64 A. 1135
Supreme Court of New Hampshire Sullivan.
Decided June 29, 1905.
ASSUMPSIT. Trial by jury, verdict for the plaintiff, and motion for a new trial. Transferred from the November term, 1904, of the superior court by Peaslee, J.
Jesse M. Barton, for the plaintiff.
Albert S. Wait, for the defendant.
WALKER, J.
“A new trial may be granted in any case, when through accident, mistake, or misfortune justice has not been done and a further hearing would be equitable.” P.S., c. 230, s. 1. After a verdict for the plaintiff, the defendant filed a petition in the superior court under this statute, alleging that new evidence had been discovered which upon another trial would change the result. Upon this petition the defendant introduced evidence tending to prove his position, but the court dismissed the petition, and the defendant excepted. The ground for dismissing the petition is not stated, and no question of law is necessarily raised by the exception. The order of the court does not appear to be erroneous.
Exception overruled.
All concurred.
Page 607
53 N.H. 442 Superior Court of Judicature of New Hampshire. BROWN v. COLLINS. June, 1873.…
131 A. 353 FLORENCE E. WOLCOTT, by her next friend, v. WILLIAM E. FELLOWS a.…
29 A. 846 DOW v. HARKIN.Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough. Decided December, 1892. If…
433 A.2d 1266 BARRINGTON EAST CLUSTER I UNIT OWNERS' ASSOCIATION a. v. TOWN OF BARRINGTON…
312 A.2d 698 KATHERINE PIPER v. ROBERT FICKETT, d.b.a. FICKETT'S JEWELERS No. 6599Supreme Court of…
358 A.2d 412 DOROTHY C. RUANE INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN…