IN RE AMDTS TO SUPREME SUPERIOR CRT RLS (N.H. 10-25-2004)

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO SUPREME AND SUPERIOR COURT RULES Supreme Court of New Hampshire October 25, 2004 ORDER This order adopts a number of minor technical amendments to court rules. Pursuant to Part II, Article 73-a of the New Hampshire Constitution and Supreme Court Rule 51, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire approves amendments to […]

Read More

IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF LANOUE, 147 N.H. 748 (2002)

802 A.2d 1179 IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF SHIRLEY LANOUE No. 2000-263Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough County Probate CourtArgued March 7, 2002 Opinion Issued June 7, 2002 1. Guardianship — Powers of Guardians — Control of Ward’sPerson Nothing in statute pertaining to guardianships requires the probate court to make specific findings of harm in determining […]

Read More

McELROY v. GAFFNEY, 129 N.H. 382 (1987)

529 A.2d 889 JOHN F. McELROY, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ACTION MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. v. LAWRENCE A. GAFFNEY a. No. 86-367 No. 86-368Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided June 3, 1987 1. Constitutional Law — Right to Jury Trial — State Constitution The New Hampshire Constitution affords the unqualified right to a trial […]

Read More

PETITION OF BETTY SPRAGUE, 132 N.H. 250 (1989)

564 A.2d 829 PETITION OF BETTY SPRAGUE PETITION OF DAVID C. WHITENACK, M.D. (New Hampshire Board of Registration in Medicine) No. 88-143Supreme Court of New Hampshire Board of Registration in Medicine Decided October 6, 1989 1. Physicians and Surgeons — Disciplinary Proceedings — Cross-Examination Although the opportunity for cross-examination is guaranteed to a complainant in […]

Read More

MOOAR v. MOOAR, 69 N.H. 643 (1899)

46 A. 1052 MOOAR, Adm’x, v. MOOAR. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1899. An offer to give it note for a certain sum in settlement of an existing debt is not evidence of a new promise to pay more than the amount of the note. The finding of the court at the […]

Read More

RICE’S PETITION, 58 N.H. 200 (1877)

RICE’S PETITION. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided August, 1877. When one has been prevented from appealing from a decree of the probate court, through mistake, accident, or misfortune, his petition for leave to appeal will be denied, if it appears that the decree of the probate court must be affirmed. PETITION, for leave […]

Read More

BROWN v. TEEL, 108 N.H. 365 (1967)

236 A.2d 699 ELLIOT R. BROWN v. ALLEN M. TEEL a. No. 5620.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued September 6, 1967. Decided December 29, 1967. 1. The findings of a master on conflicting evidence but supported by the record are binding on appeal. 2. The statutory provision (RSA 578:3) that no person shall do any […]

Read More

STATE v. URBAN, 98 N.H. 346 (1953)

100 A.2d 897 STATE v. CYRUS URBAN. No. 4235.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Nashua Municipal Court.Argued November 3, 1953. Decided November 30, 1953. A police officer in prosecuting a misdemeanor in a municipal court is acting solely in behalf of the State and not “as attorney for any party in a suit” contrary to the […]

Read More

BOUCOUVALAS v. INSURANCE CO., 90 N.H. 175 (1939)

5 A.2d 721 APOSTOLOS BOUCOUVALAS v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE. Co. No. 3010.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided April 4, 1939. At common law the knowledge of the agent is not imputable to the principal when the former is committing a fraudulent act on his own account, outside the scope of his employment, […]

Read More

STATE v. MICHELSON, 160 N.H. 270 (2010)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. GLENN MICHELSON. No. 2009-386.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Sullivan.Argued: March 24, 2010. Opinion Issued: May 7, 2010. 1. Search and Seizure — Warrant Requirement;Exceptions — Stop and Frisk Once an officer is justified in making an investigatory stop, the officer may also conduct a protective frisk if he or […]

Read More

SCOTT v. GRINNELL, 102 N.H. 490 (1960)

161 A.2d 179 GRACE EDITH SCOTT v. GEORGE H. GRINNELL, Ex’r. No. 4817.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued April 5, 1960. Decided May 31, 1960. 1. Where the plaintiff alleged in an action of assumpsit that the decedent agreed to provide funds for her lifetime support if she would resign her position and care for […]

Read More

STATE v. ANDERSON, 141 N.H. 168 (1996)

679 A.2d 583 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. RONALD S. ANDERSON No. 95-051Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided July 2, 1996 Evidence — Generally — Harmless Error Where defendant was pulled over for driving erratically and admitted to having been drinking and where officers testified at trial that defendant had slurred speech, lack […]

Read More

STATE v. HEBERT, 122 N.H. 1089 (1982)

453 A.2d 1310 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. RUSSELL E. HEBERT No. 82-099Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided December 28, 1982 1. Appeal and Error — Standard of Review — Particular Cases The standard of review of trial court’s order issued pursuant to the statute governing seizure, custody and disposition of articles was […]

Read More

DASKALOPOULOS v. MULVANITY, 79 N.H. 533 (1920)

111 A. 832 GEORGE DASKALOPOULOS v. JOHN J. MULVANITY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December 7, 1920. ASSUMPSIT, for money had and received. The plaintiff sought to recover the sum of $517, paid on account of the purchase price of an automobile which he bought of the defendant and which the defendant afterwards […]

Read More

OPINION OF THE JUSTICES, 106 N.H. 180 (1965)

207 A.2d 574 OPINION OF THE JUSTICES. No. 5345.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Request of House of Representatives.Submitted March 2, 1965. Answer returned March 10, 1965. 1. Under proposed legislation authorizing the State or any political subdivision to accept a gift of an industrial facility and to lease the same to any public or private […]

Read More

STATE v. CANNEY, 112 N.H. 301 (1972)

294 A.2d 382 STATE v. VINCENT P. CANNEY. STATE v. VIRGIL E. HOWARD. No. 6233.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided August 15, 1972. 1. Circumstantial evidence may be sufficient to warrant a jury finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. 2. No greater degree of certainty than proof beyond a reasonable doubt is required […]

Read More

WHITHAM v. GELLIS, 91 N.H. 226 (1940)

16 A.2d 703 RUTH C. WHITHAM, Adm’x v. MORRIS A. GELLIS. No. 3202.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan. Decided December 3, 1940. An accident happening to an employee while engaged in the employment, though occurring during a brief interval when the employee’s conduct was of a personal nature reasonably undertaken and not expressly forbidden, is […]

Read More

VIDAL v. ERROL, 86 N.H. 585 (1934)

172 A. 437 WILFRED VIDAL, Adm’r v. ERROL. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided May 1, 1934. There is in substance a trial, if without objection the facts are ascertained from the statements of counsel, whether or not such statements are concededly correct. Where there is a general finding, and certain special findings are […]

Read More

BAGONZI v. MILLER, 119 N.H. 369 (1979)

401 A.2d 1086 JANET BAGONZI v. GARY MILLER, DIRECTOR DIVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH No. 79-098Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original Decided May 17, 1979 Guardian and Ward — Temporary Guardianship — Continuation Order of probate court continuing temporary guardianship beyond its expiration date was not authorized by statute which provided that a temporary guardian may […]

Read More

RAYMOND v. COHEN, 80 N.H. 586 (1921)

119 A. 924 HARRY RAYMOND v. MAX COHEN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided February 1, 1921. TROVER, for junk. The defendant pleaded his discharge in bankruptcy. The plaintiff’s evidence tended to prove that he let the defendant have money to invest in metals, and that the defendant bought therewith old copper, brass, lead, […]

Read More

LEVESQUE v. LEVESQUE, 99 N.H. 147 (1954)

106 A.2d 563 DONALD LEVESQUE, by his mother and next friend a. v. LAURENT LEVESQUE. No. 4309.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued April 7, 1954. Decided July 1, 1954. The maintenance of an action by an unemancipated minor child against its parent for bodily injury caused by the negligent operation of a motor vehicle is […]

Read More

APPEAL OF LOUDON ROAD REALTY TRUST, 128 N.H. 624 (1986)

517 A.2d 843 APPEAL OF LOUDON ROAD REALTY TRUST (New Hampshire Board of Tax and Land Appeals) No. 85-194Supreme Court of New Hampshire Board of Tax and Land Appeals Decided October 3, 1986 1. Taxation — Appeals — Findings Board of tax and land appeals order in tax abatement case was vacated and remanded, where […]

Read More

CZUMAK v. N.H. DIV., 155 N.H. 368 (2007)

CHERIE L. CZUMAK a. v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES a. No. 2006-092.Supreme Court of New Hampshire MerrimackArgued: March 21, 2007. Opinion Issued: May 3, 2007. 1. Guardianship — Proceedings — Particular Proceedings In an action by guardians for specific performance of a stipulated agreement with respondents, the Division of Developmental Services and a […]

Read More

PHILBRICK v. WHITE, 106 N.H. 340 (1965)

211 A.2d 852 ELLSWORTH L. PHILBRICK v. JOHN C. WHITE a. JOHN C. WHITE a. v. ELLSWORTH L. PHILBRICK a. No. 5318.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued April 6, 1965. Decided June 30, 1965. 1. A municipal housing code which failed to provide for the mandatory hearing before the housing board required by the statutory […]

Read More

ESTATE OF LUNT v. GAYLOR, 150 N.H. 96 (2003)

834 A.2d 367 ESTATE OF MARGARET P. LUNT v. GREGORY A. GAYLOR a. No. 2002-782.Supreme Court of New Hampshire CarrollSubmitted: July 22, 2003. Opinion Issued: October 1, 2003. 1. Process — Jurisdiction Over Parties — Nonresidents Because out-of-state defendants were never properly served, the trial court never obtained personal jurisdiction over them and, accordingly, in […]

Read More

CHASE CO. v. BEAN, 58 N.H. 183 (1877)

CHASE CO. v. BEAN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided August, 1877 An action at law cannot be maintained by copartners to recover a debt which has been discharged by one of them and paid by a set-off of his separate debt with his assent, when the defendant acted in good faith. ASSUMPSIT, by […]

Read More

GATTO v. GATTO, 79 N.H. 177 (1919)

106 A. 493 JOSEPH GATTO v. JOSEPHINE GATTO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided March 4, 1919. If a marriage is entered into in reliance upon the false representations of a woman to her intended husband as to her chastity, and shortly after consummation she discloses to him that she has been guilty of […]

Read More

BOWEN v. RAILWAY, 62 N.H. 502 (1883)

BOWEN v. MT. WASHINGTON RAILWAY a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided June, 1883. The authority to pledge or alienate the property of a railroad corporation is vested in the board of directors as the general agents of the corporation, and a sale by the superintendent, unauthorized by the directors, passes no title. BILL […]

Read More

STATE v. MacARTHUR, 138 N.H. 597 (1994)

644 A.2d 68 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. ARTHUR “JAY” MacARTHUR No. 93-167Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan Decided June 27, 1994 1. Appeal and Error — Evidence — Erroneous Admission Where trial court in criminal matter has erroneously admitted evidence, court on appeal must reverse unless State can show beyond a reasonable doubt […]

Read More

FEUERSTEIN v. GILMORE d/b/a REPROGRAPHICS, 127 N.H. 715 (1986)

506 A.2d 327 KATHLEEN FEUERSTEIN v. ANTHONY C. GILMORE a., d/b/a REPROGRAPHICS No. 85-017Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided February 27, 1986 1. Statutes — Construction and Application — Legislative Intent When there is a question of statutory interpretation, legislative intent must be determined. 2. Statutes — Construction and Application — Legislative Intent The […]

Read More

GORDON v. KEZER, 64 N.H. 617 (1887)

14 A. 726 GORDON v. KEZER a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December, 1887. TRESPASS qu. cl. Upon the facts found by the referee, judgment was ordered for the plaintiff. BINGHAM, J., did not sit: the others concurred. Page Story, for the plaintiff. E. Woods and Bingham, Mitchells Batchellor, for the defendants.

Read More

JOHNSTON v. FLATLEY REALTY INVESTORS, 125 N.H. 133 (1984)

480 A.2d 55 ROBERT G. JOHNSTON v. FLATLEY REALTY INVESTORS No. 83-183Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided July 2, 1984 1. Trial — Instructions — Failure To Object In a malicious prosecution action, where the defendant failed to object to the trial court’s instructions to the jury on malice, the instructions were deemed correct. […]

Read More

CARR v. MERRIMACK FARMERS EXCHANGE, 101 N.H. 445 (1958)

146 A.2d 276 DORIS E. CARR v. MERRIMACK FARMERS EXCHANGE, INC. No. 4675.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap.Argued October 7, 1958. Decided November 28, 1958. 1. The declaration of the plaintiff, who sustained injury when the motor vehicle in which she was traveling was struck by bales of hay which fell from an oppositely approaching […]

Read More

STATE v. KNIGHT, 161 N.H. 338 (2010)

13 A.3d 244 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. ROBIN KNIGHT. No. 2009-449.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. RockinghamArgued: October 14, 2010. Opinion Issued: January 13, 2011. 1. Search and Seizure — Practice and Procedure — Motion to Suppress, Generally While the trial court may act upon an untimely motion to suppress as a matter of […]

Read More

MANOR v. GAGNON, 92 N.H. 435 (1943)

32 A.2d 688 EGBERT J. MANOR, Adm’r v. UBALD E. GAGNON. No. 3395.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June 1, 1943. In an action against the operator of an automobile for violation of Laws 1935, c. 107 by not stopping or slowing down to permit bus passengers to alight and thus causing the death […]

Read More

JEWETT v. SIEGMUND, 110 N.H. 203 (1970)

263 A.2d 678 PETER JEWETT v. WILLIAM SIEGMUND No. 6052Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided March 31, 1970 1. A preliminary hearing is not a judicial trial of the guilt or innocence of the accused but is a judicial inquiry to determine whether probable cause exists for the accused to be bound over to […]

Read More

MACHINIST v. KOORKANIAN, 82 N.H. 249 (1926)

132 A. 256 ABRAHAM MACHINIST v. SARKIS KOORKANIAN a. SARKIS KOORKANIAN a. v. ABRAHAM MACHINIST. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided February 2, 1926. The signature of the lessee is not essential to the validity of a lease accepted by him. There cannot be a lease without the reservation of some reversion to the […]

Read More

LEONARD v. FAHEY, 87 N.H. 170 (1934)

175 A. 859 HARRY P. LEONARD, Ap’t v. WILLIAM A. FAHEY, Guardian. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December 4, 1934. One who bears no relationship to either parent of a minor has no right to be appointed his guardian either under P.L., c. 290, ss. 6, 15 or otherwise. One of two petitioners […]

Read More

WONSER v. WONSER, 120 N.H. 436 (1980)

415 A.2d 881 CARL E. WONSER v. SUELLA M. WONSER No. 79-456Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided June 12, 1980 1. Parent and Child — Custody and Control of Children — Joint Custody There may be times when joint custody would be desirable but there will be other times when, despite fitness of each […]

Read More

JOHNSON v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL, 81 N.H. 289 (1924)

125 A. 147 JOHN M. JOHNSON v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF RAILROADS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided May 6, 1924. In case for negligence in the management of a train at a highway grade crossing, whereby the operator of an automobile was injured, instructions as to the duty of the defendants on discovering the plaintiff’s […]

Read More

KILUK v. POTTER, ADMINISTRATOR, 133 N.H. 67 (1990)

572 A.2d 1157 RICHARD KILUK v. WILLIAM POTTER, ADMINISTRATOR No. 89-397Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided April 13, 1990 1. Courts — Jurisdiction — Criminal Offense Under New Hampshire Constitution, district courts may only sentence a convicted criminal defendant to a year or less on individual complaints to a county correctional facility. N.H. CONST. […]

Read More

TILTON v. SANBORNTON, 78 N.H. 389 (1917)

100 A. 981 TILTON a. v. SANBORNTON a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided May 1, 1917. When the legislature makes a revision of the subject-matter of a statute and by the new statute designs a complete scheme, so much of the former statute as is excluded, though not expressly repealed, is to be […]

Read More

EGAN v. DIVISION NO. 1, ANCIENT ORDER OF HIBERNIANS, 62 N.H. 701 (1883)

EGAN a. v. DIVISION NO. 1, ANCIENT ORDER OF HIBERNIANS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1883. PETITION for a mandamus to restore the plaintiffs to membership in the Ancient Order of Hibernians. Facts found by a referee. J. P. Bartlett, for the plaintiffs. Sulloway, Topliff O’Connor, for the defendants. STANLEY, J. As […]

Read More

STATE v. SHERBURNE, 58 N.H. 159 (1877)

STATE v. SHERBURNE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided August, 1877. An indictment upon ss. 5, 6, 7, or 8, c. 259, Gen. St., is bad, if it does not show which one of those sections the defendant is accused of violating. INDICTMENT, for obstructing a sheriff in the service of a capias. The […]

Read More

KENISTON v. THE STATE, 63 N.H. 37 (1884)

KENISTON a. v. THE STATE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June, 1884. The constitutional provision, that no person shall hold the office of judge of any court after he has attained the age of seventy years, does not apply to justices of the peace. HABEAS CORPUS. The plaintiffs were arrested on a complaint […]

Read More

PSKOWSKI v. AETNA CAS. SURETY CO., 128 N.H. 781 (1986)

522 A.2d 987 WALTER H. PSKOWSKI v. AETNA CASUALTY SURETY CO., INC. No. 85-282Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided December 8, 1986 Appeal and Error — Remand — Particular Cases On appeal of determination by superior court that plaintiff was entitled to workers’ compensation benefits, where the meaning of the trial court’s order was […]

Read More

RIDEOUT v. RAILROAD, 92 N.H. 340 (1943)

30 A.2d 488 FRANK RIDEOUT, Adm’r v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. No. 3343.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided February 2, 1943. A train approaching a private grade crossing has the right of way over motor cars approaching the crossing, and the engineer has the right to assume that such cars will stop before reaching it, […]

Read More

PHILBRICK v. SHAW, 63 N.H. 81 (1884)

PHILBRICK v. SHAW. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1884. A deputy sheriff is not bound to assume the burden of defending a suit brought against the sheriff to determine a controversy between A and B as to whether goods attached by him on writs in favor of both were first attached on […]

Read More

DODGE v. LEWIS, 71 N.H. 324 (1902)

51 A. 1071 DODGE a., Ap’ts, v. LEWIS, Adm’r. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided April 1, 1902. Under the statute of descent and distribution, the sisters of an intestate’s father are entitled to the whole estate, to the exclusion of cousins. PROBATE APPEAL, from the decree of the probate court for this county […]

Read More

GRAYSON v. LaBRANCHE, 107 N.H. 504 (1967)

225 A.2d 922 PETER A. GRAYSON a. v. VICTOR P. LaBRANCHE. No. 5529.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued January 4, 1967. Decided January 27, 1967. 1. Absolute and exact certainty in contracts for the sale of realty is not required but reasonable certainty is a requisite. 2. In an action for an alleged breach of […]

Read More

NEW ENGLAND BOX CO. v. WOOD, 81 N.H. 124 (1923)

123 A. 826 THE NEW ENGLAND BOX COMPANY a. v. JENNIE WOOD a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided October 2, 1923. Mere non-user of an easement for the period of limitation will not destroy the right thereto whether acquired by deed or by prescription. BILL IN EQUITY, brought by the plaintiffs against the […]

Read More

STATE v. ANDREW FARRINGTON, 161 N.H. 440 (2011)

20 A.3d 291 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. ANDREW FARRINGTON. No. 2009-617.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Hillsborough-southern judicial district.Argued: January 6, 2011. Opinion Issued: February 23, 2011. 1. Offenses — Sexual Offenses — Statutes The plain and ordinary meaning of “solicit” in the statute prohibiting certain uses of computer services includes: to make petition […]

Read More

PATTEE v. THOMPSON, 69 N.H. 333 (1898)

41 A. 265 PATTEE a. v. THOMPSON a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1898. Under P.S., c. 112, s. 23, towns have power to appoint agents to enforce the law against the illegal sale of spirituous and malt liquors. BILL IN EQUITY, by taxpayers of the town of Warner, praying that the […]

Read More

CASSIDY v. CORPORATION, 79 N.H. 427 (1920)

111 A. 147 MICHAEL CASSIDY v. ATLANTIC CORPORATION. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June 1, 1920. In an action at common law for personal injuries by an employee against his employer who has accepted the provisions of Laws 1911, c. 163, the plaintiff is subject to the defence of the assumption of the […]

Read More

WHITCHER v. DEXTER, 61 N.H. 91 (1881)

WHITCHER v. DEXTER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June, 1881. A negotiable security taken as collateral to an antecedent debt, is no satisfaction of such debt unless it be paid, or unless it appear that the creditor has so improperly conducted in respect of it that the debtor has been injured thereby. The […]

Read More

CHRISTIAN SCIENCE PLEASANT VIEW v. CITY, CONCORD, 117 N.H. 239 (1977)

372 A.2d 267 CHRISTIAN SCIENCE PLEASANT VIEW HOME v. CITY OF CONCORD No. 7552Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided March 31, 1977 Taxation — Exemptions — Charitable or Public Uses Where special act provided that “all real and personal estate now held or hereafter acquired by the said The Christian Science Pleasant View Home, […]

Read More

WESCOTT v. VERMONT INS. CO., 104 N.H. 127 (1962)

180 A.2d 442 HERBERT WESCOTT v. VERMONT ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO. No. 4984.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire.Argued January 3, 1962. Decided May 1, 1962. 1. Where a group student accident policy provided that proof of loss must be furnished the insurer not later than ninety days after the date of such loss, proof of loss […]

Read More

EATON v. EATON, 81 N.H. 275 (1924)

125 A. 433 EMMA M. EATON a. v. PERRY A. EATON, JR., a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided April 1, 1924. A spendthrift trust “for the benefit of my said son as his needs may require,” the son then having to the testator’s knowledge a wife and daughter dependent on him for support, […]

Read More

STATE EMPLOYEES’ ASS’N OF N.H. v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, 120 N.H. 272 (1980)

415 A.2d 665 STATE EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE No. 79-185Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided April 23, 1980 1. Statutes — Construction and Application — Plain Meaning In any case involving interpretation of a statute, the starting point must be the language of […]

Read More

HAMEL v. PEABODY, 78 N.H. 585 (1916)

97 A. 220 EDWARD HAMEL, Adm’r, v. IRA W. PEABODY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided March 7, 1916. CASE, for negligently running upon the plaintiff’s intestate at a cross walk on Main street in Suncook village. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence a nonsuit was ordered, subject to exception. Transferred from the […]

Read More

STATE v. DECOTEAU, 137 N.H. 106 (1993)

623 A.2d 1338 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. DAVID DECOTEAU No. 90-605Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided April 23, 1993 1. Search and Seizure — Warrant Requirement; Execution — Generally Search made under authority of a search warrant may extend to the entire area covered by the warrant’s description. N.H. CONST. pt. 1, […]

Read More

COLBY v. WALKER, 86 N.H. 568 (1934)

171 A. 774 ROSE K. COLBY v. HAROLD WALKER. CLIFTON D. COLBY v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided April 3, 1934. Where one of two concurrent tortfeasors is discharged by a release, the question whether the other is thereby discharged depends upon whether the plaintiff has received something in full satisfaction for […]

Read More

SLATER v. PLANNING BOARD OF TOWN OF RUMNEY, 121 N.H. 212 (1981)

427 A.2d 511 PAUL D. SLATER, TRUSTEE OF THE STINSON TRUST v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF RUMNEY No. 80-203Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided March 16, 1981 1. Zoning — Appeal From Planning Board — Standard of Superior Court Review On review of decision of planning board pursuant to petition to superior […]

Read More

JEWETT v. HOLT, 93 N.H. 163 (1944)

37 A.2d 13 MAURICE G. JEWETT, Adm’r v. LIZZIE E. HOLT. HELENE E. KENDALL v. SAME. MAURICE G. JEWETT, Adm’r v. G. ARTHUR FANEUF. HELENE E. KENDALL v. SAME. No. 3467.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided April 4, 1944. The question of causal negligence of a defendant was for the jury where he continued […]

Read More

STATE v. FERBERT, 113 N.H. 235 (1973)

306 A.2d 202 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. RICHARD A. FERBERT No. 6387Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided May 31, 1973 1. Record of sentencing process warranted a holding that, prior to sentence, court properly exercised its discretion by considering a probation report’s contents and defendant’s oral presentation to the court on the question […]

Read More

BOSTON MAINE R.R. v. CONCORD, 78 N.H. 463 (1917)

101 A. 663 BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD v. CONCORD. SAME v. STATE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June 30, 1917. The materials used by a railroad in building and repairing its equipment are property “used in its ordinary business” and are taxable by the state under Laws 1911, c. 169, s. 11. The court […]

Read More

GRAND TRUNK RAILWAY v. BERLIN, 68 N.H. 168 (1894)

36 A. 554 GRAND TRUCK RAILWAY CO. v. BERLIN a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided June, 1894. The laying out of a highway will be quashed upon certiorari, so far as it affects the rights of parties who had no notice or knowledge of the highway proceeding, provided they have no other adequate […]

Read More

THISTLE v. HALSTEAD, 96 N.H. 192 (1950)

72 A.2d 455 JOHN F. THISTLE v. FRANCES ADAMS HALSTEAD. No. 3870.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. April 4, 1950. Where the findings made by the Trial Court were justified by the evidence it was under no duty to rule that certain other findings different from those made were or were not warranted. Whether evidence, […]

Read More

SPAULDING v. GROTON, 68 N.H. 77 (1894)

44 A. 88 SPAULDING v. GROTON. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June, 1894. Upon a petition to the selectmen for a highway between two fixed bounds, their laying out of a way beginning at one of the bounds, but not extending to the other, may be valid. In the return of selectmen laying […]

Read More

GILMAN v. LACONIA, 71 N.H. 212 (1902)

51 A. 631 GILMAN v. LACONIA. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided January 7, 1902. Where it is in evidence that the plaintiff in an action against a municipal corporation ran a small baggage express with one horse, the remark of his counsel, that he did not ask for a verdict because his client […]

Read More

DAVIS v. DYER, 60 N.H. 400 (1880)

DAVIS v. DYER a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December, 1880. In a suit against the trustees of a family of Shakers, the plaintiff is a competent witness, although a former trustee with whom the business which is the subject-matter of the suit was transacted is dead. In the trial of a suit […]

Read More

STATE v. WEBBER, 141 N.H. 817 (1997)

694 A.2d 970 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. WILLIAM S. WEBBER No. 95-857Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan Decided May 6, 1997 1. Search and Seizure — Generally — Reasonableness A warrantless search is per se unreasonable unless the State satisfies its burden of proving that the search is within the narrow confines of […]

Read More

LAMARCHE v. McCARTHY, 158 N.H. 197 (2008)

NANCY J. LAMARCHE v. STEPHANIE A. McCARTHY. No. 2008-355.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Belknap.Argued: November 12, 2008. Opinion Issued: December 31, 2008. 1. Parties — Intervention — Permissive A trial court should grant a motion to intervene if the party seeking to intervene has a right involved in the trial and a direct and apparent […]

Read More

FRASER v. RAILWAY, 84 N.H. 107 (1929)

146 A. 714 JAMES A. FRASER v. BERLIN STREET RAILWAY. PAULINE MASTERSON, Adm’x, v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided June 4, 1929. The greater weight of a street car as compared with an automobile and its inability to turn from its course on the track are sufficient reasons to entitle it to […]

Read More

RODRIGUE v. LAFLAMME, 122 N.H. 966 (1982)

453 A.2d 1254 GASTON RODRIGUE a. v. GASTON LAFLAMME a. No. 82-053Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos Decided November 16, 1982 1. Appeal and Error — Preservation of Questions — Failure To Present Below Generally, the failure of a party to take an exception to the trial court’s ruling will preclude review of the issue […]

Read More

STATE v. CORSON, 134 N.H. 430 (1991)

593 A.2d 248 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. LEE R. CORSON No. 90-621Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided July 8, 1991 1. Appeal and Error — Right To Appeal — Fines and Penalties Penalty assessment under statute providing that such assessment be levied on each fine or penalty imposed by court for criminal […]

Read More

PIECUCH v. MANCHESTER, 114 N.H. 8 (1974)

314 A.2d 642 ANTHONY F. PIECUCH a. v. CITY OF MANCHESTER a. No. 6434Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided January 31, 1974 1. The trial court was warranted on the evidence in the record to find as a matter of law that the harm to residents from the operation of a car wash in […]

Read More

SMITH v. BELKNAP COUNTY, 71 N.H. 203 (1902)

51 A. 628 SMITH v. BELKNAP COUNTY a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided January 7, 1902. A county is not liable for the fees of county commissioners in hearing a highway petition referred to them by the court and dismissed before final judgment by agreement of the parties in interest. Where a highway […]

Read More

IN RE BUSHWAY ESTATE, 107 N.H. 135 (1966)

218 A.2d 49 IN RE GEORGE H. BUSHWAY ESTATE. No. 5438.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued February 1, 1966. Decided March 30, 1966. 1. By virtue of statute (31 U.S.C.A., s. 191) obligations to the United States for federal tax deficiencies have priority over other claims against an insolvent estate except as to specific property […]

Read More

SEAVEY COMPANY v. RILEY, 95 N.H. 502 (1949)

67 A.2d 430 SEAVEY HARDWARE COMPANY, INC. v. WILLIAM H. RILEY, Commissioner of Labor. No. 3766.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided June 28, 1949. The statute (Laws 1945, c. 138, s. 17) providing for successorship among employers in determining the merit rating to be assessed under the Unemployment Compensation Act does not entitle a […]

Read More

UPTON v. MANCHESTER, 56 N.H. 54 (1875)

UPTON v. MANCHESTER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire FROM HILLSBOROUGH CIRCUIT COURT. Decided August 13, 1875. Police Justice of Manchester — Construction of statutes — Compensation for services — Salary — Fees and costs — Case overruled. The charter of the city of Manchester provided that all costs in criminal proceedings, which were not paid […]

Read More

GALLOWAY v. CHICAGO-SOFT, LTD., 142 N.H. 752 (1998)

713 A.2d 982 BRYAN K. GALLOWAY v. CHICAGO-SOFT, LTD. No. 96-101Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan Decided May 11, 1998 1. Contracts — Construction — Judicial Review Although, as a general rule, the proper interpretation of a contract is ultimately a question of law for the supreme court, which will determine the meaning based on […]

Read More

STATE v. ADAMS, 133 N.H. 818 (1991)

585 A.2d 853 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. RICKY C. ADAMS, SR. No. 89-346Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided January 28, 1991 1. Constitutional Law — Speedy Trial — Indictment Under the rule set forth in State v. Hastings, 120 N.H. 454 (1980), the State must obtain an indictment within sixty days of […]

Read More

ROBINSON v. ROBINSON, 66 N.H. 600 (1891)

23 A. 362 ROBINSON v. ROBINSON. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June, 1891. Any behavior of one party which affects the other physically or mentally is within the meaning of the statute granting divorce, when either party has so treated the other as seriously to injure health or to endanger reason. Whether the […]

Read More

MAYNARD v. DeGREGORY, 106 N.H. 262 (1965)

209 A.2d 712 WILLIAM MAYNARD, Attorney General v. HUGO DeGREGORY. No. 5298.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued January 5, 1965. Decided April 30, 1965. 1. Where the Legislature has recognized the tenets of the Communist Party and by numerous enactments has manifested a continuing concern to be kept informed by the Attorney General, as its […]

Read More

McMAHON v. POISSON, 99 N.H. 182 (1954)

107 A.2d 378 KATHLEEN McMAHON v. WILFRED POISSON a. No. 4304.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued June 1, 1954. Decided July 30, 1954. The statute of frauds is no bar to an action to recover damages for failure of the defendants to make certain repairs and improvements to a dwelling after they had conveyed the […]

Read More

REID v. SPADONE MACH. CO., 119 N.H. 457 (1979)

404 A.2d 1094 BRENT L. REID v. SPADONE MACHINE COMPANY No. 78-218Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided June 20, 1979 1. Appeal and Error — Scope of Review — Evidence Supreme Court will not upset denials of motions for nonsuit, dismissal, directed verdict, or judgment notwithstanding the verdict where there is sufficient evidence in […]

Read More

OPINION OF THE JUSTICES, 123 N.H. 510 (1983)

463 A.2d 891 OPINION OF THE JUSTICES No. 83-277Supreme Court of New Hampshire Request of the Senate Decided July 14, 1983 1. Courts — Supreme Court — Advisory Opinions The authority vested in the justices of the supreme court to issue advisory opinions to either branch of the legislature extends only to proposed legislation. N.H. […]

Read More

MACLAY v. FULLER, 96 N.H. 326 (1950)

76 A.2d 247 DAVID S. MACLAY a. v. ENOCH D. FULLER, Secretary of State. No. 3996.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original. Decided October 30, 1950. Where the plaintiff had no clear right to have his name printed upon the official ballots, as Democratic nominee for Representative to the General Court, for use at a biennial […]

Read More

STATE v. MILLER, 159 N.H. 125 (2009)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. SEAN MILLER No. 2008-323.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Rockingham.Argued: February 19, 2009. Opinion Issued: July 31, 2009. 1. Criminal Law — Confessions — Voluntariness In determining whether a confession following an illegal arrest is voluntary, and, thus, admissible under the New Hampshire Constitution, the court balances the following four […]

Read More

WYMAN v. DeGREGORY, 101 N.H. 82 (1957)

133 A.2d 787 LOUIS C. WYMAN, Attorney General v. HUGO DeGREGORY. No. 4563.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued February 5, 1957. Reargument ordered June 28, 1957. PETITION, under RSA 491:19, 20, to have the defendant adjudged in contempt for declining to answer certain questions in connection with the Attorney General’s investigation of subversive activities pursuant […]

Read More

STATE v. SURETTE, 130 N.H. 531 (1988)

544 A.2d 823 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JOHN SURETTE No. 87-155Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided June 8, 1988 Verdict — Form — Questions At burglary trial, court abused its discretion and committed reversible error in submitting to jury special questions form, without providing an Page 532 instruction on jury nullification, where […]

Read More

STATE v. LESSARD, 123 N.H. 788 (1983)

465 A.2d 516 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. GASTON R. LESSARD No. 82-061Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided August 31, 1983 1. Verdict — Motion To Set Aside — Denial In the case of defendant indicted for attempted first degree murder and for the felonious use of a firearm, the trial court correctly […]

Read More

STATE v. MELOON, 124 N.H. 257 (1983)

469 A.2d 1316 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. THOMAS E. MELOON No. 82-453Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided December 12, 1983 1. Appeal and Error — Evidence — Sufficiency of Evidence In evaluating whether any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, the supreme court must […]

Read More

LONDONDERRY SCH. DIST. v. STATE, 157 N.H. 734 (2008)

LONDONDERRY SCHOOL DISTRICT SAU #12 a. v. STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. No. 2006-258.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Hillsborough-southern judicial district.Submitted: October 2, 2008. Opinion Issued: October 15, 2008. 1. Constitutional Law — Judicial Powers and Duties— Mootness Generally, a matter is moot when it no longer presents a justiciable controversy because issues involved have become […]

Read More

MOORE v. COMPANY, 74 N.H. 305 (1907)

67 A. 578 MOORE v. BERLIN MILLS CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided June 29, 1907. An owner of flowage rights who creates a reservoir by means of a dam is not liable for damages caused to other land by the percolation of water, unless such use of his property is unreasonable; and […]

Read More

CURTIS v. GUARANTY TRUST LIFE INS. CO., 132 N.H. 337 (1989)

566 A.2d 176 RICHARD CURTIS AND CHERYLE GUERIN, PARENTS AND NEXT FRIENDS OF JENNIFER CURTIS PARENTS AND NEXT FRIENDS OF JENNIFER CURTIS v. GUARANTY TRUST LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY No. 88-238Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided November 13, 1989 1. Courts — Supreme Court — Jurisdiction Supreme court has no jurisdiction over questions of fact […]

Read More

CASTONGUAY v. COMPANY, 83 N.H. 1 (1927)

136 A. 702 MARJORIE CASTONGUAY v. ACME KNITTING MACHINE NEEDLE COMPANY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided March 1, 1927. Though a manager of a business is the general agent of the owner for the conduct of the business in the usual and ordinary manner and in so far as he will promote the […]

Read More

SMITH v. SMITH, 72 N.H. 168 (1903)

54 A. 1014 SMITH, Ex’r, v. SMITH a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided May 5, 1903. Where a will directs the payment of a pecuniary legacy “in case I die leaving no child,” and bequeaths the income of a fund “if there are one or more children born to me who are living […]

Read More

STATE v. RAMOS, 149 N.H. 272 (2003)

821 A.2d 979 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. Jerry Lee Ramos No. 2002-030Supreme Court of New Hampshire GraftonArgued January 8, 2003 Opinion Issued March 17, 2003 1. Criminal Offenses — Rape — Defenses To use consent as a theory of defense to the charge of aggravated felonious sexual assault through concealment or the element […]

Read More