SCAMMON v. PAGE, 102 N.H. 404 (1960)

157 A.2d 651 IRVING SCAMMON a. v. HARRY PAGE. No. 4796.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued January 5, 1960. Decided January 27, 1960. 1. Where the plaintiffs’ opening statement was insufficient to support a claim of causal negligence and their counsel was given several opportunities by the Trial Court to amend or enlarge such statement […]

Read More

PERRY v. INSURANCE COMPANY, 67 N.H. 291 (1892)

33 A. 731 PERRY v. DWELLING-HOUSE INSURANCE CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided June, 1892. On the question whether one person was at a certain time the agent of another, evidence of the previous course of dealing between them is competent. A proposition does not become a contract until the maker or his […]

Read More

FEELEY v. SAMPSON, 116 N.H. 540 (1976)

364 A.2d 875 LEO F. FEELEY IV v. GEORGE SAMPSON, SHERIFF, ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, a. No. 7253Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original Decided September 30, 1976 1. An examination of the record disclosed evidence to support the trial court’s ruling continuing the original bail while plaintiff was awaiting his second trial and disclosed no evidence that […]

Read More

SWIFT v. LUMBER CO., 64 N.H. 53 (1886)

5 A. 903 SWIFT CO. v. NEW DURHAM LUMBER CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided June, 1886. An action for rent, or for use and occupation, can only be maintained upon a promise, express or implied, to pay for the occupation; and an action for the value of slabs and edgings made at […]

Read More

BURGESS v. RAILROAD, 98 N.H. 372 (1953)

101 A.2d 781 RICHARD L. BURGESS v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. No. 4210.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued October 6, 1953. Decided December 21, 1953. In an action to recover for injuries sustained by the plaintiff as the result of a collision at a grade crossing at dusk between his truck and defendant’s locomotive on an […]

Read More

STATE v. STEWART, 155 N.H. 212 (2007)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JOHN REED STEWART d/b/a J.R.S. INTERIORS. No. 2005-493.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued: November 8, 2006. Opinion Issued: April 17, 2007. 1. Trial — Criminal Cases — Jury Instructions — Review The trial court’s answer to a jury inquiry is reviewed in the context of the court’s entire charge […]

Read More

GRIMARD v. ROCKINGHAM CTY. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, 161 N.H. 69 (2010)

ROBERT P. GRIMARD v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. No. 2009-753.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Rockingham.Argued: September 8, 2010. Opinion Issued: October 27, 2010. 1. Labor — Compensation — Particular Matters Under the plain language of the pertinent statutes, a salaried employee is entitled to receive a fixed amount of money to be paid at […]

Read More

BANK v. RAILROAD, 58 N.H. 203 (1877)

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PEORIA v. THE NORTHERN RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided December, 1877. A common carrier by railroad, who delivers goods intrusted to him for carriage, without production of the bill of lading describing the goods, is liable in trover for their value to a bona fide holder of such […]

Read More

DUMONT v. TOWN OF WOLFEBORO, 137 N.H. 1 (1993)

622 A.2d 1238 PAUL DUMONT v. TOWN OF WOLFEBORO No. 91-514Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll Decided March 30, 1993 1. Easements — Operation and Effect — Generally Defining rights of parties to an expressly deeded easement requires determining parties’ intent in light of circumstances at the time the easement was granted. 2. Deeds — […]

Read More

WYMAN v. UPHAUS, 100 N.H. 436 (1957)

130 A.2d 278 LOUIS C. WYMAN, Attorney General v. WILLARD UPHAUS. No. 4533.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued December 4, 1956. Decided February 28, 1957. Although since the decision in Pennsylvania v. Nelson, 350 U.S. 497, the State is without authority to prosecute offenses of a seditious or subversive nature against the federal government the […]

Read More

BALL v. NASHUA, 61 N.H. 403 (1881)

BALL v. NASHUA. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1881. A vote of the city council that the proceeds from the sale of certain lots owned by the city be expended in the improvement of an adjacent common, after paying the sum of $1,700 into the city treasury, and that a condition be […]

Read More

BERTHIAUME v. CITY OF NASHUA, 118 N.H. 646 (1978)

392 A.2d 143 ADELARD BERTHIAUME a. v. CITY OF NASHUA No. 78-067Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided September 27, 1978 1. Taxation — Real Property — Assessments In a suit for real property tax abatement, plaintiff owners of a shopping center had the burden of showing that the assessment placed on shopping center was […]

Read More

BOARD OF PORTSMOUTH POLICE COMM’RS v. DEP’T OF LABOR, 117 N.H. 938 (1977)

380 A.2d 258 BOARD OF PORTSMOUTH POLICE COMMISSIONERS v. STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ROBERT M. DUVALL, COMMISSIONER JOHN C. CONNORS ROBERT T. FINNEY PAUL F. HEBERT No. 7799Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided November 16, 1977 Public Employees — Compensation — Punishment Duty Where police officers, who were charged with violations […]

Read More

APPEAL OF GRANITE STATE ELEC. CO., 120 N.H. 536 (1980)

421 A.2d 121 APPEAL OF GRANITE STATE ELECTRIC COMPANY (New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission) No. 79-365Supreme Court of New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Decided September 3, 1980 1. Public Utilities — Orders — Modifications Utility companies and consumers are entitled to rely on “permanent” rates established under final orders of the public utilities commission, and […]

Read More

HUNNEYMAN v. HUNNEYMAN, 118 N.H. 652 (1978)

392 A.2d 147 ROBERT W. HUNNEYMAN v. THERESA H. HUNNEYMAN No. 78-080Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided September 27, 1978 Divorce — Trial Court — Discretion Trial court did not abuse its discretion in not awarding alimony, in reducing the amount of child support payments from that awarded on a temporary basis, and in […]

Read More

BEER v. BENNETT, 160 N.H. 166 (2010)

DOUGLAS C. BEER v. TERRY M. BENNETT No. 2008-808.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Portsmouth District CourtArgued: January 13, 2010. Opinion Issued: April 20, 2010. 1. Commerce — Consumer Protection Laws —Particular Cases In a suit under the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), the court could not agree that plaintiff admitted in his testimony that defendant made […]

Read More

HERON COVE ASSOC. v. DVMD HOLDINGS, 146 N.H. 211 (2001)

769 A.2d 373 HERON COVE ASSOCIATION a. v. DVMD HOLDINGS, INC. a. No. 98-776Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided March 29, 2001 1. Zoning and Planning — Judicial Review — Jurisdiction Upon grant of certiorari, superior court may review the decision of a planning board, and may reverse, affirm, or modify that decision where […]

Read More

WHITE v. COMPANY, 85 N.H. 389 (1932)

159 A. 124 PAUL WHITE v. BROWN COMPANY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided February 2, 1932. A verbal agreement to pay for lumber cut “over two years’ operation” at a certain price per cord is a contract “not to be performed within one year from the time of making it” (P. L., c. […]

Read More

STATE v. BIRD, 122 N.H. 10 (1982)

440 A.2d 441 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. NEIL D. BIRD No. 80-497Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided January 15, 1982 1. Trial — Instructions — Generally A trial judge’s primary duty in charging the jury is to clarify the issues of the case, and to assist the jury in understanding the questions […]

Read More

LEO PERRON v. CONCORD, 102 N.H. 32 (1959)

150 A.2d 403 LEO PERRON v. CONCORD. No. 4681.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued March 3, 1959. Decided April 7, 1959. 1. The occupation of roofing contractor was held not to be a “customary home occupation” within the meaning of a zoning ordinance provision which permitted dwellings in a general residence district to be used […]

Read More

WILLETTE v. COMPANY, 75 N.H. 399 (1909)

74 A. 870 WILLETTE v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided December 7, 1909. In an action of negligence against an employer, certain evidence deemed sufficient to warrant the conclusion that the defendant omitted to establish reasonable regulations for the conduct of his business, and failed to exercise due care in […]

Read More

SWANSON v. PRIEST, 95 N.H. 64 (1948)

58 A.2d 207 JOHN E. SWANSON v. OLIVER W. PRIEST a. No. 3691.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided March 2, 1948. There is no requirement that a memorandum for the sale of land to be valid must be signed by the purchaser. Mutuality of remedy is not essential to specific performance of a written […]

Read More

SANBORN v. RAILROAD, 76 N.H. 65 (1911)

79 A. 642 SANBORN v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided March 7, 1911. A justice presiding at a trial term has discretionary power to suspend a rule of court in a given case for cause shown. Where a plaintiff has misconceived his remedy and declared in assumpsit, he may be […]

Read More

BANK COMMISSIONERS v. ASSOCIATION, 70 N.H. 557 (1900)

49 A. 124 BANK COMMISSIONERS v. GRANITE STATE PROVIDENT ASSOCIATION. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1900. Where an insolvent corporation is in process of dissolution under the laws of this state, a judgment of the court of a state in which ancillary administration is had is conclusive here only so far as […]

Read More

FLANDERS v. PUTNEY, 58 N.H. 358 (1878)

FLANDERS v. PUTNEY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan. Decided June, 1878. An agent, having a general authority to sell and deliver merchandise, can bind his principal by a contract fixing the price, quality, and quantity of goods to be delivered, and the time and place of delivery. One who delivers a portion only of […]

Read More

NASHUA GARDEN CORP. v. GORDON, 118 N.H. 379 (1978)

386 A.2d 1278 NASHUA GARDEN CORPORATION v. ROBERT GORDON a. No. 78-008Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided May 17, 1978 1. Deeds and Conveyances — Restrictive Covenants — Changed Conditions Where deed expressly subjected ten-acre parcel of land to certain restrictive covenants, and court refused to find that conditions had sufficiently changed in the […]

Read More

KEENE v. BLOOD, 101 N.H. 466 (1958)

146 A.2d 262 KEENE v. ELTON W. BLOOD a. No. 4688.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire.Argued November 5, 1958. Decided November 28, 1958. 1. Where a municipal zoning ordinance prohibited apartments on the third floor of buildings located in a single residence district and further provided that the third floor of buildings in such district […]

Read More

CHAPMAN v. COMPANY, 74 N.H. 424 (1908)

68 A. 868 CHAPMAN v. NEWMARKET MANUFACTURING CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided February 4, 1908. An unconditional deed of a right of flowage entitles the grantee to a reasonable exercise of the privilege, as against the servient estate. CASE, for flowage. Trial by jury and verdict for the plaintiff. Transferred from the […]

Read More

MANOCK v. COMPANY, 86 N.H. 104 (1933)

164 A. 211 GEORGE H. MANOCK, Adm’r v. AMOS D. BRIDGE’S SONS, Inc. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided January 3, 1933. In a petition for compensation under P. L., c. 178 recovery is limited to servants of the petitionee. One working about the business of another may occupy a dual position so that […]

Read More

SMART v. GALE, 62 N.H. 62 (1882)

SMART v. GALE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1882. When a stock of goods together with the furniture and fixtures in a store is sold for a gross sum, and there is a failure of title as to the fixtures, the purchaser cannot maintain an action for money had and received to […]

Read More

WILSON v. CAME, 117 N.H. 1020 (1977)

381 A.2d 32 DAVID A. WILSON AND MARCIA A. WILSON v. MELVIN E. CAME No. 7872Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided December 16, 1977 Appeal and Error — Evidence — Sufficiency of Evidence Review of record from trial for assessment of damages resulting in verdict for plaintiffs in amount of $2,500 revealed ample evidence […]

Read More

CLYDE v. LAKE, 78 N.H. 322 (1917)

100 A. 552 GEORGE W. CLYDE, Trustee, v. HARRY F. LAKE, Adm’r, a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided January 2, 1917. In the absence of evidence tending to show a purpose of intestacy, the presumption is that a testator intended all his estate to pass by his will. BILL IN EQUITY, by the […]

Read More

BLUE JAY REALTY TRUST v. CITY OF FRANKLIN, 132 N.H. 502 (1989)

567 A.2d 188 BLUE JAY REALTY TRUST v. CITY OF FRANKLIN No. 89-011Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided December 13, 1989 1. Constitutional Law — Taking — Exhaustion of Remedies Court properly dismissed federal taking and due process compensation claims predicated on a zoning restriction, absent allegation that the landowner sought and was denied […]

Read More

FELDER v. RICHARDSON, 67 N.H. 509 (1893)

32 A. 830 FELKER a. v. RICHARDSON a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided December, 1893. The interest of one of two joint lessees in the demised premises is not surrendered to the lessor by operation of law, by a sale of it to the co-lessee accompanied with a parol agreement between the lessor […]

Read More

HARMON v. HAINES, 68 N.H. 28 (1894)

38 A. 734 HARMON, Adm’r, v. HAINES a., Ap’ts. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided June, 1894. An appeal lies from the decree of a judge of probate accepting or rejecting the report of a referee upon the claim of an administrator against the estate. PROBATE APPEAL. The plaintiff, administrator of his deceased wife’s […]

Read More

MITRICH v. TUTTLE, 90 N.H. 512 (1940)

11 A.2d 818 MICHAEL MITRICH, by his mother and next friend v. JONES STEVENS TUTTLE a. No. 3136.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided March 5, 1940. In an action against the operators of two automobiles for causing injuries to a passenger by their negligent operation and collision, the record of a plea of guilty […]

Read More

HOEPP v. STATE FARM INS. CO., 142 N.H. 189 (1997)

697 A.2d 943 LAWRENCE M. HOEPP v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY No. 95-755Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-northern judicial district Decided July 18, 1997 1. Contracts — Construction — Exclusionary Language On appeal, the interpretation of exclusionary language in an insurance policy is a question of law for the appellate court to decide. 2. Contracts […]

Read More

STATE v. HALL, 131 N.H. 634 (1989)

557 A.2d 997 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. LARRY HALL No. 88-433Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided May 3, 1989 1. Bail and Recognizance — Pretrial Detention — Hearing Under bail reform act, no matter when the district court establishes conditions for a defendant’s release, the State must move for a detention hearing […]

Read More

STATE v. BURKE, 77 N.H. 353 (1914)

92 A. 164 STATE v. DENNIS D. BURKE a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided October 6, 1914. In an action upon a liquor dealer’s bond, the state is entitled to a verdict upon proof that any provision of the license act was violated at the place designated in the license. It is no […]

Read More

DOBSON v. INSURANCE COMPANY, 67 N.H. 596 (1893)

41 A. 1114 DOBSON a. v. MANUFACTURERS’ MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1893. Per Curiam.[*] [*] See foot-note on page 80. Upon the authority of Gaysville Manufacturing Co. v. Insurance Co., ante, p. 457, the order for a nonsuit was error. According to the agreement, there must be Judgment […]

Read More

B. M. RAILROAD v. BRACKETT, 71 N.H. 494 (1902)

53 A. 304 BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD v. BRACKETT a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided October 7, 1902. One who is notified of the pendency of an action, and is given an opportunity to defend, is concluded as to all questions determined therein which are material to a recovery against him, in an action […]

Read More

STATE v. GORDON, 146 N.H. 324 (2001)

781 A.2d 976 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. STEVEN GORDON. No. 99-221Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-Southern Judicial District Decided April 24, 2001 1. Criminal Law — Extradition — Doctrine of Specialty Doctrine of specialty is based on principles of international comity; it requires that persons who are surrendered by a government for prosecution […]

Read More

OPINION OF THE JUSTICES (SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL), 135 N.H. 543 (1992)

608 A.2d 870 OPINION OF THE JUSTICES (Solid Waste Disposal) No. 92-132Supreme Court of New Hampshire Request of the House of Representatives Decided May 6, 1992 1. Constitutional Law — New Hampshire Constitution — Mandated Programs Invoking constitutional prohibition against mandated programs requires both a mandate of responsibility to the political subdivision and a requirement […]

Read More

CONNOLLY v. WAYCOTT, 63 N.H. 618 (1884)

CONNOLLY v. WAYCOTT. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided December, 1884. ASSUMPSIT for labor. D. H. Woodward, for the plaintiff. Lane Dole and E. R. Champlin, for the defendant. CARPENTER, J. No question of law is presented. Whether the labor was performed upon the credit of the defendant, or upon that of Knapp, was […]

Read More

STATE v. WHITING, 127 N.H. 110 (1985)

497 A.2d 1217 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. DALE R. WHITING No. 84-100Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided August 15, 1985 Searches and Seizures — Reasonable Searches and Seizures — Particular Cases Trial court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress seized evidence of a marijuana cigarette, where police officer called to the scene […]

Read More

STATE v. LAPOINTE, 81 N.H. 227 (1924)

123 A. 692 STATE v. HENRY LAPOINTE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided February 5, 1924. Laws 1919, c. 99, s. 4, providing that “the possession of any intoxicating liquor . . . shall be prima facie evidence of a violation of this section” means that possession shall be sufficient to invoke the judgment […]

Read More

BOSTON MAINE R. R. v. PORTSMOUTH, 71 N.H. 21 (1901)

51 A. 664 BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD v. MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF PORTSMOUTH. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Decided July 5, 1901. Under chapter 76, Laws 1901, the board of railroad commissioners may entertain an appeal from an order of city officers locating the tracks of a street railway whose general route has been established by […]

Read More

LANGDON v. SIBLEY, 100 N.H. 373 (1956)

127 A.2d 156 NORMAN E. LANGDON a. v. RUDOLPH A. SIBLEY. No. 4536.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll.Argued November 8, 1956. Decided November 29, 1956. A motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ bill in equity at the close of the plaintiffs’ case and before submission for decision on the merits properly raises the question of the […]

Read More

MacNEIL v. MacNEIL, 119 N.H. 952 (1979)

409 A.2d 1341 VALERIE MacNEIL v. DONALD MacNEIL No. 79-167Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided December 28, 1979 1. Divorce — Custody and Support of Children — Visitation Rights In light of the medical and psychiatric histories in the record, the court, which provided defendant with summaries of reports filed with the court by […]

Read More

MAKOWIEC v. INSURANCE CO., 83 N.H. 547 (1929)

145 A. 269 WLADYSLAW MAKOWIEC v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA v. WLADYSLAW MAKOWIEC a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided March 5, 1929. An agreement between husband and wife that he would pay the premiums on a policy upon her life and that he should be the beneficiary […]

Read More

KEENE v. TOWN OF MEREDITH, 119 N.H. 379 (1979)

402 A.2d 166 RUSSELL KEENE a. v. TOWN OF MEREDITH No. 78-238Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided May 23, 1979 Zoning — Planning Authorities — Powers and Duties Town planning board had no jurisdiction to prevent sale of one of two lots owned by plaintiff by claiming that such sale would constitute a subdivision, […]

Read More

MOFFATT v. GALE, 92 N.H. 421 (1943)

32 A.2d 526 EARLE C. MOFFATT, Ex’r v. ETTA S. GALE. No. 3388.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided May 4, 1943. The proper procedure for correction of an entry made by the trial court is by certiorari; but such remedy is discretionary and not to be granted if substantial justice can be attained by […]

Read More

AVERY v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, 2010-798 (N.H. 10-27-2011)

CURTIS AVERY a. v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION a. No. 2010-798Supreme Court of New Hampshire MerrimackArgued: June 16, 2011 Opinion Issued: October 27, 2011 Hall, Morse, Anderson, Miller Spinella, P.C., of Concord (Frank P. Spinella, Jr. on the brief and orally), for the petitioners. Michael A. Delaney, attorney general (Anne M. Edwards, associate attorney […]

Read More

HOWISON v. BANK, 88 N.H. 31 (1936)

183 A. 697 MARY A. HOWISON v. MECHANICS SAVINGS BANK, a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided March 3, 1936. The owner of an ordinary stock certificate bearing his name as owner on its face who executes the power of attorney thereon in blank and delivers the certificate thus endorsed to one as trustee […]

Read More

COBB v. MORRISON, 79 N.H. 74 (1918)

104 A. 829 ERNEST COBB v. OBE G. MORRISON. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided October 1, 1918. A release, otherwise valid, will not be set aside, on the ground of fraudulently concealing the extent of the wrongs done, in the absence of any representation express or implied that the releasee was disclosing the […]

Read More

R. C. ALLEN BUS. MACH., INC. v. ACRES, 111 N.H. 269 (1971)

281 A.2d 162 R. C. ALLEN BUSINESS MACHINES, INC. v. LYNN E. ACRES a d/b/a CONCORD TYPEWRITER SERVICE. HASKELL, INC. v. SAME. PURETEC, INC. v. SAME. Nos. 6145 6146 6147.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided July 29, 1971. 1. Foreign corporations that have not registered and obtained a certificate of authority from the secretary […]

Read More

CLEVESY v. CLEVESY, 118 N.H. 112 (1978)

383 A.2d 705 NILES A. CLEVESY v. BARBARA A. CLEVESY No. 7798Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided March 10, 1978 1. Divorce — Alimony — Modification or Vacation Original decree of divorce, incorporating stipulation allocating certain property and establishing alimony payment schedule, was subject to three-year statute of limitation, and unless party seeking benefits […]

Read More

LANGLOIS v. ASSOCIATION, 79 N.H. 264 (1919)

108 A. 289 JOSEPHINE LANGLOIS v. ASSOCIATION CANADO-AMERICAINE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided June 28, 1919. The by-law of a fraternal beneficiary society may be a stipulation of the contract of insurance and may be waived by the society. A waiver of such a by-law in regard to monthly payments of assessments may […]

Read More

STATE v. MILLER, 115 N.H. 662 (1975)

348 A.2d 345 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JAMES L. MILLER, JR. No. 7170Supreme Court of New Hampshire Durham District Court Decided November 28, 1975 1. Repeal of a statute by implication is not favored in this State and will not be found in the construction of statutes if any reasonable construction can avoid it. […]

Read More

McGRANAHAN v. COMPANY, 101 N.H. 46 (1957)

131 A.2d 631 PHILIP H. McGRANAHAN d/b/a P. H. McGRANAHAN CO. v. STANDARD CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. No. 4562.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued February 6, 1957. Decided May 9, 1957. 1. In an action by a subcontractor to perfect a statutory mechanic’s lien (RSA ch. 447) the requirement (s. 8) that the owner of the […]

Read More

LANGLEY v. LANGLEY, 84 N.H. 515 (1931)

153 A. 9 EDWARD I. LANGLEY a. v. CHARLES S. LANGLEY a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided January 6, 1931. A civil action does not lie for conspiracy alone; the ground for recovery is found in the acts done, not in the plans made. The decree of a probate court is in the […]

Read More

ASHLEY v. SCHOOL DIST., 111 N.H. 54 (1971)

274 A.2d 795 WILLIAM E. ASHLEY v. RYE SCHOOL DISTRICT a. No. 6117.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided February 26, 1971. 1. The rehiring of a teacher aide by a school board with funds from an unencumbered surplus in instructional salaries that had been validly appropriated by the school district for school purposes was […]

Read More

STRITCH v. STRITCH, 106 N.H. 409 (1965)

213 A.2d 426 RICHARD STRITCH v. NAIDA STRITCH. No. 5325.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll.Argued June 2, 1965. Submitted July 23, 1965. Decided October 5, 1965. 1. Jurisdiction in divorce proceedings is a continuing one with respect to all subsequent proceedings which arise out of the original cause of action. 2. Such jurisdiction includes the […]

Read More

CASKEY v. STATE, 93 N.H. 438 (1945)

43 A.2d 768 PAUL D. CASKEY, Ex’r v. STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. No. 3545.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June 28, 1945. Since the right of a residuary legatee attaches only to the residue of the estate after the payment of all paramount claims, the tax imposed by R. L., c. 87 upon the […]

Read More

SISTERS OF MERCY v. HOOKSETT, 93 N.H. 301 (1945)

42 A.2d 222 SISTERS OF MERCY v. TOWN OF HOOKSETT. No. 3488.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided March 6, 1945. Mount Saint Mary College is a “seminary of learning” within the meaning of R. L., c. 73, s. 7, and the real estate used by it exclusively for school purposes is not taxable. The […]

Read More

STATE v. CASSADY, 140 N.H. 46 (1995)

662 A.2d 955 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. SHELDON CASSADY No. 94-758Supreme Court of New Hampshire Durham District Court Decided July 24, 1995 1. Judgments — Collateral Estoppel — Generally Application of doctrine of collateral estoppel is not constitutionally mandated when first proceeding is civil, rather than criminal. 2. Judgments — Collateral Estoppel — […]

Read More

WHITE v. LODGE, 100 N.H. 138 (1956)

121 A.2d 795 IRA H. WHITE, Ex’r v. CORINTHIAN LODGE a. No. 4453.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued February 7, 1956. Decided March 29, 1956. In the construction of a will, the conclusion of the Trial Court as to the intent of the testator based upon an agreed statement of facts and the will itself […]

Read More

STATE v. ALLISON, 134 N.H. 550 (1991)

595 A.2d 1089 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. THOMAS E. ALLISON No. 90-003Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided July 31, 1991 1. Depositions and Discovery — Purpose — Criminal Proceedings The purpose of a bill of particulars is to protect a defendant against a second prosecution for an inadequately described offense and to […]

Read More

BOUVIER v. ALLEN, 87 N.H. 119 (1934)

174 A. 783 VITALE BOUVIER (by his mother and next friend) v. HOWARD L. ALLEN. ALBINA LIZOTTE v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided September 21, 1934. The law of the road requires that one traveling behind another and desiring to pass him shall turn to the left after the traveler in advance […]

Read More

OPINION OF THE JUSTICES, 76 N.H. 609 (1913)

85 A. 757 OPINION OF THE JUSTICES. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Decided January 24, 1913. The legislature cannot, conformably to the constitution, provide for the taxation of standing wood and timber at a rate less than that imposed upon property in general. It is within the power of the legislature to exempt certain classes […]

Read More

APPEAL OF BARRY, 141 N.H. 170 (1996)

681 A.2d 75 APPEAL OF KEVIN G. BARRY a. (Board of Trustees of the City of Manchester Employees’ Contributory Retirement System) No. 94-434Supreme Court of New Hampshire Manchester Retirement Board Decided July 11, 1996 1. Public Employees — Retirement System — Trustees of Retirement System Board of trustees of city employees’ retirement system did not […]

Read More

TOMASKO v. DUBUC, 145 N.H. 169 (2000)

761 A.2d 407 EDITH L. TOMASKO v. VINCENT E. DUBUC No. 98-836Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-Northern Judicial District Decided August 15, 2000 1. Divorce — Custody — Visitation In ruling on mother’s post-divorce petition to relocate with minor children, trial court correctly considered whether proposed modification would preclude children from participating in their normal […]

Read More

HARDIMAN v. WALSH BROS., 96 N.H. 456 (1951)

79 A.2d 19 MARY H. HARDIMAN, Adm’x v. WALSH BROTHERS. No. 3956.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. March 6, 1951. Where the duty of an employee in operating an elevator furnished by the master required no special skill for the maintenance of safety beyond that involved in doing the work such operator was a fellow […]

Read More

STATE v. EMANUEL, 139 N.H. 57 (1994)

649 A.2d 53 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. MICHAEL EMANUEL No. 91-555Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided October 21, 1994 1. Attorneys — Withdrawal From Proceeding — Proper Withdrawals An attorney in a case that has been assigned for trial can withdraw from representation only if granted permission by the court upon a […]

Read More

DAVIS v. AVERY, 81 N.H. 219 (1924)

123 A. 699 LAVADA J. DAVIS v. ALBERT J. AVERY a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided February 5, 1924. A forcible comment upon or characterization of counsel’s argument from the viewpoint of his opponent is no ground for setting aside a verdict. ASSUMPSIT. The defendant Avery’s bill of exceptions to statements of counsel […]

Read More

BURNHAM v. RAILROAD, 68 N.H. 567 (1896)

44 A. 750 BURNHAM, Adm’r, v. CONCORD MONTREAL RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1896. In an action against a railroad company for negligently causing the death of an employee, evidence which all tends to prove that the deceased knew or ought to have known of the existence of the defect complained […]

Read More

GENEST v. COMPANY, 75 N.H. 509 (1910)

77 A. 77 GENEST v. ODELL MANUFACTURING CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided July 1, 1910. If a person called as a witness is employed by one interested in the result of the suit, the fact may be shown and counsel may comment upon it, as bearing upon the credibility of the testimony; […]

Read More

BENTON v. BELLOWS, 61 N.H. 107 (1881)

JACOB BENTON v. GEORGE BELLOWS, AND JOHN BELLOWS, Tr. CYRUS WHEELER v. THE SAME. FRANCIS RICHARDSON v. THE SAME. ALBERT S. TWITCHELL v. THE SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided June, 1881. In an action committed by order of court, under the referee law of 1874, to a referee, upon whose report the […]

Read More

WOODMAN v. ROWE, 59 N.H. 453 (1879)

WOODMAN v. ROWE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December, 1879. In a suit brought by an infant, not by his guardian or next friend, when the plaintiff has become of age since the commencement of the suit, no amendment, and no appearance of a guardian or next friend, are necessary to obviate the […]

Read More

ADAMS v. ADAMS, 64 N.H. 224 (1886)

9 A. 100 ADAMS, Apt, v. ADAMS a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided December, 1886. A petition to the probate court for the appointment of a trustee will not be dismissed for want of service, because the original petition, instead of a copy, was left with the defendant. The conduct of one who […]

Read More

KUKENE v. GENUALDO, 145 N.H. 1 (2000)

749 A.2d 309 JOHN AND ANNETTE KUKENE v. JEANNE M. GENUALDO No. 97-085Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided March 21, 2000 1. Costs — Recovery of Costs and Attorney Fees — Generally Attorney’s fees may be awarded where litigation is instituted or unnecessarily prolonged through a party’s oppressive, vexatious, arbitrary, capricious or bad faith […]

Read More

ARLINGTON AM. SAMPLE BOOK CO. v. BOARD OF TAXATION, 116 N.H. 575 (1976)

364 A.2d 878 ARLINGTON AMERICAN SAMPLE BOOK COMPANY v. BOARD OF TAXATION No. 7386Supreme Court of New Hampshire Board of Taxation Decided September 30, 1976 1. Relief from board of taxation’s dismissal of appeal for tax abatement under RSA 76:16-a (Supp. 1975) as not seasonably filed was barred by statutory six-month period of limitation, whether […]

Read More

TUCKER v. TRUST CO., 69 N.H. 187 (1897)

44 A. 927 TUCKER, Trustee, Ap’t, v. NEW HAMPSHIRE TRUST CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1897. A banking corporation which is authorized by its charter to receive trust funds and act as trustee under judicial appointment may lawfully deposit in its savings department funds which it holds as trustee. If the […]

Read More

WYMAN v. SWEEZY, 100 N.H. 103 (1956)

121 A.2d 783 LOUIS C. WYMAN, Attorney General v. PAUL M. SWEEZY. No. 4395.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued January 3, 1956. Decided March 6, 1956. In a petition to the Superior Court by the Attorney General (RSA 491:19, 20) to compel a witness to answer questions he previously refused to answer in the course […]

Read More

KRUGER v. COMPANY, 84 N.H. 290 (1930)

149 A. 872 ADOLPH G. KRUGER v. EXETER MANUFACTURING COMPANY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided April 1, 1930. A servant does not assume the risk when he merely knows there is some danger without appreciation of all the factors of danger. A servant though of some knowledge and experience in the adjustment of […]

Read More

ALLEN v. COLBURN, 65 N.H. 37 (1888)

17 A. 1060 ALLEN, Adm’x, Ap’t, v. COLBURN, Ex’r. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1888. Heirs at law, who for twenty-three years neglect to claim personal effects as belonging to the estate of the decedent, may by their laches lose the right to assert such claim. PROBATE APPEAL. The appellant is administratrix […]

Read More

CARON v. LABRIE, 115 N.H. 20 (1975)

331 A.2d 155 ROGER A. CARON v. WILLIAM LABRIE No. 6883Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided January 31, 1975 1. After the supreme court was told that plaintiff’s counsel had been unable to locate his client and that neither counsel had any knowledge about the authenticity of a typewritten letter which had been received […]

Read More

BERNARD v. BERNARD, 108 N.H. 360 (1967)

236 A.2d 685 HELEN CORA BERNARD v. VALEDA E. BERNARD a. No. 5618.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued September 6, 1967. Decided December 29, 1967. 1. On a motion to dismiss a bill in equity the facts alleged in the petition are assumed to be true and will be construed most favorably to the plaintiff. […]

Read More

CHASE v. AVIGDOR, 122 N.H. 906 (1982)

451 A.2d 1315 MARION CHASE a. v. ARLENE DODGE AVIGDOR No. 81-445Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided October 14, 1982 1. Contracts — Construction — Rewriting Contract The courts generally have no authority to rewrite contracts into which the parties have freely entered. 2. Equity — Relief Available — Discretion of Court In equitable […]

Read More

REMICK v. RUMERY, 69 N.H. 601 (1899)

45 A. 574 REMICK v. RUMERY, Adm’r, Ap’t. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided June, 1899. In an action against an administrator, entries in the plaintiff’s diaries, made as a daily and original record of his transactions, are competent evidence as to items of labor performed and money expended for and loaned to the […]

Read More

MOULTON v. HALEY, 57 N.H. 184 (1876)

MOULTON v. HALEY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire FROM STRAFFORD CIRCUIT COURT. Decided August 10, 1876. Resulting trust in favor of wife against husband. Where land was purchased with money of a married woman, and the deed taken running to her husband without her knowledge, it is a question of fact and intention whether the […]

Read More

STATE v. DESMARAIS, 81 N.H. 199 (1924)

123 A. 582 STATE v. EUGENE DESMARAIS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided January 1, 1924. Under Laws 1919, c. 99, s. 4, the possession of intoxicating liquor is not conclusive but only prima facie evidence of a violation of that section, and the provision as to possession does not apply to any intoxicating […]

Read More

STATE v. ENO, 143 N.H. 465 (1999)

727 A.2d 981 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. MICHAEL ENO No. 95-615Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided April 8, 1999 1. Appeal and Error — Questions Considered on Appeal —Constitutionality Before triggering State constitutional analysis, defendant must unambiguously and specifically assert State constitutional foundation for his objection. 2. Criminal Law — Victims — […]

Read More

WEHRINGER’S CASE, 130 N.H. 707 (1988)

547 A.2d 252 WEHRINGER’S CASE No. LD-86-005Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original Decided August 5, 1988 1. Constitutional Law — Right to Counsel — Waiver Respondent in disbarment proceeding effectively waived any claims with respect to a right to court-appointed counsel, since record did not show that respondent had ever requested that a lawyer be […]

Read More

WILSON v. DAME, 58 N.H. 392 (1878)

WILSON v. DAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided August, 1878. If a person acts as an agent without authority, and his acts are ratified, he is entitled to the same compensation and remedy as if he had been duly authorized. ASSUMPSIT, on the common counts. Facts found by a referee. The plaintiff was […]

Read More

KING v. THOMSON, 119 N.H. 219 (1979)

400 A.2d 1169 JOHN A. KING v. MELDRIM THOMSON, JR. AND NEW HAMPSHIRE BOARD OF PROBATION No. 7796Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original Decided April 13, 1979 1. Public Employees — Suspension and Dismissal — State’s Interest Statute stating that State officials can only be removed from office when cause exists, while providing procedural safeguards […]

Read More

PETITION OF STATE OF N.H., 152 N.H. 185 (2005)

872 A.2d 1000 PETITION OF THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. No. 2004-320.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued: April 5, 2005. Opinion Issued: May 9, 2005. 1. Remedies — Extraordinary Writs — Certiorari Certiorari review is limited to whether the trial court acted illegally with respect to jurisdiction, authority, or observance of the law, whereby it […]

Read More

SQUIRE v. MUDGETT, 63 N.H. 71 (1884)

SQUIRE v. MUDGETT. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided June, 1884. The only measure of the homestead right is value; therefore a homestead right in a life estate is five hundred dollars’ worth of that estate, and not five hundred dollars’ worth of the premises in which the life estate exists. BILL IN EQUITY, […]

Read More

STRAW v. COMPANY, 76 N.H. 35 (1911)

79 A. 495 STRAW v. PITTSFIELD SHOE CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided February 7, 1911. A servant who suffers injury by using a hole in the wall of a mill as a means of exit from the premises cannot recover of the master therefor, if the latter did not intend the aperture […]

Read More

NEW HAMPSHIRE YORK CO. v. TITUS CONSTR. CO., 107 N.H. 223 (1966)

219 A.2d 708 NEW HAMPSHIRE YORK CO. v. TITUS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY a. No. 5466.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued April 6, 1966. Decided May 31, 1966. 1. Summary judgment procedure is designed to save time, effort and expense by allowing a final judgment to be entered immediately in those cases where there is no genuine […]

Read More