KUO v. KUO, 108 N.H. 460 (1968)

237 A.2d 690 YEE CHUN HELEN KUO v. SHAN SUN KUO. No. 5686.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford.Argued November 8, 1967. Decided January 30, 1968. 1. Certain evidence warranted the findings of the existence of cause for legal separation, and that the cause arose while the parties were domiciled in this state and was in […]

Read More

LAKE COMPANY v. LACONIA, 68 N.H. 284 (1895)

35 A. 252 WINNIPISEOGEE LAKE COTTON AND WOOLEN MFG. CO., Ap’ts, v. LACONIA. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided June, 1895. A judgment on appeal from the selectmen’s refusal to abate faxes is conclusive evidence of the value of the property assessed at the time of the assessment, in an appeal by the owner […]

Read More

DUGUAY v. GELINAS, 104 N.H. 182 (1962)

182 A.2d 451 DORIS DUGUAY v. ANDREW E. GELINAS a. No. 5000.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued April 3, 1962. Decided June 29, 1962. 1. Arguments of counsel for the plaintiff in personal injury actions employing a mathematical formula suggesting that specific sums per day, hour or minute may be allowed as damages for pain […]

Read More

PETITION OF RATTEE, 145 N.H. 341 (2000)

761 A.2d 1076 PETITION OF STEVEN RATTEE (New Hampshire Agricultural Lands Preservation Committee) THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. STEVEN RATTEE STEVEN RATTEE v. COMMISSIONER, NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, MARKETS AND FOOD a. No. 98-455 Original No. 97-840Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack October 31, 2000 1. Covenants — Restrictive Covenants — Particular Cases […]

Read More

IN RE KOTEY M., 158 N.H. 358 (2009)

IN RE KOTEY M. No. 2008-705.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Dover Family Division.Argued: January 15, 2009. Opinion Issued: February 18, 2009. 1. Minors — Crimes and Delinquency — Proceedings Competency of a juvenile to stand trial, commonly referred to as the “Dusky standard,” requires that the juvenile have: (1) sufficient present ability to consult with […]

Read More

DALTON v. STANLEY SOLAR STOVE, INC., 137 N.H. 467 (1993)

629 A.2d 794 ROBERT DALTON v. STANLEY SOLAR STOVE, INC. No. 92-459Supreme Court of New Hampshire Nashua District Court Decided July 27, 1993 1. Sales — Warranties — Implied Warranty of Fitness for Particular Purpose Implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose does not arise out of an agreement between seller and buyer; rather, […]

Read More

STATE v. ROUBO, 140 N.H. 409 (1995)

666 A.2d 1356 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. MICHAEL ROUBO No. 93-713Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided November 6, 1995 1. Evidence — Hearsay — Particular Cases Where police officer testified early in trial that defendant’s roommate stated he had been out on night in question, trial court properly admitted hearsay statement made […]

Read More

EMERY v. HILL, 67 N.H. 330 (1892)

39 A. 266 EMERY a. v. HILL a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided December, 1892. A transfer of all its property and business by a partnership to a corporation formed by the former members of the partnership and others, and the occupation by the corporation, under such transfer, of real estate leased to […]

Read More

CROCKER v. COMPANY, 99 N.H. 330 (1954)

110 A.2d 271 MICHAEL CROCKER v. W. W. WYMAN, INC. No. 4360.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire.Argued December 7, 1954. Decided December 31, 1954. Where damage to the plaintiff’s building situated relatively close to a public highway could have been caused by some agency or instrumentality other than the dynamite explosion set off by the […]

Read More

ESTATE OF CROTEAU v. CROTEAU, 143 N.H. 177 (1998)

722 A.2d 464 ESTATE OF RITA L. CROTEAU v. GEORGE D. CROTEAU No. 96-544Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough County Probate Court December 8, 1998 1. Property — Joint Tenancy — Severance The intent of the parties controls when analyzing whether a joint tenancy has been served. Page 178 2. Appeal and Error — Standards […]

Read More

APPEAL OF BRIGGS, 138 N.H. 623 (1994)

645 A.2d 655 APPEAL OF BURLEIGH BRIGGS (New Hampshire Department of Labor Compensation Appeals Board) No. 93-318Supreme Court of New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board Decided July 6, 1994 1. Administrative Law — Judicial Review — Standards An agency decision or order will not be overturned, absent an error of law, unless it is clearly unjust […]

Read More

HARTFORD IND. CO. v. WOLBARST, 95 N.H. 40 (1948)

57 A.2d 151 HARTFORD ACCIDENT INDEMNITY COMPANY v. ROGER WOLBARST a. No. 3699.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided February 3, 1948. The liability insurance policy provisions required by the financial responsibility act (R. L., c. 122, s. 1, par. VII) to indemnify the insured “against loss by reason of the liability to pay damages […]

Read More

HEALY v. HEALY, 76 N.H. 504 (1912)

85 A. 156 HEALY a. v. HEALY a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided November 6, 1912. Where claimants of property have entered into a written contract respecting it under a mutual mistake as to their legal rights, those jeopardized thereby are entitled to rescind when such a course will furnish them needed relief […]

Read More

STATE v. SIDEBOTHAM, 124 N.H. 682 (1984)

474 A.2d 1377 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. ELDON SIDEBOTHAM No. 82-579Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided April 9, 1984 1. Searches and Seizures — Standing To Challenge Search — Generally A preliminary inquiry which any court must make before it will consider a motion to suppress evidence based upon an unreasonable search […]

Read More

STACKPOLE v. RAILROAD, 62 N.H. 493 (1883)

STACKPOLE v. THE EASTERN RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided June, 1883. The failure of the vendee of property to remove it from the land of the vendor within the time stipulated in the contract of sale, does not, necessarily and as matter of law, defeat the vendee’s title to the property. If […]

Read More

WHITCHER v. DAVIS, 70 N.H. 237 (1899)

46 A. 458 WHITCHER v. DAVIS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December, 1899. In an action for alienation of affections, a defendant against whom adultery is alleged is a competent witness, and cannot refuse to testify. PETITION, for habeas corpus. The petitioner was duly summoned to give her deposition, to be used in […]

Read More

SIBSON v. STATE, 110 N.H. 8 (1969)

259 A.2d 397 HOWARD W. SIBSON a. v. STATE. No. 5916.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Port Authority. Decided November 28, 1969. 1. Tidewaters are those in which the tide ordinarily ebbs and flows, including the sea, bays, rivers and creeks; however a body or stream of water is not necessarily tidal because under unusual circumstances […]

Read More

LISBON SCHOOL DISTRICT v. DISTRICT, 75 N.H. 324 (1909)

74 A. 186 LISBON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 v. LANDAFF TOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided October 5, 1909. The word “resides,” as used in section 1, chapter 96, Laws 1901, means actual habitation, and not the legal domicile acquired by residence with the intention of making a home. Where the […]

Read More

BARTLETT v. HILL, 69 N.H. 197 (1897)

45 A. 144 BARTLETT, Ap’t, v. HILL a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1897. In the absence of an agreement by the parties or an order of court, a husband’s distributive share in the personal estate of his deceased wife is payable in money; and the funds required to pay such share […]

Read More

WHISPERING PINES v. GAGNON, 132 N.H. 624 (1989)

567 A.2d 572 WHISPERING PINES v. PATRICIA L. GAGNON No. 89-402Supreme Court of New Hampshire Derry District Court Decided December 29, 1989 Landlord and Tenant — Appeal — Jurisdiction Supreme court has no jurisdiction to hear an appeal directly from a district court in a landlord-tenant case, which is properly taken to the superior court. […]

Read More

RATTEE v. RATTEE, 146 N.H. 44 (2001)

767 A.2d 415 DEBRA RATTEE v. STEVEN RATTEE. No. 98-314.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided February 15, 2001. 1. Parent and Child — Child Support — Generally Trial courts should not employ income-averaging over a number of years to determine child support obligations; rather, child support should be determined on the basis of present […]

Read More

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO SUPREME COURT RULE 38 (N.H. 1-17-2006)

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO SUPREME COURT RULE 38, CANON 4(H) AND (I) Supreme Court of New Hampshire January 17, 2006 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER Pursuant to Part II, Article 73-a of the New Hampshire Constitution and Supreme Court Rule 51, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire approves amendments, […]

Read More

STATE v. MARTEL, 141 N.H. 599 (1997)

689 A.2d 1327 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. MICHAEL MARTEL No. 94-288Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-northern judicial district Decided January 31, 1997 1. Jury — Characteristics — Exemptions From Jury Service Since it is apparent from the language of the statute that the legislature intended requests for jury service excusals due to medical […]

Read More

PHILLIPS v. VERAX CORP., 138 N.H. 240 (1994)

637 A.2d 906 PHILIP G. PHILLIPS v. VERAX CORPORATION a. No. 92-355Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided March 3, 1994 1. Judgments — Summary Judgment — Standard for Granting Trial court must grant summary judgment when it finds no genuine issue of material fact, after considering affidavits and other evidence presented in a light […]

Read More

CONNELL v. PUTNAM, 58 N.H. 534 (1879)

CONNELL v. PUTNAM. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided March, 1879. In case, for loss of service and expenses incurred in caring for and nursing the plaintiff’s child, he may recover for his own time spent in taking care of the child. Time spent by the plaintiff stands on the same ground as money […]

Read More

LaPERLE v. SWANSON, 92 N.H. 5 (1942)

24 A.2d 269 PAUL S. LaPERLE v. CHARLES A. SWANSON. No. 3302.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided January 6, 1942. Contributory negligence in an automobile collision was not established as a matter of law because the plaintiff’s car, at a speed of between fifteen to twenty miles per hour, struck a frost heave, skidded, […]

Read More

DAVENPORT v. COMPANY, 92 N.H. 194 (1942)

27 A.2d 104 NORMAN DAVENPORT v. WHITE MOUNTAIN POWER COMPANY. No. 3336.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June 24, 1942. The general rule of damages in actions for negligence is that interest runs from the date of the verdict. Where such action proceeds to verdict and judgment, without request for an instruction for the […]

Read More

STATE v. GULLICK, 118 N.H. 912 (1978)

396 A.2d 554 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. RONALD GULLICK No. 78-160Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided December 29, 1978 1. Constitutional Law — Confessions — Admissibility Before confessions may be considered as evidence, State must show beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant had been warned of his constitutional rights, that he waived […]

Read More

ADLEY EXPRESS CO. v. BRUZZESE, 104 N.H. 283 (1962)

184 A.2d 564 ADLEY EXPRESS COMPANY a. v. ALFRED R. BRUZZESE, JR. a. No. 5056.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos.Argued September 5, 1962. Decided September 28, 1962. 1. In an action to recover damages sustained by the plaintiff when his vehicle collided with defendant’s tractor-trailer unit which had skidded and overturned in the highway at […]

Read More

GAY v. PREFERRED RISK MUT. INS. CO., 114 N.H. 11 (1974)

314 A.2d 644 RAYMOND A. GAY v. PREFERRED RISK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY No. 6475Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided January 31, 1974 1. An uninsured motorist coverage endorsement issued in New Hampshire Page 12 provides uninsured motorist protection to a New Hampshire insured to the extent that the insurance coverage of the tort-feasor is […]

Read More

BEDELL v. BAILEY, 58 N.H. 62 (1876)

BEDELL a., Ap’ts v. BAILEY, Ap’ee. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided December, 1876. The acts of a judge of probate, in the settlement of an estate in which he is interested as an executor, are void. APPEAL, from the decision of the commissioner, disallowing a claim of the appellants, as executors of Lombard, […]

Read More

COOK v. TOWN OF SANBORNTON, 118 N.H. 668 (1978)

392 A.2d 1201 NORMAN S. COOK a. v. TOWN OF SANBORNTON No. 78-094Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided October 4, 1978 1. Zoning — Appeals From Zoning Board — Standard of Superior Court Review Statute setting forth the standard of superior court review in appeals from zoning board decisions does not impose an absolute […]

Read More

STATE v. SETTLE, 132 N.H. 626 (1990)

570 A.2d 895 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JOHN A. SETTLE, JR. No. 87-435Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided January 31, 1990 1. Indictment and Information — Specificity — Generally Test of sufficiency of an indictment is not whether the indictment could possibly be made more definite and certain, but whether it alleges […]

Read More

COURAGE v. CARLETON, 96 N.H. 348 (1950)

77 A.2d 111 ROBERT E. COURAGE, JR. v. OLIVER W. CARLETON. EDITH M. COURAGE, Adm’x v. OLIVER W. CARLETON. No. 3918, No. 3954.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December 5, 1950. A minor employee is entitled to the benefits of the workmen’s compensation act (Laws 1947, c. 266) and is held to have accepted […]

Read More

STATE v. REYNOLDS, 122 N.H. 1161 (1982)

453 A.2d 1319 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. DWIGHT T. REYNOLDS No. 81-422Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided December 30, 1982 1. Arrest — Probable Cause — Generally Reasonable ground and probable cause are synonymous. 2. Arrest — Probable Cause — Generally Probable cause for arrest has been found to exist where the […]

Read More

CONCORD CO. v. ROBERTSON, 66 N.H. 1 (1889)

25 A. 718 CONCORD MANUFACTURING CO. v. ROBERTSON a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided December, 1889. Large natural ponds are held by the state in trust for public use. Under governmental grants of land bounded by them, or of tracts of land in which they are situated, the boundary is the water’s edge. […]

Read More

RAUTENBERG v. MUNNIS, 109 N.H. 25 (1968)

241 A.2d 375 CARL N. RAUTENBERG a. v. ALBERT MUNNIS a. No. 5717.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap.Argued February 7, 1968. Decided April 30, 1968. 1. A new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence is equitably required only where (1) the moving party was not at fault in failing to discover the evidence […]

Read More

APPEAL OF WAUSAU INS. COS., 143 N.H. 478 (1999)

727 A.2d 988 APPEAL OF WAUSAU INSURANCE COMPANIES (New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board) No. 96-439Supreme Court of New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board Decided April 13, 1999 1. Workers’ Compensation — Injuries and Illnesses Compensable— Generally In order for injury to be cognizable under workers’ compensation law, it must produce some work-related disability; such disability need […]

Read More

VANDEWALKER v. ROLLINS, 63 N.H. 460 (1885)

3 A. 625 VANDEWALKER, Guardian, a. v. ROLLINS, Trustee, a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided December, 1885. A by his will gave $10,000 to B in trust for C, the income to be paid to C for life, with remainder to the children of C, if she had any, and if she had […]

Read More

O’NEIL v. WALPOLE, 74 N.H. 197 (1907)

66 A. 119 O’NEIL a. v. WALPOLE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided March 5, 1907. In a proceeding under the statute authorizing the selectmen of a town situate on the Connecticut river to contract with the officers of a contiguous town in Vermont for the purchase of the real estate, easement, or franchise […]

Read More

GOVERNOR COUNCIL v. MOREY, 78 N.H. 125 (1916)

97 A. 375 GOVERNOR AND COUNCIL v. CHARLES H. MOREY a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Decided March 7, 1916. The provision of P.S., c. 222, s. 13, as to ordering notice to be given of petitions, applications, etc., is a general provision relating to all applications to the court and governs the procedure upon […]

Read More

DOW v. ROWE, 58 N.H. 125 (1877)

DOW v. ROWE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided August, 1877. A sheriff is not liable for the services of a keeper employed by his deputy. “ASSUMPSIT, for labor and services performed by the plaintiff as keeper of property attached by one Peaslee, a deputy of the defendant, who employed the plaintiff. Briggs Huse, […]

Read More

CULLEN v. LITTLETON, 84 N.H. 373 (1930)

150 A. 809 WILLIAM H. CULLEN v. LITTLETON. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June 3, 1930. Ordinarily a highway traveler is entitled to act upon the assumption that the municipality has performed its duty of maintenance and that the way is in reasonably safe condition for use. But when a traveler knows that […]

Read More

CHAGNON v. INSURANCE CO., 96 N.H. 256 (1950)

75 A.2d 167 ALEXANDRE CHAGNON, by his Conservator, ROGER CHAGNON v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 3910.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided July 6, 1950. In an action of assumpsit on disability insurance contracts causal insanity or mental incompetence excuses compliance with the contract provision that notice be given by the insured. Where a […]

Read More

V.S.H. REALTY, INC. v. CITY OF MANCHESTER, 123 N.H. 505 (1983)

464 A.2d 1111 V.S.H. REALTY, INC. a. v. CITY OF MANCHESTER No. 82-567Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided July 13, 1983 1. Highways — Alteration — Appeal There is no absolute right to a jury trial on the question of necessity in eminent domain proceedings, and an appeal of a decision of a board […]

Read More

STATE EMPLOYEES’ ASSOC. OF N.H. v. STATE OF N.H., 161 N.H. 730 (2011)

20 A.3d 961 STATE EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE a. v. THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE a. No. 2010-271.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Merrimack.Argued: February 16, 2011. Opinion Issued: April 14, 2011. 1. Statutes — Constitutionality —Presumption or Construction In Favor of Constitutionality In reviewing a legislative act, a court presumes it to be constitutional […]

Read More

BICKFORD v. BICKFORD, 74 N.H. 448 (1908)

69 A. 579 BICKFORD v. BICKFORD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided March 3, 1908. Under section 18, chapter 175, Public Statutes, the court has power to revise and modify an order as to custody and maintenance of a child, made in accordance with an agreement of the parties to a proceeding for nullity […]

Read More

STATE v. THAXTON, 122 N.H. 1148 (1982)

455 A.2d 1016 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. RUSSELL R. THAXTON No. 81-245Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided December 30, 1982 1. Criminal Law — Sentence — Determination Whenever the superior court, after a trial de novo, substantially increases a sentence imposed by the district court, the record must reflect the reasons for […]

Read More

STATE v. STEED, 140 N.H. 153 (1995)

665 A.2d 1072 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. RICHARD STEED No. 94-190Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided August 17, 1995 1. Evidence — Burden of Proof — Generally Evidentiary rulings are within the sound discretion of the trial court and the defendant has the burden to demonstrate that the trial court’s discretionary ruling […]

Read More

COOLEY v. EASTMAN, 57 N.H. 503 (1876)

COOLEY v. EASTMAN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire FROM GRAFTON CIRCUIT COURT. Decided August 11, 1876. Practice — Certificate of wilful and malicious act on execution. The court by which an action is referred under the statute and afterwards finally disposed of, is “the court before whom the action is tried,” under Gen. Stats., ch. […]

Read More

STATE v. KEITH, 136 N.H. 572 (1992)

618 A.2d 291 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. CHARLES KEITH No. 91-243Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided December 31, 1992 1. Evidence — Admissibility Generally — Prejudicial Effect Where one party has introduced one part of a written or recorded statement, the adverse party may seek to prevent a misleading impression from an […]

Read More

STATE v. HEALEY, 106 N.H. 308 (1965)

210 A.2d 486 STATE v. ALBERT HENRY HEALEY. No. 5344.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton.Argued May 5, 1965. Decided May 24, 1965. 1. The Trial Court has inherent power in its discretion to compel discovery in a criminal case where the interests of justice so require. 2. In determining whether justice requires the granting of […]

Read More

PARSONS v. ROBY, 77 N.H. 600 (1914)

92 A. 736 FRED G. PARSONS, Adm’r. v. CLARA A. ROBY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided December 1, 1914. PETITION, for an injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with real estate alleged to be charged with the debts of the plaintiff’s intestate, and for instructions as to whether the debts might be considered […]

Read More

HERRICK v. WRIGHT, 63 N.H. 274 (1884)

HERRICK, Ex’x, v. WRIGHT a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided December, 1884. Under a clause in a will giving “to my sister the promissory note I hold signed by her and by M.; also the sum of my deposit with interest” in a savings-bank, and “three hundred dollars of the sum of my […]

Read More

BLANCHARD v. WEBSTER, 62 N.H. 467 (1883)

BLANCHARD v. WEBSTER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June, 1883. A decree of the probate court granting license to an executor to sell real estate specifically devised, for the payment of debts of the testator, cannot be impeached in a collateral proceeding for fraud. WRIT OF ENTRY, to recover one undivided third part […]

Read More

PINGREE v. McDUFFIE, 56 N.H. 306 (1876)

PINGREE v. McDUFFIE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire FROM ROCKINGHAM CIRCUIT COURT. Decided March 20, 1876. Way of necessity. A party having conveyed a portion of his land over which was the only means of access to the remaining land — Held, that a right of way by necessity to the remaining land was reserved. […]

Read More

COLLINS v. DERBY, 109 N.H. 470 (1969)

256 A.2d 654 WILLIAM COLLINS a. v. DERRY a. No. 5917.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued May 6, 1969. Decided June 30, 1969. 1. Certain amendments to a municipal zoning ordinance proposed by the planning board and included in the notice for the first hearing in which there had been no change were not required […]

Read More

MERCIER v. COMPANY, 84 N.H. 59 (1929)

146 A. 165 CLARA MERCIER v. NASHUA BUICK Co. MANCHESTER BUICK Co. (trading as NASHUA BUICK Co.) v. CLARA MERCIER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided May 7, 1929. Where one signs a conditional sale memorandum as vendee, parol evidence is inadmissible in the absence of fraud or mistake to show that he was […]

Read More

BARRETT v. COMPANY, 80 N.H. 354 (1922)

117 A. 264 WILBUR E. BARRETT v. NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided April 4, 1922. An action of tort cannot be maintained where the declaration sets out a contract and alleges the defendant’s negligent failure to perform it. This rule applies to an action against a telephone […]

Read More

DUBREUIL v. DUBREUIL, 107 N.H. 519 (1967)

229 A.2d 338 GRAZIELLA DUBREUIL v. ROGER N. DUBREUIL a. No. 5555.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued December 8, 1966. Decided January 27, 1967. 1. A landlord has a duty to exercise reasonable care to keep in a reasonably safe condition a driveway used in common by tenants and over which he retains control by […]

Read More

APPEAL OF TOWN OF EXETER, 126 N.H. 685 (1985)

495 A.2d 1288 APPEAL OF TOWN OF EXETER (New Hampshire Public Employee Labor Relations Board) No. 83-509Supreme Court of New Hampshire Public Employee Labor Relations Board Decided July 1, 1985 1. Public Employees — Collective Bargaining — Interpretation of Collective Bargaining Statute Public sector collective bargaining sessions are not within the ambit of the access […]

Read More

FLYNN v. GORDON, 86 N.H. 198 (1933)

165 A. 715 ESTHER M. FLYNN v. HYMAN GORDON. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided April 4, 1933. One person cannot be charged with a breach of duty to another unless injury to the latter resulted from a risk against which a duty of protection was owed to him by the former. Due care, […]

Read More

KERSEVICH v. JAFFREY DIST. CT., 114 N.H. 790 (1974)

330 A.2d 446 LARRY KERSEVICH a. v. JAFFREY DISTRICT COURT No. 6372Supreme Court of New Hampshire Jaffrey District Court Decided December 31, 1974 1. A district court has power to punish for contempt occurring in its presence persons whose acts or conduct would obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice. 2. In formulating […]

Read More

ALCORN v. ROCHESTER ZONING BD., 115 N.H. 383 (1975)

341 A.2d 269 ANTHONY ALCORN a. v. CITY OF ROCHESTER ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT No. 7202Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided June 30, 1975 1. The zoning board’s inaction in clarifying on remand as ordered by the supreme court the grounds upon which the plaintiffs’ request for a variance was denied strongly suggested to […]

Read More

SULLIVAN v. GRAFTON, 55 N.H. 339 (1875)

SULLIVAN COUNTY v. GRAFTON COUNTY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan. Decided March 12, 1875. By Gen. Stats., ch. 75, sec. 9, it is made an offence to bring a “poor and indigent” person from a county in which such person has resided or been supported, into another county, the person effecting such removal knowing […]

Read More

STATE v. PREVOST, 141 N.H. 559 (1997)

689 A.2d 121 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. DAVID PREVOST No. 95-676Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-northern judicial district Decided January 23, 1997 1. Indictment and Information — Amendment — Procedure Courts are allowed to amend indictments in form, but not substance, and instructing the jury on an element not charged by the grand […]

Read More

BENNETT v. WARREN, 70 N.H. 564 (1900)

49 A. 105 BENNETT v. WARREN, Assignee. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1900. In an action against an employer for personal injuries, certain evidence deemed sufficient to warrant a submission of the questions whether the plaintiff was at work within the scope of his employment when injured, whether the defendant was negligent […]

Read More

CONNECTICUT c. CO. v. RAILROAD, 78 N.H. 553 (1918)

103 A. 263 CONNECTICUT VALLEY LUMBER COMPANY v. MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided February 5, 1918. In general, the remedial procedure of another state or country, including its statute of limitations, will not be enforced by the courts of this state, but this principle is usually confined to common law […]

Read More

APPEAL OF KULACZ, 145 N.H. 113 (2000)

756 A.2d 594 APPEAL OF BRIAN KULACZ (New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board) No. 99-018Supreme Court of New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board Decided July 5, 2000 1. Estoppel — Equitable Estoppel — Generally Party asserting estoppel must prove four elements: (1) a representation or concealment of material facts made with knowledge of those facts; (2) party […]

Read More

MILETTE v. N.H. RETIREMENT SYSTEM, 141 N.H. 342 (1996)

683 A.2d 531 JANE L. MILETTE v. NEW HAMPSHIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM No. 95-287Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided September 30, 1996 1. Administrative Law — Administrative Appeal — Writs of Certiorari Because RSA chapter 100-A does not provide for judicial review, a writ of certiorari is the sole remedy available to a party aggrieved […]

Read More

DURGIN v. EXPRESS CO., 66 N.H. 277 (1890)

20 A. 328 DURGIN v. AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1890. Common carriers may limit their common-law liability by express contract against risks not arising from their own negligence. The acceptance, without objection by a shipper, of a receipt for the goods, wherein such limitation is declared, may constitute […]

Read More

GARDNER v. O’LOUGHLIN, 76 N.H. 481 (1912)

84 A. 935 GARDNER, Guardian, v. O’LOUGHLIN, Trustee, a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided October 1, 1912. When a will directs that the income of a trust fund shall be expended for the support and maintenance of a son of the testatrix, as the trustee “shall deem judicious and proper,” the right of […]

Read More

STATE v. GOULD, 144 N.H. 415 (1999)

743 A.2d 300 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. ALLEN D. GOULD No. 97-888Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided December 8, 1999 1. Criminal Law — Double Jeopardy — Generally Double Jeopardy Clause of New Hampshire Constitution, as interpreted by supreme court, provides that a defendant may not be twice placed in jeopardy for […]

Read More

BARTON v. PLAISTED, 106 N.H. 117 (1964)

205 A.2d 854 LORA B. BARTON, Adm’x a. v. FRED K. PLAISTED, JR. a. No. 5275a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original.Argued October 15, 1964. Submitted December 3, 1964. Decided December 30, 1964. 1. A motion requesting the Supreme Court to receive supplementary evidence in support of exceptions preserved at the trial and presently pending on […]

Read More

LaCROIX v. MOUNTAIN, 116 N.H. 545 (1976)

366 A.2d 486 DONALD LaCROIX D.B.A. ROCHESTER CENTRAL AND RED LINE TAXI a. v. OMER P. MOUNTAIN D.B.A. ROCHESTER DIAL-A-RIDE No. 7298Supreme Court of New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Decided September 30, 1976 1. Appeal filed in supreme court on thirty-fourth day after denial by public utilities commission of motion for rehearing was dismissed as […]

Read More

MURPHY v. RAILROAD, 77 N.H. 573 (1915)

94 A. 967 EUGENE J. MURPHY v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June 26, 1915. The statute which provides that in all actions of tort for personal injuries the burden of proving contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff shall be upon the defendant (Laws 1915, c. 148) does […]

Read More

STATE v. SLATER, 109 N.H. 279 (1969)

249 A.2d 692 STATE v. ROBERT C. SLATER. No. 5788.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued September 5, 1968. Decided January 31, 1969. 1. An exception to the admission of testimony not shown to have been erroneously admitted to the prejudice of the excepting party is unavailing. 2. In a complaint for operating a motor vehicle […]

Read More

VILLAGE PRESS v. STEPHEN EDWARD CO., 120 N.H. 469 (1980)

416 A.2d 1373 THE VILLAGE PRESS, INC. v. STEPHEN EDWARD COMPANY, INC. a. No. 79-261Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided June 25, 1980 1. Corporations — Officers and Directors — Liabilities In an action on contract to hold defendant personally liable for the debts of two corporations that he controlled, where plaintiff’s only evidence […]

Read More

HOBIN v. COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL AFFILIATES, 144 N.H. 626 (2000)

744 A.2d 1134 ROSS T. HOBIN v. COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL AFFILIATES, INC. No. 97-877Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided January 31, 2000 1. Contracts — Construction — Implied Terms Implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing did not operate to limit extent of real estate franchisor’s discretion, as expressly reserved in its agreement […]

Read More

APPEAL OF HICKEY, 139 N.H. 586 (1995)

660 A.2d 1098 APPEAL OF WILLIAM A. HICKEY, JR. (New Hampshire Department of Employment Security) No. 94-184Supreme Court of New Hampshire Department of Employment Security Decided June 6, 1995 Unemployment Compensation — Generally — Construction of Statutory Provisions RSA 282-A:32 contains no provision granting relief to a person whose entrepreneurial business fails because of circumstances […]

Read More

STATE v. ENRIGHT, 108 N.H. 227 (1967)

231 A.2d 628 STATE v. WILLIAM B. ENRIGHT, JR. No. 5589.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued April 4, 1967. Decided July 18, 1967. 1. In an indictment for breaking, entering and larceny the evidence warranted the jury finding beyond a reasonable doubt that the respondent was a perpetrator of the crime. 2. In a criminal […]

Read More

HART v. RAILROAD, 72 N.H. 410 (1903)

56 A. 920 HART v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD, PERRY a. Claimants. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December 31, 1903. The statutory provisions as to conditional sales of personalty do not apply to a contract in which the parties mutually understand that the price is to be paid in cash upon delivery of the […]

Read More

PETITION OF KERRY D., 144 N.H. 146 (1999)

737 A.2d 662 PETITION OF KERRY D. (New Hampshire Division for Children, Youth, and Families) No. 97-838Supreme Court of New Hampshire Decided August 30, 1999 1. Habeas Corpus — Availability — Generally When court action results in loss of a constitutionally protected liberty interest, it may be collaterally attacked by way of petition for writ […]

Read More

STATE v. KETCHEN, 80 N.H. 112 (1921)

114 A. 20 STATE v. JOHN C. KETCHEN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan. Decided April 5, 1921. In the trial of an indictment for rape, the argument of counsel for the state in referring to the complainant’s child “as entitled to consideration” was held not to be objectionable as an appeal on the ground […]

Read More

IN RE CHRISTOPHER K., 155 N.H. 219 (2007)

IN RE: CHRISTOPHER K. No. 2005-532.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough County Probate Court.Argued: October 11, 2006. Opinion Issued: April 17, 2007. 1. Mental Health — Commitment Proceedings — Conditional Discharge The plain language of the statute on admissions for purposes of conditional discharge requires that an order of admission precede an allowance for conditional […]

Read More

HARRIS v. SMITH, 71 N.H. 330 (1902)

52 A. 854 HARRIS v. SMITH. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided April 1, 1902. The defendant in an action of trover cannot set up the defence of property in a third person without showing some right, title, or interest in himself derived from such person. The opinion of a witness as to a […]

Read More

STATE v. DAVIS, 103 N.H. 79 (1960)

165 A.2d 42 STATE v. FRANK MICHAEL DAVIS. No. 4880.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued October 4, 1960. Decided October 28, 1960. 1. An indictment charging that the respondent as an accessory after the fact to first degree murder (RSA 590:2) did feloniously receive, harbor and maintain the principal after the respondent knew the principal […]

Read More

BOYNTON v. FIGUEROA, 154 N.H. 592 (2006)

JOHN BOYNTON a. v. DENNIS FIGUEROA a. No. 2005-652.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued: October 3, 2006. Opinion Issued: December 21, 2006. 1. Evidence — Opinion Testimony — Lay Witnesses In an action by plaintiffs claiming negligent construction and installation of their home, the trial court did not err when it permitted the plaintiffs to […]

Read More

WILLIAMS v. BABCOCK, 116 N.H. 819 (1976)

368 A.2d 1166 THURSTON V. WILLIAMS v. ELISABETH T. BABCOCK No. 7464Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire Decided December 30, 1976 1. Plaintiff’s remedy for acquiring access to his land subject to gates and bars pursuant to RSA 234:18-a does not meet the standard that a legal remedy must be certain and obtainable as of […]

Read More

KENNETH E. CURRAN, INC. v. AUCLAIR TRANSP., INC., 128 N.H. 743 (1986)

519 A.2d 280 KENNETH E. CURRAN, INC. v. AUCLAIR TRANSPORTATION, INC. a. No. 85-425Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided December 5, 1986 1. Pleading — Motion To Amend — Generally A motion to amend raises an issue subject to the trial court’s discretion. 2. Pleading — Motion To Amend — Tests and Standards While […]

Read More

IAFOLLA INDUS., INC. v. CURRAN-COSSETTE CONSTR. CORP., 116 N.H. 850 (1976)

368 A.2d 1175 IAFOLLA INDUSTRIES, INC. v. CURRAN-COSSETTE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION No. 7558Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided December 30, 1976 1. A review of the record discloses sufficient evidence to support the master’s findings. 2. Although the master granted plaintiff’s request for a finding that no checks were issued by the city payable jointly […]

Read More

TUCKER v. LOWE, 78 N.H. 610 (1917)

102 A. 376 ORRIN TUCKER v. GERTRUDE F. LOWE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided November 6, 1917. ACTION, for personal injuries under chapter 163, Laws 1911. Trial by jury and verdict for the plaintiff. The plaintiff was injured while operating a re-saw slab machine for the defendant. At the time of the accident […]

Read More

TATE v. HOOPER, 97 N.H. 432 (1952)

89 A.2d 915 PEARL I. TATE, Adm’x w.w.a. Estate of NELLIE L. POTTER v. WILLIAM G. HOOPER a. No. 4133.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided July 1, 1952. A petition by an administratrix for advice and instructions, although affecting the distribution of the estate, was properly before the Superior Court. The testatrix in disposing […]

Read More

MANDIGO v. HEALEY, 69 N.H. 94 (1896)

45 A. 318 MANDIGO v. HEALEY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided December, 1896. The title of a vendee in possession, who purchased in good faith and for a sufficient consideration, is valid as against a subsequent attachment by creditors of a former owner, although the sale by which his vendor acquired title from […]

Read More

STATE v. KING, 151 N.H. 59 (2004)

855 A.2d 510 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JOSEPH E. KING. No. 2003-512.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire.Argued: March 11, 2004. Opinion Issued: May 17, 2004. 1. Offenses — Sexual Offenses — Evidence; Sufficiency Based upon the victim’s testimony coupled with a demonstration in which the victim drew a circle closely encompassing the genital […]

Read More

BRADLEY v. CITY OF MANCHESTER, 141 N.H. 329 (1996)

682 A.2d 1194 DEANNA AND WILLIAM BRADLEY a. v. CITY OF MANCHESTER a. DEANNA AND WILLIAM BRADLEY a. v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF MANCHESTER No. 95-240Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-northern judicial district Decided September 25, 1996 1. Zoning and Planning — Ordinances — Amendment The public hearing notice for a hearing on […]

Read More

BERNIER v. MILLS, 93 N.H. 165 (1944)

37 A.2d 5 MARCEL BERNIER, by his next friend v. GREENVILLE MILLS, INC. No. 3468.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided April 4, 1944. An injury suffered by an employee while engaged in the employment, although the particular act was of a personal nature, if reasonably undertaken and not expressly forbidden, is as much in […]

Read More

LIMITED EDITIONS PROPERTIES v. TOWN OF HEBRON, 2010-586 (N.H. 9-22-2011)

LIMITED EDITIONS PROPERTIES, INC. v. TOWN OF HEBRON. No. 2010-586Supreme Court of New Hampshire GraftonArgued: June 16, 2011 Opinion Issued: September 22, 2011 Martin, Lord Osman, P.A., of Laconia (Willard G.Martin, Jr. and Suzanne S. McKenna on the brief and orally), for the petitioner. Mitchell Municipal Group, P.A., of Laconia (Judith E. Whitelaw on the […]

Read More

POLLARD AUTO CO. v. NASHUA, 80 N.H. 233 (1921)

116 A. 136 POLLARD AUTO COMPANY v. NASHUA. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December 6, 1921. The expenditures of the police commission of Nashua are limited under Laws 1891, c. 208, s. 8; Laws 1913, c. 148, s. 4 to the amount appropriated by the city councils, except in respect to the compensation […]

Read More

BELIVEAU v. COMPANY, 81 N.H. 57 (1923)

120 A. 884 ERNEST BELIVEAU, Adm’r, v. THE JOHN B. VARICK COMPANY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided May 1, 1923. The assertion by counsel of a fact fairly inferable from the evidence is unexceptionable. The statement by counsel arguendo of facts which are common knowledge is unexceptionable. And so of counsel’s statement of […]

Read More