196 A.2d 706 NATIONAL SHAWMUT BANK v. ELLEN JANE CUTTER a. No. 5132.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued October 1, 1963. Decided December 30, 1963. 1. A judgment for the defendant in a replevin action, without more, implies no direction for the return of the property or for the payment of damages, and a literal […]
Category: New Hampshire Court Opinions
PATENAUDE v. TOWN OF MEREDITH, 118 N.H. 616 (1978)
392 A.2d 582 HENRY PATENAUDE v. TOWN OF MEREDITH No. 7967Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided September 27, 1978 1. Zoning — Planning Authorities — Planning Recreational Areas in Subdivisions In exercising their statutory discretion to determine the size of recreational areas in subdivisions, regulating boards must take relevant factors into account, and must […]
IN RE DEVIN ESTATE, 108 N.H. 190 (1967)
230 A.2d 735 IN RE ETHEL W. DEVIN ESTATE. No. 5601.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Probate Court.Argued April 4, 1967. Decided June 30, 1967. 1. In a bequest of the residue of the testatrix’ estate in equal shares unto two named legatees “to them and their heirs and assigns,” where the two legatees had […]
STANIELS v. WHITCHER, 72 N.H. 451 (1904)
57 A. 678 STANIELS v. WHITCHER a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided March 1, 1904. A mortgage executed and delivered on the day preceding the advancement of the loan intended to be secured thereby takes effect on the latter date, and is not given to secure a future liability, within the meaning of […]
EMERSON v. COBB, 88 N.H. 199 (1936)
186 A. 12 EDNAH S. EMERSON v. MARION COBB. JAMES EMERSON v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June 25, 1936. Errors which occur in the course of a trial are not necessarily incurable and the effect of evidence which comes improperly before a jury may be cured by an order that it […]
MERRIMACK RIVER SAV. BANK v. HIGGINS, 89 N.H. 154 (1937)
195 A. 369 MERRIMACK RIVER SAVINGS BANK v. WILSON F. HIGGINS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided November 2, 1937. A negotiable instrument payable on demand is, as regards the effect of the statute of limitations upon the liability of maker and indorser, a promise to pay forthwith. P.L., c. 312, s. 7. A […]
BARBUTO v. PEERLESS INS., 156 N.H. 565 (2007)
LEAH BARBUTO v. PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 2006-879.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Hillsborough-northern judicial district.Argued: September 6, 2007. Opinion Issued: December 18, 2007. 1. Insurance — Policies — Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists The “Uninsured Motorists Coverage” section of a policy providing that “[t]he limit of liability shall be reduced by all sums paid because of the `bodily […]
FOWLER v. WHELAN, 83 N.H. 453 (1928)
144 A. 63 FREDERICK W. FOWLER, Ex’r, v. BELLE WHELAN a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided December 4, 1928. The general rule that a legacy of a gross sum to several legatees by name, to be equally divided between them, will lapse as to those who predecease the testator, yields to the paramount […]
STATE v. MUSCARELLO, 92 N.H. 214 (1942)
29 A.2d 115 STATE v. ANGELO J. MUSCARELLO. No. 3354.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided November 4, 1942. The transportation into this state of more than three quarts of intoxicating liquor, though legally purchased in another State, is a violation of R.L., c. 170, ss. 33, 34. What is within the legally proved intention […]
LAWSON v. KIMBALL, 68 N.H. 549 (1896)
38 A. 380 LAWSON a. v. KIMBALL a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1896. A sub-contractor who has given due notice that he shall claim a lien under P. S., c. 141, s. 13, is not required to furnish at the end of each period of thirty days an account in writing […]
STATE v. AMERIGAS PROPANE, 146 N.H. 267 (2001)
769 A.2d 401 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. AMERIGAS PROPANE LP, INC. No. 99-278Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided April 9, 2001 1. Criminal Law — Defenses — Statute of Limitations Because the applicable statute of limitations in a criminal case provides the primary guarantee against bringing stale criminal charges, the doctrine of […]
BARTLETT v. McKAY, 80 N.H. 574 (1923)
120 A. 627 CARRIE B. BARTLETT, Ex’x, v. EMMA J. McKAY, Ap’t. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan. Decided March 6, 1923. To justify the disallowance of a will on the ground of undue influence, it must be established that the influence charged amounts to fraud or coercion, destroying free agency, and is not merely […]
HOLLAND v. COMPANY, 83 N.H. 482 (1929)
145 A. 142 ELLEN M. HOLLAND, Adm’x, v. MORLEY BUTTON COMPANY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided February 5, 1929. A petition for workmen’s compensation upon P. L., c. 178, brought within six years from the date of the accident is seasonably brought and is not governed by the limitation of P. L., c. […]
AUTO OWNERS’ c. CO. v. COLEMAN, 89 N.H. 356 (1938)
199 A. 365 AUTO OWNERS’ FINANCE CO., INC. v. IRA A. COLEMAN a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided May 3, 1938. Under Massachusetts General Laws, c. 255, s. 5 requiring that notice of intention to foreclose a mortgage of personal property be given “to the mortgagor or to the person in possession of […]
ARLINGTON MILLS v. SALEM, 83 N.H. 148 (1927)
140 A. 163 ARLINGTON MILLS v. SALEM. SAME v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided December 6, 1927. The superior court has power to reserve without a ruling important questions of law for the opinion of the supreme court. An inventory as required by P. L., c. 62, s. 6, may be sworn […]
WELLMAN v. REILLY, 81 N.H. 389 (1924)
127 A. 875 JAMES A. WELLMAN a. v. LEO BAYLES REILLY a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided November 5, 1924. When a statute authorizing the execution of certain classes of contracts in behalf of a city contains a proviso that the party to whom a contract is awarded shall furnish proper surety for […]
STATE v. COLBY, 67 N.H. 391 (1892)
36 A. 252 STATE v. COLBY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan. Decided December, 1892. Under Laws 1891, c. 60, a license for the keeping of a dog, if not procured till after April 30, is not a protection against a prosecution on account of the keeping of the dog before the license was procured. […]
WEST v. RAILROAD, 81 N.H. 522 (1925)
129 A. 768 ELIZABETH S. WEST, Adm’x, v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided April 7, 1925. Expert testimony may be received but is not required, when the question relates to a matter of common experience, observation or knowledge. In an action for personal injuries brought by the injured person during […]
SIROIS v. SIROIS, 94 N.H. 215 (1946)
50 A.2d 88 RITA NADEAU SIROIS, by her mother and next friend. v. THOMAS SIROIS. No. 3622.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December 3, 1946. The fact that a ceremony of marriage, between parties domiciled in this state both before and after marriage, was performed in another state does not deprive the courts of […]
ARTHUR v. HOLY ROSARY CREDIT UNION, 139 N.H. 463 (1995)
656 A.2d 830 ROBERT J. ARTHUR v. HOLY ROSARY CREDIT UNION No. 93-455Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided March 28, 1995 1. Labor — Respondeat Superior — Independent Contractors Respondeat superior, or vicarious liability, ordinarily does not extend to torts by independent contractors because the employer reserves no control or power of discretion over […]
MAILLOUX v. TOWN OF LONDONDERRY, 151 N.H. 555 (2004)
864 A.2d 335 RICHARD L. MAILLOUX v. TOWN OF LONDONDERRY a. No. 2003-790.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued: October 20, 2004. Opinion Issued: December 28, 2004. 1. Environment and Natural Resources — Environmental Rights and Actions — Burden of Proof Town failed to prove that it was a “qualifying holder” of property under the statute […]
SULLIVAN v. INVESTMENT TRUST CO., 89 N.H. 112 (1937)
193 A. 225 WILLIAM F. SULLIVAN, Superintendent of Buildings v. ANGLO-AMERICAN INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June 24, 1937. A zoning ordinance providing that “in a single residence district . . . no building . . . shall be erected, altered or used except for . . . the following […]
KOPKA REAL ESTATE, INC. v. MacLEOD, 119 N.H. 547 (1979)
404 A.2d 298 KOPKA REAL ESTATE, INC. v. ROBERT P. MacLEOD a. No. 79-048Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided July 11, 1979 1. Brokers — Commission — Right To A broker procures a customer if he informs him of the property and leads the customer to the seller. 2. Brokers — Commission — Right […]
DAVY v. DOVER, 111 N.H. 1 (1971)
273 A.2d 849 JOHN A. DAVY v. DOVER. No. 6068.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided January 29, 1971. 1. An order for examination of premises authorized by RSA 48-A:8 (III) (supp.) is synonymous with a search warrant authorized by Article IV, Section 4.1(b) of the city of Dover’s Housing Standards Ordinance which was adopted […]
JOY v. FESLER, 67 N.H. 257 (1892)
29 A. 448 JOY, Ex’r, v. FESLER, Ex’x. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1892. A testatrix, in the fifth clause of her will, provided a fund for the repair of her burial lot; in the sixth clause, provided a fund for the erection of a monument in the family burial-ground, and for […]
FEINS v. TOWN OF WILMOT, 154 N.H. 715 (2006)
JONATHAN FEINS a. v. TOWN OF WILMOT a. No. 2005-832.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued: September 13, 2006. Opinion Issued: January 18, 2007. 1. Zoning and Planning — Judicial Review — Burden of Proof The burden of proof is on the party seeking to set aside the decision of the zoning board or planning board […]
GNIRK v. GNIRK, 134 N.H. 199 (1991)
589 A.2d 1008 MARLENE GNIRK v. PAUL E. GNIRK No. 90-106Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided April 26, 1991 1. Divorce — Custody and Support of Children — Modification of Decree Decision of trial court modifying a support order will not be disturbed unless the court has clearly abused its discretion. 2. Divorce — […]
STATE v. KINNE, 161 N.H. 41 (2010)
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. BERNARD KINNE. Nos. 2009-569, 2009-691.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Grafton.Argued: June 23, 2010 Opinion Issued: October 27, 2010 1. Habeas Corpus — Availability — Generally When court action results in the loss of a constitutionally protected liberty interest, it may be collaterally attacked by way of petition for writ […]
PALMER v. BLANCHARD, 75 N.H. 588 (1908)
71 A. 628 PALMER, Adm’r, v. BLANCHARD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided December 1, 1908. CASE, for negligently causing the death of the plaintiff’s daughter Trial by jury and verdict for the defendant. Transferred from the February term, 1908, of the superior court by Stone, J. The defendant is a physician and treated […]
PAGE v. PORTSMOUTH HOSPITAL, 79 N.H. 520 (1918)
104 A. 345 CALVIN PAGE a., Ex’rs, v. PORTSMOUTH HOSPITAL a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June 29, 1918. PETITION, for the construction of a will. The question is whether two houses and the land on which they stand are devised by a certain clause of the will. Transferred by Allen, J., without […]
CHASE v. BOODY, 55 N.H. 574 (1875)
CHASE v. BOODY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided August 12, 1875. Bailment for hire — Degree of care. C. bailed to B. a horse, for hire, to convey him from D. to S. B., upon arriving at S., put up the horse in a proper place, and the next morning properly watered, fed, […]
WALKER v. WALKER, 68 N.H. 407 (1895)
39 A. 432 WALKER, Ex’r, v. WALKER. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided December, 1895. Funds in the hands of an executor, derived from sales of subscription rights and a division of the capital of a corporation, are part of the principal, and pass to the remainder-man, subject to the payment of the income […]
PARISEAU CORP. v. STATE, 102 N.H. 364 (1959)
156 A.2d 753 THE PARISEAU CORPORATION v. STATE a. No. 4792.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough.Argued November 4, 1959. Decided December 31, 1959. 1. The unemployment compensation statute (RSA 282:6E) entitling an employing unit acquiring the trade or business of another employer, and intending to continue such business, to the merit rating of its predecessor […]
HYLAND v. HINES, 80 N.H. 179 (1921)
116 A. 347 MYRTIE A. HYLAND, Adm’x, v. WALKER D. HINES, Director General. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton. Decided October 4, 1921. P. S., c. 225, s. 1 does not limit the right to use the deposition of a witness to the party who takes it; but permits either party to use the deposition […]
WELTS’ CASE, 136 N.H. 588 (1993)
620 A.2d 1017 WELTS’ CASE No. LD-90-007Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original Decided February 12, 1993 1. Appeal and Error — Findings — Master’s Findings In reviewing findings of judicial referee in attorney disciplinary action, court’s only function is to determine whether a reasonable person could have reached same decision as referee on basis of […]
LaPOINT v. MONADNOCK PAPER MILL, 79 N.H. 61 (1918)
104 A. 251 ALBERT J. LaPOINT v. MONADNOCK PAPER MILL. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June 29, 1918. A mill-operator who has not accepted the provisions of Laws 1911, c. 163 is liable for an injury to an employee caused by the negligence of his fellow-servant; and in such case an employee who […]
NADEAU v. CITY, 155 N.H. 810 (2007)
GAIL C. NADEAU 1994 TRUST v. CITY OF PORTSMOUTH GAIL C. NADEAU 1994 TRUST a. v. CITY OF PORTSMOUTH a. No. 2005-934.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued: March 15, 2007. Opinion Issued: August 17, 2007. 1. Taxation — Assessment of Real Property Taxes — Abatement In order to prevail in a petition for abatement, the […]
HIDDEN v. RAILWAY, 72 N.H. 422 (1904)
57 A. 333 HIDDEN v. EXETER, HAMPTON AMESBURY STREET RAILWAY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided February 2, 1904. Certain evidence deemed sufficient to warrant a finding that a release executed by the plaintiff, and pleaded in bar of an action for personal injuries, was obtained by fraud on the part of the defendant’s […]
HARRIMAN v. CITY OF LEBANON, 122 N.H. 477 (1982)
446 A.2d 1158 WILLIAM B. HARRIMAN a. v. CITY OF LEBANON a. No. 81-273Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided May 24, 1982 1. Appeal and Error — Questions Considered on Appeal — Moot Questions The question of mootness is one of convenience and discretion and is not subject to hard-and-fast rules. 2. Municipal Corporations […]
NARRAMORE v. CLARK, 63 N.H. 166 (1884)
NARRAMORE v. CLARK Tr. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided June, 1884. An attorney at law is chargeable upon trustee process for money collected by him in the course of his professional employment. FOREIGN ATTACHMENT. The trustee is an attorney at law, and at the time of the service of the writ upon him […]
GRIFFIN v. AVERY, 120 N.H. 783 (1980)
424 A.2d 175 ANTOINETTE (AVERY) GRIFFIN v. ROBERT S. AVERY a. No. 80-086Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided December 3, 1980 1. Divorce — Custody and Support of Children — Remedies for Failure To Pay To be considered a judgment for the purposes of full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution, […]
STATE v. COBB, 123 N.H. 536 (1983)
465 A.2d 1203 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. CHARLES COBB No. 82-392Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided July 19, 1983 1. Witnesses — Impeachment — Prior Convictions The supreme court saw no reason to depart from the rationale of its decision the same day in State v. Robinson rejecting a claim similar to […]
ALLSTATE INS. CO. v. O’SHAUGHNESSY, 118 N.H. 66 (1978)
384 A.2d 486 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. DANIEL O’SHAUGHNESSY a. No. 7711Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided February 3, 1978 1. Insurance — Automobile Policies — Law Governing Policy Where automobile liability policy issued by insurer to insured was issued in Maine, covering automobile registered in Maine, policy must be interpreted under applicable Maine […]
BRACK v. MIDDLESEX MUT. INS. CO., 118 N.H. 72 (1978)
382 A.2d 914 JOHN BRACK, ADMINISTRATOR ESTATE OF JUDITH BRACK v. MIDDLESEX MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., a. No. 7743Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided February 3, 1978 1. Insurance — Automobile Policies — Uninsured Motorist Coverage Where plaintiff’s decedent, who was killed while passenger in car owned and operated by insured motorist, had insurance under […]
WARDWELL v. JONES, 58 N.H. 305 (1878)
WARDWELL v. JONES, COUNTY OF ROCKINGHAM, Tr. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided June, 1878. Under the General Statutes, the fees of a juror due him from the county are attachable on trustee process. FOREIGN ATTACHMENT. The court reserved the question, whether the county is chargeable as trustee for juror’s fees due the defendant. […]
WOOD’S CASE, 137 N.H. 698 (1993)
634 A.2d 1340 WOOD’S CASE No. LD-92-009Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original Decided November 23, 1993 1. Attorneys — Code of Professional Responsibility — Disciplinary Rules Professional Conduct Rule prohibiting a lawyer from representing “another person” in a matter in which the lawyer has formerly represented a different client does not encompass a lawyer’s pro […]
HALLOCK v. YOUNG, 72 N.H. 416 (1904)
57 A. 236 HALLOCK v. YOUNG a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided February 2, 1904. In an action by an indorsee against the maker of a promissory note obtained by fraud on the part of the original payee, it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to prove that he is a bona fide holder […]
STATE v. RUSSO, 140 N.H. 751 (1996)
674 A.2d 156 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. MICHAEL RUSSO No. 94-671Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided April 4, 1996 1. Trial — Generally — Mistrial Defendant’s claim of mistrial based on self-incrimination was not adequately preserved because although defendant objected generally to the prosecutor’s question, he never moved for a mistrial before […]
LAMONTAGNE BUILDERS v. BROOKS, 154 N.H. 252 (2006)
LAMONTAGNE BUILDERS, INC. v. R. SCOTT BROOKS a. No. 2005-409.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough-northern judicial district.Argued: May 11, 2006. Opinion Issued: October 20, 2006. 1. Costs — Recovery of Costs and Attorney Fees — Statutes and Rules Pursuant to rule of the supreme court, if the prevailing party fails to file an itemized request […]
LOVELL v. RAILROAD, 75 N.H. 568 (1910)
78 A. 621 LOVELL v. BOSTON MAINE RAILROAD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December 6, 1910. A contract which the parties thereto are forbidden to make by the lex loci contractus is invalid and cannot be enforced in this jurisdiction. A shipper of freight is not estopped to set up the invalidity of […]
WILSON v. GOODNOW, 98 N.H. 110 (1953)
95 A.2d 112 ALICE W. WILSON v. ARLENE E. GOODNOW. No. 4191.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire. Decided March 3, 1953. Where there are no requests for findings or rulings and the sole exception is to the verdict as rendered, the question for consideration by the Supreme Court under its discretionary procedure is whether there […]
STATE v. PESSETTO, 160 N.H. 813 (2010)
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. RICHARD S. PESSETTO. No. 2009-525.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Candia District Court.Submitted: June 10, 2010. Opinion Issued: October 19, 2010. 1. Search and Seizure — Practice and Procedure— Disposition of Properly Contraband materials may fall into one — or both — of two categories: contraband per se or derivative […]
DELUCCA v. DELUCCA, 152 N.H. 100 (2005)
871 A.2d 72 DENA DELUCCA a.v. ROLAND H. DELUCCA. No. 2004-247.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap County Probate Court.Argued: January 12, 2005. Opinion Issued: April 8, 2005. 1. Property — Partition — Generally An action for partition calls upon the court to exercise its equity powers and consider the special circumstances of the case, in […]
COLEMAN v. COLEMAN, 94 N.H. 456 (1947)
55 A.2d 471 RALPH W. COLEMAN v. RALPH K. COLEMAN. RALPH K. COLEMAN a. v. RALPH W. COLEMAN a. No. 3679.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided November 4, 1947. Remaindermen may not compel partition or a partition sale under the provisions of R. L., c. 410, ss. 1, 25, as against a life tenant […]
BRYANT v. BOWLES, 108 N.H. 315 (1967)
234 A.2d 534 DONALD R. BRYANT, Adm’r w/w/a v. RAIMOND BOWLES a. No. 5629.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham.Argued September 7, 1967. Decided October 31, 1967. 1. Summary judgment procedure (RSA 491:8-a) was held properly to have been invoked in an action on promissory notes where the affidavits and exhibits submitted in support thereof disclosed […]
HOLMES v. SCHNOEBELEN, 87 N.H. 272 (1935)
178 A. 258 D. LAWRENCE HOLMES v. CLEMENT A. SCHNOEBELEN a. and Tr. D. LAWRENCE HOLMES a. v. SAME. CHARLES F. CHASE v. CLEMENT A. SCHNOEBELEN a. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY v. D. LAWRENCE HOLMES a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided April 2, 1935. The holder of a lightning rod purchaser’s agreement […]
BARTON v. H.D. RIDERS MOTORCYCLE CLUB, 131 N.H. 60 (1988)
550 A.2d 91 CATHERINE BARTON a. v. H.D. RIDERS MOTORCYCLE CLUB, INC. a. No. 87-381Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton Decided October 31, 1988 1. Zoning — Ordinances — Violation To have statutory standing to seek injunctions or abatement orders to cure a zoning violation, a private plaintiff must generally show that the public nuisance […]
MORRISON v. BANK, 65 N.H. 253 (1889)
20 A. 300 MORRISON v. THE CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK a. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided June, 1889. A surety is not discharged by the creditor’s neglect to levy his execution, obtained in an action against the principal, upon the principal’s property therein attached. A creditor who brings an action against the debtor to […]
TOWN OF NOTTINGHAM v. LEE HOMES, INC., 118 N.H. 438 (1978)
388 A.2d 940 TOWN OF NOTTINGHAM v. LEE HOMES, INC., a. No. 7939Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided June 19, 1978 1. Zoning — Application for Subdivision — Legal Authority To Regulate Subdivisions Where developer applied to planning board for approval of proposed subdivision of its property and application was denied in 1972, and […]
AHERN v. COMPANY, 88 N.H. 287 (1936)
188 A. 470 MARGARET F. AHERN, Adm’x v. ELDREDGE BREWING COMPANY, INC. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided December 1, 1936. A trier of fact cannot be permitted to determine by guess or conjecture between two equally probable causes of an injury for only one of which the defendant is liable. Hence in a […]
STATE v. MUSSEY, 153 N.H. 272 (2006)
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. WILLIAM MUSSEY. No. 2004-784.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack.Argued: January 12, 2006. Opinion Issued: February 24, 2006. 1. Criminal Law — Prosecutorial Conduct — Trial Conduct The prosecutor erred in making the statement in closing argument that effectively told the jury that if it returned a verdict of not […]
KNOWLTON v. PITTSFIELD, 62 N.H. 535 (1883)
KNOWLTON v. PITTSFIELD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided June, 1883. The lack of a visible boundary of a highway, and the existence of an unsafe private way in the general direction of the public travel, are not the test of the duty of the town to maintain a railing in the public way. […]
HARRINGTON v. CONCORD GEN. MUT. INS. CO., 152 N.H. 26 (2005)
871 A.2d 54 GARRY K. HARRINGTON v. CONCORD GENERAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 2004-612.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire.Argued: February 9, 2005. Opinion Issued: March 21, 2005. 1. Insurance — Policies — Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists Statute pertaining to uninsured or hit-and-run motor vehicle coverage requires only that uninsured motorist coverage be provided to policy holders in […]
SMART v. HUCKINS, 82 N.H. 342 (1926)
134 A. 520 CHARLES F. SMART a. v. SIMON O. HUCKINS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll. Decided June 1, 1926. A patent ambiguity in the description in a deed may be resolved by competent extrinsic evidence of the intention of the parties. A subsequent statement of intention by one of the parties is not […]
LORD v. LORD, 58 N.H. 7 (1876)
LORD, Ex’x, v. LORD a., Ap’ts. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided December, 1876. The interest of an attesting witness of a will, to be disqualifying, must be a present, certain, and vested interest. The name of an attesting witness of a will who is unable to write, may be written by another, at […]
MILLER v. AMICA MUTUAL INS., 156 N.H. 117 (2007)
JOHN MILLER, SR., AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN G. MILLER, JR. v. AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 2006-904.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Hillsborough-northern judicial district.Argued: June 7, 2007. Opinion Issued: August 28, 2007. 1. Insurance — Policies — Exclusionary Clauses Absent a statutory provision or public policy to the contrary, an insurance company […]
POLIZZO v. TOWN OF HAMPTON, 126 N.H. 398 (1985)
494 A.2d 254 JAMES R. POLIZZO a. v. TOWN OF HAMPTON a. No. 84-276Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham Decided April 18, 1985 1. Highways — Public Roads A public highway may be created in any one of four ways: (1) through the taking of land by eminent domain and the laying out of a […]
STATE v. DEDRICK, 135 N.H. 502 (1992)
607 A.2d 127 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. ROBERT DAVID DEDRICK No. 91-041Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided May 1, 1992 1. Trial — Instructions — Review Claim that trial court erroneously instructed or refused to instruct the jury, or refused to answer a jury question in language requested by defendant, must be […]
CARTER v. PROVO, 87 N.H. 369 (1935)
180 A. 258 CHARLOTTE J. CARTER v. LESTER G. PROVO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided June 27, 1935. An oral promise by an executor to pay the plaintiff one-half of the residuum of an estate of which the executor is residuary legatee in consideration that the plaintiff would surrender a claim against the […]
GOVERNOR’S ISLAND CLUB v. TOWN OF GILFORD, 124 N.H. 126 (1983)
467 A.2d 246 GOVERNOR’S ISLAND CLUB, INC. v. TOWN OF GILFORD a. GLENN W. SUTTON, JR. a. v. TOWN OF GILFORD a. No. 82-065 No. 82-075Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap Decided October 28, 1983 1. Zoning — Variances — Burden of Proof The supreme court has adopted a five-part test for granting a variance […]
STATE v. FLYNN, 110 N.H. 451 (1970)
272 A.2d 591 STATE v. JAMES M. FLYNN. No. 5793.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December 1, 1970. 1. Where an order of a district court purporting to vacate a sentence in a criminal case and to dismiss the complaint was entered after expiration of the time for appeal to the superior court, the […]
MILLARD v. PERRIN, 118 N.H. 565 (1978)
391 A.2d 886 ALBERT J. MILLARD v. EVERETT I. PERRIN, WARDEN, NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE PRISON No. 78-077Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original Decided September 18, 1978 1. Constitutional Law — Equal Protection — Legitimate State Purpose In deciding an equal protection challenge to a statute treating prisoners differently in the application of good time credits, […]
EICHEL v. PAYEUR, 106 N.H. 484 (1965)
214 A.2d 116 HAROLD EICHEL v. ISABELLE PAYEUR. ELAINE D. EICHEL v. SAME. ISABELLE PAYEUR v. HAROLD EICHEL. LOUIS A. PAYEUR v. SAME. No. 5381.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos.Argued September 9, 1965. Decided October 29, 1965. 1. The testimony of jurors is incompetent to impeach their verdict. 2. The Trial Court may in its […]
OPINION OF THE JUSTICES, 65 N.H. 673 (1889)
23 A. 620 OPINION OF THE JUSTICES. Supreme Court of New Hampshire December 1889 Chapter 304, Laws of 1887, was not a creation or renewal of corporate powers, within the meaning of Gen. Laws, c. 13, s. 5. To the Senate of New Hampshire: The undersigned have received an attested copy of a resolution adopted […]
FELCH v. RAILROAD, 66 N.H. 318 (1890)
29 A. 557 FELCH, Adm’r, v. CONCORD RAILROAD. FELCH v. SAME. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided June, 1890. A railroad company is bound to exercise ordinary care to avoid injury by its trains to one wrongfully upon its track. That the party injured could have been seen on the track by the engineer […]
STATE v. GIRMAY, 139 N.H. 292 (1994)
652 A.2d 150 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. HAILE SELASSIE GIRMAY No. 93-192Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton December 30, 1994 1. Evidence — Relevance — Expert Testimony Where defendant failed to show how the social, cultural, and political world in his homeland was relevant to the issue of his state of mind at […]
EMERY v. HOVEY, 84 N.H. 499 (1931)
153 A. 322 SAMUEL W. EMERY v. SALLY W. HOVEY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided January 6, 1931. The judgment of a court of record of one state, having jurisdiction of the parties and the cause, is conclusive in the courts of every other state and of the United States, no matter how […]
STATE v. GALLAGHER, 102 N.H. 335 (1959)
156 A.2d 765 STATE v. FRANK GALLAGHER. No. 4716.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap.Argued December 1, 1959. Decided December 31, 1959. 1. A private park or a private way not laid out under authority of statute does not constitute a “way” within the definition of that term in the motor vehicle statute (RSA 259:1 XXXV). […]
TRACHY v. LAFRAMBOISE, 146 N.H. 178 (2001)
770 A.2d 1097 STUART D. TRACHY a. v. RICHARD LAFRAMBOISE. No. 97-631Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack March 26, 2001 1. Public Employees — Removal and Suspensions —Governing Law Statute relating to discharge or suspension from employment applies only to individuals for whom county commissioners are either the hiring or appointing authority, and to disciplinary […]
LANE v. MANCHESTER MILLS, 75 N.H. 102 (1908)
71 A. 629 LANE, Adm’r, v. MANCHESTER MILLS. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided November 4, 1908. The fact that a servant was young and inexperienced may warrant a finding that he did not intelligently assume the risk of dangers to which he was exposed, especially when there is evidence that the peril was […]
IN RE SEARCH WARRANT FOR MEDICAL RECORDS, 160 N.H. 214 (2010)
IN RE SEARCH WARRANT FOR MEDICAL RECORDS OF C.T. No. 2009-208.Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Portsmouth District Court.Argued: October 15, 2009. Opinion Issued: May 6, 2010. 1. Search and Seizure — Practice and Procedure— Generally A warrant may be challenged only after its execution. 2. Appeal and Error — Questions Considered on Appeal— Moot Questions […]
PETRUS v. COMPANY, 75 N.H. 587 (1908)
71 A. 213 PETRUS v. BERLIN MILLS CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided November 4, 1908. CASE, for personal injuries. Trial by jury. A nonsuit was ordered at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, and he excepted. Transferred from the December term, 1907, of the superior court by Chamberlin, J. Page 588 William […]
ARMSTRONG v. ARMSTRONG, 123 N.H. 291 (1983)
461 A.2d 103 LORNE D. ARMSTRONG v. MARGARET C. ARMSTRONG No. 82-316Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford Decided May 6, 1983 1. New Trial — Discretion of Trial Court — Review The granting of a motion for a new trial, after notice and an opportunity to be heard, is within the discretion of the trial […]
PETERSON v. PAPPACOSTANTIS, 92 N.H. 146 (1942)
26 A.2d 677 FRANK PETERSON v. GEORGE PAPPACOSTANTIS. RICHARD PETERSON, by his next friend, v. SAME. ROBERT PETERSON, by his next friend, v. SAME. KOULA PAPPACOSTANTIS v. SAME. STEPHEN PAPPACOSTANTIS, by his next friend, v. SAME. PAULINE PIERROCHAKOW v. SAME. MARY PIERROCHAKOW, by her next friend, v. SAME. KRISTIE PIERROCHAKOW v. SAME. ALICE ADAMS v. […]
BOISSONNAULT v. SAVAGE, 137 N.H. 229 (1993)
625 A.2d 454 CHARLES J. BOISSONNAULT v. BARBARA A. SAVAGE No. 92-155Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough Decided May 20, 1993 1. Property — Joint Tenancy — Severance Sheriff’s sale of husband’s interest in property to satisfy execution of judgment severed joint tenancy in property husband had with wife, thus converting the estate into a […]
VITIC v. NEW ENGLAND MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CORP., 111 N.H. 348 (1971)
283 A.2d 490 BOZIDAR VITIC v. NEW ENGLAND MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION. No. 6253.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham. Decided November 2, 1971. 1. A finding that the defendant was obligated for an indefinite period to supply water annually during the summer months without charge to a house sold to the plaintiff was warranted by evidence […]
PUTNAM v. DEPT. OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, 103 N.H. 495 (1961)
175 A.2d 519 GRACE D. PUTNAM v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY a. No. 4940.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Cheshire.Argued November 7, 1961. Decided November 30, 1961. 1. An employee who terminated her employment because she was unable to find transportation from her home to the place of employment after a fellow-employee with whom […]
IN RE JUVENILE, 148 N.H. 743 (2002)
813 A.2d 1197 IN RE JUVENILE No. 2002-098Supreme Court of New Hampshire MerrimackArgued October 17, 2002 Opinion Issued December 20, 2002 1. Courts—District Court—Jurisdiction Provision of the Child Protection Act on the jurisdiction of the district court over proceedings alleging the abuse or neglect of a child confers jurisdiction to the court over any case […]
STATE v. FLYNN, 144 N.H. 567 (1999)
744 A.2d 1131 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. RAYMOND X. FLYNN No. 97-614Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos Decided December 30, 1999 1. Offenses — Burglary — Evidence Sufficiency Lack of privilege or license to enter burglarized premises can be proven circumstantially without testimony from all owners or occupiers of premises. RSA 635:1, I. […]
SAWTELLE v. THE STATE, 67 N.H. 590 (1891)
35 A. 1130 SAWTELLE v. THE STATE. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford. Decided December, 1891. CLARK, J. In the matter of the petition of Sawtelle for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, the petition is dismissed. There is no newly discovered evidence to warrant a new trial. Attorney-General and Solicitor, […]
STATE v. SHUTT, 116 N.H. 495 (1976)
363 A.2d 406 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. WILLIAM T. SHUTT STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. MICHAEL F. DONOVAN Nos. 7290 and 7466Supreme Court of New Hampshire Nashua District Court Decided August 31, 1976 1. No mandate, express or implied, can be found in RSA 262-A:69-b (Supp. 1975) directing preservation of the ampoules used in […]
LEDOUX v. RAILWAY, 75 N.H. 598 (1909)
74 A. 874 LEDOUX v. HUDSON, PELHAM SALEM ELECTRIC RAILWAY CO. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December 7, 1909. CASE, for negligence. Trial by jury and verdict for the plaintiff. Transferred from the January term, 1909, of the superior court by Wallace, C.J., on the defendants’ exceptions to the denial of a motion […]
BRUCHHAUSEN v. WALTON, 111 N.H. 98 (1971)
276 A.2d 6 WALTER BRUCHHAUSEN a. v. EDWIN C. WALTON a. No. 6075.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos. Decided April 5, 1971. 1. A conveyance of “all my right, title and interest in an easement over the northerly portion of certain premises owned by me” was properly interpreted as a grant of a new easement […]
GAGE v. DUDLEY, 64 N.H. 437 (1887)
13 A. 865 GAGE v. DUDLEY. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack. Decided December, 1887. The removal of a tax-collector from town vacates his office. A tax-collector has no authority, outside of the town in which he has his appointment, to seize the property of a resident of the town to enforce the collection of […]
IN RE HOME FOR CHILDREN, 155 N.H. 528 (2007)
PETITION OF CHASE HOME FOR CHILDREN a. (New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services). Nos. 2006-070, 2006-219.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services.Argued: January 11, 2007. Opinion Issued: June 8, 2007. 1. Administrative Law — Administrative Appeal— Writs of Certiorari Because there is no statutory provision for appellate review of […]
STATE v. NOVOSEL, 120 N.H. 176 (1980)
412 A.2d 739 THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. VIKTOR NOVOSEL No. 79-049Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack Decided March 13, 1980 1. Constitutional Law — Due Process — Sentence Because it would be extremely difficult to prove the actual existence of a retaliatory motivation, no vindictive motive on the part of the prosecution need […]
PIPER v. MEREDITH, 83 N.H. 107 (1927)
139 A. 294 OSCAR G. PIPER v. MEREDITH. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap. Decided October 4, 1927. For the purpose of taxation it is immaterial who is the ultimate owner of the fee since title is not the test of taxability. A perpetual lease upon condition conveys to the lessee a determinable or base […]
LAMPESIS v. COMOLLI, 101 N.H. 491 (1958)
147 A.2d 114 JAMES T. LAMPESIS v. JOSEPH F. COMOLLI. No. 4700.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford.Argued December 2, 1958. Decided December 31, 1958. 1. Where the Supreme Court in awarding a new trial in an action of deceit because of error in the instructions to the jury on the issue of damages deemed it […]
IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF KAPITULA, 153 N.H. 492 (2006)
IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF THEODORE KAPITULA. No. 2005-005.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack County Probate Court.Submitted: January 12, 2006. Opinion Issued: May 17, 2006. 1. Mental Health — Guardians of Incapacitated Persons — Appointment Nothing in the plain language of the statute on findings requires that the probate court provide written illumination of all facts […]
BROWN v. FITZGERALD, 70 N.H. 211 (1899)
47 A. 415 BROWN a. v. FITZGERALD. Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1899. Whether justice requires the allowance of an amendment to an answer in equity is a question of fact determinable at the trial term. An allegation of deceit in a sale of land is supported by evidence that the vendors, […]