THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. MOHAMED DAOUD. No. 2008-206.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Hillsborough-northern judicial district.Argued: March 12, 2009. Opinion Issued: June 3, 2009. 1. Search and Seizure — Generally — Definitions The New Hampshire Constitution provides protection against unreasonable seizures. An inquiry into the reasonableness of a seizure is only necessary, when an […]
Category: New Hampshire Court Opinions
DIMOCK v. LUSSIER, 86 N.H. 54 (1932)
163 A. 500 ARTHUR V. DIMOCK v. PAUL LUSSIER. MASSACHUSETTS ANTI-SALOON LEAGUE v. SAME. BERNADETTE DEMERS v. SAME. BERNADETTE DEMERS v. ARTHUR V. DIMOCK. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided November 1, 1932. In an action by the owner of a motor vehicle for injury to his car the owner is chargeable with the […]
MOORE v. CARPENTER, 63 N.H. 65 (1884)
MOORE v. CARPENTER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided June, 1884. The remedy of a defendant who has been defaulted without notice is by a petition for a new trial or by motion, and not on a bill in equity. BILL IN EQUITY, to restrain the further prosecution of two suits at law against […]
HAAKENSEN v. BURGESS SULPHITE FIBRE CO., 77 N.H. 588 (1913)
87 A. 250 JULIUS HAAKENSEN v. BURGESS SULPHITE FIBRE CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided May 6, 1913. CASE, for personal injuries. Trial by jury and verdict for the plaintiff. Transferred from the September term, 1912, of the superior court by Chamberlin, J., on the defendants’ exception to the denial of a motion […]
BERLINER v. CLUKAY, 150 N.H. 80 (2003)
834 A.2d 297 WILLIAM BERLINER v. CRAIG CLUKAY d/b/a TREELINE TIMBER. No. 2002-481.Supreme Court of New Hampshire GraftonArgued: May 7, 2003. Opinion Issued: September 30, 2003. 1. Appeal and Error — Preservation of Questions — Failure to Make Specific Objections A chambers discussion directed at persuading the court to craft or utilize a proposed instruction, […]
CAMPTON v. PLYMOUTH, 64 N.H. 304 (1886)
8 A. 824 CAMPTON v. PLYMOUTH AND HOLDERNESS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December, 1886. Towns which have been required to contribute to the construction of highways and bridges in another town, under c. 55, s. 1, of the Compiled Statutes, may be required to contribute towards repairing the same highways and rebuilding […]
OPINION OF THE JUSTICES, 112 N.H. 42 (1972)
288 A.2d 697 OPINION OF THE JUSTICES. No. 6388.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Request of House of Representatives. Decided March 3, 1972. 1. Findings that industrial assistance programs akin to the State’s would serve a public purpose and not be primarily for the benefit of private persons or uses and would be within the policy […]
STRAFFORD v. INSURANCE CO., 89 N.H. 297 (1938)
197 A. 819 STRAFFORD v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS’ INSURANCE COMPANY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided March 1, 1938. The surety on the bond of a tax collector, appointed for a specified year, is liable for his peculations of money collected under the warrant for that year although he pays over that money to cover […]
STATE v. GORHAM, 120 N.H. 162 (1980)
412 A.2d 1017 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. BILLY C. GORHAM No. 79-213Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided March 5, 1980 1. Homicide — Defenses Self-Defense When a person unreasonably, though honestly, believes himself in mortal danger, he loses the defense of self-defense. 2. Jury — Duties — Instructions Self-defense instruction to jury […]
STATE v. HOLLIS, 59 N.H. 390 (1879)
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. HOLLIS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1879. Actions to recover pay for the board of prisoners at the reform school should be brought in the name of “The Reform School.” It is no defence to an action against a town for the board of a prisoner […]
THOMAS v. FINGER, 141 N.H. 134 (1996)
679 A.2d 567 ROBERT J. THOMAS v. GEORGE R. FINGER a. No. 95-155Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided June 11, 1996 1. Attachment and Garnishment — Attachment Proceedings — Property Subject to Attachment In case involving petition for ex parte attachments to properties to protect plaintiff’s statutory lien for labor and materials, although plaintiff […]
REID v. SPADONE MACH. CO., 119 N.H. 457 (1979)
404 A.2d 1094 BRENT L. REID v. SPADONE MACHINE COMPANY No. 78-218Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided June 20, 1979 1. Appeal and Error — Scope of Review — Evidence Supreme Court will not upset denials of motions for nonsuit, dismissal, directed verdict, or judgment notwithstanding the verdict where there is sufficient evidence in […]
OPINION OF THE JUSTICES, 123 N.H. 510 (1983)
463 A.2d 891 OPINION OF THE JUSTICES No. 83-277Supreme Court of New Hampshire Request of the Senate Decided July 14, 1983 1. Courts — Supreme Court — Advisory Opinions The authority vested in the justices of the supreme court to issue advisory opinions to either branch of the legislature extends only to proposed legislation. N.H. […]
MACLAY v. FULLER, 96 N.H. 326 (1950)
76 A.2d 247 DAVID S. MACLAY a. v. ENOCH D. FULLER, Secretary of State. No. 3996.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original. Decided October 30, 1950. Where the plaintiff had no clear right to have his name printed upon the official ballots, as Democratic nominee for Representative to the General Court, for use at a biennial […]
STATE v. MILLER, 159 N.H. 125 (2009)
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. SEAN MILLER No. 2008-323.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Rockingham.Argued: February 19, 2009. Opinion Issued: July 31, 2009. 1. Criminal Law — Confessions — Voluntariness In determining whether a confession following an illegal arrest is voluntary, and, thus, admissible under the New Hampshire Constitution, the court balances the following four […]
BLANCHARD v. RAILROAD, 86 N.H. 263 (1933)
167 A. 158 EDWARD J. BLANCHARD v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD, a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided June 6, 1933. Under P. L., c. 239, ss. 19, 22 the right to seek the suspension of an order of the public service commission is given only as an incident to proceedings for appeal. One whose […]
LUND COMPANY v. ROLFE, 93 N.H. 280 (1945)
41 A.2d 226 C. A. LUND COMPANY v. RICHARD S. ROLFE. No. 3504.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided February 6, 1945. The merit experience rating earned by a corporation under the provisions of the Unemployment Compensation Act (R.L., c. 218) does not inure to the benefit of a successor partnership, since the statute contains […]
HUEY v. COMPANY, 81 N.H. 103 (1923)
122 A. 334 WILLIAM Q. HUEY v. WEST OSSIPEE MINE, INC. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided June 28, 1923. Upon a petition for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence the petitioner must produce the best evidence thereof reasonably obtainable; if the new witness is not called in person, the […]
BALDWIN v. INS. CO., 60 N.H. 422 (1880)
BALDWIN v. HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided December, 1880. An alienation by the insured, without notice, of one of several parcels of real estate covered by a fire policy containing a stipulation against alienation, avoids the policy as to property not alienated, unless the court can say as matter […]
STATE v. TINKHAM, 143 N.H. 73 (1998)
719 A.2d 580 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. FREDERICK L. TINKHAM, JR. No. 97-017Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll Decided October 5, 1998 1. Evidence — Particular Matters — Exclusionary Rule “Fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine requires exclusion from trial of evidence derivatively obtained through violation of Part I, Article 19 of New […]
STATE v. SHERBURNE, 58 N.H. 535 (1879)
STATE v. SHERBURNE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided March, 1879. Evidence, that on the defendant’s motion judgment was arrested on the first indictment because it was insufficient, will not maintain a plea of former conviction. INDICTMENT, for an assault upon an officer. Plea autrefois convict. Facts agreed. The defendant was indicted, at the […]
BELLOTTE v. ZAYRE CORP., 116 N.H. 52 (1976)
352 A.2d 723 JAMES HAROLD BELLOTTE a. v. ZAYRE CORPORATION No. 7356Supreme Court of New Hampshire United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Decided January 31, 1976 1. Sellers of products are not insurers and are not subject to absolute liability unless their products are unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer. Page […]
STATE v. DOE, 104 N.H. 172 (1962)
181 A.2d 645 STATE v. JANE DOE. No. 5042.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued May 1, 1962. Decided June 5, 1962. 1. A complaint under RSA 570:25 (supp) alleging facts which may constitute both the crime of being a disorderly person and with behavior which was wanton and lascivious was held insufficient because of the […]
DAIMLERCHRYSLER v. VICTORIA, 153 N.H. 664 (2006)
917 A.2d 209 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION v. DARREN VICTORIA. No. 2005-357.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued: February 22, 2006. Opinion Issued: June 14, 2006. 1. Sales — Remedies for Buyer — Recovery ofPrice Paid The provision describing the intent of the law governing new motor vehicle arbitration suggests that the “Lemon Law” is remedial in nature, […]
ATTORNEY-GENERAL v. FOGARTY, 73 N.H. 607 (1905)
63 A. 219 ATTORNEY-GENERAL (ex rel. PUTNAM) v. FOGARTY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided October 3, 1905. INFORMATION, in the nature of quo warranto, filed by the attorney-general and prosecuted by the relator. Facts agreed. Transferred from the January term, 1905, of the superior court by Chamberlin, J. Hamblett Spring and Charles W. […]
FOLSOM v. RAILROAD, 68 N.H. 454 (1896)
38 A. 209 FOLSOM, Adm’r, v. CONCORD MONTREAL RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June, 1896. In an action against a railroad for causing the death of a traveler at a highway crossing in the compact part of a city, evidence that there was no flagman stationed at the crossing, and that the […]
STATE v. SMART, 136 N.H. 639 (1993)
622 A.2d 1197 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. PAMELA SMART No. 91-239Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided February 26, 1993 1. Criminal Law — Right to Impartial Jury — Review Defendant’s argument on appeal under State and Federal Constitutions as to prejudice from pretrial publicity was addressed by reference to federal decisions, since […]
AMEY v. WINCHESTER, 68 N.H. 447 (1895)
39 A. 487 AMEY v. WINCHESTER. BUCKLEY v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided December, 1895. The responsibility of an innkeeper for the goods of his guest does not extend to one who is at the inn for some special purpose not connected with passage or travel. CASE, against an innkeeper, by each […]
BLANCHARD v. AMES, 60 N.H. 404 (1880)
BLANCHARD v. AMES. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December, 1880. In a lease of a water-power for six years, absolute for two years, with privilege to the lessor to sell the property after that time, giving to the lessee the first option of buying, the covenants are not broken by a conveyance of […]
OPINION OF THE JUSTICES, 84 N.H. 557 (1930)
149 A. 321 OPINION OF THE JUSTICES. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Decided January 7, 1930. The legislature may exempt from taxation standing trees of less than a fixed diameter; and if different species of trees are fairly distinguishable as to rapidity of growth, market size, etc., further differentiating exemptions may be made accordingly. A […]
SIMES v. ATWELL, 85 N.H. 537 (1932)
161 A. 381 THOMAS H. SIMES, Ex’r v. DANIEL S. ATWELL, Ap’t. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June 23, 1932. In the absence of a motion for a nonsuit or for a directed verdict, the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the action is not presented by a motion to […]
MARSTON v. SAVINGS BANK, 69 N.H. 669 (1899)
45 A. 1007 MARSTON v. STRAFFORD SAVINGS BANK a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided June, 1899. BILL IN EQUITY, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure recovered by the defendant bank against the plaintiff. Upon hearing, the bill was dismissed. Frank F. Fernald, for the plaintiff. Arthur G. Whittemore and John S. H. Frink, […]
LYMAN v. ELSHER, 59 N.H. 316 (1879)
LYMAN, Ap’t, v. ELSHER, Ap’ee. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided December, 1879. When a guardian’s account is settled by a decree in the probate court upon insufficient notice, and the settlement is satisfactory to a surety on the guardian’s bond, but the surety is entitled to a valid decree for his own protection, […]
STATE v. DAVIS, 108 N.H. 45 (1967)
226 A.2d 873 STATE v. THOMAS W. DAVIS. No. 5449.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Keene District Court.Argued November 1, 1966. Reargued February 7, 1967. Decided March 7, 1967. 1. A lawful arrest may be made for a misdemeanor without a warrant only if there is reason to believe that the offense was committed in the […]
STATE v. THIEL, 160 N.H. 462 (2010)
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. KIMBERLY THIEL. No. 2009-488.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Concord District Court.Argued: April 22, 2010. Opinion Issued: June 30, 2010. 1. Appeal and Error — Record orTranscript — Adequacy An appellate court first examines the threshold question whether an adequate record exists to resolve an issue. It is the burden […]
LEMM DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. TOWN OF BARTLETT, 133 N.H. 618 (1990)
580 A.2d 1082 LEMM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. TOWN OF BARTLETT No. 89-175Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll Decided October 17, 1990 1. Zoning — Subdivision Ordinances — Construction and Application Interpretation of subdivision regulations is a question of law; it is to be decided by appellate court, which is not bound by the interpretation of […]
STATE v. BEEDE, 156 N.H. 102 (2007)
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. WALTER BEEDE. No. 2006-011.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Belknap.Submitted: March 22, 2007. Opinion Issued: August 28, 2007. 1. Evidence — Hearsay — Non-Hearsay Out-of-court statements that are offered as evidence of legally operative verbal conduct are not hearsay. They are considered “verbal acts.” N.H. R. Ev. 801(c). 2. Evidence […]
STATE v. SETTLE, 127 N.H. 756 (1986)
512 A.2d 1083 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JOHN A. SETTLE, JR. No. 84-316Supreme Court of New Hampshire Concord District Court Decided April 9, 1986 1. Continuance — Discretion of Court Trial court has broad discretion in ruling on motions to continue, and its ruling will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion. […]
STANKIEWICZ v. MANCHESTER, 156 N.H. 587 (2007)
AMES M. STANKIEWICZ v. CITY OF MANCHESTER. No. 2006-911.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Hillsborough-northern judicial district.Argued: November 8, 2007. Opinion Issued: December 20, 2007. 1. Municipal Law — Construction of Ordinances — Generally When a city and any employees’ groups enter into contracts, those contracts must comply with the terms of the city’s code of […]
GEORGE v. COMMERCIAL CREDIT CORP., 105 N.H. 269 (1964)
197 A.2d 212 RAYMOND GEORGE, Adm’r v. COMMERCIAL CREDIT CORPORATION a. No. 5205.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original.Argued January 7, 1964. Decided January 31, 1964. 1. While the Supreme Court has concurrent original authority to grant a writ of certiorari to effectuate a transfer from the Superior Court and consideration of a question of law […]
DERRY BANK v. GRIFFIN, 68 N.H. 183 (1894)
34 A. 740 DERRY NATIONAL BANK v. GRIFFIN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided December, 1894. A tax sale of non-resident land cannot be sustained when the amount of taxes assessed thereon is not inserted in the collector’s list and advertisement as required by G. L., c. 59, ss. 1, 3. BILL IN EQUITY, […]
SLEEPER v. ABBOTT, 60 N.H. 162 (1880)
SLEEPER a. v. ABBOTT a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided June, 1880. Confidential communications between attorney and client are not to be revealed by the attorney; but the privilege is that of the client and not of the attorney, and may be waived. ASSUMPSIT, on a promissory note. The evidence tended to show […]
FOGG v. MOULTON, 59 N.H. 499 (1880)
FOGG a., Ap’ts, v. MOULTON, Ex’r. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June, 1880. The fact that a will, produced at a trial of the question of its validity, has a seal upon it, is evidence on the question whether the seal was there when the will was signed. When the law of a […]
QUINN v. TUTTLE, 104 N.H. 1 (1962)
177 A.2d 391 GEORGE E. QUINN v. GUY A. TUTTLE, Adm’r. No. 4941.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford.Argued October 3, 1961. Decided January 29, 1962. 1. A decedent’s bequest to his widow of the residue of his estate for the duration of her lifetime with the power to consume such portion of the principal and […]
CASTLES v. WELCH, 63 N.H. 369 (1885)
CASTLES v. WELCH. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1885. The course of proceeding in bastardy cases is so far criminal that the warrant may be served by an officer authorized to serve warrants in criminal cases; and the defendant’s recognizance for his appearance at court may be taken to the state. COMPLAINT […]
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY v. BROWN, 76 N.H. 571 (1911)
79 A. 690 ROCKINGHAM COUNTY v. BROWN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided April 4, 1911. WALKER, J. This is an agreed case which makes no provision for a final order or other disposition of the case, after the questions of law supposed to be involved are determined. It is not advisable for the […]
IN RE CITY SAV. BANK, 113 N.H. 378 (1973)
309 A.2d 31 In re CITY SAVINGS BANK OF BERLIN AND BERLIN CITY NATIONAL BANK No. 6605Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos Decided July 24, 1973 1. New Hampshire does not have a statute requiring that depositors in a mutual savings bank be given a cash option in the event of a merger. 2. A […]
JONES v. RAILROAD, 67 N.H. 234 (1892)
30 A. 614 JONES a. v. CONCORD MONTREAL RAILROAD a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1892. The right to take new stock in the increase of capital authorized by chapter 3, Laws 1891, belongs to the shareholders in all the classes constituting the stockholders of the Concord Montreal Railroad in proportion to […]
APPEAL OF FRANKLIN LODGE OF ELKS, 151 N.H. 565 (2004)
864 A.2d 325 APPEAL OF FRANKLIN LODGE OF ELKS # 1280 BPOE (New Hampshire Sweepstakes Commission). No. 2004-094.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sweepstakes Commission.Argued: October 13, 2004. Opinion Issued: December 28, 2004. 1. Gambling — Generally — Regulation and Control Where, in amending statutes governing the licensing and operation of legal gambling operations in New […]
MATHES v. BANK, 62 N.H. 491 (1883)
MATHES v. DOVER NATIONAL BANK. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided June, 1883. An officer’s return of a levy of an execution on a right to redeem mortgaged land may be amended to show the fact that the equity on which the levy was made included a creditor’s right to contest the validity of […]
NEW ENG. TEL. CO. v. STATE, 95 N.H. 515 (1949)
68 A.2d 114 NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE a. No. 3874.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Public Service Commission. Decided August 16, 1949. A motion addressed to the Supreme Court alleging that current utility rates are confiscatory and seeking injunctive relief against interference with the promulgation of new rates […]
BASSETT v. DODGE, 77 N.H. 602 (1915)
93 A. 967 WILLIAM BASSETT, JR., v. CLARENCE H. DODGE a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided April 6, 1915. CASE, for negligently burning the plaintiff’s buildings. Trial by jury and verdict for the plaintiff. The defendants’ motions for a nonsuit and a directed verdict were denied, and they excepted. Transferred from the May […]
CONFORTI v. CITY OF MANCHESTER, 141 N.H. 78 (1996)
677 A.2d 147 ANDREW CONFORTI a. v. CITY OF MANCHESTER No. 94-709Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-northern judicial district Decided May 29, 1996 1. Zoning and Planning — Ordinances — Generally Movie theaters and live entertainment are not permitted uses in a B-1 zone in the City of Manchester. 2. Zoning and Planning — Ordinances […]
UNIVERSITY OF N.H. v. APRIL, 115 N.H. 576 (1975)
347 A.2d 446 UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. WAYNE APRIL AND UNH GAY STUDENTS ORGANIZATION No. 6992Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided October 31, 1975 1. Where federal district court and State superior court had in personam jurisdiction over the parties and were free to try actions commenced in each independently of the other, […]
OLSEN v. RAILROAD, 82 N.H. 120 (1925)
130 A. 213 ADOLF OLSEN v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June 25, 1925. In the absence of other sufficient precaution or excusing circumstances, a pedestrian is guilty of contributory negligence in failing to look for an electric car the approach of which may reasonably be anticipated, before stepping upon […]
STATE v. DUKE, 100 N.H. 292 (1956)
123 A.2d 745 STATE v. HENRY C. DUKE. No. 4505.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued June 7, 1956. Decided July 6, 1956. Where a respondent voluntarily testifies in criminal proceedings the latitude allowed in cross-examination as to his past offenses, for the sole purpose of discrediting him, is within the sound discretion of the Trial […]
STATE v. GRIERSON, 96 N.H. 36 (1949)
69 A.2d 851 STATE v. FLORENCE LEAH W. GRIERSON. No. 3846.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided December 6, 1949. The testimony of a witness, deceased at the time of trial in the Superior Court, which had been given against the respondent at a preliminary hearing in the Municipal Court is admissible where the respondent’s […]
LOCKE v. BRICK CO., 73 N.H. 492 (1906)
63 A. 178 LOCKE a. v. NEW ENGLAND BRICK CO. a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided February 6, 1906. The rule that a mortgage of personal property is invalid as to subsequent attaching creditors when there is an understanding that until default the mortgagor shall retain possession and use or dispose of the […]
WALKER v. WALKER, 106 N.H. 282 (1965)
210 A.2d 468 ESSFA E. WALKER v. HOWARD C. WALKER. No. 5247.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll.Argued January 5, 1965. Decided May 24, 1965. 1. The test usually applied to determine the admissibility of opinion evidence is whether the witness’ knowledge of the matter in question will probably aid the triers of fact in search […]
HORNE v. ROCHESTER, 62 N.H. 347 (1882)
HORNE v. ROCHESTER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided December, 1882. The laying out of a highway by selectmen, upon petition and a hearing before them, is a judgment which cannot be attacked collaterally on account of a failure to order notice by posting a copy of the petition and order of notice, and […]
ALUKONIS v. KASHULINES, 97 N.H. 298 (1952)
86 A.2d 327 ANNIE ALUKONIS v. ARTHUR J. KASHULINES a. No. 4089.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided February 5, 1952. Certain evidence justified the finding that the plaintiff’s predecessors in title intended, in the transfer of certain property, to include an adjoining strip of land and such intent coupled with actual possession in excess […]
STATE v. ROBINSON, 78 N.H. 286 (1916)
99 A. 292 STATE (JOHN W. PLUMMER, STATE TREASURER) v. ALLAN H. ROBINSON a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided November 8, 1916. Fines for the violation of the automobile law (Laws 1911, c. 33, s. 27) are to be paid by the clerks of municipal courts to the state under the provisions of […]
STATE v. NICKERSON, 114 N.H. 47 (1974)
314 A.2d 648 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. CHARLES NICKERSON No. 6673Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided January 31, 1974 1. Judge was held enabled to determine the existence of probable cause to issue a search warrant from police officers’ affidavits relying on informants’ hearsay information and revealing some of the underlying circumstances from […]
STATE v. MAXFIELD, 121 N.H. 103 (1981)
427 A.2d 12 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. PETER A. MAXFIELD No. 80-102Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided March 6, 1981 1. Searches and Seizures — Warrantless Searches — Reasonableness Where police had lawfully arrested defendant on the underlying charge of driving while intoxicated, and subsequent to his submitting to breathalyzer test at […]
MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. v. LAMARRE, 83 N.H. 206 (1928)
140 A. 174 MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY v. GEORGE LAMARRE a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided January 3, 1928. A wife may maintain an action against her husband for negligence. A policy of insurance against liability for negligence in driving an automobile will not be canceled when there is no evidence of collusion on […]
SMITH v. SANDERS, 56 N.H. 339 (1876)
SMITH v. SANDERS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire FROM BELKNAP CIRCUIT COURT. Decided March 20, 1876. Writ of entry — Husband and wife — Pleading. Husband and wife may jointly disseize a person: therefore a writ in which husband and wife are joined as defendants, and in which a joint disseizin is alleged was held […]
HEATH v. CLEVELAND, 104 N.H. 451 (1963)
189 A.2d 488 L. ALINE HEATH, Ex’x v. REGINALD A. CLEVELAND, Adm’r. No. 5094.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued February 5, 1963. Decided March 29, 1963. 1. An action of tort for physical injuries to the person against the estate of a deceased person may not be sustained against objection by the administrator if begun […]
MAHAGAN v. MEAD, 63 N.H. 570 (1885)
3 A. 919 MAHAGAN v. MEAD a. WILLEY v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided December, 1885. If successive sales of portions of mortgaged land are made to different persons by the mortgagor, the part unsold is first liable to satisfy the mortgage debt, and after it the parcels sold in the inverse […]
BONARDI v. KAZMIRCHUK, 146 N.H. 640 (2001)
776 A.2d 1282 NICHOLAS BONARDI v. DONNA KAZMIRCHUK No. 99-678Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-northern judicial district Decided July 18, 2001 1. Easements — Creation — Prescriptive Easements To establish a prescriptive easement, defendant must prove by the balance of the probabilities that she used plaintiffs driveway for 20 years and that her use was […]
CONVERSE v. HOBBS, 64 N.H. 42 (1886)
5 A. 832 CONVERSE v. HOBBS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided June, 1886. On a bill in equity between partners for an accounting and for winding up the concern, a private cash-book kept by one of them may be admitted in evidence to show that he has accounted to the firm for money […]
PAGE v. D’AMOURS, 99 N.H. 441 (1955)
113 A.2d 544 HARRY A. PAGE, Trustee v. ERNEST R. D’AMOURS, Director, Register of Charitable Trusts. No. 4382.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire.Submitted March 2, 1955. Decided April 27, 1955. Laws 1947, c. 283, permitting the probate court to apportion trustee’s compensation and expenses between principal and income unless otherwise provided in the trust instrument […]
HARTNETT v. HARTNETT, 93 N.H. 406 (1945)
43 A.2d 153 ELIZABETH E. HARTNETT v. CORNELIUS J. HARTNETT. No. 3515.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June 28, 1945. The jurisdiction of the Superior Court over divorces and legal separations is entirely statutory. In a petition for legal separation, since R. L., c. 339 contains no provision for temporary allowances to be paid […]
STATE v. THOMAS WINWARD, 161 N.H. 533 (2011)
20 A.3d 338 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. THOMAS WINWARD. No. 2009-882.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Rockingham.Argued: January 20, 2011. Opinion Issued: February 25, 2011. 1. Indictment and Information — Amendment — Generally The requirement that a defendant be tried only for crimes for which he or she has been indicted is not violated […]
HOLTE v. RONDEAU, 105 N.H. 304 (1964)
199 A.2d 100 PAUL C. HOLTE a. v. GERARD RONDEAU a. No. 5198.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued February 4, 1964. Decided March 31, 1964. 1. A petition under the provisions of RSA 110-A:77 I (supp) prior to amendment (Laws 1961, 64:1) by a person injured in his person or property by any member of […]
WALLACE v. STEARNS, 96 N.H. 367 (1950)
77 A.2d 109 ELLA C. WALLACE v. LENA M. STEARNS a. No. 3971.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December 5, 1950. The dismissal of a petition for partition because no remedy was available to petitioner who held with others estates of different classes is no bar to a new petition, based upon the same […]
CITY OF MANCHESTER v. DOUCET, 133 N.H. 680 (1990)
582 A.2d 288 CITY OF MANCHESTER v. ROBERT DOUCET No. 89-324Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided November 9, 1990 1. Workers’ Compensation — Attorney Fees — Reasonable Fees Trial court’s determination of a reasonable attorney’s fee will not be disturbed unless it is lacking in evidentiary support or is tainted by error of law. […]
IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF LUONG, 157 N.H. 429 (2008)
IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF PHUONG PHI THI LUONG. No. 2007-294.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Hillsborough County Probate Court.Argued: April 10, 2008. Opinion Issued: July 2, 2008. 1. Guardianship — Duties and Liabilities ofGuardians — Particular Matters Nothing in the statute pertaining to estate planning by a guardian permits a probate court to use a referee […]
MARTEL v. M. M. MADES CO., INC., 121 N.H. 231 (1981)
427 A.2d 522 RICHARD MARTEL v. M. M. MADES CO., INC. a. No. 80-380Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original Decided March 16, 1981 1. Statutes — Construction and Application — Plain Meaning A statute that is clear and unambiguous is not subject to interpretation by supreme court. 2. Workmen’s Compensation — Computation of Awards — […]
HANAFIN v. McCARTHY, 95 N.H. 36 (1948)
57 A.2d 148 HANAFIN a. v. McCARTHY a. No. 3687.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided February 3, 1948. A nonresident alien may have an estate by inheritance and may take his respective interest in New Hampshire real property of a resident decedent only by virtue of a treaty provision between the United States and […]
WENTWORTH v. RAILROAD, 55 N.H. 540 (1875)
WENTWORTH v. PORTSMOUTH DOVER RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided August 12, 1875. Letting of land upon share — Trespass qu. cl. not maintainable by landlord during continuance of term. The usual contract for a letting of land upon shares in this state, establishes the relation of landlord and tenant between the owner […]
MOORE v. CITY OF ROCHESTER, 121 N.H. 100 (1981)
427 A.2d 10 RICHARD P. MOORE a. v. THE CITY OF ROCHESTER a. No. 80-085.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided March 6, 1981 1. Zoning — Variances — Purpose Purpose of a variance is to prevent a zoning ordinance from becoming oppressive or confiscatory. 2. Zoning — Variances — Use of Land for Particular […]
OPINION OF THE JUSTICES, 95 N.H. 552 (1949)
65 A.2d 45 OPINION OF THE JUSTICES. No. 3838.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Decided March 23, 1949. Graduated mileage rates prescribed by the General Court which are sufficiently related to the cost of travel or the amount which would be expended by any individual member in attendance in making a round trip from his residence […]
STONE v. STONE, 111 N.H. 167 (1971)
276 A.2d 924 DORIS I. STONE v. ROY E. STONE No. 6180.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford, Decided April 30, 1971. 1. The basis for a finding of contempt being a party’s wilful disobedience of an existing court order, a legally separated husband was properly found not to be in contempt for his failure to […]
SMITH v. TURNER, 91 N.H. 198 (1940)
17 A.2d 87 EDNA B. SMITH v. EDGAR TURNER. SAME v. GENEVIEVE TURNER. WILLIAM F. SMITH (GENERAL EXCHANGE INSURANCE CORPORATION, plaintiff in interest) v. EDGAR TURNER. SAME v. GENEVIEVE TURNER. No. 3206.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided December 3, 1940. Statutes of limitation generally relate only to the remedy without affecting the right; and […]
WELCH v. ADAMS, 63 N.H. 344 (1885)
1 A. 1 WELCH a., Ex’rs, v. ADAMS, Ap’t. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided June, 1885. It is not necessary to the legal execution of a will that it be signed or sealed in the presence of the subscribing witnesses, nor that the witnesses sign in the presence of each other, though such […]
MOORE’S CASE, 98 N.H. 324 (1953)
99 A.2d 913 MOORE’S CASE. No. 4266.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original.Heard and argued October 21, 22, 1953. Decided October 30, 1953. The conduct of an attorney consisting of a persistent disregard of agreements of counsel and orders of the court, followed by unwarranted charges against officers of the court was such as to require […]
THERESA S. v. SUP’T OF YDC, 126 N.H. 53 (1985)
489 A.2d 592 THERESA S. v. SUPERINTENDENT OF THE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER No. 84-582Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided February 8, 1985 1. Infants — Children in Need of Services — Placement of Children Statute authorizing punishment for contempt of court, of child in need of services who refuses to participate in dispositional plan […]
PETITION OF LaFOREST, 110 N.H. 508 (1970)
272 A.2d 598 PETITION OF DONALD W. LaFOREST No. 6112Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original Decided December 30, 1970 1. Denial of credit against a maximum sentence for time while at liberty on parole does not subject a prisoner to cruel and unusual punishment under the eighth amendment of the Federal Constitution. 2. The Parole […]
HORTON v. COMPANY, 86 N.H. 472 (1934)
171 A. 322 MARION C. HORTON, Adm’x v. EAGLE INDEMNITY INS. CO. a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided February 6, 1934. If, after the death of an agent of an insurance company, his administrator obtains authority to continue the business, the insurer’s right to collect unpaid premiums from policy-holders is governed by the […]
MANCHENTON v. AUTO LEASING CORP., 135 N.H. 298 (1992)
605 A.2d 208 JOHN MANCHENTON a. v. AUTO LEASING CORP. a. No. 90-220Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided March 9, 1992 1. Judgments — Summary Judgment — Generally Trial court is obligated to grant summary judgment when, after considering all the evidence presented in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, no genuine […]
CASSUBE v. MAYNARD, 112 N.H. 229 (1972)
293 A.2d 594 ROBERT F. CASSUBE a. v. WILLIAM MAYNARD a., AND OLLA, INC. No. 6346.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided June 30, 1972. 1. A taxpayer seeking an abatement has a constitutional right to be heard upon the assessment made against him, and he has the statutory right to a court appeal if […]
FLANDERS v. GEORGE, 55 N.H. 486 (1875)
FLANDERS v. GEORGE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided August 12, 1875. Will — License to sell land for payment of debts — Notice. Provisions of a will held to impose upon the executor, who was also residuary legatee and accepted the will, the burden of paying the debts of the deceased, without calling […]
REED v. CTY. OF HILLSBOROUGH, 148 N.H. 590 (2002)
813 A.2d 472 LOUISE REED v. COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH No. 2001-629Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-Northern Judicial DistrictArgued October 9, 2002 Opinion Issued December 2, 2002 1. Evidence—Expert Testimony—Generally Where scientific issues are beyond the capacity of people of common experience and knowledge to form a valid judgment by themselves, expert evidence is required to […]
MANNING v. RAILWAY, 80 N.H. 404 (1922)
118 A. 386 DANIEL P. MANNING, JR., v. MANCHESTER STREET RAILWAY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June 6, 1922. Whether one is making “a viatic use of” a highway is generally a question of fact; but if the use made is in no way incident to a traveler’s use of the highway and […]
STATE v. FLYNN, 151 N.H. 378 (2004)
855 A.2d 1254 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JOHN FLYNN. No. 2003-470.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued: July 15, 2004. Opinion Issued: September 1, 2004. 1. Offenses — Sexual Offenses — Evidence; Sufficiency Defendant’s conviction for sexual penetration by cunnilingus was supported by sufficient evidence where, although there was no direct testimony that defendant’s […]
PREMIER CAPITAL v. GALLAGHER, 144 N.H. 284 (1999)
740 A.2d 1047 PREMIER CAPITAL, INC. v. CHARLES A. GALLAGHER PREMIER CAPITAL, INC. v. CHARLES A. GALLAGHER a. Nos. 98-110, 98-111Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided November 2, 1999 1. Limitation of Actions — Accrual of Actions — Tolling of Limitations Period Limitations period for an action to recover on a demand note is […]
OPINION OF THE JUSTICES, 117 N.H. 837 (1977)
379 A.2d 796 OPINION OF THE JUSTICES No. 7932Supreme Court of New Hampshire Request of the Governor and Council Decided October 26, 1977 Executive Branch — Governor — Presentation of House Bill If Governor waives any defect in presentation to him of house bill, and if he files that written statement with secretary of state, […]
McGRATH v. TOWN OF CANAAN, 147 N.H. 623 (2002)
795 A.2d 828 DAVID McGRATH v. TOWN OF CANAAN No. 2001-308Supreme Court of New Hampshire GraftonSubmitted: February 22, 2002 Opinion Issued: April 18, 2002 1. Public Utilities — Rates and Charges — Particular Cases Town’s minimum water and sewer rates and an availability charge did not violate regulatory statutes on the basis that they were […]
BLAIS v. TOWN OF GOFFSTOWN, 119 N.H. 613 (1979)
406 A.2d 295 JOAN BLAIS v. TOWN OF GOFFSTOWN No. 79-046Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided August 17, 1979 1. Municipal Corporations — Sovereign Immunity — Waiver The legislature, by enacting RSA 412:3 (Supp. 1977) relating to a limited waiver of municipal immunity, did not intend to create substantive causes of action where none […]
STEVENS v. MESERVE, 73 N.H. 293 (1905)
61 A. 420 STEVENS, Ap’t, v. MESERVE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided June 6, 1905. The guardian of a minor heir has authority to agree to a division of the ancestor’s personal estate in kind, without first obtaining an order from the probate court, when he is satisfied that such a course will […]