STATE v. LAVALLEE, 145 N.H. 424 (2000)

765 A.2d 671 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. RANDY LAVALLEE No. 98-773Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-Southern Judicial District Decided November 22, 2000 1. Appeal and Error — Preservation of Questions — Failure toRaise Below Because defendant did not raise, before the trial court, his constitutional argument concerning limitation of his cross-examination of victim, […]

Read More

EMMONS v. COMPANY, 83 N.H. 181 (1927)

141 A. 65 E. MARIA EMMONS v. UTILITIES POWER COMPANY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December 6, 1927. An undeveloped water power is a property right inherent in the ownership of the adjacent riparian land, and the owner thereof is entitled to compensation therefor when taken under the flowage act. The measure of […]

Read More

STATE v. CATE, 58 N.H. 240 (1878)

STATE v. CATE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided March, 1878. The prohibition of unusual traffic within two miles of any public assembly convened for religious worship (Gen. St., c. 255, 8. 9) is constitutional. It is not necessary to allege or prove that the traffic disturbed the assembly or its worship. COMPLAINT, under […]

Read More

BEEDE v. LAMPREY, 64 N.H. 510 (1888)

15 A. 133 BEEDE v. LAMPREY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided June, 1888. In trover for trees carelessly but not wilfully cut by the defendant on the plaintiff’s land, the measure of damages is the value of the trees immediately after they are severed from the realty. TROVER, for two hundred spruce logs. […]

Read More

BARTLETT v. REMINGTON, 59 N.H. 364 (1879)

BARTLETT, Adm’r, v. REMINGTON a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided December, 1879. A fund being deposited in a savings-bank in the name of M. A. R., the depositor, “in trust for Sarah,” the beneficiary called “Sarah” may be identified by parol evidence. Page 365 An executory trust without consideration is not enforceable. A […]

Read More

ELLIS v. ROYAL INS. CO., 129 N.H. 326 (1987)

530 A.2d 303 VALERIE G. ELLIS v. ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND THE CONCORD GROUP INSURANCE COMPANIES CONCORD GENERAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND VALERIE G. ELLIS No. 85-554Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided May 28, 1987 1. Conflict of Laws — Contracts In the absence of an express choice of law […]

Read More

WHITMAN v. MOREY, 63 N.H. 448 (1885)

2 A. 899 WHITMAN, Ex’r, Ap’t, v. MOREY a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December, 1885. On the question of testamentary capacity, the will itself is evidence. On the question of undue influence, the proponent of the will may show that nominal legacies to heirs other than children were inserted at the suggestion […]

Read More

BOUCHER v. JOHNSON, 117 N.H. 343 (1977)

373 A.2d 349 GERMAINE BOUCHER, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF EUGENIE COURCHESNE v. PAULINE JOHNSON No. 7611Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided April 29, 1977 1. Joint Tenancy — Right of Survivorship Statute providing that any bank account maintained in names of two persons payable to either and payable to survivor of them shall […]

Read More

HILL v. GROSSER, 59 N.H. 513 (1880)

HILL v. GROSSER a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June, 1880. Money paid on a contract for the purchase of land cannot be recovered by one who refuses to complete the contract and take a deed, the other party being in no fault. BILL IN EQUITY, for keeping on foot a discharged mortgage, […]

Read More

OPINION OF THE JUSTICES, 88 N.H. 494 (1937)

190 A. 432 OPINION OF THE JUSTICES. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Decided February 2, 1937. House Bill No. 41 for the prevention of unemployment by extending limited state assistance to industries is unconstitutional for the reasons set forth in the preceding Opinion of the Justices. Where means and methods constitutionally prohibited are an integral […]

Read More

SMITH v. INSURANCE CO., 68 N.H. 405 (1895)

44 A. 531 SMITH v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. SMITH a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided December, 1895. A policy of insurance payable to a wife and, in case of her death before her husband, to their children, vests upon her death in the children then living, and […]

Read More

SEAMAN v. BERRY, 114 N.H. 474 (1974)

322 A.2d 922 PAUL SEAMAN v. ASHMAN L. BERRY, SR. LUCILLE A. SEAMAN v. SAME No. 6836Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided July 19, 1974 1. Defendant’s motion to set aside verdicts as excessive involved questions of fact for trial judge, whose decision should not be set aside unless no reasonable person could make […]

Read More

DOWSE v. RAILROAD, 91 N.H. 419 (1941)

20 A.2d 629 WARREN E. DOWSE v. MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD. No. 3239.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided June 3, 1941. In an action against a railroad for killing the plaintiff’s cows while being herded over a private farm crossing on returning from pasture, certain evidence, e.g. the obstructions to a view of the train, […]

Read More

LANGDELL v. COMPANY, 78 N.H. 243 (1916)

99 A. 90 SAMUEL F. LANGDELL v. EASTERN BASKET VENEER COMPANY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided October 3, 1916. An attaching creditor may be permitted to enter his writ as of a prior term, if justice so require; and when through accident or mistake he then failed to enter it and the attachment […]

Read More

STATE v. PIPER, 73 N.H. 230 (1905)

60 A. 432 STATE v. PIPER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided March 7, 1905. In an indictment against a bank official for making a false entry in a book of the institution, an allegation that a depositor did not withdraw a specified sum is a sufficient averment that the money was not paid […]

Read More

THORP v. INSURANCE CO., 75 N.H. 251 (1909)

72 A. 690 THORP a. v. AETNA INSURANCE CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided April 6, 1909. A policy insuring against loss by fire or lightning the “horses . . . contained in frame barn” does not cover an animal kept therein at the time the contract was made, but afterward turned out […]

Read More

HOLBROOK v. FAULKNER, 55 N.H. 311 (1875)

HOLBROOK v. FAULKNER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided March 11, 1875. A school district, being in possession of a school-house, voted to repair it, and to buy land enough to straighten the line west of the school-house. Held, that this was a sufficient location to give the county commissioners jurisdiction of a petition […]

Read More

KIESMAN v. MIDDLETON, 156 N.H. 479 (2007)

KARL KIESMAN v. STEPHEN MIDDLETON. No. 2006-817.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. District Court for Northern Carroll County.Submitted: October 18, 2007. Opinion Issued: December 4, 2007. 1. Offenses — Particular Crimes — Stalking When issuing a stalking order in response to a civil petition filed pursuant to statute, the trial court must make findings on the […]

Read More

NOEL v. LAPOINTE, 86 N.H. 162 (1933)

164 A. 769 EMERY NOEL v. AIME LAPOINTE. WILFRED CHAMBERLAND v. SAME. ALFRED R. McCUTCHEON v. SAME. MARCEL THIBODEAU, Adm’r v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided February 7, 1933. To constitute a joint enterprise as between the operator of a motor vehicle and a passenger riding therein at his request there must […]

Read More

JOHNSON v. BELL, 58 N.H. 395 (1878)

JOHNSON, Assignee, v. BELL a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided August, 1878. The interest of one in land agreed to be conveyed to him by a parol contract, which would be enforced in equity, is subject to attachment. The release from attachment of one tract of land by the attaching creditor, who had […]

Read More

STATE v. BUNDY, 130 N.H. 382 (1988)

539 A.2d 713 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. EDWARD BUNDY, JR. No. 85-231Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire Decided April 1, 1988 1. Trial — Instructions — Review Claim of an erroneous jury charge must be evaluated by reading the alleged offending portion in the context of the trial court’s whole charge. 2. Trial […]

Read More

CUMMINGS v. PARKER, 63 N.H. 198 (1884)

CUMMINGS a. v. PARKER a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June, 1884. A final decree in equity is not reopened and changed on motion, when it appears that the facts upon which the motion is based existed and were known to the party making it at the time of the original hearing in […]

Read More

BRISTOL CREAMERY CO. v. TILTON, 70 N.H. 239 (1899)

47 A. 591 BRISTOL CREAMERY CO. v. TILTON. SAME v. DALTON. SAME v. EMMONS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December, 1899. Where subscriptions to corporate stock are in excess of the authorized issue and no allotment has been made, the subscribers are not liable for an assessment upon the shares. ASSUMPSIT, for an […]

Read More

STATE v. BALDWIN, 124 N.H. 770 (1984)

475 A.2d 522 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. MARY SUE BALDWIN No. 83-173Supreme Court of New Hampshire Claremont District Court Decided April 13, 1984 1. Constitutional Law — Due Process — Generally The essential purpose of the fourth amendment is to safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by governmental officials. […]

Read More

BROOKS v. R. A. CLARK’S GARAGE, INC., 117 N.H. 770 (1977)

378 A.2d 1144 WAYNE BROOKS v. R. A. CLARK’S GARAGE, INC. No. 7726Supreme Court of New Hampshire Lebanon District Court Decided October 17, 1977 1. Contracts — Agreements to Repair — Waiver of Right to Estimate Repairman who agrees to perform any repair on customer’s motor vehicle is not entitled to recover for such repairs […]

Read More

YOUNG v. BENTON, 70 N.H. 268 (1899)

46 A. 51 YOUNG v. BENTON, Ex’r, a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided December, 1899. A clause in a will charging “the estate inherited from my late husband with a life annuity” is sufficient to create a priority in favor of the annuitant, in the absence of evidence from which a contrary intent […]

Read More

GREENVILLE v. MASON, 57 N.H. 385 (1876)

GREENVILLE v. MASON. Supreme Court of New Hampshire FROM HILLSBOROUGH CIRCUIT COURT. Decided August 11, 1876. Perambulation — Fraud. It being alleged in the bill, and admitted by the general demurrer that the defendants’ selectmen had by fraudulent misrepresentations induced the plaintiffs’ selectmen to join in an erroneous return of the perambulation, the defendant town […]

Read More

STATE v. KEYSER, 117 N.H. 45 (1977)

369 A.2d 224 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. CHESTER B. KEYSER No. 7510Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided January 31, 1977 1. Searches and Seizures — Instigation and Participation by Private Parties The fourth amendment protections do not extend to actions taken by private parties without the instigation or participation of law enforcement officers. […]

Read More

VIGNO v. VIGNO, 79 N.H. 108 (1918)

106 A. 285 CORA VIGNO v. GIDEON VIGNO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided December 3, 1918. A libel for divorce will be dismissed on motion, if the alleged marriage was entered into prior to the date of a decree divorcing the libelant from another person. The judgment day is the last day of […]

Read More

COLLINS v. PEARSON, 75 N.H. 567 (1910)

78 A. 495 COLLINS v. PEARSON. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December 6, 1910. A writ of mandamus is not issued if an order requiring the defendant to comply with the prayer of the petition would be wholly nugatory. PETITION for mandamus. Trial by the court. Facts found, and case transferred from the […]

Read More

PETITION OF HAINES, 148 N.H. 380 (2002)

808 A.2d 72 PETITION OF DR. JEFFREY HAINES No. 2001-720Supreme Court of New Hampshire MerrimackArgued May 16, 2002 Opinion Issued September 25, 2002 1. Discovery—Production of Documents or Objects—Confidentialor Privileged In a negligence action, for the trial court to abrogate defendant’s statutory privileges and compel discovery of his medical records, it had to find that […]

Read More

STATE v. RICHTER, 145 N.H. 640 (2000)

765 A.2d 687 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. DIRK RICHTER No. 99-090Supreme Court of New Hampshire Salem District Court Decided December 28, 2000 1. Search and Seizure — Generally — Definitions A police officer’s random computer check of a passing vehicle registration is not a search subject to protections of Fourth Amendment or Part […]

Read More

STATE v. HAYCOCK, 136 N.H. 361 (1992)

616 A.2d 481 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. WALTER HAYCOCK No. 91-323Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided November 20, 1992 1. Weapons — Felon in Possession of a Firearm — Control Whether a defendant has “control” over weapons for purposes of criminal statute is not based upon their location at any particular place, […]

Read More

CAMPBELL v. CLOUGH, 71 N.H. 181 (1901)

51 A. 668 CAMPBELL, Ex’r, v. CLOUGH a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December 3, 1901. Where a town declines to accept a bequest in trust unless certain burial lots owned by the testator are transferred to it, the executor is not authorized to make such conveyance, nor does the sum so bequeathed […]

Read More

BLAISDELL v. CITY OF ROCHESTER, 135 N.H. 589 (1992)

609 A.2d 388 GEORGE BLAISDELL v. CITY OF ROCHESTER No. 90-613Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided May 28, 1992 1. Judges — Disqualification — Relative of Attorney When a judge is related within the third degree to a partner in a law firm representing a party-in-interest before that judge, that partner will always be […]

Read More

PERHAM v. FIBRE CO., 64 N.H. 2 (1885)

3 A. 312 PERHAM v. THE HAVERHILL FIBRE CO. a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December, 1885. It will be ascertained at the trial term whether there are persons not made plaintiffs in a bill in equity who will be affected by the decree, and if so such persons may be there joined. […]

Read More

CLARK v. LOVELACE, 102 N.H. 97 (1959)

151 A.2d 224 LAWRENCE C. CLARK a. v. ROLAND A. LOVELACE a. No. 4724.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll.Argued April 7, 1959. Decided May 21, 1959. 1. Where the defendants purchased for themselves with their own funds a certain lot of land situated between their land and that of the plaintiffs and refused to convey […]

Read More

BELFORD v. OLSON, 94 N.H. 278 (1947)

51 A.2d 635 JOHN A. BELFORD, Adm’r v. ARTHUR OLSON, Adm’r. No. 3639.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided March 4, 1947. A will which contains a bequest of the residue of the testator’s estate to his wife “to have and to hold during her lifetime with full and complete power to dispose of the […]

Read More

STATE v. LIVINGSTON, 153 N.H. 399 (2006)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. DAVID LIVINGSTON. No. 2004-859.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll.Argued: January 12, 2006. Opinion Issued: April 25, 2006. 1. Search and Seizure — Generally — Administrative Searches A warrantless administrative search is reasonable if: (1) there is a substantial government interest that informs the regulatory scheme pursuant to which the […]

Read More

MERCHANTS MUT. c. CO. v. KENNETT, 90 N.H. 253 (1939)

7 A.2d 249 MERCHANTS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. H. C. KENNETT a. No. 3089Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll Decided May 31, 1939 A petition for a declaratory judgment by an insurer to determine coverage in relation to a motor vehicle liability policy is defective which fails to state that a claim of coverage has […]

Read More

SMITH v. MORRILL, 71 N.H. 409 (1902)

52 A. 928 SMITH v. MORRILL. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June 3, 1902. The erroneous admission of incompetent testimony does not furnish cause for setting aside a general verdict when it is apparent from a special finding that the result of the trial was not affected thereby. A plaintiff who has been […]

Read More

McGEE v. BRAGG, 94 N.H. 349 (1947)

53 A.2d 428 WILLIAM T. McGEE v. FRED BRAGG a. No. 3653.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided June 3, 1947. Where the right to vote in a town involves a temporary absence therefrom, the question of whether the voter has the requisite intention of returning thereto as his home is primarily one of fact […]

Read More

MANCHESTER v. HODGE, 74 N.H. 468 (1908)

69 A. 527 MANCHESTER v. HODGE a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided March 3, 1908. Where a deed of land refers for a boundary to a street not actually existing at the time, but which is surveyed shortly afterward in substantial accordance with the terms of the conveyance, it will be presumed that […]

Read More

KEEFE v. RETIREMENT BOARD, 99 N.H. 224 (1954)

108 A.2d 40 RICHARD H. KEEFE, Ex’r v. NEW HAMPSHIRE POLICE RETIREMENT BOARD. No. 4347.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Submitted September 7, 1954. Decided September 30, 1954. Under the police retirement system (R. L., c. 221, as amended) benefits are payable only “in equal monthly installments on the first business day of each calendar month” […]

Read More

BLAKE v. RAILROAD, 73 N.H. 597 (1906)

64 A. 202 BLAKE a. v. CONCORD MONTREAL RAILROAD a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June 8, 1906. The board of railroad commissioners have no power to discontinue any part of a highway for the purpose of avoiding or improving a grade crossing, except as such discontinuance results from a change in location. […]

Read More

KEENE PUBLISHING CORP. v. CHESHIRE CTY. SUPER. CT., 119 N.H. 710 (1979)

406 A.2d 137 KEENE PUBLISHING CORP. v. CHESHIRE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT No. 79-232Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original Decided September 13, 1979 1. Constitutional Law — Public Trial — Press Coverage Press has a State constitutional right, though not unlimited, to gather news. 2. Constitutional Law — Public Trial — Press Coverage Preliminary hearings may […]

Read More

PITMAN v. MERRIMAN, 80 N.H. 295 (1922)

117 A. 18 WILLIAM PITMAN, Adm’r, v. HELEN B. MERRIMAN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided February 7, 1922. In an action upon P. S., c. 191, ss. 8-13, for negligently causing death, the amount which the intestate could have earned for his estate is what would remain after deducting the necessary expense of […]

Read More

CHESTER ROD GUN CLUB v. TOWN OF CHESTER, 152 N.H. 577 (2005)

883 A.2d 1034 CHESTER ROD AND GUN CLUB, INC. v. TOWN OF CHESTER. No. 2004-857.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued: May 10, 2005. Opinion Issued: September 2, 2005. 1. Zoning and Planning — Generally — Exceptions, Variances, andNonconforming Uses To obtain a variance, an applicant must show that: (1) granting the variance will not be […]

Read More

BRICKELL v. COMPANY, 93 N.H. 140 (1944)

36 A.2d 622 HARRY L. BRICKELL v. BOSTON MAINE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY. No. 3461.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided March 7, 1944. The statute (R. L., c. 119, s. 28) providing for the use of “oil burning light or flare” when a truck is parked on the highway does not authorize the use of some […]

Read More

SHANGRI-LA, INC. v. STATE, 113 N.H. 440 (1973)

309 A.2d 285 SHANGRI-LA, INC. v. STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE No. 6624Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided August 27, 1973 1. Legislature intended to incorporate by reference into Business Profits Tax (RSA ch. 77-A) the federal income tax method of determining taxable income in the case of a corporation that elected treatment as a […]

Read More

TOWN OF EXETER v. LAMPERT, 118 N.H. 328 (1978)

387 A.2d 332 TOWN OF EXETER v. HAROLD LAMPERT a. No. 7938Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided May 9, 1978 1. Zoning — Appeal From Superior Court — Failure To Appeal By their failure to appeal entry of decree ordering them to remove large sign from side of their building located in land conservation […]

Read More

MADIGAN v. BURNS, 67 N.H. 319 (1892)

29 A. 454 MADIGAN v. BURNS a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided December, 1892. If land is devised to tenants in common, with a condition that it shall not be divided, proceedings for partition may nevertheless be maintained by one of the tenants in common, if he is the person entitled to the […]

Read More

KAMINSKI v. FISCH, 127 N.H. 482 (1985)

503 A.2d 784 KLEM KAMINSKI v. MORTIMER L. FISCH a. No. 84-600Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided December 5, 1985 1. Boundaries — Evidence, Ascertainment, and Establishment Master’s ruling granting a motion for nonsuit in a case involving a boundary line dispute was erroneous as a matter of law, where there was some evidence […]

Read More

STATE v. PARADIS, 123 N.H. 68 (1983)

455 A.2d 1070 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. PAUL A. PARADIS, JR. No. 82-057Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided January 26, 1983 1. Mental Health — Commitment — Standard of Proof The language of the criminal commitment statute, “that it would be dangerous for him to go at large,” does not set a […]

Read More

STATE v. WAYNE KELLEY, 120 N.H. 14 (1980)

413 A.2d 300 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. WAYNE J. KELLEY No. 79-216Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided January 24, 1980 1. Evidence — Circumstantial Evidence — Generally A fact may be proved by circumstantial evidence. 2. Evidence — Circumstantial Evidence — Generally Circumstantial evidence consists of proof of facts or circumstances which […]

Read More

PRECINCT v. NADEAU, 155 N.H. 429 (2007)

EAST DERRY FIRE PRECINCT v. JOHN R. NADEAU a. JOHN R. NADEAU v. EAST DERRY FIRE PRECINCT. No. 2005-855.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued: March 15, 2007. Opinion Issued: May 11, 2007. 1. Contracts — Rescission — Generally Rescission is an equitable remedy the grant of which is always a matter within the sound discretion […]

Read More

GENDRON v. ST. PIERRE, 73 N.H. 419 (1905)

62 A. 966 GENDRON v. ST. PIERRE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December 5, 1905. In an action for slanderously charging a husband with causing or hastening the death of his wife by neglect during her illness, it is not necessary that the declaration should allege that the plaintiff had exclusive care of […]

Read More

RICE v. HOLDEN, 55 N.H. 398 (1875)

RICE v. HOLDEN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided March 12, 1875. An action omitted from the printed docket of the court by mistake ordered to be restored. The plaintiff, at the November term, 1874, moved the circuit court for leave to bring this action forward from the docket of the supreme judicial court […]

Read More

CLARK v. INSURANCE CO., 87 N.H. 353 (1935)

179 A. 352 HELEN M. CLARK v. AETNA INSURANCE CO. SAME v. NIAGARA FIRE INSURANCE CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June 4, 1935. Where a husband conveyed property to his wife, and obtained an assignment of a fire insurance policy thereon to her, his failure to inform the insurer of an agreement […]

Read More

LIBERTY MUT. INS. CO. v. CUSTOMBILT, INC., 128 N.H. 167 (1986)

512 A.2d 1098 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. CUSTOMBILT, INC. No. 84-562Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided June 5, 1986 1. Appeal and Error — Findings — Supporting Evidence Findings and rulings of the trial court must be sustained unless they are lacking in evidential support or tainted by error of law. 2. Witnesses […]

Read More

HATCH v. BULLOCK, 57 N.H. 15 (1876)

HATCH v. BULLOCK. Supreme Court of New Hampshire FROM GRAFTON CIRCUIT COURT. Decided March 21, 1876. Estoppel of tenant to deny his landlord’s title. The plaintiff bargained with I. B. for certain real estate, and went into immediate possession of the same under a parol agreement that the purchase-money should be applied on a debt […]

Read More

IN RE BROWN, 126 N.H. 309 (1985)

493 A.2d 447 In re ARTHUR M. BROWN No. 84-388Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton County Probate Court Decided March 28, 1985 1. Constitutional Law — Due Process — Treatment of Mentally Ill In determining whether the procedural safeguards of chapter governing civil commitment protect in individual’s due process rights, a balancing test involving consideration […]

Read More

STATE v. YATES, 137 N.H. 495 (1993)

629 A.2d 807 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. WILLIAM A. YATES, II No. 91-499Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided August 5, 1993 1. Constitutional Law — Due Process — Generally Burglary conviction obtained through false evidence violated Fourteenth Amendment Due Process protection, where witness testified falsely that he had nothing to do with […]

Read More

LEWIS v. DUDLEY, 70 N.H. 594 (1900)

49 A. 572 LEWIS, Trustee, v. DUDLEY a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan. Decided December, 1900. Where real estate is conveyed to the wife of the vendee thereof, in trust for him and in fraud of his creditors, the transaction cannot be impeached as against one who, in good faith, without notice of the […]

Read More

KNOX LEASING v. TURNER, 132 N.H. 68 (1989)

562 A.2d 168 KNOX LEASING a. v. ROBERT K. TURNER a. TOWN OF NOTTINGHAM v. ROBERT A. BONSER a. No. 87-242 No. 88-107Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Rockingham Decided August 9, 1989 1. Attorney and Client — Unauthorized Practice — Generally In New Hampshire there exists a strong public policy against the unauthorized practice […]

Read More

HALL v. DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MED. CTR, 153 N.H. 388 (2006)

SHERRY HALL a. v. DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER a. No. 2004-708.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton.Argued: January 11, 2006. Opinion Issued: April 25, 2006. 1. Physicians and Surgeons — Malpractice — Generally A wrongful birth claim is a form of a medical malpractice action. 2. Physicians and Surgeons — Malpractice — Duties of Physicians Medical […]

Read More

ROBINSON v. RAILROAD, 85 N.H. 474 (1932)

160 A. 473 HENRY D. ROBINSON v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided May 3, 1932. The duty to give attention to one’s safety in a position of obvious danger is imposed because the ordinary man gives that attention; and one who takes no thought about his safety does not use […]

Read More

MANLEY v. RAILWAY, 75 N.H. 465 (1910)

76 A. 81 MANLEY v. LACONIA STREET RAILWAY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided April 5, 1910. A servant cannot recover for injuries received in the master’s service, if he knew the risk he voluntarily incurred, or as a reasonable man ought to have known and appreciated it. It is no part of a […]

Read More

HUMPHREY v. CUNNINGHAM, WARDEN, 133 N.H. 727 (1990)

584 A.2d 763 EDWARD D. HUMPHREY, SR. v. MICHAEL CUNNINGHAM, WARDEN, THE NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE PRISON No. 89-403Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided December 28, 1990 1. Habeas Corpus — Availability of Writ — Generally A petitioner may collaterally attack a proceeding by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus after the time […]

Read More

MERRIMACK VALLEY WOOD PRODS. v. NEAR, 152 N.H. 192 (2005)

876 A.2d 757 MERRIMACK VALLEY WOOD PRODUCTS, INC. a.v. GLEN NEAR. No. 2004-447.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued: March 23, 2005. Opinion Issued: May 9, 2005. 1. Labor — Employment Contracts — Generally The law does not look with favor upon contracts in restraint of trade or competition. 2. Labor — Employment Contracts — Construction […]

Read More

SNIERSON v. SCRUTON, 145 N.H. 73 (2000)

761 A.2d 1046 RICHARD S. SNIERSON a. v. ROBERT T. SCRUTON a. No. 97-288.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided April 12, 2000. Ordered December 5, 2000. 1. Appeal and Error — Dismissal of Complaint — Failure toState a cause of Action When reviewing a trial court decision dismissing a cause of action for failure […]

Read More

R. J. BERKE CO. v. J. P. GRIFFIN, INC., 116 N.H. 760 (1976)

367 A.2d 583 R. J. BERKE CO., INC. a. v. J. P. GRIFFIN, INC. a. J. P. GRIFFIN, INC. a. v. R. J. BERKE CO., INC. a. No. 7242Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided December 30, 1976 1. Quantum meruit is a restitutionary remedy intended for use by contracting parties who are in material […]

Read More

NEW CASTLE v. RAND, 101 N.H. 201 (1957)

136 A.2d 914 New Castle v. Dorothy Rand a. No. 4625.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued December 4, 1957. Decided December 18, 1957. 1. The courts of this state have traditionally proceeded on the basic assumption that the orderly dispatch of judicial business is accomplished more efficiently where every plaintiff and every defendant is given […]

Read More

AMERICAN FED. AFL-CIO v. DOVER, 109 N.H. 299 (1969)

249 A.2d 681 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL #572 v. DOVER. No. 5866.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford.Argued January 7, 1969. Decided January 31, 1969. 1. Where a collective bargaining contract between municipal employees and a city provided that the final appeal of grievances was to the personnel advisory board […]

Read More

STATE v. TRAVIS, 82 N.H. 220 (1926)

131 A. 598 STATE v. LINWOOD O. TRAVIS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided January 5, 1926. A defendant in a criminal prosecution who voluntarily becomes a witness may be cross-examined as to any relevant matter which tends to discredit him as a witness, including a previous conviction of a criminal offense regarding which […]

Read More

STATE v. BOYLE, 148 N.H. 306 (2002)

807 A.2d 1234 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. DANIEL BOYLE No. 2001-495Supreme Court of New Hampshire RockinghamArgued July 11, 2002 Opinion Issued September 16, 2002 1. Search and Seizure—Warrant Requirement: Exceptions—CommunityCaretaking Where an officer testified that he seized defendant because he found his response to the officer’s initial questioning unusual, and that defendant’s response, […]

Read More

OPINION OF THE JUSTICES, 82 N.H. 561 (1927)

138 A. 284 OPINION OF THE JUSTICES. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Decided March 15, 1927. An occupation tax, so-called, which places charges upon various vocations, avocations and ordinary transactions of business and private life which contain no element subject to supervision either under the police power or as things affected with a public use […]

Read More

BENTON v. O’BRIEN, 111 N.H. 323 (1971)

282 A.2d 22 RICHARD D. BENTON a. v. EDWARD P. O’BRIEN. No. 6232.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided October 5, 1971. Soule Leslie, for the plaintiffs, filed no brief. Sayer Giordano, for the defendant, filed no brief. Memorandum Opinion Exceptions by defendant to rulings and decree for plaintiffs enjoining the defendant from operating a […]

Read More

OPINION OF THE JUSTICES, 131 N.H. 583 (1989)

557 A.2d 1355 OPINION OF THE JUSTICES. No. 89-061.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Request of the Senate. Decided April 26, 1989. 1. Constitutional Law — Due Process — Generally The standard for determining whether a law or procedure violates due process is whether the law or procedure is fundamentally unfair. (Opinion of Chief Justice Brock […]

Read More

SAGENDORPH v. MARVIN, 101 N.H. 79 (1957)

133 A.2d 490 BEATRIX THORNE SAGENDORPH v. OLIVER W. MARVIN a. No. 4580.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire.Argued June 4, 1957. Decided June 20, 1957. 1. The interest and dividends tax authorized to be levied upon income received from a nonresident trustee by an inhabitant of this state (RSA 77:1, 12) is a tax upon […]

Read More

SYLVAIN v. HENDERSON, 116 N.H. 10 (1976)

354 A.2d 135 CHARLES H. SYLVAIN, AP’T v. PRISCILLA S. HENDERSON, EXECUTRIX OF THE WILL OF EUDORE J. SYLVAIN, AP’EE No. 6805Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided January 31, 1976 1. The right to trial by jury in probate appeals is statutory rather than constitutional. 2. The superior court’s denial of the plaintiff’s motion […]

Read More

HUTCHINS v. BERRY, 75 N.H. 416 (1910)

75 A. 650 HUTCHINS v. BERRY a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided February 1, 1910. Where a deed of a mill privilege reserves a preferential right to draw water for running machinery then used or thereafter to be installed in a certain gristmill, the measure of the right is not the capacity of […]

Read More

AMES v. AMES, 117 N.H. 554 (1977)

374 A.2d 1181 LINDA R. AMES v. FREDERICK L. AMES No. 7666Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided June 27, 1977 1. Divorce — Alimony — Discretion Amount of alimony to be awarded a spouse is largely within trial court’s discretion. 2. Divorce — Alimony — Computation In setting alimony, trial court could properly have […]

Read More

JENKS v. MENARD, 145 N.H. 236 (2000)

761 A.2d 462 EDWARD F. AND EDITH RECORD JENKS v. GERARD MENARD, JR. a. No. 98-451Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided August 31, 2000 1. Limitation of Actions — Proceedings — Statutes Sole test for whether new action may be brought after adverse judgment, under New Hampshire’s one-year saving statute, is whether plaintiff’s right […]

Read More

TOWNE v. RICE, 59 N.H. 412 (1879)

TOWNE v. RICE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided December, 1879. The storage of a wagon by the vendee of the same, six days after the sale, in the barn of the vendor over night for convenience and security, held, under the circumstances of the case, not to be conclusive evidence of a secret […]

Read More

SHEEDY v. MERRIMACK CTY. SUPER. CT., 128 N.H. 51 (1986)

509 A.2d 144 SEAN D. SHEEDY v. MERRIMACK COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT AND MERRIMACK COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT No. 83-472Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original Decided May 9, 1986 1. Constitutional Law — Due Process — Statutory Vagueness A statute or government regulation is void for vagueness when it either forbids or requires the doing of an […]

Read More

STATE v. ALLEN, 128 N.H. 390 (1986)

514 A.2d 1263 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. ROBERT ALLEN No. 84-537Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided August 7, 1986 1. Homicide — Attempted Murder — Elements Attempted murder is a single, generic crime comprising an act committed with the purpose to cause the death of another, when that act is a substantial […]

Read More

STATE v. MOULTON, 131 N.H. 467 (1989)

554 A.2d 1292 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JAMES MOULTON No. 87-462Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided March 6, 1989 Constitutional Law — Due Process — Suppression of Favorable Evidence Defendant’s claim that he was denied due process because the State suppressed or withheld evidence either in bad faith or with culpable negligence […]

Read More

PLIMPTON v. THEOS, 113 N.H. 651 (1973)

312 A.2d 686 EDWARD L. PLIMPTON v. LEWIS THEOS No. 6661Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided November 30, 1973 1. Plaintiff’s testimony that he had never drilled a well on a flat rate basis was admissible as evidence of a party’s custom probative of his intent or action. 2. Trier of fact’s function is […]

Read More

GUERIN v. COMPANY, 70 N.H. 133 (1899)

46 A. 185 GUERIN v. NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided December, 1899. The declarations of an agent are not binding upon the principal unless made by virtue of express authority, or required by the ordinary prosecution of the business in which he is engaged. In an action […]

Read More

LANG v. STOCKWELL, 55 N.H. 561 (1875)

LANG v. STOCKWELL Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided August 12, 1875. Secret trust — Reservation of use of chattel by vendor. Upon the sale of a chattel, it was agreed as part of the bargain that the vendor should still have the right to use the thing sold, in and about his business. […]

Read More

DOLAN v. MAPLE LEAF HEALTH CARE CENTER INC., 119 N.H. 424 (1979)

402 A.2d 196 MARION B. DOLAN v. MAPLE LEAF HEALTH CARE CENTER, INC. EPSOM MANOR HEALTH CENTER, INC. No. 79-029Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided May 23, 1979 1. Judgments — Summary Judgment — Affidavits Although a counter-affidavit opposing motion for summary judgment must contain more than vague and general allegations, it need not […]

Read More

WHITTIER v. INSURANCE CO., 55 N.H. 141 (1875)

WHITTIER v. THE HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided March 11, 1875. A citizen of this state brought an action in the supreme court of this state against a corporation created by the legislature of the state of Connecticut, and having its principal place of business in the latter state. […]

Read More

CADLE CO. v. BOURGEOIS, 149 N.H. 410 (2003)

821 A.2d 1001 THE CADLE COMPANY, SERVICING AGENT FOR CADLE PROPERTIES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC. v. MAURICE BOURGEOIS a. No. 2002-165Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-Northern Judicial DistrictArgued January 14, 2003 Opinion Issued April 28, 2003 1. Partnerships — Generally — Dissolution A partnership-at-will may be dissolved at any time by the express will of […]

Read More

HAMILTON BANK v. HORTON, 68 N.H. 235 (1894)

44 A. 296 HAMILTON NATIONAL BANK v. HORTON Tr. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1894. In the absence of fraud, wages of the defendant which have been once attached by the plaintiff in the hands of the trustee, and the trustee discharged, may be held in a second suit by the plaintiff […]

Read More

STATE v. SCARLETT, 118 N.H. 904 (1978)

395 A.2d 1244 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. MICHAEL SCARLETT No. 78-116Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided December 29, 1978 1. Criminal Law — Public Prosecutor — Standard of Conduct A public prosecutor is to be held to a high standard of conduct. 2. Evidence — Blood-Stained Bedspread — Admissibility Where exception was […]

Read More

JENKINS v. CANAAN MUN. CT., 116 N.H. 616 (1976)

366 A.2d 208 FOSTER JENKINS v. CANAAN MUNICIPAL COURT No. 7230Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided October 29, 1976 1. A defendant tried before a municipal or district court presided by a nonlawyer judge is not deprived under New Hampshire’s two-tier Court system of his right to a fair trial and to the effective […]

Read More

STATE v. ARTHUR, 118 N.H. 561 (1978)

391 A.2d 884 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. ANDREW L. ARTHUR No. 78-068Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided September 18, 1978 1. New Trial — Grounds To warrant a new trial or dismissal of the charges, the defendant must at least show that the evidence was favorable to him and that he has […]

Read More

WALLS v. OXFORD MANAGEMENT CO., 137 N.H. 653 (1993)

633 A.2d 103 DEANNA WALLS v. OXFORD MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC. AND NASHUA-OXFORD BAY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP No. 92-338Supreme Court of New Hampshire U.S. District Court Decided November 4, 1993 1. Negligence — Duty — Generally Claims for negligence rest primarily upon a violation of some duty owed by the offender to the injured party; absent […]

Read More

LYNCH v. GRUNDY, 97 N.H. 286 (1952)

86 A.2d 114 NORMAN P. LYNCH v. LOWIE GRUNDY a. No. 4085.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided February 5, 1952. In the absence of proof of the law of the foreign jurisdiction where a contract was made, the rights of the parties in an action for breach thereof are governed by the law of […]

Read More