523 A.2d 28 In re ESTATE OF MABEL M. WARD No. 85-551Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire County Probate Court Decided December 30, 1986 1. Courts — Probate Courts — Jurisdiction Funds allegedly misappropriated by individual acting under a general power of attorney for incompetent, who was later appointed executor of estate of incompetent, constituted […]
Category: New Hampshire Court Opinions
STATE v. LACHAPELLE, 133 N.H. 1 (1990)
572 A.2d 584 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. CLARENCE LACHAPELLE No. 88-322Supreme Court of New Hampshire Manchester District Court Decided April 11, 1990 1. Indictment and Information — Specificity — Generally To meet standard of New Hampshire Constitution, a complaint must inform a defendant of the offense with which he is charged with sufficient […]
KIMBALL v. GRATE CO., 69 N.H. 485 (1898)
45 A. 253 KIMBALL a. v. NEW ENGLAND ROLLER GRATE CO. a. STATE (ex rel. KIMBALL a.) v. WILLIAMS a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1898. Shares of stock issued to the promoters of a corporation illegally and without consideration, and by them transferred to be held for the benefit of the […]
GREELEY a. v. BAGLEY, 60 N.H. 579 (1880)
GREELEY a. v. BAGLEY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June, 1880. Burleigh Adams, for the plaintiffs. Burrows Jewell, for the defendant. TRESPASS, qu. cl. Report of a referee in favor of the plaintiffs. The location of a disputed boundary being found by the referee, and no error of law appearing in his finding, […]
TISDALE v. COMPANY, 73 N.H. 357 (1905)
62 A. 168 TISDALE a. v. JOHN H. PRAY SONS CO. a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided October 3, 1905. A mortgage of personalty, in which the affidavit required by statute is not signed and sworn to by both the mortgagee and the mortgagor, is not entitled to registration; and the unauthorized record […]
POKIGO v. INTERNATIONAL BRO. OF ELECTRIC WORKERS, 106 N.H. 384 (1965)
213 A.2d 689 ROBERT J. POKIGO a. v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS . a. No. 5331.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued March 3, 1965. Decided May 24, 1965. Motion to remand denied October 5, 1965. 1. Where the courts of this state have no jurisdiction over the subject matter the parties cannot confer jurisdiction […]
SMITH v. RAILROAD, 87 N.H. 246 (1935)
177 A. 729 MABEL JOHNSON SMITH, Adm’x v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. FLORENCE A. SMITH v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided March 5, 1935. In an action for negligently backing a freight train upon persons walking upon the track, evidence that defendant’s right of way had been commonly used by pedestrians at the […]
STATE v. FRAZIER, 74 N.H. 112 (1906)
65 A. 297 STATE v. FRAZIER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided December 4, 1906. Whether a jury shall be interrogated as to the grounds upon which they proceeded in arriving at a verdict, and whether a verdict shall be set aside because instructions were disregarded, are questions of fact determinable by the trial […]
BANK v. HUNTON, 69 N.H. 509 (1898)
45 A. 351 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NEWPORT v. HUNTON. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan. Decided December, 1898. Where money obtained upon the promissory note of a married woman been used by her to discharge an obligation of the husband to the payee, the test of her liability is whether the payment of the […]
STATE v. MCGILL, 153 N.H. 813 (2006)
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. DONALD S. MCGILL. No. 2004-442.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued: May 18, 2006. Opinion Issued: August 1, 2006. 1. Witnesses — Impeachment, Corroboration — Prior Convictions and Criminal Charges A trial court’s ruling to admit evidence of prior convictions is reviewed under an unsustainable exercise of discretion standard. To […]
RANCOURT v. RAILROAD, 92 N.H. 284 (1943)
30 A.2d 453 HENRY RANCOURT, Adm’r v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. No. 3372.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided January 5, 1943. In an action by an administrator against a railroad claiming that his decedent’s death was caused by the air current of a fast express train, known as the Flying Yankee, while she stood on […]
STATE v. VALE MILLS, 63 N.H. 4 (1883)
STATE v. VALE MILLS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1883. Admissibility of ancient records, and of reputation as to location of boundary affirmed. A declaration in a petition for a highway, signed by the defendant’s grantor, as to the location of a disputed boundary of another highway, is admissible on the trial […]
ST. JOHNSBURY TRUCKING CO. v. STATE, 118 N.H. 209 (1978)
385 A.2d 215 ST. JOHNSBURY TRUCKING CO., INC. v. THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE No. 7675Supreme Court of New Hampshire Board of Taxation Decided April 7, 1978 1. Taxation — Appeals — Standards for Review Scope of review in appeal from decision of board of taxation is governed by statute providing that order of commission […]
APPEAL OF KEENE STATE COLLEGE EDUC. ASS’N, 120 N.H. 32 (1980)
411 A.2d 156 APPEAL OF KEENE STATE COLLEGE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, NHEA/NEA (New Hampshire Public Employee Labor Relations Board) No. 78-294Supreme Court of New Hampshire Public Employee Labor Relations Board Decided January 31, 1980 1. Public Employees — Public Employees Labor Relations Board — Structure Statute governing composition of public employee labor relations board requires two […]
WOODWARD v. ROBERTS, 58 N.H. 503 (1878)
WOODWARD v. ROBERTS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided August, 1878. The provision of the U.S. St. of 1866, c. 184, s. 9, that no unstamped instrument shall be admitted in evidence in any court until legally stamped, applies only to the courts of the United States. ASSUMPSIT, on the defendant’s note for $150, […]
GREELY v. WILLEY, 71 N.H. 240 (1902)
51 A. 918 GREELY v. WILLEY a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided March 7, 1902. The mere fact that a defendant of record has obtained a discharge in bankruptcy does not render him a competent witness for his co-defendant in the trial of an action prosecuted by the administrator of a deceased plaintiff. […]
DUNLAP v. DUNLAP, 84 N.H. 352 (1930)
150 A. 905 LLOYD W. DUNLAP v. WALTER E. DUNLAP. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided June 3, 1930. By the English law the parental duty of support was only a moral obligation, and hence a failure to perform it was not a breach of legal duty. There is no rule of common law […]
OSGOOD v. THORNE, 63 N.H. 375 (1885)
OSGOOD v. THORNE a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1885. The fact that a conveyance was made for the purpose of preferring certain creditors of the grantor, does not of itself make such conveyance fraudulent as to his other creditors. An objection to the competency of a magistrate appointed to determine whether […]
POWELL v. PAPPAGIANIS, 108 N.H. 523 (1968)
238 A.2d 733 WESLEY POWELL v. GEORGE S. PAPPAGIANIS, Attorney General. No. 5743.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap.Argued March 5, 1968. Decided March 29, 1968. 1. The grand jury is an investigatory body as well as an accusatory body and its investigations are not subject to legislative control, nor are its powers restricted by statute […]
HOUNSELL v. NORTH CONWAY, 154 N.H. 1 (2006)
MARK HOUNSELL a. v. NORTH CONWAY WATER PRECINCT. No. 2005-505.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll.Argued: March 9, 2006. Opinion Issued: August 1, 2006. 1. Records — Right to Inspect — Exceptions Where a water precinct retained individuals to investigate a complaint that an employee of the precinct had threatened and harassed a co-worker and, during […]
STATE v. KING, 2009-704 (N.H. 11-2-2011)
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. HORACE KING. No. 2009-704Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-northern judicial districtArgued: September 15, 2011 Opinion Issued: November 2, 2011 Michael A. Delaney, attorney general (Elizabeth C.Woodcock, assistant attorney general, on the brief and orally), for the State. Pamela E. Phelan, assistant appellate defender, of Concord, on the brief and […]
MESERVE v. STATE, 119 N.H. 149 (1979)
400 A.2d 34 ROBERT W. MESERVE AND BENJAMIN H. LACY, TRUSTEES OF BOSTON AND MAINE CORPORATION v. THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE No. 78-131Supreme Court of New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Decided March 23, 1979 1. Public Utilities — Regulatory Agencies — Powers Where railroad corporation appealed from a public utilities commission supplemental order deciding […]
ACADIA INSURANCE COMPANY v. McNEIL, 142 N.H. 815 (1998)
711 A.2d 873 ACADIA INSURANCE COMPANY v. MICHAEL McNEIL a. No. 97-432Supreme Court of New Hampshire U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Decided May 22, 1998 1. Statutes — Maxims and Rules of Construction — Legislative History or Intent In matters of statutory interpretation, the supreme court is the final arbiter of the […]
HOEN v. HAINES, 85 N.H. 36 (1931)
154 A. 129 EMMA HOEN v. ARCHIE HAINES. FRED HOEN v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided March 3, 1931. A passenger in one motor vehicle is entitled to recover for an injury caused by the defendant’s negligent driving of another vehicle when such negligence is the sole proximate cause of the injury. […]
PRASSAS v. COMPANY, 100 N.H. 209 (1956)
123 A.2d 157 GEORGE N. PRASSAS v. J. F. McELWAIN COMPANY a. No. 4431.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued May 1, 1956. Decided May 31, 1956. An agreement for workmen’s compensation executed by the employee and the employer’s insurance carrier and approved by the State Labor Commissioner pursuant to RSA 281:36 has the effect of […]
IN THE MATTER OF ALEXANDER AND EVANS, 147 N.H. 441 (2002)
790 A.2d 142 IN THE MATTER OF KAREN ALEXANDER AND JONATHAN EVANS No. 2001-488Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-northern judicial district Decided February 11, 2002 1. Domestic Violence — Abuse Prevention — Protective Orders In a proceeding on violation of a mutual restraining order and for a domestic violence protective order, evidence of contacts and […]
PETITION OF M. M. RAILROAD, 68 N.H. 347 (1895)
44 A. 483 PETITION OF THE MILFORD MANCHESTER RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1895. The previous refusal of the legislature to grant a charter for a railroad over a certain route is not a bar to proceedings under P. S., c. 156, for the formation of a railroad corporation to construct, […]
BECK v. TOWN OF AUBURN, 121 N.H. 996 (1981)
437 A.2d 289 RICHARD BECK v. TOWN OF AUBURN No. 80-290Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided November 20, 1981 1. Zoning — Planning Authorities — Powers and Duties Although the powers of a town planning board extend to off-site improvements and obligations necessitated by a proposed development, it has only those powers granted to […]
RENOVEST CO. v. HODGES DEVELOPMENT CORP., 135 N.H. 72 (1991)
600 A.2d 448 RENOVEST COMPANY v. HODGES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION No. 89-559Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided December 6, 1991 1. Dismissal and Nonsuit — Grounds for Granting — Lack of Evidence In most circumstances, appropriate standard of review for a motion to dismiss (or nonsuit) is to take the evidence presented and determine if, […]
FISHER v. TOWN OF BOSCAWEN, 121 N.H. 438 (1981)
431 A.2d 131 RICHARD FISHER v. TOWN OF BOSCAWEN No. 80-157Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided June 10, 1981 1. Zoning — Hearings — Rehearing Zoning board of adjustment rehearing process is designed to afford a board an opportunity to correct its own mistakes before appeal to the courts, and board which denied application […]
LESSER v. FURNITURE CO., 68 N.H. 343 (1895)
44 A. 490 LESSER a. v. NEW HAMPSHIRE FURNITURE CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1895. How far the cross-examination of a witness may be carried for the purpose of discrediting him, is a question of fact to be determined at the trial term. ASSUMPSIT for goods sold and delivered. Trial by […]
STATE v. WHITE, 145 N.H. 544 (2000)
765 A.2d 156 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. DELVIN WHITE No. 97-412Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-Northern Judicial District Decided December 27, 2000 1. Witnesses — Impeachment, Corroboration — SpecificInstances of Conduct A defendant may introduce a victim’s prior allegations of sexual assault, for impeachment purposes, by showing that such allegations were “demonstrably false,” […]
WHITE v. WHITE, 60 N.H. 210 (1880)
WHITE v. WHITE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided December, 1880. Objections to defects of service and entry of a libel for divorce are waived by a general appearance and a motion for a continuance. LIBEL FOR DIVORCE, commenced by writ of attachment and summons, in the ordinary form of such writs, commanding the […]
STATE v. KELLY, 120 N.H. 904 (1980)
424 A.2d 820 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JOHN M. KELLY No. 80-011Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided December 29, 1980 1. Appeal and Error — Preservation of Questions — Failure To Present Below Failure to properly object and take exception to alleged errors occurring during course of trial precluded the party from […]
MURRAY v. HYYRYNEN, 119 N.H. 784 (1979)
408 A.2d 403 ALAN D. MURRAY a. v. PENTTI A. HYYRYNEN a. No. 78-169Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll Decided November 14, 1979 1. Vendor and Purchaser — Representations — Inaccurate Representations Request for a ruling that there was no evidence of fraud before the court is irrelevant to an action in assumpsit based on […]
UNIVERSITY v. FORBES, 88 N.H. 17 (1936)
183 A. 860 AMERICAN UNIVERSITY v. IRVING E. FORBES, Ex’r, a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided March 3, 1936. P. L., c. 302, ss. 1-5, barring action against a decedent’s estate unless notice of the claim has been given, applies equally whether the estate has passed from the executor to a legatee, personally, […]
STATE v. DUFF, 129 N.H. 731 (1987)
532 A.2d 1381 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. ROBERT DUFF No. 86-084Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided October 9, 1987 1. Evidence — Admissibility Generally — Discretion of Court Decisions on the admissibility of evidence rest with the sound discretion of the trial court. 2. Evidence — Admissibility Generally — Probative Value At […]
ATWOOD v. BERRY, 87 N.H. 331 (1935)
179 A. 412 BASIL E. ATWOOD v. NORMAN J. BERRY a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided June 4, 1935. A petition for mandamus may be amended by adding new parties and new prayers for relief; and no prejudice is caused any of the defendants, if, upon such amendment, the procedure disassociates the original […]
PEARSON v. BEEF CO., 69 N.H. 584 (1899)
44 A. 113 PEARSON v. DOVER BEEF CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided June, 1899. In an action for deceit in a sale between residents of this state, evidence that the vendors unjustifiably caused the arrest of the vendee in another state, in a suit to recover the price of the goods, is […]
IN RE NASSAR, 156 N.H. 769 (2008)
IN THE MATTER OF GEORGE J. NASSAR AND MAUREEN NASSAR. No. 2006-870.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Plymouth Family Division.Submitted: November 13, 2007. Opinion Issued: March 7, 2008. 1. Divorce — Alimony — Particular Cases Where there was no evidence to support the trial court’s finding that the husband induced the wife to return to the […]
SNOW v. SNOW, 75 N.H. 433 (1910)
75 A. 881 SNOW, Ap’t, v. SNOW, Ex’r, a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided March 1, 1910. A widow is not entitled to dower in woodland of her husband from which he annually cut trees for use at his mill, but which was not occupied by him during the marriage in connection with […]
WAIT v. ASSOCIATION, 66 N.H. 581 (1891)
23 A. 77 WAIT a. v. NASHUA ARMORY ASSOCIATION. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1891. The president of a corporation has no implied authority to act as agent of the corporation. The admission in evidence of the by-laws of a corporation for the purpose of showing that the president had not such […]
STATE v. PIASECNY, 108 N.H. 216 (1967)
231 A.2d 620 STATE v. HENRY C. PIASECNY. No. 5574.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued April 4, 1967. Decided July 18, 1967. 1. The parole of the defendant from the New Hampshire Hospital where he was committed under the provisions of RSA 607:3 (supp) after the grand jury refused to indict him for murder on […]
SMITH v. JUDKINS, 60 N.H. 127 (1880)
SMITH, Ex’r, v. JUDKINS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June, 1880. A sheriff receiving specific directions as to the attachment of property is bound to follow them, if he can lawfully do so, and it is no excuse from liability to show merely that he acted in good faith. CASE, for neglect of […]
STATE v. TYLER, 158 N.H. 776 (2009)
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. ERIC TYLER. No. 2008-079.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Rockingham.Argued: April 16, 2009. Opinion Issued: June 3, 2009. 1. Trial — Criminal Cases — Jury Instructions — Particular Cases The court declined to adopt a rule requiring an acquittal instruction when the evidence presented at trial about a prior act […]
VEINO v. BEDELL, 99 N.H. 274 (1954)
109 A.2d 555 JAMES G. VEINO v. EDWARD E. BEDELL a. No. 4345.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Submitted November 4, 1954. Decided November 30, 1954. By virtue of the negotiable instrument law (R. L., c. 366, ss. 24, 28) illegality of consideration for a promissory note is an affirmative defense and the party asserting it […]
BROADHURST v. MORGAN, 66 N.H. 480 (1891)
29 A. 553 BROADHURST v. MORGAN, Ap’t. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided June, 1891. Counts in case and assumpsit, relating to the same subject-matter, may he joined in one declaration. Whether justice requires an amendment of the declaration is ordinarily a question of fact to be determined at the trial term. If A, […]
RAY v. AUSTIN, 56 N.H. 36 (1875)
RAY v. AUSTIN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire FROM MERRIMACK CIRCUIT COURT. Decided August 13, 1875. Reference — Practice. The referee law of 1874 contains no provision that upon the neglect or refusal of any party to appear before the referee, being certified to the court, judgment shall be rendered against him as upon nonsuit […]
TENN, TRUSTEE v. 889 ASSOCIATES, LTD., 127 N.H. 321 (1985)
500 A.2d 366 SYLVIA TENN, TRUSTEE OF DOXON REALTY TRUST v. 889 ASSOCIATES, LTD. No. 84-304Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided October 24, 1985 1. Continuance — Discretion of Court Setting a trial date is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court, as is any ruling on a motion for continuance […]
KENDALL v. DRAKE, 67 N.H. 592 (1891)
30 A. 524 KENDALL v. DRAKE a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December, 1891. TRESPASS, for assault and battery. The dividing line between the premises of adjoining owners was in dispute. The plaintiff, at the request of one of the owners, leaned against the fence erected by him upon the strip of land […]
STATE v. TETREAULT, 97 N.H. 260 (1952)
85 A.2d 386 STATE, by Patricia Bosse, Complainant v. RUDOLPHE TETREAULT. No. 4082.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Somersworth Municipal Court. Decided January 2, 1952. Bastardy proceedings (R.L., c. 128) are civil in nature although criminal in form. The nonresidence of the mother of a bastard child begotten outside the state is no bar to the […]
MORRISON v. JOHNSON, 92 N.H. 219 (1942)
29 A.2d 132 NATHAN H. MORRISON v. VERDIE E. JOHNSON. No. 3356.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided November 4, 1942. Upon a bill in equity to remove a cloud from the title to real estate, the description claimed to be a cloud applied with reasonable certainty to a definite tract of land; hence testimony […]
GIBBS v. HELGEMOE, 116 N.H. 825 (1976)
367 A.2d 1041 FRANK D. GIBBS v. RAYMOND A. HELGEMOE, WARDEN No. 7467Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original Decided December 30, 1976 1. A writ of habeas corpus places on the plaintiff committed to the State prison on a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity the difficult burden of proving that his mental […]
COLANTONIO v. COMPANY, 97 N.H. 23 (1951)
79 A.2d 633 GAETANO COLANTONIO v. KINGSBURY MACHINE TOOL CO. a. No. 4001.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided April 3, 1951. A claimant suffering from silicosis is not entitled as a matter of law to total disability payments under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Laws 1947, c. 266, s. 2 III) after […]
IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF G.S., 157 N.H. 470 (2008)
IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF G.S. No. 2007-387.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Merrimack County Probate Court.Argued: May 22, 2008. Opinion Issued: July 11, 2008. 1. Guardianship — Proceedings — ParticularProceedings A probate court’s express finding that a ward’s mental illness prevented him from making informed decisions regarding his health care decisions and made him unable to […]
WIESZECK v. SEPESSY, 116 N.H. 160 (1976)
355 A.2d 865 EMIL S. WIESZECK v. BERTHA L. SEPESSY EMIL S. WIESZECK a. v. BERTHA L. SEPESSY No. 7174Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided March 31, 1976 1. Under the “emergency doctrine”, a person in an emergency situation through no fault of his own must conduct himself as a reasonably prudent man would […]
ANDERSON v. MOTORSPORTS, 155 N.H. 491 (2007)
MAUD ANDERSON a. v. MOTORSPORTS HOLDINGS, LLC. No. 2006-008.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued: April 3, 2007. Opinion Issued: May 30, 2007. 1. Zoning and Planning — Ordinances — Construction Section in a town wetlands conservation ordinance stating: “Where any provision of this ordinance is in conflict with State or Federal law or regulation, or […]
FUNTOWN USA, INC. v. TOWN OF CONWAY, 129 N.H. 352 (1987)
529 A.2d 882 FUNTOWN USA, INC. v. TOWN OF CONWAY No. 86-169Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll Decided June 3, 1987 1. Costs — Attorney Fees — Appeals Where plaintiff successfully litigated claim against town concerning the issuance of a building permit for a recreational facility and was awarded attorney’s fees, and where, on appeal, […]
KLINGER v. CARTIER, 96 N.H. 180 (1950)
71 A.2d 786 LEO KLINGER v. RUDOLPH G. CARTIER a. No. 3898.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. March 7, 1950. A member of the General Court is a state official and as such his compensation due and payable by the State for services rendered as a member of the House of Representatives is subject to […]
PRATT v. MAGNUSON, 87 N.H. 486 (1935)
179 A. 355 MERLE J. PRATT v. HAZEL M. MAGNUSON a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June 4, 1935. ACTION, two counts of the declaration being for negligence for personal injury and property damage arising from a motor vehicle accident, and another count being for malicious conduct of one of the defendants in […]
STATE v. GRUBER, 132 N.H. 83 (1989)
562 A.2d 156 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. PAUL GRUBER No. 87-491Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided August 9, 1989 1. Evidence — Past Conduct — Admissibility The decision to admit evidence of prior offenses or bad acts lies within the sound discretion of the trial court upon a determination that the evidence […]
WELLS v. BEAUPRE, 86 N.H. 577 (1934)
172 A. 397 JOSEPHINE WELLS v. ERNEST BEAUPRE, Tr. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided May 1, 1934. A plaintiff by moving to charge the trustee upon the disclosure on file elects to stand upon the facts therein stated. Where in trustee-process substituted service had been made upon an insurance company as trustee by […]
RICHARDSON CAMERON v. LAHOUT, 82 N.H. 560 (1926)
134 A. 349 RICHARDSON CAMERON CO., INCORPORATED, v. HERBERT LAHOUT. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June 24, 1926. ASSUMPSIT, to recover the balance due on a contract for the installation of a heating plant, and for extras. Trial by the court and verdict for the plaintiff. The plaintiff agreed to install a steam […]
STATE v. CRUMP, 107 N.H. 62 (1966)
217 A.2d 183 STATE v. JOHNNY LEE CRUMP. No. 5391.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued December 7, 1965. Decided February 28, 1966. 1. In an indictment for illegal possession of narcotic drugs (RSA 318-A:2) evidence that the narcotic drugs discovered by the police in a brown paper bag was in a place where the police […]
STATE v. COPELAND, 124 N.H. 90 (1983)
467 A.2d 238 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. COSCO COPELAND No. 82-202Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided October 26, 1983 1. Criminal Law — Confessions — Voluntariness In proving voluntariness, the State must show that a confession was the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice, and was not extracted by any […]
NASHUA BOARD OF EDUCATION v. VAGGE, 102 N.H. 457 (1960)
159 A.2d 158 NASHUA BOARD OF EDUCATION v. MARTO J. VAGGE, Mayor and the Board of Aldermen. No. 4804.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued February 2, 1960. Decided March 31, 1960. 1. The extent of control which the mayor and board of aldermen may exercise over the local board of education in school administration is […]
JOHNSON v. LANG, 71 N.H. 251 (1902)
51 A. 908 JOHNSON v. LANG. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided March 7, 1902. Where tools of a debtor’s occupation are attached on mesne process, the owner may maintain trover against the officer without first specifically claiming an exemption. The waiver which may be implied from a failure of the owner of attached […]
APPEAL OF ROSE, 146 N.H. 219 (2001)
769 A.2d 377 APPEAL OF JOYCE E. ROSE (New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board). No. 99-485Supreme Court of New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board Decided March 29, 2001 1. Workers’ Compensation — Proceedings to Secure Compensation— Attorney Fees Although claimant was successful in obtaining a rehearing before the board, that did not establish that she “prevailed” within […]
STATE v. LAROCHELLE, 112 N.H. 392 (1972)
297 A.2d 223 STATE v. JON LAROCHELLE. No. 6425.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rochester District Court. Decided November 3, 1972. 1. The reference in RSA 262-A:69-a to an “official report of said test” as conclusive evidence of the conduct and results of a test to determine alcohol by weight in the blood indicates legislative reliance […]
HOLMAN v. MANNING, 65 N.H. 92 (1889)
18 A. 746 HOLMAN v. MANNING. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June, 1889. The court does not ordinarily revise findings of fact lawfully made by a referee, or by a judge at the trial term. DOE, C.J. In assumpsit, foreign attachment, and a bill in equity, filed as an amendment of the declaration, […]
STEPHAN v. SEARS ROEBUCK CO., 110 N.H. 248 (1970)
266 A.2d 855 ROBERT STEPHAN v. SEARS ROEBUCK CO. ROBERT STEPHAN v. KING-SEELEY THERMOS CO. No. 5972Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided April 30, 1970 1. Strict liability in tort for the sale of a defective product, and contributory negligence as a defense to an action based upon such strict liability, set forth in […]
McDILL v. ENVIRONAMICS CORP., 144 N.H. 635 (2000)
757 A.2d 162 WILLIAM D. McDILL v. ENVIRONAMICS CORPORATION No. 97-894Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided February 3, 2000 1. Appeal and Error — Evidence — Particular Cases Whether after-acquired evidence may limit damages or completely bar liability is a question of law reviewable de novo on appeal. 2. Labor — Termination of Employment […]
GILBERT v. DESMARAIS, 87 N.H. 150 (1934)
175 A. 247 FLORIDA GILBERT v. EDWARD DESMARAIS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided November 7, 1934. An exception to a finding by the trial justice that a verdict is excessive presents the question whether such finding could reasonably be made and will be set aside when it is apparent that the court unwittingly […]
O’CONNOR v. BUCKLIN, 59 N.H. 589 (1879)
O’CONNOR v. BUCKLIN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1879. An officer, having in his legal custody a prisoner arrested for a violation of the criminal law, may make sufficient search of his person to ascertain if he has money or other articles of value, by means of which, if left in his […]
BOWLAN LUMBER CO. v. LEMIRE, 120 N.H. 465 (1980)
416 A.2d 1371 BOWLAN LUMBER COMPANY, INC. a. v. ADRIEN LEMIRE a. No. 79-207Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided June 25, 1980 1. Workmen’s Compensation — Notice of Claim Under workmen’s compensation statute, if no notice of work-related injury is given within statutory period, workmen’s compensation claim is barred, no matter how minor the […]
SAVINGS BANK v. CHICK, 64 N.H. 410 (1887)
13 A. 372 ROCHESTER SAVINGS BANK v. CHICK a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided December, 1887. A stipulation in a promissory note, that “All the signers agree to be holden should the time of payment be extended,” does not bind a surety to an indefinite extension of the time of payment made by […]
BOUTHIETTE v. WIGGIN, 122 N.H. 774 (1982)
451 A.2d 368 RENE L. BOUTHIETTE, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF TERESA M. BOUTHIETTE v. STEVEN WIGGIN No. 81-106Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided September 8, 1982 1. Appeal and Error — Transcript — Absence In a wrongful death action, where the direct testimony of an expert witness regarding the net financial loss to […]
PUBLIC SERVICE CO. v. STATE, 102 N.H. 71 (1959)
150 A.2d 521 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY a. v. STATE a. No. 4743.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original.Argued April 7, 1959. Decided April 21, 1959. 1. In an appeal from an order of the Public Utilities Commission fixing current rates of an electric utility as temporary rates pending a determination of permanent rates, and in appeals […]
LEMAY v. DEMERS, 77 N.H. 563 (1915)
94 A. 262 JOSEPH LEMAY v. HONORE DEMERS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided May 4, 1915. Where there is no evidence concerning the defendant’s financial condition, a statement in argument which in effect informs the jury that he is a person of slender means exceeds the limits of legitimate advocacy, and furnishes ground […]
GAGNON v. DANA, 69 N.H. 264 (1897)
39 A. 982 GAGNON v. DANA a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1897. A gratuitous lender of a chattel is not liable for an injury to the borrower, or his servant, from defects in it not known to the lender. In such a case, it is erroneous to instruct the jury that […]
KELLY v. SIMOUTIS, 91 N.H. 407 (1941)
20 A.2d 628 JOHN E. KELLY v. STANLEY SIMOUTIS a. No. 3251.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June 3, 1941. One who purchases property with knowledge that his vendor’s purpose in making the conveyance is to defeat a possible attachment, and takes the conveyance to protect his vendor against it, participates in the fraud, […]
STATE v. A. B. C., 68 N.H. 441 (1895)
40 A. 1065 STATE, v. A. B. C. a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December, 1895. If a private prosecutor, acting reasonably and in good faith, procures the attendance of witnesses whose testimony entirely fails to sustain the charge an indictment, he may tax their fees against the defendant unless costs are limited […]
WHITAKER v. L.A. DREW, 149 N.H. 55 (2003)
816 A.2d 984 STEVEN WHITAKER v. L.A. DREW, INC. No. 2001-755Supreme Court of New Hampshire CarrollArgued November 13, 2002 Opinion Issued January 17, 2003 1. Evidence — Expert Testimony — Generally Where scientific issues would be beyond the capacity of persons of common experience and knowledge to form a valid judgment by themselves, expert evidence […]
APPEAL OF EMISSARIES OF DIVINE LIGHT, 140 N.H. 552 (1995)
669 A.2d 802 APPEAL OF EMISSARIES OF DIVINE LIGHT (New Hampshire Board of Tax and Land Appeals) No. 94-291Supreme Court of New Hampshire Board of Tax and Land Appeals Decided December 27, 1995 1. Taxation — Exemptions From Taxation — Religious Societies and Institutions New Hampshire Board of Tax and Land Appeals correctly held that […]
STATE v. BEAN, 117 N.H. 185 (1977)
371 A.2d 1152 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. GERARD J. BEAN, JR. No. 6749Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided March 31, 1977 1. Indictment and Information — Sufficiency — Attempts Indictment charging that defendant “did feloniously attempt to carnally know and abuse . . ., a woman child under the age of 16 years, […]
KNAPP v. EXPRESS CO., 55 N.H. 348 (1875)
KNAPP v. THE U.S. CANADA EXPRESS CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided March 12, 1875. The plaintiffs gave to the agent of the defendants, an express company, a promissory note, telling him they wanted him to send it by express for collection upon the makers at H. The agent took the note, saying […]
BERGERON v. SAVINGS BANK, 63 N.H. 195 (1884)
BERGERON v. DARTMOUTH SAVINGS BANK. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June, 1884. A married woman is under no legal disability to set up the defence of her disability to be a surety of her husband. A writ of error does not lie on the ground of objections which should have been taken before […]
MITCHELL v. SMITH, 90 N.H. 36 (1939)
4 A.2d 355 KARL P. MITCHELL, Ex’r. v. ESTATE OF JOHN W. SMITH a. No. 3038.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided February 7, 1939. In a petition by the creditor of a decedent’s estate upon the statute (P. L., c. 302, s. 28) to enforce a claim otherwise barred by the two year limitation […]
CURTIS v. RAILROAD, 78 N.H. 116 (1916)
97 A. 743 CLEVELAND H. CURTIS v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. HARRY J. DANFORTH v. SAME. SIMEON PARTRIDGE v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided February 1, 1916. Argument of counsel embodying an erroneous rule of law will not destroy a verdict unless the error was approved by the court; the presumption is that […]
BAER v. ROSENBLATT, 106 N.H. 26 (1964)
203 A.2d 773 FRANK P. BAER v. ALFRED D. ROSENBLATT. No. 5211.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap.Argued June 2, 1964. Decided October 6, 1964. 1. The authority granted to the Superior Court (RSA 507:11) to change the venue in an action where there is ground to apprehend that a fair and impartial trial cannot be […]
JANVRIN v. POWERS, 79 N.H. 44 (1918)
104 A. 252 JOHN A. JANVRIN v. THOMAS POWERS a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June 29, 1918. Under P.S., c. 141, ss. 13, 15, notice of intention to claim a sub-contractor’s lien is not required to establish a lien on the property of one whose promise to the plaintiff is original and […]
LITTLE v. UPHAM, 64 N.H. 279 (1886)
8 A. 823 LITTLE v. UPHAM. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1886. Whether a verdict is against the evidence is a question of fact to be decided at the trial term. TRESPASS, for assault and battery. Plea, the general issue, with a brief statement that the defendant acted in self-defence. Verdict for […]
STATE v. SIMPSON, 133 N.H. 704 (1990)
582 A.2d 619 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. DAVID SIMPSON No. 89-465Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan Decided November 15, 1990 1. Appeal and Error — Evidence — Sufficiency of Evidence A fact-specific analysis is employed in reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence in criminal convictions. 2. Sexual Assault — Aggravated Felonious Sexual Assault […]
CATE v. MARTIN, 69 N.H. 610 (1899)
45 A. 644 CATE v. MARTIN a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1899. In a petition for mandamus, the statement that a board of aldermen, at a legal meeting, after a full investigation and hearing of all parties in interest, by a majority vote of all the qualified members, legally passed resolutions […]
McSHANE v. DOVER, 78 N.H. 507 (1917)
102 A. 622 PETER J. McSHANE v. DOVER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided December 4, 1917. One who sells property to the officials of a city for its use cannot recover of the city therefor, if the only conclusion from the evidence is that they pledged their own and not the city’s credit. […]
ROBBINS a. v. JOHNSON, 147 N.H. 44 (2001)
780 A.2d 1282 PAMELA ROBBINS a. v. BERTHA G. JOHNSON a. No. 99-422Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire County Probate Court Decided October 3, 2001 1. Wills — Construction — Omitted Children Pretermitted heir creates a conclusive rule of law that a child who is neither named nor referred to in a will and is […]
LAUTEN v. ROWAN, 59 N.H. 215 (1879)
LAUTEN v. ROWAN. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June, 1879. A sale of liquor in another state, valid by the law of that state, may be enforced here, although the vendor was an agent of this state, and knew that the vendee, a resident of this state, was not a town agent for […]
STATE v. JOHNSON, 134 N.H. 498 (1991)
594 A.2d 1288 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JOHN JOHNSON No. 90-404Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided July 26, 1991 1. Estoppel — Collateral Estoppel — Criminal Cases General proposition is recognized that doctrine of collateral estoppel may be applied in criminal setting, but instances where it has been applied are extremely limited. […]
DEYETTE v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 142 N.H. 560 (1997)
703 A.2d 661 TRACEY AND GREGORY DEYETTE v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY No. 96-327Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-northern judicial district Decided December 31, 1997 1. Insurance — Policies — Construction Language in an insurance policy will be interpreted as a matter of law. The plain and ordinary meaning of the policy’s words will be […]
CARTER v. COLBY, 71 N.H. 230 (1902)
51 A. 904 CARTER v. COLBY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided February 4, 1902. The statute relating to the killing of disabled animals (Laws 1897, c. 22, s. 1), in so far as it authorizes a destruction of property without giving the owner thereof notice and an opportunity to be heard, is an […]