BENTON v. WRIGHT, 63 N.H. 617 (1884)

BENTON v. WRIGHT.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos.
Decided June, 1884.

On the report of a referee, the only question was as to the sufficiency of demands made by the defendant upon the plaintiff for a deed of certain land and for a certain promissory note.

STANLEY, J.

The referee decided the question of fact in favor of the plaintiff, and no error of law appears in his finding.

SMITH and CARPENTER, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Ray, Drew, Jordan Carpenter, for the plaintiff.

Bingham, Aldrich Remich, for the defendant.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 63 N.H. 617

Recent Posts

BROWN v. COLLINS, 53 N.H. 442 (1873)

53 N.H. 442 Superior Court of Judicature of New Hampshire. BROWN v. COLLINS. June, 1873.…

7 years ago

WOLCOTT v. FELLOWS, 82 N.H. 556 (1925)

131 A. 353 FLORENCE E. WOLCOTT, by her next friend, v. WILLIAM E. FELLOWS a.…

9 years ago

DOW v. HARKIN, 67 N.H. 383 (1892)

29 A. 846 DOW v. HARKIN.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1892. If…

9 years ago

BARRINGTON EAST OWNERS’ ASSOC. v. TOWN OF BARRINGTON, 121 N.H. 627 (1981)

433 A.2d 1266 BARRINGTON EAST CLUSTER I UNIT OWNERS' ASSOCIATION a. v. TOWN OF BARRINGTON…

9 years ago

PIPER v. FICKETT, 113 N.H. 631 (1973)

312 A.2d 698 KATHERINE PIPER v. ROBERT FICKETT, d.b.a. FICKETT'S JEWELERS No. 6599Supreme Court of…

9 years ago

RUANE v. CARDINAL REALTY, INC., 116 N.H. 321 (1976)

358 A.2d 412 DOROTHY C. RUANE INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN…

9 years ago