DALZELL v. HARLOW, 129 N.H. 43 (1986)

523 A.2d 54 HUGH M. DALZELL a. v. ROBERT F. HARLOW a. No. 86-139Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided December 30, 1986 Evidence — Parol or Extrinsic — Particular Cases In an action brought by back lot owners seeking a declaration of rights to use a dock, where back lots were conveyed subject to […]

Read More

BOUCHER v. BOUCHER, 131 N.H. 377 (1988)

553 A.2d 313 ANN R. BOUCHER v. J. PHILIP BOUCHER No. 87-442Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided December 30, 1988 1. Divorce — Property Settlement — Fault Although fault may not be considered in making a division of property following a no-fault divorce decree, property need not be distributed equally, though it must be […]

Read More

SPRINGER v. HUNGERFORD, 100 N.H. 503 (1957)

130 A.2d 538 HAROLD SPRINGER a. v. RICHARD H. HUNGERFORD, Supt. Laconia State School. No. 4561.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued February 6, 1957. Decided March 26, 1957. The issuance of writs of habeas corpus is reserved for the determination of questions which involve fundamental freedoms and occasions of pressing necessity where other remedies are […]

Read More

ALTON BAY CAMP MEETING ASSO. v. ALTON, 109 N.H. 44 (1968)

242 A.2d 80 ALTON BAY CAMP MEETING ASSOCIATION v. ALTON. No. 5658.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap.Argued October 3, 1967. Decided May 29, 1968. 1. Land owned by a charitable religious organization and leased to various owners of cottages and boathouses thereon who pay taxes on such buildings and are either members of the organization […]

Read More

STATE V. CHRISICOS, 159 N.H. 405 (2009)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. MICHELLE CHRISICOS. No. 2009-062.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Hillsborough-southern judicial district.Argued: September 24, 2009. Opinion Issued: November 17, 2009. 1. Criminal Law — Habitual Offender Statute — Construction The first section of the statute pertaining to habitual motor vehicle offenders is not ambiguous. RSA 262:23, I. 2. Criminal Law […]

Read More

O’GRADY v. DEERY, 94 N.H. 5 (1946)

45 A.2d 295 ELEANOR P. O’GRADY a. v. FRANK L. DEERY a. No. 3558.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan. Decided January 2, 1946. There can be neither dower nor curtesy in an estate held in joint tenancy. The deed of a person mentally incompetent, but not under guardianship, passes a seisin and is not void […]

Read More

SYNCOM INDUS. v. WOOD, 155 N.H. 73 (2007)

920 A.2d 1178 SYNCOM INDUSTRIES, INC. d/b/a SYNCOM SERVICES v. ELDON WOOD a. No. 2005-126.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued: November 8, 2006. Opinion Issued: March 16, 2007. 1. Labor — Employment Contracts — Noncompetition Covenants The law does not look with favor upon contracts in restraint of trade or competition. Such contracts are narrowly […]

Read More

APPEAL OF CAMPAIGN FOR RATEPAYERS’ RIGHTS, 162 N.H. 245 (2011)

APPEAL OF CAMPAIGN FOR RATEPAYERS’ RIGHTS a (New Hampshire Site Evaluation Committee). No. 2010-121.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Site Evaluation Committee.Argued: March 10, 2011. Opinion Issued: July 21, 2011. 1. Appeal and Error — Briefs The questions presented for review in a party’s brief “shall be the same as the question previously’ set forth in […]

Read More

SIMONDS v. CROSS, 63 N.H. 123 (1884)

SIMONDS v. CROSS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1884. Evidence in recoupment of damages is not admissible under the general issue. TROVER, for a lot of timber. Plea, the general issue. Facts found by the court. In the fall of 1880 the plaintiff bargained with the defendant for certain timber then standing […]

Read More

JUDGE OF PROBATE v. SOUTHARD, 62 N.H. 229 (1882)

JUDGE OF PROBATE v. SOUTHARD a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June, 1882. By s. 7, c. 327, Laws 1846, when a husband was administrator of his intestate wife, the legal and beneficial title of her personalty vested in him, subject to the payment of her debts. One claiming as next of kin, […]

Read More

CAPELLE v. COMPANY, 80 N.H. 481 (1922)

120 A. 556 MINERVA CAPELLE, Adm’x, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided December 5, 1922. A contract “to indemnify the assured from liability imposed by law for loss by reason of the . . . use . . . of” a certain automobile was construed to […]

Read More

SHEA v. MANCHESTER, 89 N.H. 547 (1938)

3 A.2d 103 MARY E. SHEA v. MANCHESTER. JEREMIAH P. SHEA v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December 6, 1938. A city, in furnishing water to its inhabitants at established rates, acts in a private proprietary capacity and may be held liable for an injury caused by the negligent maintenance of its […]

Read More

APPEAL OF NET REALTY HOLDING TRUST, 128 N.H. 795 (1986)

519 A.2d 313 APPEAL OF NET REALTY HOLDING TRUST (New Hampshire Board of Tax and Land Appeals) No. 86-009Supreme Court of New Hampshire Board of Tax and Land Appeals Decided December 8, 1986 1. Taxation — Appraisal and Assessment — Prior Judgments In a later proceeding in which the value of property may be in […]

Read More

STATE v. MURRAY, 134 N.H. 613 (1991)

598 A.2d 206 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JAMES MURRAY No. 90-232Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided August 9, 1991 1. Searches and Seizures — Warrantless Searches — Plain View Under the New Hampshire Constitution, in order to justify a warrantless seizure under the “plain view” exception, the State must prove by a […]

Read More

STATE v. ROYAL, 113 N.H. 224 (1973)

305 A.2d 676 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. WALTER ROYAL STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. MICHELLE MORRISSETTE No. 6323 No. 6382Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Exeter District Court Decided May 31, 1973 1. In prohibiting “publicly cast contempt . . . by acts” upon the United States flag, RSA 573:4 is directed against acts […]

Read More

KENDRICK v. PIERCE, 63 N.H. 619 (1885)

KENDRICK, Adm’r, v. PIERCE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided June, 1885. ASSUMPSIT, for money paid by a surety of the defendant. Judgment was ordered for the plaintiff, and a bill of exceptions was allowed. E. M. Forbes and Batchelder Faulkner, for the plaintiff. H. W. Brigham and Haskins Stoddard, for the defendant. DOE, […]

Read More

RAY’S STATELINE MARKET v. TOWN OF PELHAM, 140 N.H. 139 (1995)

665 A.2d 1068 RAY’S STATELINE MARKET, INC. v. TOWN OF PELHAM AND ADOLPH JAROSKY, INTERVENOR No. 94-143Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-southern judicial district Decided August 14, 1995 1. Zoning and Planning — Administration and Enforcement — Procedure Superior court’s finding that although land at issue had already been zoned “residential” by virtue of the […]

Read More

PARKER v. LYNDEBOROUGH, 79 N.H. 99 (1918)

105 A. 7 ELMER B. PARKER v. LYNDEBOROUGH a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided November 6, 1918. Under Laws 1901, c. 96, s. 1; Laws 1905, c. 19, a school district not maintaining the preparatory course therein specified is liable for tuition in the grammar grades furnished by another district as part of […]

Read More

JOHNSON v. WHEELER, 146 N.H. 594 (2001)

777 A.2d 864 MARK JOHNSON v. WAYNE WHEELER a. No. 99-468Supreme Court of New Hampshire Concord District Court Decided July 6, 2001 1. Landlord and Tenant — Statutes — Construction Statute focusing on prohibited conduct of landlords suggests that the legislature intended it to deter unacceptable landlord conduct rather than to remedy harm to tenants. […]

Read More

MORGENSTERN v. TOWN OF RYE, 147 N.H. 558 (2002)

764 A.2d 782 THOMAS MORGENSTERN v. TOWN OF RYE No. 99-527Supreme Court of New Hampshire RockinghamArgued: September 19, 2001 Opinion Issued: April 15, 2002 1. Zoning and Planning — Ordinances — Challenges A plaintiff who chooses to initiate a declaratory judgment action to challenge the validity of a zoning ordinance may do so after the […]

Read More

HOBBS v. COMPANY, 75 N.H. 73 (1908)

70 A. 1082 HOBBS, Adm’r, v. GEORGE W. BLANCHARD SONS CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided October 6, 1908. An answer in a deposition inconsistent with subsequent testimony of the witness is not evidence of the facts therein asserted, and is admissible only for the purpose of contradiction. The owner or possessor of […]

Read More

IN RE SARGENT, 116 N.H. 77 (1976)

354 A.2d 404 IN THE MATTER OF JOHN H. SARGENT No. 7168Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack County Probate Court Decided February 27, 1976 1. The legislature’s long-standing and practical application of RSA 8:40 (Supp. 1975) and RSA 8:43 (Supp. 1975), whereby the State has held all persons committed directly to the State hospital liable […]

Read More

TOWN, PLAISTOW BD, v. TOWN, PLAISTOW ZBA, 146 N.H. 263 (2001)

769 A.2d 397 TOWN OF PLAISTOW BOARD OF SELECTMEN v. TOWN OF PLAISTOW ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT a. No. 99-255Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided April 9, 2001 1. Zoning and Planning — Administration and Enforcement —Hearings There is no statutory requirement that a request for rehearing on a zoning board of adjustment decision […]

Read More

MAHMOUD v. IRVING OIL CORP., 155 N.H. 405 (2007)

MAHER MAHMOUD v. IRVING OIL CORPORATION. No. 2006-644.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton.Argued: March 22, 2007. Opinion Issued: May 3, 2007. 1. Appeal and Error — Briefs Because plaintiff failed to comply with the rule governing questions presented for review in briefs, he failed to demonstrate that the issues were preserved for appeal and he […]

Read More

KEARNEY v. HAZELTON, 84 N.H. 228 (1930)

149 A. 78 RICHARD KEARNEY a. Ap’ts v. OREN L. HAZELTON a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided February 4, 1930. In an appeal under the zoning statute (P. L., c. 42, s. 61) from a decision of the board of adjustment the members of the board are not properly made parties. When a […]

Read More

STATE v. PARKER, 160 N.H. 203 (2010)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. ANTHONY PARKER. Nos. 2008-885, 2008-886.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Hillsborough-southern judicial district.Argued: January 20, 2010. Opinion Issued: May 6, 2010. 1. Criminal Law — Confessions —Voluntariness For a statement to be admissible at trial, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the statement was voluntary. Whether a […]

Read More

LORD v. LOVETT, 146 N.H. 232 (2001)

770 A.2d 1103 BELINDA JOYCE LORD v. JAMES LOVETT, M.D. a. No. 99-179Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided April 4, 2001 1. Physicians and Surgeons — Malpractice — Injury Loss of opportunity doctrine is medical malpractice form of recovery which allows plaintiff, whose preexisting injury or illness is aggravated by the alleged Page 233 […]

Read More

STATE v. RHOADES, 139 N.H. 432 (1995)

655 A.2d 414 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. DENNIS RHOADES No. 93-812Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire Decided March 6, 1995 1. Discovery — Depositions — Generally A defendant has no general and unqualified due process right under either the State or Federal Constitutions to compel depositions in criminal cases depositions in criminal cases […]

Read More

STATE v. MICHAUD, 150 N.H. 359 (2003)

839 A.2d 35 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. DAVID MICHAUD. No. 2001-341.Supreme Court of New Hampshire StraffordArgued: September 10, 2003. Opinion Issued: December 22, 2003. 1. Trial — Criminal Cases — Generally — Severance A defendant has an absolute right to sever unrelated charges; unrelated offenses are, obviously, those offenses that are not related, […]

Read More

McKEE v. RIORDAN, 116 N.H. 729 (1976)

366 A.2d 472 JOHN B. McKEE a. v. FRANCIS J. RIORDAN No. 7506Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided November 30, 1976 1. In this case, the cause of action alleging malpractice by an attorney at law accrued when the plaintiffs discovered or through reasonable care and diligence should have discovered that their cause of […]

Read More

HANDLEY v. TOWN OF HOOKSETT, 147 N.H. 184 (2001)

785 A.2d 399 GERALD HANDLEY v. TOWN OF HOOKSETT No. 2000-020Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided November 14, 2001 1. Zoning and Planning — Ordinances — Amendment Under statute governing zoning ordinance protest petitions, town was not obligated to determine the validity of the petition before voting began; the statute on its face does […]

Read More

GOTHIC METAL LATHING v. FDIC, 135 N.H. 262 (1992)

603 A.2d 926 GOTHIC METAL LATHING v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, AGENT No. 90-397Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided February 28, 1992 Liens — Mechanic’s Liens — Statutes Mechanic’s lien was not properly perfected where writ of attachment did not contain any description of the property to be attached, did not state the purpose […]

Read More

MIKELL v. SCH. ADMIN. UNIT #33, 158 N.H. 723 (2009)

HEIDI L. MIKELL, ADMINSTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOSHUA R. MARKIEWICZ v. SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT #33 a. No. 2008-737.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Rockingham.Argued: March 18, 2009. Opinion Issued: May 15, 2009. 1. Negligence — Proximate Cause — Intervening Causes As a general rule, negligence actions seeking damages for the suicide of another will not […]

Read More

LAW v. ALLEY, 67 N.H. 93 (1891)

29 A. 636 LAW a. v. ALLEY a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided December, 1891. In the absence of evidence whether a certain fund or piece of property in the hands of an executor is capital, or income, the presumption of fact is that it is capital. BILL IN EQUITY, by the executors […]

Read More

WEARE v. DEERING, 58 N.H. 206 (1877)

WEARE v. DEERING. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1877. A person cannot gain a settlement in the fourth method, without being, in some legal sense, the payer of the taxes duly assessed on his estate. ASSUMPSIT, for relief furnished a pauper in 1873. Facts found by a referee. The pauper had a […]

Read More

BARKER v. COMPANY, 78 N.H. 571 (1918)

103 A. 757 JOSEPH H. BARKER v. PUBLISHERS’ PAPER COMPANY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided March 5, 1918. In trespass q. c. f., damages may be awarded for the loss of the use of the property subsequent to the date of the writ, if such loss has been caused by acts prior thereto. […]

Read More

BUCKNER v. BUCKNER, 120 N.H. 402 (1980)

415 A.2d 871 JOY M. BUCKNER v. GEORGE D. BUCKNER, SR. No. 79-298Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided June 12, 1980 1. Constitutional Law — Equal Protection — Discrimination It is a denial of equal protection for a statute to authorize alimony for a wife but not for a husband; therefore, if State statutes […]

Read More

SNYDER v. CLIFTON, 139 N.H. 549 (1995)

659 A.2d 899 JEAN HURLEY SNYDER v. CHRISTOPHER B. CLIFTON No. 93-715Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided June 1, 1995 1. Divorce — Child Support — Power of Court The superior court was empowered to order support for child until high school graduation if the evidence revealed that she was actively pursuing her diploma […]

Read More

BLEVENS v. TOWN OF BOW, 146 N.H. 67 (2001)

767 A.2d 446 KENNETH E. BLEVENS, SR. a. v. TOWN OF BOW No. 97-633Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided March 1, 2001 1. Judges — Disqualification — Generally A trial court is per se disqualified due to the probability of unfairness when the court has become personally embroiled in criticism from a party before […]

Read More

DOW v. SEARS, ROEBUCK CO., 143 N.H. 166 (1998)

720 A.2d 598 ELLICE DOW v. SEARS, ROEBUCK CO. No. 97-162Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided November 30, 1998 1. Administrative Law — Judicial Review — Final Orders New Hampshire’s Law Against Discrimination does not allow for judicial review of a single human rights commissiner’s initial probable cause detemination; plain language of statute limits […]

Read More

EASTMAN v. THAYER, 60 N.H. 408 (1880)

EASTMAN a. v. THAYER a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided December, 1880. A mortgagee not in possession is under no obligation to pay the taxes on the mortgaged estate. Where there has been no refusal by the mortgagee to render an account, and there is no controversy as to the amount due on […]

Read More

SMITH v. BULLARD, 61 N.H. 381 (1881)

SMITH, Adm’r, v. BULLARD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1881. The contract of the members of a mutual relief association, by which, on the death of one, the sum of one dollar, assessed on each survivor, is due to an appointee of the deceased, being one of his heirs or a member […]

Read More

McQUAID v. MICHOU, 85 N.H. 299 (1932)

157 A. 881 MARY McQUAID v. NICHOLAS MICHOU. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided January 5, 1932. A verdict for the defendant in case for malpractice is not a bar to a subsequent action of assumpsit for breach of a promise to effect a cure, if in the former action the promise was only […]

Read More

SMART v. BATCHELDER, 57 N.H. 140 (1876)

SMART v. BATCHELDER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire FROM ROCKINGHAM CIRCUIT COURT. Decided August 10, 1876. Delivery of goods — Attachment. The defendant contracted with W. for the sale to him of all the square-edged boards at his mill, at a certain price per thousand for all the merchantable boards in the lot. The quantity […]

Read More

WILSON v. SOCIETY, 78 N.H. 210 (1916)

98 A. 478 DELIA WILSON v. GRAND TRUNK RAILWAY INSURANCE AND PROVIDENT SOCIETY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided June 6, 1916. A contract of accident insurance between a railroad’s employee and an association of which he is a member, providing in effect that one half of the sum insured, for which the railroad […]

Read More

GAUTSCHI v. AUTO BODY DISCOUNT CENTER, 139 N.H. 457 (1995)

660 A.2d 1067 REESE R. AND CINDY L. GAUTSCHI v. AUTO BODY DISCOUNT CENTER, INC. AND MICHAEL R. DUBE No. 93-485Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-southern judicial district Decided March 28, 1995 1. Fraud — Consumer Fraud — Particular Cases RSA 358-A:3, IV-a does not purport to transform later representations into violations of the Consumer […]

Read More

ADAMS v. SULLIVAN, 110 N.H. 101 (1970)

261 A.2d 273 EVERETT ADAMS v. DANIEL J. SULLIVAN EVERETT ADAMS v. DANIEL J. SULLIVAN Nos. 5868 5953Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided January 30, 1970 1. A sheriff’s return of service is not conclusive and not uncontrovertible, but is entitled to a presumption of correctness which the contestant must overcome by evidence. 2. […]

Read More

JUDGE OF PROBATE v. JACKSON, 58 N.H. 458 (1878)

JUDGE OF PROBATE v. JACKSON a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided August, 1878. Where a judgment has been rendered for the penalty of the official bond of a trustee who has been removed, a scire facias, sued out by a beneficiary entitled to a portion of the income of the trust fund, may […]

Read More

STAMPER v. SELECTMEN, TOWN OF HANOVER, 118 N.H. 241 (1978)

385 A.2d 1213 JAMES STAMPER v. SELECTMEN, TOWN OF HANOVER No. 7965Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided April 7, 1978 1. Towns — Powers of Selectmen — Regulation of Streets Where motion made and seconded at town meeting that town direct selectmen to consider enacting a bylaw to relocate itinerant merchants from streets to […]

Read More

STATE v. CAMARGO, 126 N.H. 766 (1985)

498 A.2d 292 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. ACOVETH CAMARGO No. 84-210Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided July 24, 1985 1. Searches and Seizures — Warrantless Searches — Validity The State has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that a warrantless search was constitutionally permissible, since a warrantless search […]

Read More

CORSON v. LIBERTY MUT. INS. CO., 110 N.H. 210 (1970)

265 A.2d 315 WILLIS A. CORSON v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY No. 5714Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided April 30, 1970 1. A workmen’s compensation carrier that gratuitously undertook to assist in the safety of plant operations by making inspections and rendering advice to the insured employer which was primarily charged with the duty […]

Read More

LUMBERMEN’S c. CO. v. McCARTHY, 90 N.H. 320 (1939)

8 A.2d 750 LUMBERMEN’S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. EDWARD McCARTHY a. No. 3050.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided October 3, 1939. The primary duty of an insurer against liability who has assumed the defence of an action against the assured is to pay his legal liability for damages. The provisions of a policy which […]

Read More

O’DOWD v. HELLER, 82 N.H. 387 (1926)

134 A. 344 JOHN T. O’DOWD v. LOUIS HELLER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan. Decided June 24, 1926. A notice to quit, given by a landlord to his tenant, which does not correctly name the date on which the tenancy is to terminate, will not operate to terminate it at any time. In trespass […]

Read More

STEVENS v. MERCHANTS MUT. INS. CO., 135 N.H. 26 (1991)

599 A.2d 490 BETTE E. STEVENS v. MERCHANTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY No. 90-414Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided November 7, 1991 1. Conflict of Laws — Contracts — Insurance Interpretation of underlying insurance contract, absent compelling contrary reasons, is governed by the law where the insured risk is situated. 2. Conflict of Laws — […]

Read More

WYMAN v. DEGREGORY, 102 N.H. 564 (1960)

162 A.2d 612 LOUIS C. WYMAN, Attorney General v. HUGO DEGREGORY. No. 4867.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued July 14, 1960. Decided July 19, 1960. PER CURIAM. Petition for stay of an order of committal and for bail pending appeal from the order of committal to jail for contempt of court for failure to answer […]

Read More

GAGE v. PORTER, 64 N.H. 619 (1888)

15 A. 146 GAGE a. v. PORTER a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1888. DEBT, on an injunction bond filed in a bill in equity brought by Porter against the plaintiffs for leave to redeem mortgaged lands. Porter obtained a decree giving her leave to redeem by paying to the plaintiffs the […]

Read More

CANAAN v. GRAFTON COUNTY, 64 N.H. 595 (1888)

15 A. 18 CANAAN v. GRAFTON COUNTY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June, 1888. In gaining a legal settlement under Gen. Laws, c. 81, s. 1, IX, it is immaterial that the pauper was taxed by a wrong name. PETITION, to be reimbursed the sum of $134.50 expended for the support of one […]

Read More

BRYSON v. CARROLL, 93 N.H. 287 (1945)

41 A.2d 240 CHESTER W. BRYSON v. JOHN E. CARROLL. No. 3507.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided February 6, 1945. The defendant’s duty to maintain a divisional fence is discharged when he maintains one which is reasonably stout and sufficient to prevent ordinary livestock from escaping. He is not required to maintain an impassable […]

Read More

WHITNEY v. PARKER, 63 N.H. 416 (1885)

WHITNEY a. v. PARKER a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided June, 1885. In a petition for partition under the statute, the committee have no authority, without the consent of the parties, to set off to one more than his just share of the estate, and award that he pay a sum of money […]

Read More

STATE v. LOWE, 140 N.H. 271 (1995)

665 A.2d 740 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. KEITH E. LOWE No. 94-108Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire Decided October 3, 1995 1. Evidence — Hearsay Exceptions — Medical Diagnosis or Treatment Trial court’s finding that child made statement for the purpose of medical treatment or diagnosis was not clearly erroneous. N.H. R. EV. […]

Read More

WILLOUGHBY v. HOLDERNESS, 62 N.H. 227 (1882)

WILLOUGHBY, Adm’r, v. HOLDERNESS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June, 1882. A contract that is valid by the established construction of the constitution when the contract is made, is not invalidated by a charge of that construction. ASSUMPSIT, against a town, on a promissory note dated January 22, 1879, and given to the […]

Read More

LAU v. LAU, 81 N.H. 44 (1923)

122 A. 345 HENRY E. LAU, Adm’r, v. BLANCHE I. LAU, Ap’t, a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided May 1, 1923. Laws 1915, c. 161 prohibits certain marriages of feeble-minded persons but does not render them void; hence such a marriage cannot be attacked except in proceeding to obtain a decree of nullity […]

Read More

STATE v. SMITH, 98 N.H. 149 (1953)

95 A.2d 789 STATE v. SAMUEL SMITH. No. 4188.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Portsmouth Municipal Court. Decided April 7, 1953. To establish the defense of former jeopardy it must appear that the offense previously charged was the same in law and in fact. Hence, the defense of former jeopardy may not be successfully pleaded to […]

Read More

MOSES v. HELGEMOE, 116 N.H. 190 (1976)

355 A.2d 428 RONALD MOSES v. RAYMOND A. HELGEMOE, WARDEN, NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE PRISON No. 7337Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided March 31, 1976 1. The record disclosed evidence supporting the trial court’s ruling that failure to have counsel appointed for defendant at probable cause hearing and at arraignment was harmless error. Ronald Moses, […]

Read More

APPEAL OF UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF N.H., 131 N.H. 368 (1988)

553 A.2d 770 APPEAL OF UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF NEW HAMPSHIRE (New Hampshire Public Employee Labor Relations Board) No. 87-376Supreme Court of New Hampshire Public Employee Labor Relations Board Decided December 30, 1988 1. Public Employees — Public Employee Labor Relations Board — Interpretation of Statutes Legislature has vested the public employee labor relations board with […]

Read More

APPEAL OF THE CITY OF NASHUA, 121 N.H. 874 (1981)

435 A.2d 1126 APPEAL OF THE CITY OF NASHUA (New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission) No. 80-384Supreme Court of New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Decided October 7, 1981 1. Administrative Law — Orders and Regulations — Binding Effect The law of New Hampshire is well settled that an administrative agency must follow its own rules and […]

Read More

TOPORE v. RAILROAD, 78 N.H. 311 (1916)

100 A. 153 BAHRE TOPORE, Adm’r, v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided December 5, 1916. To an action upon the federal employers’ liability act, 35 U.S. Stat. 65, c. 149, the negligence of a fellow servant is not a defense. In such an action the question whether an order to […]

Read More

MacRAE v. BRANT, 108 N.H. 177 (1967)

230 A.2d 753 THOMAS T. MacRAE v. PAUL R. BRANT. No. 5585.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued March 8, 1967. Decided June 30, 1967. 1. Since an appeal to the Superior Court from a conviction of larceny in a municipal court vacates the judgment below and transfers the whole proceedings to be tried de novo, […]

Read More

PEASLEE v. KOENIG, 122 N.H. 828 (1982)

453 A.2d 832 EARLE C. PEASLEE a. v. WALTER L. KOENIG d/b/a NEW HAMPSHIRE FOREST DEVELOPMENT ASSOC. No. 81-345Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll Decided September 10, 1982 1. Trespass — Trees and Wood — Burden of Proof In an action by landowners to recover the civil penalty prescribed under statute governing willful trespass to […]

Read More

STATE v. COTE, 108 N.H. 290 (1967)

235 A.2d 111 STATE v. ROGER F. COTE. No. 5579.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued May 2, 1967. Decided October 31, 1967. 1. In an indictment for breaking, entering and larceny the evidence warranted the finding beyond a reasonable doubt that the respondent was present at the place of the crime when it was committed; […]

Read More

IN RE WILSON ESTATE, 119 N.H. 425 (1979)

402 A.2d 197 In re JEAN FISCHER WILSON ESTATE No. 79-033Supreme Court of New Hampshire Probate Court, Cheshire County Decided May 23, 1979 1. Wills — Probate — Witnesses Purported will attested by two, rather than three witnesses, and executed in New Hampshire was properly denied admission to probate. RSA 551:2. 2. Wills — Probate […]

Read More

STATE v. EVANS, 127 N.H. 501 (1985)

506 A.2d 695 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. VERNON W. EVANS No. 84-428Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided December 31, 1985 1. Prisons — Treatment of Inmates — Fundamental Rights A prison must provide its inmates with adequate food, clothing, shelter, sanitation, medical care and protection for personal safety to satisfy its eighth […]

Read More

MOORE v. MOORE, 96 N.H. 130 (1950)

71 A.2d 409 EUGENIA M. MOORE v. ERNEST F. MOORE. No. 3888.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham, Decided February 7, 1950. An authenticated copy of a judgment of a court of a foreign state is admissible to establish such judgment in the courts of this state where the genuineness of the document and signatures were […]

Read More

HARRINGTON’S CASE, 100 N.H. 243 (1956)

123 A.2d 396 HARRINGTON’S CASE. No. 4510.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original.Submitted June 6, 1956. Decided June 6, 1956. The embezzlement by an attorney of his clients’ funds is a violation of his oath of office and demonstrates his unfitness to practice law and for such conduct an attorney will be disbarred. Page 244 COMPLAINT, […]

Read More

STATE v. CONSTANT, 135 N.H. 254 (1992)

605 A.2d 206 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. LEONARD CONSTANT No. 90-610Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided February 28, 1992 1. Constitutional Law — Double Jeopardy — Generally Double jeopardy provision of the New Hampshire Constitution protects the accused from prosecution for the same crime, not only after acquittal, but also after conviction. […]

Read More

CROTEAU v. COMPANY, 79 N.H. 515 (1920)

112 A. 397 ELEAZER CROTEAU v. TWIN STATE GAS ELECTRIC CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided December 7, 1920. Electric light wires having fallen into a highway, one who without authority under no stress of emergency is injured in attempting to cut the wires, is a volunteer and not entitled to recover for […]

Read More

MOORE v. AKSTEN, 123 N.H. 220 (1983)

459 A.2d 266 ROBBY A. MOORE v. VICTOR AKSTEN No. 81-411Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided March 31, 1983 1. Continuance — Discretion of Court Disposition of pretrial motions for continuance and a motion to amend the pleadings falls within the sound discretion of the trial court. 2. Continuance — Discretion of Court In […]

Read More

STATE v. KARAFOTIS, 104 N.H. 191 (1962)

182 A.2d 609 STATE v. CHRIS KARAFOTIS. No. 5006.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Pittsfield Municipal Court.Argued May 2, 1962. Decided June 29, 1962. 1. A respondent charged with a misdemeanor has no right to take depositions prior to arraignment and plea. The defendant was arrested on July 14, 1961, and admitted to bail on the […]

Read More

UNION LEADER CORP. v. NEW HAMPSHIRE HSG. FIN. AUTH., 142 N.H. 540 (1997)

705 A.2d 725 UNION LEADER CORPORATION a. v. NEW HAMPSHIRE HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY Nos. 95-802, 96-008Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-northern judicial district Decided December 31, 1997 1. Records — Right to Inspect — Generally The interpretation of the Right-to-Know Law (RSA ch. 91-A) is decided ultimately by the supreme court, which resolves questions regarding […]

Read More

ORDER (N.H. 3-21-2006)

ORDER Supreme Court of New Hampshire March 21, 2006 ORDER Pursuant to Part II, Article 73-a of the New Hampshire Constitution and Supreme Court Rule 51, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire adopts the following amendments to court rules. Note: To assist the reader in identifying the changes that are being made to existing rules, […]

Read More

SIMONEAU v. ENFIELD, 112 N.H. 242 (1972)

293 A.2d 317 RAYMOND SIMONEAU v. TOWN OF ENFIELD. No. 6410.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided June 30, 1972. 1. The legislative plan for allowing recovery for certain injuries from bridges, culverts, and dangerous embankments is restricted and limited. 2. Plaintiff was barred by the provisions of RSA 247:28 from maintaining a tort action […]

Read More

LOWELL v. U.S. SAVINGS BANK, 132 N.H. 719 (1990)

572 A.2d 184 FREDERICK W. LOWELL v. THE U.S. SAVINGS BANK OF AMERICA, JOSEPH FANARAS, CHARLES MUTRIE, JEFFREY BREISETH AND JAMES WALSH No. 88-370Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided March 8, 1990 1. Constitutional Law — Right to Jury Trial — Generally The New Hampshire Constitution affords the parties to a suit involving legal […]

Read More

EMERY v. COMPANY, 89 N.H. 165 (1937)

195 A. 409 ALBERT J. EMERY a. v. TILO ROOFING COMPANY, INC. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided November 2, 1937. Causal connection between the negligence complained of and loss incurred must be proved, but physical causation need not always be proved by an eye witness to that fact, and a finding upon the […]

Read More

STATE v. ORDE, 161 N.H. 260 (2010)

13 A.3d 338 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. DAVID ORDE. No. 2009-737.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Hlllsborough-southern judicial district.Argued: October 21, 2010. Opinion Issued: November 30, 2010. 1. Search and Seizure — Generally — Expectation of Privacy The New Hampshire Constitution protects all people, their papers, their possessions and their homes from unreasonable searches […]

Read More

STATE v. HARDING, 114 N.H. 335 (1974)

320 A.2d 646 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. DOUGLAS N. HARDING No. 6747Supreme Court of New Hampshire Nashua District Court Decided May 31, 1974 1. Under the Miller test of obscenity as developed by the Supreme Court of the United States (413 U.S. 15 (1973)), a statute regulating obscenity must be limited to works (1) […]

Read More

DERRY v. COUNTY, 62 N.H. 485 (1883)

DERRY v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June, 1883. In the fourth method of gaining a settlement, the assessor’s valuation of the estate prescribed is not conclusive. CLAIM, for the support of Mary and Esther Corning, children of David Corning. The parties agree that David Corning resided in Derry from 1859 […]

Read More

STATE v. MATTHEWS, 123 N.H. 502 (1983)

463 A.2d 889 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. CARROLL G. MATTHEWS, JR., ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF MABEL L. MATTHEWS No. 82-464Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided July 13, 1983 1. Executors and Administrators — Debts and Expenses — Source for Payment The statute imposing liability on the estate of a decedent whose […]

Read More

FITZHUGH v. RAILWAY, 80 N.H. 185 (1921)

115 A. 803 EARL H. FITZHUGH v. GRAND TRUNK RAILWAY CO. a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided November 1, 1921. A mere conspiracy does not constitute a civil cause of action. A principal and agent may be joined as defendants in an action seeking to charge both for a tort committed by the […]

Read More

LENGAS v. RESNICK, 87 N.H. 161 (1934)

175 A. 824 ANASTASIA LENGAS v. SAMUEL RESNICK a. VASILIO LENGAS v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December 4, 1934. The owner of a tenement building is under no obligation to light the stairways retained in his control for the common use of his tenants unless he has expressly or impliedly so […]

Read More

PAPPAGIANIS v. DANIELL, 108 N.H. 467 (1968)

238 A.2d 10 GEORGE S. PAPPAGIANIS, Attorney General a. v. EUGENE S. DANIELL, JR. a. as Robert F. Kennedy for President Write-In Committee. No. 5730.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued February 7, 1968. Decided February 9, 1968. 1. The legislative enactment (RSA 70:1-a (supp)) as inserted by Laws 1965, 236:3 that “the provisions of this […]

Read More

HUTCHINSON v. HUTCHINSON, 133 N.H. 772 (1990)

583 A.2d 734 PETER O. HUTCHINSON v. CAROL L. HUTCHINSON No. 90-025Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided December 31, 1990 1. Divorce — Custody and Support of Children — Modification of Decree The trial court has broad discretion in awarding and modifying child support orders, and its orders will be upheld on appeal unless […]

Read More

FITZGIBBONS v. HANCOCK, 97 N.H. 162 (1951)

82 A.2d 769 ROBERT EDWARD FITZGIBBONS v. PARKER L. HANCOCK a. No. 4039.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided July 27, 1951. Whether a minor upon arraignment to indictments for armed robbery and larceny may be permitted to plead guilty without the advice of counsel is dependent upon the facts of the particular case and […]

Read More

WALKER v. WETHERBEE, 65 N.H. 656 (1874)

23 A. 621 WALKER v. WETHERBEE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan. Decided June, 1874. When a division of fence in a statutory method, between owners of adjoining lands, is rendered unequal by a change of land-title on either side, severing the boundary line, the statute authorizes a new division. Impounding animals doing damage in […]

Read More

STATE v. COMTOIS, 122 N.H. 1173 (1982)

453 A.2d 1324 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. FREDDY E. COMTOIS No. 82-151Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided December 30, 1982 1. Trial — Conduct of Trial — Discretion of Judge Although the discovery of truth in the context of a criminal trial is quite properly limited by certain constitutional safeguards and privileges, […]

Read More

BANK v. NOYES, 62 N.H. 35 (1882)

NATIONAL STATE CAPITAL BANK v. NOYES a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1882. Under the 46th rule of court, providing that the signatures and indorsements of all instruments declared on shall be considered as admitted at the first term, unless notice be given upon the docket that they are disputed within the […]

Read More

ATTORNEY-GENERAL v. REMICK, 73 N.H. 25 (1904)

58 A. 871 ATTORNEY-GENERAL (ex rel. ANDREWS) v. REMICK. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided July 28, 1904. The nature and extent of the authority of a mayor as presiding officer of a city council are to be determined by such principles of parliamentary usage as are generally observed in deliberative assemblies, in the […]

Read More

HARDY v. MERRILL, 56 N.H. 227 (1875)

HARDY v. MERRILL. Supreme Court of New Hampshire FROM MERRIMACK CIRCUIT COURT. Decided December 14, 1875. Evidence — Opinions of non-professional witnesses — Insanity — Practice — Right to open and close. Non-professional witnesses, who are not subscribing witnesses to a will, may testify to their opinions in regard to the sanity of the testator, […]

Read More

MALTAIS v. ASSURANCE SOCIETY, 93 N.H. 237 (1944)

40 A.2d 837 ALBINA MALTAIS v. THE EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES. ALBINA MALTAIS, Adm’x v. SAME. No. 3489.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided December 5, 1944. A non-occupational group insurance policy containing a provision that no payment shall be made for loss resulting from bodily injuries arising out of and […]

Read More

SCAMMON v. PAGE, 102 N.H. 404 (1960)

157 A.2d 651 IRVING SCAMMON a. v. HARRY PAGE. No. 4796.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued January 5, 1960. Decided January 27, 1960. 1. Where the plaintiffs’ opening statement was insufficient to support a claim of causal negligence and their counsel was given several opportunities by the Trial Court to amend or enlarge such statement […]

Read More

PERRY v. INSURANCE COMPANY, 67 N.H. 291 (1892)

33 A. 731 PERRY v. DWELLING-HOUSE INSURANCE CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided June, 1892. On the question whether one person was at a certain time the agent of another, evidence of the previous course of dealing between them is competent. A proposition does not become a contract until the maker or his […]

Read More