is conferred by will upon a tenant for life the question whether he has exercised the power is one of fact. His exercise of a right […]

Read More

MAHONEY v. TOWN OF CANTERBURY, 150 N.H. 148 (2003)

834 A.2d 227 CATHERINE MAHONEY a. v. TOWN OF CANTERBURY a. No. 2002-638.Supreme Court of New Hampshire MerrimackArgued: September 10, 2003. Opinion Issued: October 14, 2003. 1. Highways — Generally — Laying Out, Altering, Reclassifying or Discontinuing Under the statute defining highways, to establish a highway by prescription, it must appear that the general public […]

Read More

HOLT v. BAKER, 58 N.H. 276 (1878)

HOLT v. BAKER a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided March, 1878. A mortgage, paid and discharged with money borrowed of a third party upon the promise of a first mortgage as security for the loan, the discharge Page 277 being recorded, and the lender having no actual notice of a recorded second mortgage, […]

Read More

STATE v. GOFF, 117 N.H. 830 (1977)

379 A.2d 206 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. ROBERT C. GOFF No. 7785Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rochester District Court Decided October 24, 1977 Appeal and Error — Record — Adequacy Where counsel for defendant appeared alone to argue his motion attacking legal validity of motor vehicle summonses and asserted that district court, in […]

Read More

STATE v. DEAN, 109 N.H. 245 (1968)

248 A.2d 707 STATE v. ROBERT L. DEAN. No. 5760.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued November 6, 1968. Decided December 31, 1968. 1. A municipal zoning ordinance establishing within the town but two districts (1) a general agricultural and residential district and (2) a recreational and camp zone was held not invalid, or void for […]

Read More

MURRAY v. BOSTON MAINE R. R., 107 N.H. 367 (1966)

224 A.2d 66 MADELEINE Y. MURRAY a. v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. No. 5454.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued June 7, 1966. Decided September 30, 1966. 1. Instructions to the jury are not required to be given in the exact phraseology requested, and are sufficient if, taking the charge as a whole, the law was correctly […]

Read More

PEVARE v. TOWNE, 57 N.H. 220 (1876)

PEVARE v. TOWNE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire FROM MERRIMACK CIRCUIT COURT. Decided August 10, 1876. Trespass — Title, whether disputed — Limitation of costs. In trespass qu. cl. the plaintiff included in his description of the locus land of the defendant. The defendant confessed damages to the amount of six dollars done to land […]

Read More

TURCOTTE v. INSURANCE CO., 87 N.H. 440 (1935)

182 A. 9 FRANK TURCOTTE v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December 3, 1935. A life policy provided for benefits “if the insured shall become totally and permanently disabled . . . to such an extent that he is rendered wholly, continuously and permanently unable to . . […]

Read More

STATE v. HANLEY, 116 N.H. 235 (1976)

356 A.2d 687 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JOHN HANLEY No. 7263Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided April 30, 1976 1. The State had the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt the essential elements of the attempted burglary, that is, a substantial step by the defendant towards an unauthorized breaking and entering of […]

Read More

PRESCOTT v. ROBINSON, 74 N.H. 460 (1908)

69 A. 522 PRESCOTT v. ROBINSON. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided March 3, 1908. A woman who is injured during pregnancy by a highway collision caused by another’s negligence is entitled to damages for mental distress due to her fear or apprehension before the birth of the child that it would be deformed […]

Read More

PETITION OF DEAN, 142 N.H. 889 (1998)

711 A.2d 547 PETITION OF THOMAS DEAN No. 97-547Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original Decided June 16, 1998 1. Attorneys — Privileged Communications — Waiver of Privilege The attorney-client privilege is not absolute. Implied waiver occurs when the asserting party has put the otherwise privileged communications “at issue” in the present dispute. 2. Attorneys — […]

Read More

CHADBOURNE v. GILMAN, 64 N.H. 353 (1887)

10 A. 701 CHADBOURNE a. v. GILMAN a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided June, 1887. A mortgage of land made by a husband directly to his wife to secure a valid debt due from him to her will be sustained in equity. BILL IN EQUITY, to set aside a mortgage of certain land […]

Read More

BANK v. HERRICK, 62 N.H. 174 (1882)

KEENE FIVE CENTS SAVINGS BANK v. HERRICK a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided June, 1882. The payee of a promissory note is entitled to have a mortgage given by the maker to his surety assigned to him after their insolvency, although the condition of the mortgage is for the indemnity of the surety […]

Read More

STATE v. GIBNEY, 133 N.H. 890 (1991)

587 A.2d 607 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. VINCENT GIBNEY No. 90-015Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided March 8, 1991 1. Evidence — Hearsay — Non-Hearsay Prior to 1985 adoption of the New Hampshire Rules of Evidence, test employed in New Hampshire was that out-of-court statements by co-conspirators were admissible as non-hearsay when […]

Read More

INSURANCE CO. v. McKELLAR, 68 N.H. 326 (1895)

44 A. 516 NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. McKELLAR a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1895. The surrender of a bond upon which A was liable is a sufficient consideration for a promissory note signed by A as principal and by B and C as sureties. A promissory note executed in […]

Read More

STATE v. SANTOS, 107 N.H. 490 (1967)

225 A.2d 617 STATE v. STEPHEN A. SANTOS. No. 5561.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued December 7, 1966. Decided January 13, 1967. 1. On an indictment charging that the defendant was feloniously present, aiding and abetting another to commit a robbery, evidence that the defendant was present during commission of the crime by another together […]

Read More

WHITE v. POOLE, 74 N.H. 71 (1906)

65 A. 255 WHITE a., Ex’rs, v. POOLE a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided November 7, 1906. An oral agreement to convey real estate is sufficiently definite to sustain decree for specific performance when the identity of the land is made reasonably certain by the contract itself and the acts of the parties […]

Read More

FERRY v. FERRY, 94 N.H. 395 (1947)

54 A.2d 151 MARGUERITE FERRY v. MARION E. FERRY. No. 3670.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided July 2, 1947. An action to recover damages for unlawful commitment to a hospital for the insane is an action of trespass to the person and as such must be brought within two years after the cause of […]

Read More

AUCLAIR TRANSP., INC. v. ROSS EXPRESS, INC., 117 N.H. 630 (1977)

376 A.2d 146 AUCLAIR TRANSPORTATION, INC. a. v. ROSS EXPRESS, INC. No. 7755Supreme Court of New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Decided July 25, 1977 1. Public Utilities — Regulatory Agencies — Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity Application filed with state public utilities commission for certificate of public convenience and necessity to operate as common […]

Read More

SAVINGS BANK v. ROLLINS, 63 N.H. 66 (1884)

LACONIA SAVINGS BANK v. ROLLINS Wife. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided June, 1884. The sale on execution of an equity of redemption of premises in which a homestead right exists, made after a homestead has been demanded, and before the same has been set off and assigned according to the requirements of the […]

Read More

GELINAS v. STERLING INDUS. CORP., 139 N.H. 14 (1994)

648 A.2d 465 DARLENE GELINAS AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT N. GELINAS v. STERLING INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION a. No. 92-314Supreme Court of New Hampshire U.S. District Court Decided September 21, 1994 1. Compromise and Settlement — Generally — Settlement The United States District Court has jurisdiction to approve conditional structured settlement of wrongful death […]

Read More

APPEAL OF NORTHEAST REHAB. HOSP., 149 N.H. 83 (2003)

816 A.2d 970 APPEAL OF NORTHEAST REHABILITATION HOSPITAL (New Hampshire Department of Labor) No. 2001-713Supreme Court of New Hampshire Department Of LaborArgued November 6, 2002 Opinion Issued January 24, 2003 1. Labor — Regulation — Whistleblowers’ Act The plain meaning of the term “employee” as used in the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act encompasses only persons currently […]

Read More

ROWELL v. CHASE, 61 N.H. 135 (1881)

ROWELL v. CHASE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided December, 1881. An affirmation of actual knowledge of the existence of a fact which does not exist with intent to deceive is a fraudulent representation, for which an action will lie in behalf of one who relies thereon and is injured. Where neither the evidence […]

Read More

CRIPPEN v. ROGERS, 67 N.H. 207 (1892)

30 A. 346 CRIPPEN v. ROGERS a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1892. The law of this state does not unnecessarily allow its process to be used by a creditor residing in another state to avoid the just operation of the insolvency law of that state. When a Massachusetts creditor, A, has […]

Read More

STATE v. DANSEREAU, 157 N.H. 596 (2008)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. MICHAEL DANSEREAU. No. 2007-552.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Hillsborough-northem judicial district.Argued: June 26, 2008. Opinion Issued: August 15, 2008. 1. Criminal Law — Judgment and Sentence —Enhanced Sentencing On its face, the phrase “convicted . . . on sentences in excess of one year” in the statute governing extended […]

Read More

GRAVELINE v. COMPANY, 81 N.H. 279 (1924)

124 A. 552 FRANK X. GRAVELINE v. D. F. SULLIVAN AUTO CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided April 1, 1924. One of two or more joint wrongdoers who have been compelled to pay damages for their joint wrong cannot recover of another joint wrongdoer in pari delicto. Where upon a bill in equity […]

Read More

CRAGIN v. WOOLLETT, 104 N.H. 202 (1962)

182 A.2d 457 JOHN H. CRAGIN a. v. C. GEORGE WOOLLETT a. No. 5034.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued May 1, 1962. Decided June 29, 1962. 1. In the construction of the deeds to the parties from their common predecessor in title and the surrounding circumstances it was held that the grant of a right […]

Read More

APPEAL OF CITY OF CONCORD, 161 N.H. 344 (2010)

13 A.3d 186 APPEAL OF CITY OF CONCORD. (New Hampshire Board of Tax and Land Appeals) No. 2009-491.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Board of Tax and Land AppealsArgued: June 10, 2010. Opinion Issued: January 13, 2011. 1. Taxation — Exemptions From Taxation — Charitable Organizations An organization seeking a charitable tax exemption must satisfy four […]

Read More

HEBBARD v. BERLIN, 66 N.H. 623 (1889)

29 A. 493 HEBBARD v. BERLIN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided December, 1889. DOE, C. J. The case falls within the general principle of Knowlton v. Pittsfield, 62 N.H. 535. Case discharged. BINGHAM, J., did not sit: the others concurred. Twitchell Goss, for the plaintiff. R. N. Chamberlin and Drew Jordan, for the […]

Read More

STATE v. AMYOT, 119 N.H. 671 (1979)

407 A.2d 812 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. GEORGE F. AMYOT DONALD R. BLAIS JEAN C. CHALIFOUX PHILIP F. IRISH No. 78-286Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided August 20, 1979 1. Constitutional Law — Equal Protection — Classifications State guarantee of equal protection of the laws mandates that there be a rational relationship […]

Read More

SALEM COALITION FOR CAUTION v. TOWN OF SALEM, 121 N.H. 694 (1981)

433 A.2d 1297 SALEM COALITION FOR CAUTION, INC. a. v. THE TOWN OF SALEM a. No. 81-215Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided August 5, 1981 1. Declaratory Judgments — Purpose The remedy of declaratory judgment is intended to grant relief from uncertainty concerning the status or legal rights existing between adverse parties. 2. Declaratory […]

Read More

REMICK v. MERRILL, 80 N.H. 225 (1921)

116 A. 344 CHARLES G. REMICK, Trustee, v. JOSHUA B. MERRILL, 2d., a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided December 6, 1921. Former decisions upon the construction of wills are not to be given the force of binding authorities in a given case, unless the language of the will and the circumstances are so […]

Read More

TROTTIER v. CITY OF LEBANON, 117 N.H. 148 (1977)

370 A.2d 275 ROBERT L. TROTTIER v. CITY OF LEBANON AND LEBANON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT No. 7539Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided February 28, 1977 1. Zoning — Construction of Ordinances — Intent The construction of the terms of a zoning ordinance is a question of law, and the proper inquiry is the […]

Read More

APPEAL OF OMNI COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 122 N.H. 860 (1982)

451 A.2d 1289 APPEAL OF OMNI COMMUNICATIONS, INC. d/b/a PAGE CALL (New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission) No. 81-431Supreme Court of New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Decided October 12, 1982 1. Public Utilities — Regulatory Agencies — Purposes The legislative intent in establishing the state board of railroad commissioners, the public service commission, and ultimately the […]

Read More

STATE v. KRUEGER, 146 N.H. 541 (2001)

776 A.2d 720 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. KYLE KRUEGER No. 99-446Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-southern judicial district Decided June 22, 2001 1. Criminal Law — Double Jeopardy — Identity of Offenses Separate indictments of defendant for aggravated felonious sexual assault could be sustained where each image of defendants’s actions depicted on videotape […]

Read More

BURKE v. ELLINWOOD, 72 N.H. 595 (1903)

55 A. 1132 BURKE v. ELLINWOOD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June 10, 1903. TROVER, by a deputy sheriff against the receiptor of the goods attached in Fairfield v. Day, ante, p. 160. The facts are stated in the report of that case. Upon a trial at the May term, 1902, of the […]

Read More

CAPLAN v. CAPLAN, 83 N.H. 318 (1928)

142 A. 121 DORA CAPLAN v. LENA CAPLAN a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided May 1, 1928. A husband is not liable for his wife’s torts, though committed in his presence and without his objection; she is now exclusively liable for her own torts (P. L., c. 288, s. 2) and marriage no […]

Read More

MANCHESTER v. DUGGAN, 75 N.H. 33 (1908)

70 A. 1075 MANCHESTER v. DUGGAN Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided October 6, 1908. A party who procures an instruction which expressly excludes the consideration of incompetent evidence thereby waives his exception to its admission. A defendant in a writ of entry who relies upon his adverse possession of the premises is not […]

Read More

OPINION OF THE JUSTICES, 111 N.H. 206 (1971)

278 A.2d 348 OPINION OF THE JUSTICES. No. 6264.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Request of House of Representatives. Decided June 11, 1971. 1. Because of the requirements of uniformity and proportionality contained in part II, article 5 of the State Constitution, a constitutional amendment is a prerequisite to the enactment of a constitutional statute providing […]

Read More

GOSLIN v. TOWN OF FARMINGTON, 132 N.H. 48 (1989)

561 A.2d 507 RANDALL GOSLIN AND DONNA GOSLIN v. TOWN OF FARMINGTON No. 88-333Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided July 27, 1989 1. Zoning — Variances — Requisites To obtain a variance, plaintiffs have to demonstrate to the zoning board of adjustment that: (1) denying the variance would impose on them an unnecessary hardship; […]

Read More

APPEAL OF SULLIVAN COUNTY NURSING HOME, 133 N.H. 389 (1990)

578 A.2d 325 APPEAL OF SULLIVAN COUNTY NURSING HOME (New Hampshire Public Employee Labor Relations Board) No. 89-132Supreme Court of New Hampshire Public Employee Labor Relations Board Decided July 18, 1990 1. Public Employees — Public Employee Labor Relations Board — Abuse of Discretion While public employee labor relations board (PELRB) generally has discretion to […]

Read More

FLANDERS v. GREELY, 64 N.H. 357 (1887)

10 A. 686 FLANDERS v. GREELY a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1887. A vested remainder may be conveyed in mortgage. BILL IN EQUITY, to foreclose a mortgage given by Simon Greely, one of the defendants, to the plaintiff, April 3, 1867, to secure a note for $59.55, dated January 1, 1861. […]

Read More

BARR v. STEVENS, 79 N.H. 192 (1919)

106 A. 483 ALBERT T. BARR v. CHARLES W. STEVENS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided April 1, 1919. Under Laws 1897, c. 78, s. 18 and Laws 1915, c. 119, a ballot containing a cross in a party circle above the names of the three candidates for county commissioner printed thereunder, A, B […]

Read More

BRIDGHAM v. KEENE, 112 N.H. 84 (1972)

289 A.2d 392 WILLIAM T. BRIDGHAM a. v. CITY OF KEENE a. No. 6095.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided March 31, 1972. 1. RSA ch. 49-A does not require that a proposed city charter be published in a medium of general circulation. 2. A charter commission report and proposed charter recommendations filed with a […]

Read More

MURPHY v. McQUADE REALTY, INC., 122 N.H. 314 (1982)

444 A.2d 530 THOMAS J. MURPHY, JR., a. v. McQUADE REALTY, INC. No. 81-255Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided April 2, 1982 1. Injunction — Standards for Granting — Generally The issuance of injunctions, either temporary or permanent, has long been considered an extraordinary remedy. 2. Injunction — Standards for Granting — Immediate Threat […]

Read More

INTERSTATE BRIDGE c. v. HAM, 91 N.H. 179 (1940)

16 A.2d 362 MAINE-NEW HAMPSHIRE INTERSTATE BRIDGE AUTHORITY v. RICHARD H. HAM. No. 3178.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided November 6, 1940. A legislative grant of power to condemn for a public use may be exercised only within the clear definition of the grant. A bridge corporation or authority empowered to acquire by condemnation […]

Read More

LACHAPELLE v. TOWN OF GOFFSTOWN, 134 N.H. 478 (1991)

593 A.2d 1152 JACQUELINE LACHAPELLE v. TOWN OF GOFFSTOWN No. 90-218Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided July 24, 1991 1. Judgments — Default — Discretion of Trial Court Decision to strike default is within trial court’s discretion and will not be disturbed unless trial court clearly abused its discretion or erred as a matter […]

Read More

COOS LUMBER CO. v. BUILDERS SUPPLY CO., 104 N.H. 404 (1963)

188 A.2d 330 COOS LUMBER COMPANY v. BUILDERS LUMBER AND SUPPLY CO. No. 5096.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos.Argued January 2, 1963. Decided January 31, 1963. 1. A contract for the sale of logs to be severed and removed from the realty by the seller was a contract for the sale of goods, and in […]

Read More

OPINION OF THE JUSTICES, 122 N.H. 199 (1982)

442 A.2d 594 OPINION OF THE JUSTICES No. 82-041Supreme Court of New Hampshire Request of the Senate Decided March 8, 1982 1. Mental Health — Commitment — Nature The loss of liberty and stigmatization present in the involuntary civil commitment setting are fully comparable to the deprivation attending a criminal conviction, and the deprivation of […]

Read More

Y.M.C.A. v. KEENE, 70 N.H. 223 (1899)

46 A. 186 THE YOUNG MEN’S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION v. KEENE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided December, 1899. The rented real estate of a corporation formed solely for benevolent and charitable purposes is not exempted from taxation as property “used for the purposes of the association.” BILL IN EQUITY, for an abatement of taxes. […]

Read More