PHELAN v. L. M. L. CORP., 123 N.H. 294 (1983)

461 A.2d 105 JOSEPH F. PHELAN v. L. M. L. CORP. No. 82-430Supreme Court of New Hampshire Claremont District Court Decided May 6, 1983 Appeal and Error — Transcript — Absence Where the issue before the supreme court on appeal from an award in a small claims action, as to when the tenant relinquished possession […]

Read More

CARTER v. BERLIN MILLS, 58 N.H. 52 (1876)

CARTER v. THE BERLIN MILLS CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided December, 1876. The liability of a person for damages arising from the negligence or misfeasance of another, in the performance of a lawful contract, is confined, in its application, to the relation of master and servant, or principal and agent, and does […]

Read More

EMERY v. WOODWARD, 96 N.H. 61 (1949)

69 A.2d 865 BERNARD P. EMERY v. WILLIAM L. WOODWARD a. No. 3868.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided December 6, 1949. While the testimony of a witness concerning what he overheard of conversation between the plaintiff real estate broker and the purchaser in the absence of the seller, having a tendency to show that […]

Read More

CIBOROWSKI v. ROBINSON, 116 N.H. 723 (1976)

366 A.2d 493 JACOB CIBOROWSKI v. RICHARD ROBINSON RICHARD ROBINSON, d.b.a. ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION CO. v. JACOB CIBOROWSKI No. 7486Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided November 30, 1976 1. Evidence supported the trial court’s finding that the defendant quit the premises in October 1973; accordingly the finding must stand. 2. By allowing the defendant to […]

Read More

COMMERCIAL UNION ASSUR. v. MONADNOCK REG. SCH. DIST., 121 N.H. 275 (1981)

428 A.2d 894 COMMERCIAL UNION ASSURANCE COMPANIES v. MONADNOCK REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT a. No. 80-427Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire Decided April 3, 1981 1. Insurance — Notice of Claim — “As Soon as Practicable” Whether there has been a substantial breach of insurance policy provisions requiring notice to be given “as soon as practicable” […]

Read More

DEERING v. TIBBETTS, 105 N.H. 481 (1964)

202 A.2d 232 TOWN OF DEERING, ex rel WILLIAM B. BITTENBENDER v. EARL TIBBETTS. No. 5242.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued June 3, 1964. Decided July 17, 1964. 1. A municipal ordinance prohibiting the erection of any building or trailer within one-fourth mile of the town common unless the selectmen approve the plans for construction […]

Read More

STATE v. CARLSON, 146 N.H. 52 (2001)

767 A.2d 421 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. CARL CARLSON. No. 99-008.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided February 15, 2001. 1. Evidence — Particular Matters — Opening the Door Doctrine Sexual assault defendant opened the door to evidence of a prior sexual encounter with a different underage female since, in context of totality […]

Read More

IN RE SABRINA C., 137 N.H. 445 (1993)

629 A.2d 782 IN RE SABRINA C. No. 91-569Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack County Probate Court Decided July 23, 1993 1. Parent and Child — Termination of Parental Rights — Abandonment Statute providing grounds for termination of parental rights creates a rebuttable presumption that a parent intends to abandon the child if the parent […]

Read More

NEW HAMPSHIRE-VERMONT HOSP. SERV. v. DURKIN, 112 N.H. 2 (1972)

286 A.2d 242 NEW HAMPSHIRE-VERMONT HOSPITALIZATION SERVICE v. JOHN A. DURKIN, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER. NEW HAMPSHIRE-VERMONT PHYSICIAN SERVICE v. SAME. No. 6365. No. 6366.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original. Decided January 20, 1972. Upton, Sanders Upton (Mr. Richard F. Upton orally) for the plaintiff New Hampshire-Vermont Hospitalization Service. Sulloway, Hollis, Godfrey Soden (Mr. James B. Godfrey […]

Read More

HAINES v. INSURANCE CO., 59 N.H. 199 (1879)

HAINES v. THE REPUBLIC FIRE INS. Co. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June, 1879. An exception to the charge of the court stands upon the ground intended when it was taken. An exception to an erroneous instruction to the jury will be treated as waived, unless, when taken, it is so stated that […]

Read More

AMOSKEAG TRUST CO. v. INSURANCE CO., 88 N.H. 154 (1936)

185 A. 2 AMOSKEAG TRUST COMPANY, Trustee. v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided May 5, 1936. In an action on a policy of life insurance containing a provision for incontestability “after two years from its date of issue except for non-payment of premium” the defence of fraud is […]

Read More

MOODY v. DOWNS, 63 N.H. 50 (1884)

MOODY a. v. DOWNS GIGNOUX, Tr. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June, 1884. A surviving partner’s assignment of all real and personal estate “belonging to me personally, or as surviving partner * * * to divide and pay all the balance of said proceeds among all my creditors according to law,” conveys his […]

Read More

WUELPER v. UNIVERSITY OF N.H., 112 N.H. 471 (1972)

298 A.2d 747 ERIK WUELPER a. v. UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. No. 6345.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided December 29, 1972. 1. An adverse claim presented in a petition for declaratory judgment must be based on actual facts and must involve definite and concrete legal relations of parties having adverse interests. 2. A declaratory […]

Read More

MARTINEAU v. WALDMAN, 93 N.H. 386 (1945)

42 A.2d 735 ROBERT MARTINEAU, Adm’r v. ERNEST WALDMAN. No. 3534.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June 5, 1945. A question of law once decided is not reconsidered in the same case except upon a motion for rehearing. The phrase “expenses of recovery” in R. L., c. 355, s. 14, providing for distribution of […]

Read More

JANSON v. SCHIER, 117 N.H. 570 (1977)

375 A.2d 1159 HENRY P. JANSON v. ALLAN A. SCHIER a. No. 7472Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided July 11, 1977 1. Homestead — Exemption Upon death of judgment debtor, his wife became entitled to his homestead exemption for life. RSA 480:3-a. Page 571 2. Property — Improvements — Reimbursement Where judgment debtor conveyed […]

Read More

PESATURO v. KINNE, 161 N.H. 550 (2011)

20 A.3d 284 LINDA PESATURO v. ROBBIN KINNE. No. 2010-127.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Hillsborough-southern judicial district.Submitted: January 6, 2011. Opinion Issued: February 25, 2011. 1. Nuisance — Generally — Basis of Liability It is the common law rule that a landowner is under no affirmative duty to remedy conditions of purely natural origin on […]

Read More

COUNTY v. JAFFREY, 58 N.H. 426 (1878)

MERRIMACK COUNTY v. THE TOWN OF JAFFREY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided August, 1878. The right of the insane asylum to recover the charges of supporting a pauper, committed on the order of the judge of probate as dangerously insane, is not affected by the fact that the proceedings leading to the commitment […]

Read More

ARCHIE v. BLAIR, 107 N.H. 471 (1966)

225 A.2d 383 GLADYS M. ARCHIE a. v. CLIFFORD I. BLAIR. No. 5546.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued November 2, 1966. Decided December 20, 1966. 1. In an action for damages sustained as the result of plaintiff’s vehicle being struck by defendant’s vehicle where a crucial issue before the jury was whether the defendant, who […]

Read More

SEPPALA AHO CONSTR. CO. v. NASHUA, 113 N.H. 361 (1973)

306 A.2d 760 SEPPALA AHO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. CITY OF NASHUA a. No. 6635Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided June 29, 1973 1. RSA ch. 280 imposes a duty on authorized officials of a city to obtain from labor commissioner a schedule of minimum wage rates for incorporation in the advertisement for bids […]

Read More

STATE v. SIMONE, 152 N.H. 755 (2005)

887 A.2d 135 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. FRANK SIMONE. No. 2004-279.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-Southern Judicial District.Argued: September 29, 2005. Opinion Issued: November 30, 2005. 1. Offenses — Particular Crimes — Stalking Evidence demonstrating that defendant obsessively called and sent packages to the victim for several years even though she, the police, […]

Read More

SIRRELL v. STATE, 146 N.H. 364 (2001)

766 A.2d 725 EVELYN SIRRELL a. v. STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE a. No. 2001-063Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided May 3, 2001 1. Taxation — Constitutional Requirements and Restrictions— Particular Statutes Statewide property tax law, like any legislative act, is presumed constitutional and will not be declared invalid except upon “unescapable grounds”. RSA 76:3. […]

Read More

V V CORP. v. AMERICAN POLICYHOLDERS’ INS. CO., 127 N.H. 372 (1985)

500 A.2d 695 V V CORPORATION a. v. AMERICAN POLICYHOLDERS’ INSURANCE CO. No. 84-447Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided October 30, 1985 1. Constitutional Law — Full Faith and Credit Generally, a judgment rendered in this country by a court of competent jurisdiction is entitled under the United States Constitution to full faith and […]

Read More

IN RE KEVIN GENDRON, 157 N.H. 314 (2008)

IN THE MATTER OF KEVIN GENDRON AND JODY PLAISTEK. No. 2007-844.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Derry Family Division.Argued: April 10, 2008. Opinion Issued: May 20, 2008. 1. Appeal and Error — Record or Transcript —Contents In a custody proceeding, although the trial court initially denied the father’s post-hearing motion to accept an acknowledgment of parentage, […]

Read More

IN RE MUNDY, 97 N.H. 239 (1952)

85 A.2d 371 IN RE ALBERT T. MUNDY a. No. 4059.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided January 2, 1952. Proceedings under the sexual psychopath act (Laws 1949, c. 314) are civil in nature and offend no provision of criminal due process. Members of the sexual psychopath examining board as provided by Laws 1949, c. […]

Read More

STATE v. FLEURY, 114 N.H. 325 (1974)

321 A.2d 108 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. RONALD G. FLEURY No. 6733Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided May 31, 1974 1. Motion to dismiss indictments on ground grand jurors were improperly selected was properly denied where record warranted conclusions that process of selecting jury panel did not depart materially or substantially from requirements […]

Read More

TOWN OF NORTH HAMPTON v. SANDERSON, 131 N.H. 614 (1989)

557 A.2d 643 TOWN OF NORTH HAMPTON v. JARIB M. SANDERSON, JR. No. 88-085Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided May 3, 1989 1. Municipal Corporations — Excavation Operations — Authority of Selectmen Trial court properly ruled that board of selectmen did not have the authority to enter into a settlement agreement which would validly […]

Read More

SANBORN v. RANDALL, 62 N.H. 620 (1883)

SANBORN v. RANDALL. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan. Decided June, 1883. One of several owners in common may maintain an action on a lease for all the rent when it is payable to him, and the lease is signed by no other owner. But if the right of one of the other owners to […]

Read More

HARDY v. BANK, 61 N.H. 34 (1881)

HARDY, Guardian, v. CITIZENS’ NATIONAL BANK OF KEENE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided June, 1881. A guardian has no authority to bind his ward, either by note or by a pledge of the property of the ward. One taking in pledge, from a guardian, a note payable to the order of the guardian […]

Read More

TOWN OF MILFORD v. JOHNSON, 122 N.H. 875 (1982)

451 A.2d 1295 TOWN OF MILFORD v. AVERY JOHNSON No. 81-292Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided October 14, 1982 1. Costs — Attorney Fees — Scope of Review Scope of review by the supreme court of trial court’s awarding attorney’s fees is limited. 2. Costs — Attorney Fees — Particular Fees Where property owner […]

Read More

STATE v. POLK, 155 N.H. 585 (2007)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JONATHAN M. POLK. No. 2005-921.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-northern judicial district.Argued: February 22, 2007. Opinion Issued: June 22, 2007. 1. Highways — Motor Vehicles — OperatingUnder Influence Driving while intoxicated is a strict liability offense, where the commission of the prohibited conduct alone constitutes the offense. RSA 265:82. […]

Read More

KANE v. N.H. STATE LIQUOR COMM’N, 118 N.H. 706 (1978)

393 A.2d 555 KATHERINE T. KANE v. NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE LIQUOR COMMISSION No. 78-036Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire Decided October 30, 1978 1. Contracts — Implied Contacts — Implied-in-Fact Existence of an implied-in-fact contract is a question of fact. 2. Contracts — Implied Contracts — Implied-in-Fact In action for contractual indemnity in which landlord […]

Read More

BELLOWS FALLS c. CO. v. STATE, 94 N.H. 187 (1946)

49 A.2d 511 BELLOWS FALLS HYDRO-ELECTRIC CORPORATION NEW ENGLAND POWER COMPANY CONNECTICUT RIVER POWER COMPANY v. STATE. No. 3615.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Public Service Commission. Decided November 6, 1946. The Public Service Commission is not empowered under the provisions of R. L., c. 289 to grant permission to a foreign utility doing or desiring […]

Read More

SCHOFIELD v. COMPANY, 90 N.H. 422 (1939)

10 A.2d 227 LAWRENCE SCHOFIELD v. E. R. BATES COMPANY. No. 3129.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December 5, 1939. A workman who during his minority accepts compensation under the act, does not thereby make it binding election to pursue the statutory remedy to the exclusion of his common-law rights, but his subsequent acceptance […]

Read More

HANSEL v. CITY OF KEENE, 138 N.H. 99 (1993)

634 A.2d 1351 PETER D. HANSEL a. v. CITY OF KEENE No. 93-278Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire Decided December 21, 1993 1. Appeal and Error — Standards of Review — Generally Function of appellate review is to determine whether a reasonable person could find as did the trial judge. 2. Estoppel — Equitable Estoppel […]

Read More

COHEN v. TOWN OF HENNIKER, 134 N.H. 425 (1991)

593 A.2d 1145 GABRIEL COHEN v. TOWN OF HENNIKER No. 90-335Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided July 8, 1991 1. Zoning — Subdivision Ordinances — Review The decision of the superior court will be upheld unless the decision is not supported by the evidence or is clearly erroneous. 2. Constitutional Law — Property — […]

Read More

STATE v. FOURNIER, 158 N.H. 214 (2009)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. RAYMOND K. FOURNIER. No. 2008-615.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Hillsborough-northern judicial district.Argued: November 19, 2008. Opinion Issued: January 8, 2009. 1. Mental Health — Commitment Proceedings — Procedure The supreme court ordinarily classifies the care, treatment and indeterminate commitment of persons who are insane, mentally deranged, emotionally or mentally […]

Read More

IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA (MEDICAL RECORDS OF PAYNE), 150 N.H. 436 (2004)

839 A.2d 837 IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA FOR MEDICAL RECORDS OF CURTIS PAYNE. IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA FOR MEDICAL RECORDS OF SCOTT CARTA. THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. GREGORY BARKA. Nos. 2002-384, No. 2002-390, No. 2002-643.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-southern Judicial DistrictArgued: July 16, 2003. Opinion Issued: January 6, 2004. 1. […]

Read More

CARTIER v. CASUALTY CO., 84 N.H. 526 (1931)

153 A. 6 GEORGE CARTIER v. LUMBERMEN’S MUTUAL CASUALTY Co. a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided January 6, 1931. A clause in an automobile liability insurance policy excepting liability for “accidents to members of the assured’s household including domestic or household servants” includes within such exception not only a household of which the […]

Read More

ALACRON v. SWANSON, 145 N.H. 625 (2000)

765 A.2d 1043 ALACRON, INC. v. WILLIAM SWANSON a. No. 98-442.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-Southern Judicial District Decided December 28, 2000 1. Dismissal — Practice and Procedure — Generally Plaintiff need only make a prima facie showing of jurisdiction facts in order to defeat defendant’s motion to dismiss. RSA 510:4, I. 2. Courts — […]

Read More

CROWN PAPER CO. v. CITY OF BERLIN, 142 N.H. 563 (1997)

703 A.2d 1387 CROWN PAPER CO. D/B/A CROWN VANTAGE a. v. CITY OF BERLIN No. 96-423Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos Decided December 31, 1997 1. Appeal and Error — Standards of Review — Generally Questions of law are reviewed de novo. Findings of fact, however, are overturned only if unsupported by the evidence. 2. […]

Read More

WEGNER v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CAS. INS. CO., 148 N.H. 107 (2002)

803 A.2d 598 MARSHA WEGNER, ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF CHRISTIAN WEGNER v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY No. 2001-023Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-Southern Judicial DistrictArgued May 8, 2002 Opinion Issued July 24, 2002 1. Insurance — Kinds — Automobile Insurance Where a valid policy exclusion in an automobile insurance policy bars liability […]

Read More

STATE v. DELLORFANO, 128 N.H. 628 (1986)

517 A.2d 1163 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JOSEPH DELLORFANO No. 85-229Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided October 3, 1986 1. Constitutional Law — Self-Incrimination — Miranda Warning The fifth amendment requires the exclusion of incriminating statements elicited during a custodial interrogation prior to apprising a suspect of his constitutional rights. U.S. CONST. […]

Read More

IN THE MATTER OF UNNAMED ATTORNEY UNNAMED TITLE CO., 138 N.H. 729 (1994)

645 A.2d 69 IN THE MATTER OF UNNAMED ATTORNEY AND UNNAMED TITLE COMPANY No. SMC-93-016Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original Decided July 27, 1994 1. Attorneys — Judicial Control — Audit To obtain accounting from a lawyer’s related business entity, professional conduct committee must show that its audit of a New Hampshire lawyer’s records led […]

Read More

TOWN OF NOTTINGHAM v. NEWMAN, 147 N.H. 131 (2001)

785 A.2d 891 TOWN OF NOTTINGHAM v. DIANE NEWMAN a. No. 99-677Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided November 1, 2001 1. Zoning and Planning — Administration and Enforcement —Enforcement and Penalties Application of statute imposing a civil penalty for violation of a local zoning ordinance or a condition of a permit did not deny […]

Read More

STEVENS v. KING, 74 N.H. 144 (1907)

65 A. 944 STEVEN’S v. KING a., Trs. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided February 5, 1907. Where the estate of one sued as trustee is settled in the insolvent course, the claim of the principal defendant against the estate is barred if not presented to the commissioner within the time limited, in which […]

Read More

SMALL v. COMPANY, 96 N.H. 265 (1950)

74 A.2d 544 PERCY C. SMALL v. CHRONICLE AND GAZETTE PUBLISHING COMPANY. No. 3921.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided July 6, 1950. To authorize the finding that a new trial should be granted because of newly discovered evidence it must appear that the evidence is material to the issues joined and its character such […]

Read More

LeBEAU v. LeBEAU, 80 N.H. 139 (1921)

114 A. 28 FLORA A. LeBEAU v. EUGENE LeBEAU. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided May 3, 1921. Under P.S., c. 175, s. 18, an order decreeing alimony, though made in accordance with the agreement of the parties, may be re-examined and revised. MOTION, to bring forward a decree in a libel for a […]

Read More

PROVENCAL v. VERMONT MUT. INS. CO., 132 N.H. 742 (1990)

571 A.2d 276 THERESA PROVENCAL v. VERMONT MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND CRUICKSHANK COMPANY No. 89-162Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided March 9, 1990 1. Pleading — Motion To Dismiss — Generally On appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss, issue is whether the allegations in the plaintiff’s pleadings are reasonably susceptible of […]

Read More

WOOD PIANO CO. v. HUCKINS, 75 N.H. 611 (1910)

78 A. 614 WOOD PIANO CO. v. HUCKINS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December 6, 1910. REPLEVIN, for a piano sold conditionally by the plaintiffs to one Wright and attached by the defendant as the property of Wright. Transferred without a ruling from the May term, 1910, of the superior court by Plummer, […]

Read More

LEGISLATIVE UTIL. CONSUMERS’ COUNCIL v. PUBLIC UTIL., 117 N.H. 972 (1977)

380 A.2d 1083 LEGISLATIVE UTILITY CONSUMERS’ COUNCIL VOLUNTEERS ORGANIZED IN COMMUNITY EDUCATION v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE AND PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE No. 7717Supreme Court of New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Decided December 2, 1977 1. Public Utilities — Judicial Review — Rate Regulations In order to prevail in […]

Read More

PETTIGREW v. GAMACHE, 104 N.H. 530 (1963)

191 A.2d 92 EMILE PETTIGREW, JR. v. ROSE-ANNA GAMACHE a. No. 5119.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued April 2, 1963. Decided May 28, 1963. 1. Where the testator devised his estate in trust with instructions to the trustee to use and apply the net income and any part or the whole of the principal if […]

Read More

IN RE ESTATE OF BORKOWSKI, 120 N.H. 54 (1980)

410 A.2d 1121 In re THE ESTATE OF JENNIE T. BORKOWSKI No. 79-160Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham County Probate Court Decided January 31, 1980 1. Bills and Notes — Payment Because a promissory note obligates the maker to repay, the money received by the maker is not an advancement but a debt. 2. Descent […]

Read More

IN THE MATTER OF SARVELA, 154 N.H. 426 (2006)

IN THE MATTER OF JENNIFER SARVELA AND BRIAN D. SARVELA. No. 2005-634.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-southern judicial district.Argued: September 13, 2006. Opinion Issued: November 29, 2006. 1. Divorce — Grounds — Habitual Drunkenness The phrase “habitual drunkard” in the statute setting forth grounds for absolute divorce does not refer to one who habitually abuses […]

Read More

POWELL v. CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER, 145 N.H. 7 (2000)

749 A.2d 301 CHERYL L. POWELL v. CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER a. No. 97-860Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-Northern Judicial District Decided March 21, 2000 1. Common Law — Abrogation — Preemption By Statute A plaintiff may not raise a claim under the common law if the legislature intended to replace it with a statutory cause […]

Read More

ALCORN v. ROCHESTER ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, 114 N.H. 491 (1974)

322 A.2d 608 ANTHONY ALCORN a. v. ROCHESTER ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT a. No. 6889Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided July 19, 1974 1. A zoning board of adjustment has authority to grant a variance from permitted uses within a district as long as the granting of Page 492 the variance does not diminish […]

Read More

IN THE MATTER OF GLAUDE FOGG, 151 N.H. 273 (2004)

855 A.2d 494 IN THE MATTER OF MICHELLE (FOGG) GLAUDE AND KENNETH FOGG, II. No. 2003-694.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford.Argued: June 10, 2004. Opinion Issued: July 16, 2004. 1. Divorce — Child Support — Duty to Support Upon the dissolution of a marriage, absent a valid adoption, a stepparent’s duty to support a stepchild […]

Read More

BRODERICK v. WATTS, 136 N.H. 153 (1992)

614 A.2d 600 EDWARD BRODERICK, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATES OF FRANCIS W. DeFRANCESCO, RITA Y. DeFRANCESCO, AND BRIAN S. DeFRANCESCO v. IDA WATTS No. 90-399Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided September 1, 1992 1. Judgments — Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict — Tests Motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict are essentially the […]

Read More

EMPLOYERS LIABILITY CORP. v. NEW HAMPTON SCHOOL, 103 N.H. 185 (1961)

168 A.2d 119 EMPLOYERS LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION v. NEW HAMPTON SCHOOL a. No. 4877.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap.Argued January 3, 1961. Decided March 7, 1961. 1. Where the first notice of an accident was not given by the policyholder to its comprehensive liability insurer or its agent until five and a half years after […]

Read More

HESS v. SHURTLEFF, 74 N.H. 114 (1906)

65 A. 377 HESS a. v. SHURTLEFF. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided December 4, 1906. Whether a witness offered as an expert is qualified to testify in that capacity is a question of fact determinable by the trial court. In an action to recover the price of goods sold, the plaintiff is not […]

Read More

LANG v. ISABELLE, 119 N.H. 780 (1979)

407 A.2d 826 MARTHA JANE LANG a. v. JOSEPH A. L. ISABELLE No. 79-147Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided October 24, 1979 1. Easements — Prescription — Scope In equity action where defendant/landowner whose property was adjacent to plaintiffs’ property was permanently enjoined from blocking roadways or otherwise interfering with plaintiffs’ use of them, […]

Read More

MOSKOWITZ v. MOSKOWITZ, 118 N.H. 199 (1978)

385 A.2d 120 DAVID L. MOSKOWITZ v. BARBARA R. MOSKOWITZ MICHAEL BOLDUC v. CHRISTINE BOLDUC Nos. 7937 7949Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided March 31, 1978 1. Common Law — Name Change At common law, a person could adopt another name at will; absent statutory restrictions, one may lawfully change his name at will […]

Read More

STATE v. HAST, 133 N.H. 747 (1990)

584 A.2d 175 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. GEORGE HAST No. 89-510Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided December 28, 1990 1. Trial — Instructions — Requests A requested instruction on a party’s theory of defense must be given if such theory is supported by some evidence, and refusal to charge on that defense […]

Read More

SANDERSON v. TAYLOR, 64 N.H. 97 (1886)

5 A. 717 SANDERSON v. TAYLOR. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided June, 1886. The service of a writ by copy or summons given to the defendant is not invalidated by the sheriff’s non-execution of a command of the same writ to attach property. CASE, for slander. The writ commanded the sheriff to attach […]

Read More

ATLANTIC RESTAURANT MGT. CORP. v. MUNRO, 130 N.H. 460 (1988)

543 A.2d 916 ATLANTIC RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION v. LOUISE MUNRO No. 87-306Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll Decided May 13, 1988 1. Contracts — Specific Performance — Discretion of Trial Court The granting of specific performance of a contract is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court, which bases its decision upon […]

Read More

STATE v. ATKINS, 145 N.H. 256 (2000)

761 A.2d 484 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. GEORGE M. ATKINS, III. No. 96-175Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided September 28, 2000 1. Appeal and Error — Preservation of Questions — Particular Cases Failure of defendant to object to allegedly improper statements in prosecutor’s closing argument precluded consideration of that issue on appeal. […]

Read More

TOWN OF HAMPTON v. BRUST, 122 N.H. 463 (1982)

446 A.2d 458 TOWN OF HAMPTON a. v. DONALD A. BRUST a. No. 81-090Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided May 21, 1982 1. Statutes — Construction and Application — Purpose Provision of the statute governing enactment of zoning regulations by towns and village districts, which required planning board to determine the final form in […]

Read More

HARDY v. GAGE, 66 N.H. 552 (1891)

22 A. 557 HARDY v. GAGE a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided June, 1891. In a devise over to the heirs of the testator after a gift for life or in fee, whether the next of kin living at the testator’s death, or at the death of the first taker, are entitled to […]

Read More

STATE v. STONE, 113 N.H. 36 (1973)

300 A.2d 331 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. HARRY F. STONE No. 6461.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire Decided January 31, 1973 1. Defendant who pleaded guilty knowing that the sentencing court was not bound to follow the county attorney’s recommendation was not entitled to withdraw his plea of guilty following the imposition of a […]

Read More

APPEAL OF BEHAVIOR SCIENCE INSTITUTE, 121 N.H. 928 (1981)

436 A.2d 1329 APPEAL OF BEHAVIOR SCIENCE INSTITUTE (New Hampshire Department of Health and Welfare, Office of Health Planning and Development) No. 80-470Supreme Court of New Hampshire Department of Health and Welfare, Office of Health Planning Development Decided October 30, 1981 1. Appeal and Error — Remand Where the procedures followed in applying for a […]

Read More

MORAN v. RAILWAY, 74 N.H. 500 (1908)

69 A. 884 MORAN v. DOVER, SOMERSWORTH, AND ROCHESTER STREET RAILWAY CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided May 5, 1908. Where the evidence in an action for personal injuries discloses the nature and extent of medical treatment required by the plaintiff, but is silent as to the value or cost of the physician’s […]

Read More

IN RE PARCEL OF LAND, 132 N.H. 1 (1989)

561 A.2d 1061 In re PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN EFFINGHAM, NEW HAMPSHIRE, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE MELOON LOT, CONSISTING OF 84 ACRES MORE OR LESS, DESCRIBED AT BOOK 101, PAGE 307 OF THE REGISTRY OF DEEDS, COUNTY OF CARROLL; 1969 BANNER TRAVEL TRAILER, SERIAL NO. B24564; BROWN 1969 DODGE VAN, VIN 2082163749; BRIGGS AND […]

Read More

STATE v. BURKE, 2010-202 (N.H. 9-22-2011)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. ROBERT BURKE. No. 2010-202Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-northern judicial districtArgued: April 21, 2011 Opinion Issued: September 22, 2011 Michael A. Delaney, attorney general (Thomas E.Bocian, assistant attorney general, on the brief and orally), for the State. Pamela E. Phelan, assistant appellate defender, of Concord, on the brief and […]

Read More

SMITH v. RAILROAD, 88 N.H. 430 (1937)

190 A. 697, 191 A. 833 MABEL JOHNSON SMITH, Adm’x v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. FLORENCE A. SMITH v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided March 2, 1937. In an action against a railroad for negligently backing a freight train upon persons walking upon its track, the charge after stating that a certain rule […]

Read More

CARLTON v. HENDERSON, 79 N.H. 416 (1920)

111 A. 75 WALTER CARLTON v. HARRY P. HENDERSON, Trustee a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided May 4, 1920. Devise to A in trust to pay the income to B “and any part or the whole of the principal to be paid . . . at the discretion of” A. A, having declined […]

Read More

GURNSEY v. KEENE, 68 N.H. 243 (1894)

34 A. 742 GURNSEY a., Ap’ts, v. KEENE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided December, 1894. The question of procedure upon an appeal from a decision of the mayor and aldermen in a highway proceeding is one of fact, to be determined at the trial term. APPEAL, from the decision of the mayor and […]

Read More

SILVER v. JONES, 81 N.H. 297 (1924)

126 A. 13 ALMA SILVER v. CHARLES A. JONES. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided May 6, 1924. In case by a highway traveler for injuries received in consequence of frightening horse by an automobile, a finding that the defendant turned to the left of the center of the road as he was about […]

Read More

ESTATE OF LIBBY v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO., 147 N.H. 616 (2002)

809 A.2d 768 THE ESTATE OF GEORGE LIBBY v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY No. 2001-056Supreme Court of New Hampshire RockinghamArgued: February 13, 2002 Opinion Issued: April 17, 2002 1. Insurance — Policies — Uninsured Motorists The phrase “legally entitled to recover” contained in unisured motorist provisions of decedent insured’s automobile policies meant that […]

Read More

FARNUM v. COMPANY, 69 N.H. 231 (1897)

45 A. 745 FARNUM v. CONCORD LAND AND WATER POWER CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided December, 1897. Counts in case and assumpsit for different causes of action not dependent upon substantially the same evidence cannot be joined; but a verdict for the plaintiff upon one count will not be disturbed for misjoinder […]

Read More

McNALLY v. BAILEY, 65 N.H. 208 (1889)

18 A. 745 McNALLY v. BAILEY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided June, 1889. A finding that the assignment of a chattel mortgage was taken in good faith, without knowledge or notice of an existing lien, excludes the inference that the assignee had constructive notice of such a lien. REPLEVIN, for a piano. Facts […]

Read More

SCHROEDER v. TOWN OF WINDHAM, 158 N.H. 187 (2008)

WILLIAM SCHROEDER a. v. TOWN OF WINDHAM a. No. 2008-147.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Rockingham.Argued: November 19, 2008. Opinion Issued: December 18, 2008. 1. Zoning and Planning — Generally — Exceptions, Variances, and Nonconforming Uses The court has on several occasions recognized a distinction between area and use restrictions for purposes of zoning. With respect […]

Read More

NAULT v. N L DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, 146 N.H. 35 (2001)

767 A.2d 406 JACQUELINE S. NAULT a. v. N L DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. No. 98-630.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Gorham District Court. Decided February 12, 2001. 1. Interest — Generally — Statutory Provisions Under RSA 524:1-a, a plaintiff who prevails in an action for debt or account is entitled to pre-judgment and post-judgment interest from commencement […]

Read More

KIMBALL v. GILMAN, 60 N.H. 54 (1880)

KIMBALL, Adm’r, v. GILMAN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1880. If the money due upon a policy of insurance on the life of a person made for the benefit of his wife is upon decease paid to his administrator, the latter will hold it in trust for the wife, and is may […]

Read More

TOWN OF RUMNEY v. BANEL, 118 N.H. 786 (1978)

394 A.2d 323 TOWN OF RUMNEY v. EDWARD BANEL, TRUSTEE FOR STEPHEN E. BANEL, VICTORIA J. BANEL ELIZABETH C. BANEL No. 78-133Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided November 15, 1978 1. Eminent Domain — Taking — Necessity In establishing the reason for a taking, absolute necessity is not required; rather, only reasonable necessity need […]

Read More

COUGHLIN v. COMPANY, 94 N.H. 57 (1946)

46 A.2d 130 MARY COUGHLIN v. ARMS TEXTILE COMPANY. No. 3566.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided March 5, 1946. When a plaintiff is present and testifies in court, he will not be nonsuited upon the strength of inconsistent statements he made in a deposition. In an action at common law, the negligence of the […]

Read More

STATE v. MCCOOEY, 148 N.H. 86 (2002)

802 A.2d 1216 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JOHN D. McCOOEY No. 2001-352Supreme Court of New Hampshire Dover District CourtArgued May 1, 2002 Opinion Issued July 22, 2002 1. Offenses — Particular Crimes — Disorderly Crimes —Disorderly Conduct Conviction of defendant, a high school student, for disorderly conduct was reversed because no rational trier […]

Read More

TOWN OF TILTON v. STATE, 137 N.H. 463 (1993)

629 A.2d 791 TOWN OF TILTON AND TOWN OF NORTHFIELD v. THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE No. 92-290Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided July 27, 1993 1. Statutes — Maxims and Rules of Construction — Interpretation as a Whole To divine the intent of a statute, supreme court determines its meaning from its construction […]

Read More

SANBORN v. CLOUGH, 64 N.H. 315 (1887)

10 A. 678 SANBORN, Ex’r, v. CLOUGH a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June, 1887.[*] [*] Doe, C. J., was not present at this term. The will of B., after providing for the payment of his debts and funeral charges, and giving certain money legacies, disposed of his residuary estate as follows: “Fifth. […]

Read More

STATE v. ANDERSON, 142 N.H. 918 (1998)

714 A.2d 227 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. ERIC ANDERSON No. 97-597Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-southern judicial district Decided July 24, 1998 1. Criminal Law — Double Jeopardy — New Hampshire Constitution Defendant’s argument that his prosecution was barred on double jeopardy grounds was considered under the State Constitution, federal decisions being relied […]

Read More

GARLAND v. RAILROAD, 76 N.H. 556 (1913)

86 A. 141 GARLAND, Adm’r, v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided February 4, 1913. The defendant in an action for negligence is not liable without proof that the act or omission of which he was guilty constituted a breach of duty owed by him to the person injured thereby. CASE, […]

Read More

STATE v. BRINKMAN, 136 N.H. 716 (1993)

621 A.2d 932 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. ROBERT E. BRINKMAN No. 91-230Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided March 11, 1993 1. Appeal and Error — Preservation of Questions — Failure To Make Specific Objections A contemporaneous and specific objection is required to preserve an issue for appellate review, and reviewing court will […]

Read More

DOLE v. PIKE, 64 N.H. 22 (1885)

3 A. 743 DOLE, Surviving Partner, v. PIKE a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided December, 1885. Whether the questions at issue in a suit at law are so complicated that a jury trial is impracticable must be determined at the trial term. BILL IN EQUITY, praying, among other things, for an injunction to […]

Read More

STATE v. BERGER, 125 N.H. 83 (1984)

480 A.2d 27 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. BRUCE BERGER No. 82-141Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided June 22, 1984 1. Controlled Substances — Sale — Generally The supreme court has interpreted the meaning of the word “sale” as defined by the controlled drug act to be much broader in scope than that […]

Read More

NOYES v. BARNET, 57 N.H. 605 (1876)

NOYES v. BARNET. Supreme Court of New Hampshire FROM COOS CIRCUIT COURT. Decided August 11, 1876. Foreclosure suit — Parties. Where a mortgage is given to secure several notes held by different parties, a writ of entry to foreclose the mortgage must be in the names of all the owners of the notes. FROM COOS […]

Read More

HARDY v. RAILROAD, 68 N.H. 523 (1896)

41 A. 179 HARDY, Adm’r, v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1896. In an action against a railroad company for injuries to a freight brakeman by an overhead bridge, the timbers of which were six inches lower than the lowest portion of the bridge guard, a motion for a […]

Read More

BOISSONNAULT v. BRISTOL FEDERATED CHURCH, 138 N.H. 476 (1994)

642 A.2d 328 LUC AND LEEANN BOISSONNAULT v. BRISTOL FEDERATED CHURCH No. 92-637Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided May 19, 1994 1. Judgments — Summary Judgment — Standards for Granting In determining whether motion for summary judgment was properly granted, supreme court considers affidavits and other evidence, as well as all inferences properly drawn […]

Read More

LAMB v. DANVILLE SCHOOL BOARD, 102 N.H. 569 (1960)

162 A.2d 614 EDWARD R. LAMB v. DANVILLE SCHOOL BOARD. No. 4872.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued July 14, 1960. Decided July 19, 1960. 1. A vote at a special school district meeting to appropriate a particular sum for the construction of a school and to issue bonds therefor was not rendered invalid by the […]

Read More

LIMOGES v. HORACE MANN INS. CO., 134 N.H. 474 (1991)

596 A.2d 125 NORMAN LIMOGES v. HORACE MANN INSURANCE COMPANY No. 90-189Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided July 24, 1991 1. Insurance — Definitions — Resident Relative Trial court did not err in finding that plaintiff, a child of divorced parents, was a “relative resident” in his father’s household within meaning of uninsured motorist […]

Read More

LAFFERTY v. HOULIHAN, 81 N.H. 67 (1923)

121 A. 92 FRED H. LAFFERTY v. JOHN H. HOULIHAN a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided May 1, 1923. Every citizen has the right to call the attention of his fellow citizens to the mal-administration of public affairs or the misconduct of public servants, if his real motive in so doing is to […]

Read More

BUNNELL v. LUCAS, 126 N.H. 663 (1985)

495 A.2d 1282 STEVEN F. BUNNELL v. STEPHEN LUCAS No. 84-134Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided June 19, 1985 1. Jury — Deliberations — “Chalking” It is improper for jurors to agree in advance to be bound by an average of their respective positions on an issue, since to so decide an issue may […]

Read More

NOLETTE v. COMPANY, 81 N.H. 222 (1924)

124 A. 550 DESSIRRIE NOLETTE v. MANCHESTER RENDERING COMPANY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided February 5, 1924. The duty of an employer to warn his employees as to the danger of his premises extends not only to such parts thereof as he has prepared for their use but also to those which he […]

Read More