IN RE LYKES ESTATE, 113 N.H. 282 (1973)

305 A.2d 684 IN RE JAMES M. LYKES III ESTATE No. 6622Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan Decided May 31, 1973 1. Provision by New Hampshire testator that testamentary trust for New Hampshire beneficiaries shall be construed according to laws of Texas is valid. 2. Nature and extent of interest given to trust beneficiaries is […]

Read More

GIBSON v. HEYWARD, 67 N.H. 265 (1892)

30 A. 407 GIBSON v. HEYWARD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan. Decided June, 1892. A division of the partition fence between land owned by A and land owned by him and B as tenants in common “may be established by usage and acquiescence of the parties,” under Gen. Laws, c. 142, s. 3. The […]

Read More

OPINION OF THE JUSTICES, 86 N.H. 604 (1934)

171 A. 443 OPINION OF THE JUSTICES. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Decided February 17, 1934. At a special meeting of a town or district called with the permission of the superior court (Laws 1927, c. 56, ss. 1, 2; Laws 1931, c. 103) an issue of bonds may be legally voted regardless of the […]

Read More

LANCASTER STARCH CO. v. MOORE, 62 N.H. 671 (1883)

LANCASTER STARCH CO. v. MOORE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided June, 1883. Under the General Statutes, a stockholder who has paid his corporation the full amount of his shares is not liable on assessments made for other purposes than the payment of debts. ASSUMPSIT, by a corporation against one of its stockholders, for […]

Read More

EMERSON v. LEBANON, 67 N.H. 579 (1893)

39 A. 466 EMERSON, Adm’r, v. LEBANON. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December, 1893. On the question whether a highway is defective by reason of the insufficiency of a railing, evidence that the highway surveyor said, when the railing was put in several years before, that it was temporary, may be properly excluded […]

Read More

ADAMS v. PAGE, 76 N.H. 270 (1911)

81 A. 1074 ADAMS a., Trustees, v. PAGE a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided December 5, 1911. Heirs-at-law who unsuccessfully attempt to defeat a testamentary trust and to obtain possession of the fund are not entitled to an allowance out of the trust estate for their counsel fees and costs. MOTION, by the […]

Read More

MARTIN v. RAILROAD, 91 N.H. 63 (1940)

13 A.2d 465 HARRY MARTIN, by his father and next friend, v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. JOSEPH J. MARTIN v. SAME. No. 3153.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided May 7, 1940. When the crossing gates at a grade-crossing are raised, or other signalling devices fail to show a warning, either of these facts may constitute […]

Read More

WATERMAN v. LEBANON, 78 N.H. 23 (1915)

95 A. 657 ROSAMOND A. WATERMAN v. LEBANON. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided October 5, 1915. Money deposited in a Vermont savings bank by a resident of this state is not taxable here. The reenactment of a statute without change is a legislative adoption of the judicial interpretation previously given it. PETITION, for […]

Read More

CLARK v. CLARK, 76 N.H. 551 (1913)

85 A. 758 CLARK, Guardian, v. CLARK a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided January 7, 1913. A legally adopted child is an heir in the descending line of its adopting parents, within the meaning of section 12, chapter 186, Public Statutes, and as such may take a legacy given to one of its […]

Read More

HILL-GRANT LIVING TRUST V. KEARSARGE LIGHTING PRECINCT, 159 N.H. 529 (2009)

THE HILL-GRANT LIVING TRUST v. KEARSARGE LIGHTING PRECINCT. No. 2009-023.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Carroll.Argued: September 24, 2009. Opinion Issued: December 16, 2009. 1. Constitutional Law — Due Process — Condemnations and Takings Rescission of a challenged ordinance will not moot an otherwise valid regulatory taking claim. As the United States Supreme Court has stated, […]

Read More

STATE v. DONOHUE, 150 N.H. 180 (2003)

834 A.2d 253 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. ROBERT DONOHUE. No. 2002-641.Supreme Court of New Hampshire BelknapArgued: September 11, 2003. Opinion Issued: October 24, 2003. 1. Conspiracy — Criminal Conspiracy — Generally Conspiracy punishes the agreement to commit or cause the commission of a crime. 2. Conspiracy — Criminal Conspiracy — Elements in General […]

Read More

McCONNELL v. CATE, 70 N.H. 296 (1900)

47 A. 266 McCONNELL v. CATE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1900. The right to impound cattle does not depend upon the extent of the damage done by them. REPLEVIN, for four calves. Facts found by the court. The defendant impounded four calves found doing damage in his inclosure. The damage consisted […]

Read More

HOUSEHOLD GOODS CARRIERS v. OUELLETTE, 107 N.H. 199 (1966)

219 A.2d 699 HOUSEHOLD GOODS CARRIERS ASS’N a. v. RONALD E. OUELLETTE d/b/a RON’S MOVING STORAGE. No. 5399.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission.Argued April 5, 1966. Decided May 31, 1966. 1. The granting by the Public Utilities Commission of a certificate to the defendant to operate as a household goods carrier between points […]

Read More

LAVOIE v. INSURANCE CO., 85 N.H. 550 (1932)

161 A. 376, 162 A. 182 PETER LAVOIE v. NORTH BRITISH . MERCANTILE INSURANCE, COMPANY a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June 23, 1932. An owner of premises having authorized an insurance agent to procure fire insurance without directing in what companies to make the placement, the owner being indifferent thereto, but authorizing […]

Read More

HOLDEN ENG’G SURVEYING v. PEMBROKE RD. REALTY TR., 137 N.H. 393 (1993)

628 A.2d 260 HOLDEN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, INC. v. PEMBROKE ROAD REALTY TRUST a. No. 92-486Supreme Court of New Hampshire Concord District Court Decided July 7, 1993 1. Contracts — Construction — Ambiguity Interpretation of a contract, including whether a contract term is ambiguous, is ultimately a question of law for supreme court to decide. […]

Read More

HANOVER INS. CO. v. GRONDIN, 119 N.H. 394 (1979)

402 A.2d 174 THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY v. ERNEST M. GRONDIN, JR. a. No. 78-255Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided May 23, 1979 1. Insurance — Coverage — Notice Exclusionary language of homeowner’s liability insurance policy providing that policy did not apply to the ownership, operation and use of a watercraft owned by the […]

Read More

WHITE v. DEARBORN, 70 N.H. 622 (1899)

45 A. 1084 WHITE v. DEARBORN a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1899. BILL OF EXCEPTIONS, to an order of the court denying the plaintiff’s motion for a continuance. Henry B. Atherton and Bertis A. Pease, for the plaintiff. Charles J. Hamblett, for the defendants. YOUNG, J. No question of law is […]

Read More

MEDICO v. ALMASY, 108 N.H. 324 (1967)

234 A.2d 527 JOHN MEDICO v. ALBERT F. ALMASY. No. 5648.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Manchester District Court.Submitted September 8, 1967. Decided October 31, 1967. 1. The statute (RSA 525:1, 3) providing for the allowance of costs in “every action or petition, unless otherwise directed by law or by the court” grants discretionary power to […]

Read More

HALL v. WENTWORTH, 84 N.H. 236 (1930)

149 A. 81 WILLIAM B. HALL v. WENTWORTH’S LOCATION. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided February 4, 1930. In declaring upon the statute of highways (P. L., c. 89, s. 9) the plaintiff is not limited to those defects mentioned in his statement of claim; the statute does not require that such statement shall […]

Read More

SCHOOL-DISTRICT v. PRENTISS, 66 N.H. 145 (1889)

20 A. 931 SCHOOL-DISTRICT NO. 1 IN WALPOLE v. PRENTISS a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided December, 1889. The statute (G. L., c. 85, s. 4) which authorizes towns, by vote, to divide the school-money among the districts, is not in conflict with the constitution. Nor was that provision repealed by Laws of […]

Read More

CARON v. ASSOCIATION, 90 N.H. 560 (1940)

10 A.2d 668 ANATOLE CARON, INC. a. v. MANCHESTER FEDERAL SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION, a. No. 3100[.]Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided January 2, 1940. BILL IN EQUITY, to enjoin the foreclosure of a mortgage and to remove a cloud on the title to real estate. Trial by the court. At the close of all […]

Read More

STACK v. CAVANAUGH, 67 N.H. 149 (1891)

30 A. 350 STACK v. CAVANAUGH a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1891. An infant may avoid his contract for the purchase of a horse upon accounting for the benefit, if any, derived from the purchase, and upon restoring the animal to the vendor, although its value may have been diminished by […]

Read More

IN RE DONOVAN, 162 N.H. 1 (2011)

IN RE ESTATE OF TIMOTHY M. DONOVAN. No. 2010-297.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Sullivan County Probate Court.Argued: March 17, 2011. Opinion Issued: April 28, 2011. 1. Wills — Construction — Generally Three well-settled rules govern a court’s analysis of a will. First, the testator’s intent is the court’s principal guide in interpreting a will. Second, […]

Read More

HAWTHORNE TRUST v. MAINE SAVINGS BANK, 136 N.H. 533 (1992)

618 A.2d 828 HAWTHORNE TRUST v. MAINE SAVINGS BANK a. No. 91-378Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided December 29, 1992 1. Appeal and Error — Standards of Review — Generally Findings and rulings of trial court will be upheld unless unsupported by evidence or erroneous as a matter of law, and standard is not […]

Read More

IN RE SCOTT, 160 N.H. 354 (2010)

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERTA L. (PIERCE) SCOTT AND JAMES P. PIERCE. No. 2009-520.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Hillsborough-northern judicial district.Argued: April 8, 2010. Opinion Issued: June 3, 2010. 1. Parent and Child — Child Support —Generally To interpret the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA), a court relies not only upon the ordinary rules […]

Read More

NAPPI v. RAILWAY, 78 N.H. 261 (1916)

99 A. 185 FRANK NAPPI, Adm’r., v. GRAND TRUNK RAILWAY COMPANY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided October 3, 1916. The duty imposed upon railroads by the fencing statute (P. S., c. 159, s. 23), is to fence their tracks against domestic animals and not against people. An infant trespasser upon the tracks of […]

Read More

BARRETT v. CADY, 78 N.H. 60 (1915)

96 A. 325 ALONZO D. BARRETT, Adm’r v. ELISHA H. CADY, Adm’r. ELISHA H. CADY, Adm’r v. ZOE M. EVANS a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided December 7, 1915. A bill of interpleader cannot be maintained where the plaintiff can determine the right between the conflicting claimants without hazard to himself; hence an […]

Read More

FRENCH v. R.S. AUDLEY, INC., 123 N.H. 476 (1983)

464 A.2d 279 CORA CATE FRENCH v. R.S. AUDLEY, INC. a. No. 82-105Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided July 13, 1983 1. Trespass — Trees and Wood — Remedies and Damages The multiple damages provisions of the statute governing wilful trespass are intended to deter people from damaging or removing the marketable resources specified […]

Read More

MARRONE v. TOWN OF HAMPTON, 123 N.H. 729 (1983)

466 A.2d 907 MICHAEL MARRONE a. v. THE TOWN OF HAMPTON a. No. 82-331Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided August 31, 1983 1. Highways — Public Use — Encroachment The law is clear that a municipality cannot authorize a permanent encroachment on a public street unless such power has been expressly delegated by the […]

Read More

VILLARS v. PORTSMOUTH, 100 N.H. 453 (1957)

129 A.2d 914 PAUL E. VILLARS by his father and next friend v. CITY OF PORTSMOUTH AND AMERICAN FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 4543.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued January 2, 1957. Decided February 28, 1957. A petition for declaratory judgment may properly be maintained against a municipality to determine its liability, for which the municipality […]

Read More

MATOSSIAN v. AMERICAN CIRCUS CORP’N, 83 N.H. 147 (1927)

139 A. 580 LOUDER MATOSSIAN v. AMERICAN CIRCUS CORPORATION. JACOB KOUCHKIAN v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided December 6, 1927. In case for injuries to the plaintiff’s wife and minor son by driving a wagon upon a sidewalk and injuring them, the question of the driver’s negligence in unexpectedly driving upon them […]

Read More

STATE v. DeMATTEO, 134 N.H. 296 (1991)

591 A.2d 1323 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. ROBERT A. DeMATTEO No. 89-518Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided June 5, 1991 1. Forgery and Counterfeiting — Statutes — Generally Intent of forgery statute is to protect the general public by protecting the integrity of commercial, legal, and other written documents and symbols. 2. […]

Read More

SCAMMON v. PEARSON, 80 N.H. 122 (1921)

113 A. 771 JOHN SCAMMON a., Ex’rs, Ap’ts, v. EDWARD N. PEARSON, Adm’r, a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided May 3, 1921. Upon a probate appeal, the appellant is limited to the questions presented by his reasons for appeal, while all matters involved are open to the appellee. The findings of a probate […]

Read More

APPEAL OF WILLIAMSON, 140 N.H. 667 (1996)

671 A.2d 112 APPEAL OF LEIGH H. WILLIAMSON (New Hampshire Department of Employment Security) No. 94-631Supreme Court of New Hampshire Department of Employment Security Decided February 12, 1996 1. Unemployment Compensation — Practice and Procedure — Judicial Review When reviewing decisions of the department of employment security (DES), supreme court will not substitute its judgment […]

Read More

STATE v. SLADE, 116 N.H. 436 (1976)

362 A.2d 194 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. DANNY SLADE No. 7280Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided July 30, 1976 1. The burden of proof rests upon the prosecution to show that the search of the defendant’s home without a warrant was justified. 2. No amount of probable cause can, without more, justify a […]

Read More

OPINION OF THE JUSTICES, 119 N.H. 266 (1979)

401 A.2d 507 OPINION OF THE JUSTICES No. 79-083Supreme Court of New Hampshire Request of the Senate Decided May 7, 1979 Courts — Supreme Court — Advisory Opinions Supreme Court asked to be excused from answering Senate’s inquiries regarding Senate bill proposing to repeal law exempting department of employment security from right to know law, […]

Read More

REYNOLDS v. CHASE, 87 N.H. 227 (1935)

177 A. 291 WILLIS L. REYNOLDS, Adm’r, a. v. LIZZIE M. CHASE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided February 5, 1935. A written agreement for the support of A and B by C and D providing that all property left by A and B at their decease should “become the sole property of” C […]

Read More

JUDGE v. COUCH, 59 N.H. 39 (1879)

JUDGE OF PROBATE v. COUCH. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June, 1879. To maintain an action on a probate bond for not accounting, it is necessary to aver and prove a breach of the bond by a neglect or refusal to comply with the order of the probate court to account. There is […]

Read More

PETITION OF DONOVAN D/B/A DONOVAN GROUP HOME, 137 N.H. 78 (1993)

623 A.2d 1322 PETITION OF DAVID DONOVAN d/b/a DONOVAN GROUP HOME (New Hampshire Division of Mental Health and Developmental Services and Division of Public Health Services) No. 91-289Supreme Court of New Hampshire Division of Mental Health and Developmental Services Division of Public Health Services Decided April 16, 1993 1. Administrative Law — Administrative Appeal — […]

Read More

TAYLOR v. PETTEE, 70 N.H. 38 (1899)

47 A. 733 TAYLOR, Adm’r, v. PETTEE a. STEVENS v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided December, 1899. Where branches of a fraternal order have united to form a funeral benefit association, and, as a prerequisite to membership therein, have severally adopted a by-law providing that the amount of each benefit, less costs […]

Read More

BURKE v. FIREMAN’S FUND INS. CO., 120 N.H. 365 (1980)

415 A.2d 677 HENRY A. BURKE a. v. FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY No. 79-331Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan Decided May 12, 1980 1. Insurance — Indemnification Before insurer’s duty to provide indemnity arises, plaintiff must first have the liability of insured judicially imposed. 2. Insurance — Indemnification Absent a judicial determination of insured’s liability, […]

Read More

HEALEY v. HUTCHINSON, 66 N.H. 316 (1890)

20 A. 332 HEALEY v. HUTCHINSON. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1890. The valuation put upon personal property attached, in a receipt given therefor to the officer making the attachment, is conclusive against the receiptor. A receiptor is not holden for property taken by a paramount title after the receipt. TROVER, for […]

Read More

KELSEA v. STRATFORD, 79 N.H. 273 (1919)

108 A. 298 BURLEIGH H. KELSEA, Adm’r, v. STRATFORD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided October 7, 1919. The town of Stratford, having the duty of maintaining a certain portion of the West Side road established by Laws 1909, c. 155, is liable upon the statute of highways for injuries received thereon; and is […]

Read More

ANTONIOU v. KENICK, 124 N.H. 606 (1984)

474 A.2d 566 SOPHIA ANTONIOU v. THEODORE J. KENICK No. 83-196Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided March 2, 1984 1. Limitation of Actions — Statutes — Torts The supreme court held in Henderson Clay Prod’s, Inc. v. Edgar Wood Assoc’s, Inc., 122 N.H. 800 (1982), that the classifications created by the statute of limitations […]

Read More

APPEAL OF N.H. TROOPERS ASSOC., 145 N.H. 288 (2000)

761 A.2d 486 APPEAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE TROOPERS ASSOCIATION (New Hampshire Public Employee Labor Relations Board) No. 98-374Supreme Court of New Hampshire Public Employee Labor Relations Board Decided October 5, 2000 1. Public Employees — Tenure — Demotion Nonsupervisory state police corporals did not suffer demotion in rank but change in job title when their […]

Read More

MULLIN v. MULLIN, 60 N.H. 16 (1880)

MULLIN v. MULLIN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1880. On good cause being shown, a writ of restitution may be awarded for alimony that has been granted in a suit for a divorce. LIBEL FOR DIVORCE, upon which a, decree in favor of the libellant was made at the May term, 1878, […]

Read More

STATE v. HAYES, 138 N.H. 410 (1994)

640 A.2d 288 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. THOMAS HAYES No. 93-179Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided April 5, 1994 1. Appeal and Error — Filing of Notice of Appeal — Timeliness Trial court’s refusal, after granting defendant’s motion to suppress evidence on day before trial, to grant State reasonable continuance necessary to […]

Read More

TOOHEY v. DAVIS, 85 N.H. 80 (1931)

153 A. 832 D. N. TOOHEY Co. v. HYMAN DAVIS. NATHAN COHEN v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided March 3, 1931. The mere employment of a real estate broker, though in writing, to sell land confers merely authority to find a purchaser but not an implied power to bind the employer by […]

Read More

SKLAR REALTY v. TOWN OF MERRIMACK, 125 N.H. 321 (1984)

480 A.2d 149 SKLAR REALTY, INC. v. TOWN OF MERRIMACK AND AGWAY, INC. No. 83-327 No. 83-471Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided July 31, 1984 1. Zoning — Planning Authorities — Powers and Duties Since, if a planning board could not impose a condition subsequent upon approval of application for non-residential uses of land […]

Read More

BARTLETT v. NEW BOSTON, 77 N.H. 476 (1915)

93 A. 796 EBEN L. BARTLETT v. NEW BOSTON a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided February 2, 1915. To gain a residence in a town, a person must go there with the intention of remaining and making that place his home. Certain evidence deemed sufficient to warrant the finding that one visiting a […]

Read More

LEVESQUE v. COTE, 102 N.H. 297 (1959)

156 A.2d 120 ALBERT LEVESQUE v. MARY B. COTE. No. 4753.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued October 6, 1959. Decided December 1, 1959. 1. Where the plaintiff purchased a house with his own funds and had the deed thereto placed in the names of himself and the defendant as joint tenants with the understanding that […]

Read More

STATE v. SHERBURNE, 59 N.H. 99 (1879)

STATE v. SHERBURNE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1879. On an indictment for resisting a sheriff, unnecessarily described as “legally appointed and duly qualified,” his legal appointment and due qualifications must be proved. INDICTMENT, for resisting and obstructing Edwin Judkins, sheriff of the county, in the service of a criminal process. The […]

Read More

APPEAL OF TOWN OF PELHAM, 143 N.H. 536 (1999)

736 A.2d 1223 APPEAL OF TOWN OF PELHAM (New Hampshire Board of Tax and Land Appeals) No. 96-561Supreme Court of New Hampshire Board of Tax and Land Appeals Decided May 11, 1999 1. Taxation — Assessment of Real Property Taxes — PropertyTaxable Property owner’s use of truck trailers as storage sheds was entirely consistent with […]

Read More

LABRECQUE v. TOWN OF SALEM, 128 N.H. 455 (1986)

514 A.2d 829 DENNIS LABRECQUE v. TOWN OF SALEM a. No. 85-408Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided August 12, 1986 1. Zoning — Variances — Review A zoning board’s decision is subject to limited judicial review, and the appealing party must satisfy the statutory burden of proof to show that the decision is unlawful […]

Read More

WILSON v. ELLIOTT, 57 N.H. 316 (1876)

WILSON v. ELLIOTT. ELLIOTT v. WILSON. Supreme Court of New Hampshire FROM HILLSBOROUGH CIRCUIT COURT. Decided August 11, 1876. A contract made by one partner on behalf of the firm, in the business of the firm, is binding upon the firm. FROM HILLSBOROUGH CIRCUIT COURT. Both actions are assumpsit, and were tried together. In the […]

Read More

BERNARDI GREATER SHOWS v. RAILROAD, 89 N.H. 490 (1938)

1 A.2d 360 BERNARDI GREATER SHOWS, INC. v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. MAYO WILLIAMS v. SAME. MATILDA PADGETT, Adm’x v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided September 6, 1938. The interpretation of a written agreement involves a consideration of all the evidentiary facts and circumstances bearing thereon. Hence the construction put upon such an […]

Read More

BRODY v. BOUTIN, 95 N.H. 103 (1948)

58 A.2d 209 REGINALD V. BRODY v. AIME J. BOUTIN. No. 3720.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan. Decided April 6, 1948. Whether a message transmitted by the sheriff to a jury constituted such an interference with their deliberations as to render the trial unfair presents an issue of fact for the Trial Court. TRESPASS for […]

Read More

STATE v. BURGESS, 156 N.H. 746 (2008)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JOHN BURGESS. No. 2006-871.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Hillsborough-northern judicial district.Argued: November 13, 2007. Opinion Issued: February 26, 2008. 1. Criminal Law — Judgment and Sentence — Factors for Consideration Although a sentencing judge has broad discretion to choose the sources and types of evidence upon which to rely […]

Read More

BRIDGHAM v. EFFINGHAM, 86 N.H. 332 (1933)

168 A. 904 GEORGE D. BRIDGHAM v. EFFINGHAM. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided November 7, 1933. A petition for leave to file a claim for injuries caused by a defective highway will not ordinarily be denied unless it conclusively appears that the plaintiff has or can have no valid claim. A grant of […]

Read More

DESAUTELLE v. FLETCHER, 103 N.H. 177 (1961)

167 A.2d 685 LOUISE F. DESAUTELLE, Adm’x v. MELVIN E. FLETCHER. No. 4897.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll.Argued January 3, 1961. Decided February 7, 1961. 1. In an action for death of a pedestrian struck by defendant’s motor vehicle, the issue of contributory negligence was properly submitted to the jury where there was evidence of […]

Read More

CUSHMAN v. GRAFTON, 97 N.H. 32 (1951)

79 A.2d 630 CHARLES CUSHMAN, Adm’r v. COUNTY OF GRAFTON a. No. 4011.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided April 3, 1951. A county engaged in a governmental function is not liable for the negligence of its agents or servants. The maintenance of a jail including the employment of a turnkey is a governmental function […]

Read More

TREISMAN v. TOWN OF BEDFORD, 132 N.H. 54 (1989)

563 A.2d 786 ROBERT S. TREISMAN v. TOWN OF BEDFORD AND DEAN KAMEN No. 87-096 No. 88-441Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided August 9, 1989 1. Zoning — Accessory Use — Generally Because a zoning ordinance cannot specifically provide for every lawful use, the rule of accessory use recognizes that owners may employ land […]

Read More

EBELT v. EBELT, 103 N.H. 369 (1961)

172 A.2d 363 LENORE BLAKE EBELT v. MARTIN FREDERICK EBELT. No. 4930.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton.Submitted June 6, 1961. Decided June 30, 1961. 1. In the statutory provision relating to orders for support of minor needy children in divorce proceedings (RSA 458:18) granting power to the court to award the custody of a child […]

Read More

N.H.-VT. PHYSICIAN SERV. v. DURKIN, 113 N.H. 295 (1973)

306 A.2d 62 NEW HAMPSHIRE-VERMONT PHYSICIAN SERVICE v. JOHN A. DURKIN, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER No. 6685Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original Decided June 22, 1973 1. Although there is no statutory provision for suspension of insurance commissioner’s order for Blue Shield insurance rates, supreme court may issue writs of certiorari under the authority of RSA 490:4 […]

Read More

ALLSTATE INS. CO. v. CHATIGNY, 103 N.H. 81 (1960)

166 A.2d 122 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. DANIEL P. CHATIGNY a. No. 4781.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued November 1, 1960. Decided November 30, 1960. 1. In declaratory judgment proceedings to determine an insurer’s liability under an “Allstate Crusader Policy” affording coverage to “any relative with respect to a non-owned . . . automobile . […]

Read More

IN RE TRAILER AND PLUMBING SUPPLIES, 133 N.H. 432 (1990)

578 A.2d 343 In re TRAILER AND PLUMBING SUPPLIES No. 89-390Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided July 23, 1990 1. Contracts — Construction — Divisibility A contract is a single, indivisible agreement if the parties gave a single assent to the whole transaction and did not assent separately to different parts of the proposal. […]

Read More

RIEL v. PRESS, 70 N.H. 334 (1900)

47 A. 608 RIEL v. PRESS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1900. The deed of a married woman resident in this state is sufficient to convey the title to realty acquired and held by her here, without the signature of her alien husband who has always resided abroad. In an action to […]

Read More

BANK v. BUZZELL, 61 N.H. 612 (1882)

FARMINGTON SAVINGS BANK v. BUZZELL a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided June, 1882. Authority given by a married woman to her husband to sign her name to notes as surety for his benefit, does not include authority to sign her name as principal maker, and does not estop her from showing want of […]

Read More

DEARBORN v. TOWN OF MILFORD, 120 N.H. 82 (1980)

411 A.2d 1132 RICHARD DEARBORN, a. v. TOWN OF MILFORD, a. No. 79-096Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided February 14, 1980 1. Towns — Powers — Authorized by Legislature Cities and towns have only such powers as the State grants them; however, a town through adoption of an ordinance may choose to exercise less […]

Read More

TRAVELERS INS. CO. v. GREENOUGH, 88 N.H. 391 (1937)

190 A. 129 THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO. v. RICHARD F. GREENOUGH a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided February 2, 1937. In a petition under the declaratory judgment act to determine coverage the burden of proof is upon the claimant asserting the coverage whether he institutes the petition or whether the insurer is the […]

Read More

TODD v. TODD, 78 N.H. 386 (1917)

103 A. 17 BERT F. TODD, Adm’r, v. CHARLES B. TODD, Adm’r. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided April 3, 1917. Personal property of a non-resident decedent is not required to be distributed according to our statute of distributions and may be remitted to the court of his domicile. PETITION, by the administrator appointed […]

Read More

MERRILL v. CITY OF MANCHESTER, 124 N.H. 8 (1983)

466 A.2d 923 CLINTON MERRILL a. v. CITY OF MANCHESTER a. JOHN H. GADD a. v. CITY OF MANCHESTER a. No. 82-559 No. 82-560Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided October 3, 1983 1. Appeal and Error — Preservation of Questions — Failure To Present Below On appeal by landowners from an order of the […]

Read More

MERRIMACK LOAN CO. v. THEODOROU, 91 N.H. 487 (1941)

22 A.2d 855 MERRIMACK LOAN COMPANY, INC. v. GEORGE THEODOROU. No. 3273.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided November 4, 1941. A partial payment constituting an acknowledgment of the debt made by one of two joint debtors binds only the debtor who makes the payment and does not suspend the running of the statute in […]

Read More

WHITTEMORE v. MERRILL, 63 N.H. 614 (1884)

WHITTEMORE, Adm’r, a., v. MERRILL. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June, 1884. BILL IN EQUITY, for the cancellation of a deed of a farm from N. A. D., now deceased, widow of G. A. D.., deceased. A part of Page 615 the plaintiffs, heirs-at-law of N. A. D., claimed that the deed was […]

Read More

STATE v. WATKINS, 148 N.H. 760 (2002)

813 A.2d 435 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. BRUCE WATKINS No. 2001-172Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-Southern Judicial DistrictArgued September 18, 2002 Opinion Issued December 24, 2002 1. Criminal Law—Habitual Offender Statute—Construction Defendent failed in his assertion that the statute governing the procedure for revocation of the driver’s license of a person found to […]

Read More

KRAVITZ v. BEECH HILL HOSP., 148 N.H. 383 (2002)

808 A.2d 34 JUDITH KRAVITZ a. v. BEECH HILL HOSPITAL, L.L.C. a. No. 2000-832Supreme Court of New Hampshire CheshireArgued February 7, 2002 Opinion Issued September 27, 2002 1. Verdict—Requisites and Validity—Impeachment of Verdict Although the testimony or affidavits of jurors are inadmissible when offered as a basis for setting the verdict aside, they may be […]

Read More

BUSSEY v. BUSSEY, 95 N.H. 349 (1949)

64 A.2d 4 EMERY M. BUSSEY v. MERCY B. BUSSEY. No. 3778.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided February 1, 1949. Whether the fraud practiced upon a libelee in obtaining a divorce decree is considered as extrinsic or intrinsic the granting or denial of relief from such decree is governed by general equitable considerations. A […]

Read More

APPEAL OF WESTMORELAND SCHOOL BD., 132 N.H. 103 (1989)

564 A.2d 419 APPEAL OF WESTMORELAND SCHOOL BOARD (New Hampshire Public Employee Labor Relations Board) No. 88-213Supreme Court of New Hampshire Public Employee Labor Relations Board Decided August 9, 1989 1. Public Employees — Public Employee Labor Relations Board — Authority Public employee labor relations board, as an adjunct to its responsibilities to interpret governing […]

Read More

STATE v. KOPPEL, 127 N.H. 286 (1985)

499 A.2d 977 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. DONALD L. KOPPEL THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. NORMAN B. FOREST, JR. No. 85-006Supreme Court of New Hampshire Concord District Court Decided August 16, 1985 1. Constitutional Law — New Hampshire Constitution — Searches and Seizures Article of State Constitution providing protection against unreasonable searches […]

Read More

STATE v. JACQUES, 69 N.H. 220 (1897)

40 A. 398 STATE v. JACQUES. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided December, 1897. One who keeps a restaurant open on the Lord’s day for the sale of food, to be eaten on the premises, may be convicted of keeping a shop open on Sunday for the reception of company. COMPLAINT, for keeping a […]

Read More

STATE v. DUFFY, 146 N.H. 648 (2001)

778 A.2d 415 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. BRIAN DUFFY No. 2000-250Supreme Court of New Hampshire Portsmouth District Court Decided July 23, 2001 1. Constitutional Law — New Hampshire Constitution —Construction and Application Because the New Hampshire Constitution affords greater protection to a criminal defendant than the Federal Constitution in requiring the State to […]

Read More

WINCH v. BEAN, 62 N.H. 427 (1882)

WINCH v. BEAN a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December, 1882 A promise to furnish for the promisee a good and sufficient home at the promisor’s house is broken by such treatment of the promisee there as he cannot reasonably be required to endure. BILL IN EQUITY, by Dolly S. Winch against Sarah […]

Read More

STATE v. COOK, 135 N.H. 702 (1992)

609 A.2d 942 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JAMES W. COOK No. 91-167Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire Decided June 30, 1992 1. Perjury — Elements — Generally Reiteration of a false statement, after a partial disclosure of the truth, gives rise to a separate charge of perjury. 2. Perjury — Elements — Generally Trial […]

Read More

FOSTER v. CALDERWOOD, 118 N.H. 508 (1978)

389 A.2d 1388 ROBERT H. FOSTER a. v. WALTER A. CALDERWOOD a. No. 78-005Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided July 18, 1978 1. Attorney and Client — Attorney Retained by Insurer — Representation Afforded Insured In action against defendants seeking money damages for trespass to property upon plaintiffs’ allegation that defendants had appropriated a […]

Read More

STATE v. MAYNARD, 137 N.H. 537 (1993)

629 A.2d 1345 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. RICHARD MAYNARD No. 91-270Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll Decided August 19, 1993 1. Criminal Law — Speedy Trial — Tests and Standards In determining whether a defendant has been deprived of his right to a speedy trial under either the State or Federal Constitutions, four […]

Read More

NAVONIS v. NAVONIS, 116 N.H. 505 (1976)

363 A.2d 420 KATHERINE NAVONIS v. VINCENT W. NAVONIS No. 7310Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided August 31, 1976 1. Although the United States Constitution permits a State to award support when property of the defendant can be reached in the State Page 506 without service on the defendant there, RSA 458:19-a prescribes a […]

Read More

McCRACKEN v. INSURANCE CO., 94 N.H. 474 (1947)

55 A.2d 894 VANCE McCRACKEN, by his father and next friend a. v. CAR GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION, LTD. a. No. 3673.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided December 2, 1947. Where knowledge of facts, by an insurer, giving rise to a right of avoidance or forfeiture of a policy of liability insurance is not obtained […]

Read More

GREGG v. COMPANY, 69 N.H. 247 (1897)

46 A. 26 GREGG a. v. PAGE BELTING CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1897. Where a known, described, and defined article is ordered of and supplied by a manufacturer, there is no implied warranty that it shall answer the particular purpose for which it was stated to be required. A judgment […]

Read More

TOWLE v. LAWRENCE, 59 N.H. 501 (1880)

TOWLE v. LAWRENCE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June, 1880. In an action for damages for withholding property from, or not conveying property to, the plaintiff, a tender of the property or part of it, or a conveyance of it or part of it, to the plaintiff, may be allowed at the trial […]

Read More

ROXBURY v. WILLEY, 116 N.H. 27 (1976)

351 A.2d 69 THEODORE ROXBURY, JR. v. WESLEY L. WILLEY a. No. 7065Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided January 31, 1976 1. The evidence did not support the trial court’s award of $13,000 to the defendants as the fair value of the improvements they had made on the property in good faith under the […]

Read More

FORTIN v. MORTON, 101 N.H. 477 (1958)

147 A.2d 644 CECILE E. FORTIN a. v. JOHN O. MORTON, Commissioner. No. 4683.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued December 2, 1958. Decided December 31, 1958. 1. The Commissioner of Public Works and Highways acting under statutory authority (RSA 236:3) to design limited access highways and to regulate and restrict access thereto did not abuse […]

Read More

STATE v. McBREAIRTY, 142 N.H. 12 (1997)

697 A.2d 495 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. WILLIAM McBREAIRTY No. 96-049Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided May 9, 1997 1. Appeal and Error — Questions Considered on Appeal — Constitutionality Because the protections provided by the State and Federal Constitutions in the area of unreasonable search and seizure (investigatory stops) are equivalent, […]

Read More

ABBOTT v. ABBOTT, 77 N.H. 601 (1915)

93 A. 460 ELLEN S. ABBOTT v. ISABEL F. ABBOTT. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided February 2, 1915. PETITION FOR PARTITION. At the April term, 1914, of the superior court, the plaintiff’s motion that the answer to the petition be disallowed was denied by Branch, J., subject to exception. Joseph S. Matthews (by […]

Read More

DZIAMA v. CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, 140 N.H. 542 (1995)

669 A.2d 217 GARY DZIAMA, TRUSTEE OF THE MALT HOUSE EXCHANGE REALTY TRUST v. CITY OF PORTSMOUTH No. 94-230Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided December 22, 1995 1. Zoning and Planning — Statutes — Construction The trial court properly found that plaintiff failed to meet the statutory prerequisite to an appeal to the court […]

Read More

PETITION OF DUNLAP, 134 N.H. 533 (1991)

604 A.2d 945 PETITION OF KENNETH R. DUNLAP, JR. (New Hampshire State Board of Education) No. 89-561Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original Decided July 31, 1991 1. Appeal and Error — Right To Appeal Although statute providing that State Board of Education’s review of local school board decision is final and binding on both parties […]

Read More

HUTCHINSON v. PARKER, 64 N.H. 89 (1886)

5 A. 830 HUTCHINSON v. PARKER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1886. In trespass qu. cl. for felling the defendant’s trees across the line fence, and covering the plaintiff’s land with brush, the measure of damages is not necessarily the expense of removing the brush, nor are they necessarily limited to the […]

Read More

CUMMINGS v. CENTER HARBOR, 57 N.H. 17 (1876)

CUMMINGS v. CENTER HARBOR. Supreme Court of New Hampshire FROM GRAFTON CIRCUIT COURT. Decided March 21, 1876. Finding of fact by referee — “Travelling upon the highway.” A finding of fact by a referee will not be set aside where it appears that there was evidence upon which it might legally be based. Whether one […]

Read More

LAMPREY v. DONACOUR, 58 N.H. 376 (1878)

LAMPREY v. DONACOUR. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided August, 1878. Evidence that after a sale the property sold was taxed to the vendor, with his knowledge and without objection, is admissible to show that the sale was fraudulent. An inventory of property made by municipal assessors of taxes for the purpose of taxation […]

Read More

GAUTHIER v. ROBINSON, 122 N.H. 365 (1982)

444 A.2d 564 ALBERT J. GAUTHIER a. v. PAUL ROBINSON a. No. 81-283Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan Decided April 7, 1982 1. Property — Servitudes If an owner of a tract of land has adopted a general scheme for the development of his lots, and has inserted in his deeds uniform restrictions intended for […]

Read More

SMILIE v. HOBBS, 64 N.H. 75 (1886)

5 A. 711 SMILIE v. HOBBS a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1886. Sufficiency of certain evidence considered. ASSUMPSIT, upon a warranty of a steam-heating boiler. Facts found by the court. The defendants, by their agent Chesley, at the time of the sale, warranted the boiler to be durable, meaning, as both […]

Read More